In Kenya, there is no law that prohibits media from covering court proceedings as long as journalists can identify themselves, and public officials like school principals are treated equally under the law when accused of offenses, with courts maintaining that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Family Drama as Captain Waweru Finally Sues Wife With Assault!!He Claims She Took all his Properties
Added:There is no law known in Kenya that can gag media in covering court proceedings as long as the journalists uh can identify themselves court.
Nothing special with this case.
The mere fact that the suspect is a principal of a school is like any other Kenyan who has committed an offense.
>> Our first thing is that this is between a husband and a wife.
But from covering this proceeding, I'm shocked that they even have cameras on me.
This being a family dispute that the image image of my client is sustained. He is innocent until she be proved guilty.
Yeah, on the second application I have instructions to object to the taking of these pleas.
>> a chance to to also respond.
I think the application counsel is making is is getting into another file. Yes. And I think we are now prosecuting another criminal matter.
>> Yes.
>> at least the one before court.
So, as much as we will go to that to those details, I believe that I I was of the opinion that we restrict ourselves to the matter before this court.
And I think the charges that are preferred here, whether there are other matters, it is the prerogative of an independent office that has led to the charges here.
>> The first one was on the media and the second one was delivering this uh >> tea checking.
>> Yes, but >> to the court to make a decision about the same.
And on the issue of uh tea checking, I would wish to state that uh the charges herein have been properly instituted by the office of the DPP.
Uh the file was compiled and the same was brought to our office.
We state that uh the proper guidelines were followed, the decision decision to start guidelines.
And it was found that the file meets the two tests.
That is the evidential test and the public interest test.
And by the letter dated 8th of July 2026, the accused person herein be charged with the offense of assault contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code.
Enough evidence to charge the suspect herein.
On those grounds, your honor, So, I pray that the accused done uh they are allowed to run from publishing in different courts.
And they various court they are allowed to make a determination depending on the evidence that will be tendered.
>> There is no law known in Kenya that can gag media in covering court proceedings as long as the journalists uh can identify themselves in court.
There is nothing special with this case.
The mere fact that the suspect is a principal of a school is like any other Kenyan who has committed an offense.
Therefore, I submit that the media be allowed to cover and report this matter as it ought to be done like any other matter.
>> subject somewhere else, but I think he has also not been truthful to this court.
It is not true that the protection of If you look at 8215, >> copies of the letters that my colleague has written because the DPP can supply to help you on making your >> Based on the above findings, the court therefore proceeds to dismiss the two applications and direct that the above matter proceeds for plea taking. Dated and delivered today, 21st July 2026.
Those are my orders.
>> You are most obliged to you.
If the accused is not in It's allowed 18 hours and then we Let's see if you can produce We give you a book out there assorted plastic ware thereby came actually what we have to a lot too.
Not true.
I was the one who was to her cash bail.
You know that will be a very welcome considerate move from this court, sir.
>> Yes, Mr. Kimani thanks to you.
>> The complainant is being threatened by the accused person and using the children to intimidate the complainant including interfering with witnesses.
There is evidence of an attempt on the IO who rejected advances on integrity issues.
That is the reason why even though the offense is assault we are opposing bond because there are more chances of interfering with witnesses and writing [clears throat] cajoling messages to the complainant.
And in the event that this court is inclined to grant bond terms to the accused person will the court help us to warn the accused person from interfering or even reaching out to the complainant despite their relations.
unless granted by this court to initiate alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are there.
>> It's unfortunate my learned colleague is actually bringing false truths to court.
By good grace.
Number two, the IO is a police officer.
>> Objection.
>> Yes.
>> Let us just focus to this application.
>> Maybe it's just hit by I'm sorry.
>> No urgent evidence has been placed to this court including any proof from the IO.
No further evidence has been tendered to show that there has been any compromise of the witnesses.
The court proceeds to give the following directions. Number one, that the accused person is admitted to a bond of 200,000 with one surety or an alternative cash bail of 100,000.
Number two, the accused person is given a warning not to interfere with any witnesses unless at the time parties may want to explore ADR resolution. A violation of order two or any other directions will lead to the cancellation of bail and bond terms. I want to give a mention before this court for pre-trial directions.
>> [music] >> That is all. I believe you have no other matter. We will break for the day unless there is any concern.
Thank you. We will break for the day.
Have a good afternoon.
I will post the ruling on the CTS. You will check Yes, I will make a few edits and I will post it.
>> You going to >> You will mention the mentions too.
>> Let me see.
>> I hear you loud and >> Let me see if you can put up a 14.
>> Hey, I'm going to get
Related Videos

Session 5: Law, Genomic Medicine & Health Equity Conference/Webcast -- Dr. Consuelo Wilkins
UMNconsortium
234 views•2019-01-02

Consider This: ICJ Climate Ruling — Holding Nations to Account
astroawani
307 views•2025-08-11

The Third Gender I Legal Recognition of Intersex Community
KBCChannel1News
259 views•2023-07-09

What Are Proceedings In Court? - CountyOffice.org
CountyOfficeLaw
129 views•2025-03-06

Understanding the EU Electronic Evidence Package | Interview with Cristos Velasco | EP 7
DejanKosutic
816 views•2025-04-22

8 Violations in ONE Day? Judge West Gives Ultimate Wake-Up Call
LawAndLogicTV
263 views•2026-04-26

United States v. Navajo Nation Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
QuimbeeDotCom
589 views•2023-09-21

Young Professionals: CPR Part 36 Offers with Harry Dyson
kingschambers4859
902 views•2024-04-30
Trending

19 of My Creepiest Fiction Stories
zackdfilms
192K views•2026-07-24

Independent Autopsy Proved Nolan Wells Was Hanged!!
taylorhousepublishing7785
27K views•2026-07-24

Flash Drought in Europe...
WeathermanEurope
36K views•2026-07-24

Nobody Respected The Penguin | The Batman (2004)
SerumLake
12K views•2026-07-24