Ramaphosa's Phala Phala Scandal FINALLY Exposed Once and For All

Added: 2026-05-22

[00:00:00]In this video, the Pala Pala scandal finally gets explained. And it's not everything that you'll hear in most media. But if you stay with me all the way till my biblical reaction at the end, you'll get the three C's. That's all you need to know. And the rest is just noise. And I'm going to close by dropping a bombshell cuz you know the point is South Africa will prosper. You ready? Okay, press like and let's go.

[00:00:32]So, of course, you know that 3 years ago, this is when the scandal broke.

[00:00:38]>> Former State Security Director General Arthur Fraser has met with the Hawks. In a statement, Fraser says the meeting happened so that he could assist the Hawks with their investigation into his complaint against President Sir Rama Porsa. Fraser says he gave them additional information and details to enable them to do their work. The former spy boss also says he appreciates their professionalism and the speed at which they have responded to his complaint.

[00:01:03]Earlier this month, Fraser laid a criminal complaint against Ramaporsa over the president's alleged failure to report the theft of money alleged to be in the millions from his game farm in Limpopo. Ramaporsa has denied any wrongdoing.

[00:01:18]>> Okay. He has denied any wrongdoing from the beginning. So just recently the NEC got together and they made a decision that they are backing up Rama Posa.

[00:01:29]Let's hear how Fig Balula defines this scandal.

[00:01:33]>> These dollars you are talking about were found in the farm of the president.

[00:01:38]Whether they were in couches or wherever they were found, there was a breakin in the farm of the president and to that extent there is a case in court in terms of the breakin.

[00:01:52]That's what has happened. So the honors is on the owner of the dollars to explain and if it's on the wrong side of the law that will be it.

[00:02:02]The only source of engagement in relation to this issue is the institutions we have created to probe all of these particular questions.

[00:02:14]Is this compatible with ANC values?

[00:02:18]ANC values do not say people must steal.

[00:02:22]Has the president stolen.

[00:02:26]He didn't steal. They stole from him. So that's the scandal. The owner of the dollars, whoever brought them in must account. And those who stole the dollars, they stole. So before we actually get into what is this scandal, which is the three C's, let's start with the man. Is the man involved in this scandal a naive villager? Nope. Is he an informal trader? Nope. A confused pensioner maybe? Nope. Who is the man?

[00:03:03]Because if you forget the man, you forget the scandal. The scandal is that Sil Rama Porsa, a qualified lawyer, a former legal advisor, the chairperson behind drafting the constitution, the chief negotiator in Cordessa, a former secretary general, a CEO of the ANC and the mighty ANC back then, the leader of N a union which I believe he took from 3,000 members and grew it up to 60,000 members. A leader in Kosatu, a man who has held chairmanships in boardrooms, directorships, and shareholding. A billionaire. In fact, most people said it's good that we have a billionaire coming in now because he has no reason to steal from the state. a president who came into power on a cleanup ticket after state capture and nine wasted years. This is not important because I'm trying to put him down. It's good for perspective because the question becomes, does this man understand and probably even is an expert in the seriousness of cash records?

[00:04:33]What's legal? What's illegal? Banking disclosure, risk and public office, process, paper trails, reporting duties, risk compliance, formal handling of serious matters, corporate governance, audit trails, conflicts of interests, recordkeeping, financial controls. Can one man be an expert or understand all of these things? Well, probably not. But what if he's had enough practice? Do you think he might have figured any of this out having shares in McDonald's and being the master franchiser? You know, if he was weak in one of them, he would have picked it up as chairperson at Bidvest or maybe as a director at Mandi or maybe at MTN, at Lawnman, at Max Steel, at Standard Bank. Do you think at some point all of these things came up while he was leading at SAB Miller? And if he missed any of them from the corporate world, what about as a deputy president, leader of government, business? I think it's fair to think on any of these things above my head. I'd say not only does he understand them, but he must be an expert at them or at least very good at all of them. The scandal is this man is linked to the three C's. The first C is the cash. 10 million rands. Not pocket money, not petty cash, not envelope, not money that fills up a laptop bag. 10 million rands in cash. So the amount is shocking to be in cash, but what triggers further red flags is that it's in dollars. So there's legal and regulatory matters that are linked to the man we started with. So the first C is the cash. The second C is the couch. I know you know all of this, but you're going to hear so much over the coming period that it helps to just remember the scandal is the man being linked to the first Cash and second C the couch is not in the bank, not in the safe, not in a lawyer's trust account.

[00:07:16]It's inside furniture.

[00:07:19]In fact, a few days ago, the portfolio committee on police were frustrated because nobody knows what kind of magical couch is this.

[00:07:32]>> Is the couch and where's the leftover money counted and confiscated as part of evidence? And if not, why not? Because we can't be told here to say that no you know the couch doesn't mean anything.

[00:07:47]That house breaker was not about stealing the couch was about stealing the money and the money unfortunately those people who were working there knew where the money was. The money was on the sofa or whether the sofa was moved if that was if that's if it's true because there's that allegation that the sofa was moved elsewhere. Everyone knows that money was found in a couch via the couch. Was this couch actually booked in as part of of of evidence? Because there's no there's no pictures nowhere.

[00:08:19]We don't hear anything about this couch.

[00:08:21]I'm asking again. Almost half a million dollars of of money. That is a lot of money. And we were told it was stashed in a couch. Edin couch. Does this couch have a hidden safe in it? Where is the couch that was meant to have been booked in?

[00:08:38]>> Where is the sofa? The coach uh the crime we investigated as responded to earlier. It's a house breaking and theft. Yes, indeed. The sofa, if if there's a sofa in a house, it is part of the furniture, but the crime is housebreaking and theft. and is not the theft of the sofa, it's the theft of uh cash.

[00:09:07]>> Put a pin on this engagement. We'll come back to it. Now, the cash was in the couch. Not overnight, not one weekend.

[00:09:17]Not until the bank opens for close to six weeks and 5 days approximately.

[00:09:26]this money. So much money in a weird currency is sitting in the couch. Now that's pretty much the scandal. Now the theft of the cash in the couch is not the scandal. The theft exposes the scandal. Let's be describe it in his own way. The story was that there's a a Sudanese businessman who lives in in in in Dubai who came to South Africa carrying lots and lots of cash in dollars bought buffalo and I'm sure all of us have heard this right the commissioner of Texas and Mr. Ket have said there is no record of such monies being declared at Oatambbo airport.

[00:10:29]So that record doesn't exist.

[00:10:34]It's not been found.

[00:10:38]But there's no assumption to think that it exists but has not been found.

[00:10:43][laughter] So it hasn't been found.

[00:10:52]And therefore the the suspicion arises naturally.

[00:10:59]Is this not part of money laundering? it arises naturally because uh I I don't know how much money I've owned at any particular time, but certainly never owned $580,000.

[00:11:28]>> And it's it's strange. It's odd.

[00:11:31]that the successful business person who's got that amount of money and can buy buffaloos walks around with that kind of money as cash.

[00:11:47]It's a strange concept.

[00:11:55]All of this emphasize I mean it it draws attention to this issue to the question are we not yet dealing with the problem of money laundering.

[00:12:06]>> So I'm saying that the colleague when said that is money laundering business a great listing business and this pala pala thing not related to that. I'm saying that's a legitimate issue to arise but of course yet to be proved whether in fact it is money laundering. So of course the man should tell us about the cash in the couch. So immediately parliament tried to get some answers out of him 3 years ago and this is basically what happened.

[00:12:41]>> Speaker, take your seat.

[00:12:42]>> IT'S A POINT OF EXISION.

[00:12:43]>> TAKE YOUR SEAT. THERE'S NO EXISION. TAKE YOUR SEAT. TAKE A SEAT t >> President Zil Rama Posa's virtual appearance sparked an uproar from EFF members. There is concerns around his conspicuous absence from the National Assembly.

[00:12:59]>> The way we are constituted it is extremely wrong. There are no longer COVID restrictions. postpone the sitting, arrange a proper venue and allow all of us to come under one roof because the way you are doing is tantamount to protecting the the the president of the ANC and the executive from a proper from being held properly accountable to parliament.

[00:13:26]>> By far the biggest hot button item was the 2020 theft and from Apostles Palopala farm in Liopo. We wanted of the man in the matras and pillows of Ra today.

[00:13:41]>> We want the man which is in the pillows.

[00:13:44]>> The first part of the question is asking if the president is willing to engage the elected representatives of South Africa on this particular issue.

[00:13:55]>> I stand ready to as people have said take the nation into its confidence. I stand ready to do so to give an explanation.

[00:14:07]But for me, it's been important that this matter having occurred that I should give space, stand back and allow the various agencies to deal with this matter as thoroughly as I believe they are doing.

[00:14:29]However, MPs wouldn't be appeased and didn't hold back.

[00:14:33]>> The question has not been answered.

[00:14:35]There has not been an attempt on the part of the president to respond to the question or to try to attempt to even give an answer.

[00:14:43]>> The president must answer the question today. He went to kidnap people. He engaged in money laundering. He intimidated women and kidnapped women in his farm. And we are told he must not answer. Please, the president must answer the question.

[00:14:59]>> President says he will account to investigative authorities rather than parliament that is a very dismal state of affairs. So I would implore the president he says I stand ready to answer all the questions that is now that he would use his discretion and answer to parliament right now.

[00:15:18]Meanwhile, political parties have until Thursday to submit their name of experts will sit on a panel to look into the contentious issue >> which takes us to the third C which brings some kind of perspective to the scandal the cover up. So on the 13th of December 2022, retired Chief Justice Nobo basically says Ramaposa may have violated section 962 and section 341 of PRAA. Section 962 of the constitution says the president shall not have a side gig. Section 341 of PRAA says if you are in a position of authority and something like a theft or bribery but theft happens that's above a 100,000 thou shalt report it to the hawks. Not a police station, not a detective, not a public protector.

[00:16:30]the Hawks and 214 ANC MPs answer his question of will you investigate this and they all go no thank you 3 months later SARS the South African revenue services comes out with a statement they tell us Ramaposa and his company Danyon CC are tax compliant and then adds to the statement basically to say the president gave us permission to tell you he is tax compliant and we encourage all other politicians all other people in power to give us permission to tell the country that they are tax compliant remember he said I'll talk to you after the institutions ions.

[00:17:29]Institution number one answers a real question. Is he tax compliant? And they come out and tell us he's tax compliant.

[00:17:38]Well, 3 days later, Gizvet, the commissioner of SARS, comes out again and says the $4 million sale of the game at Ramaposa's farm has been declared.

[00:17:55]A tax compliance statement issued by SARS indicates that the $4 million US sale of game at of game animal rather at President Sel Ramaposa's Palopala farm in 2020 has been declared. Now the South African Revenue Services Commissioner Edward Kisweta says all highprofile political office bearsers should agree to make their tax affairs public as evidence of a commitment to transparency and he joins us live now. Thank you so much commissioner for your time. Of course these are two issues. I mean we saw the first statement that talks about the b the the in fact the buyer and now the statement of talking about the president. Let's talk about the clarity around these two statements because they are part of the same story.

[00:18:38]>> So the the accountability for the declaration of bringing the cash into our country rests with a traveler. Any amount above 25,000 has to be declared.

[00:18:51]If it is higher than that, SARS customs officers will detain the balance and the traveler would have to apply to the Reserve Bank for the release of the money subject to a justifiable explanation. SARS can find no evidence that such a declaration has been made in terms of assessing the tax liability of a taxpayer. And in this case, the president together with the entities in question and based on the audit and the investigation we've done, we can say that all outstanding returns and questions are submitted. All outstanding payments are paid. There is therefore no outstanding liability and that means the taxpayer is fully compliant. That's the statement we made and we could not make that statement without the consent of the president and the public officers who are responsible for those entities.

[00:19:50]>> SARS doesn't help us. They narrow their concern to DD file tax returns. But we are none the wiser about why the man has the cash in the couch. except that the cash was not even declared on entry because there's no proof of it. So, institution number two, 30th of June, 2023, the public protector releases a report.

[00:20:23]She basically says the president has pretty much done nothing wrong. you know, like specifically clearly on the nose kind of wrong and he doesn't really like proper proper really have a side gig. I mean, well, you know what I mean.

[00:20:44]But then she goes on to say, "But his chief bodyguard, Wally, now he's been naughty." And so that's all we knew by the 30th of June 2023 from Advocate Galga. And I don't know if I'm exaggerating when she when I say she says he doesn't kind of really really have a side gig here for yourself. You tell me at the bottom. and section section 96 of the constitution is very clear on you know in fact I'm going to borrow from it saying that members of the cabinet and deputy ministers may not undertake paid work or act in a way that is inconsistent with their office or expose themselves to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between their official responsibilities and private interests and I wonder if you took this section into account because I know that you used of course the constitution used the executive members ethics act you also used of course the public protector act but did you take this act into consideration.

[00:21:41]>> Most definitely it is there in the report. We have we have taken it into account and we go in length to interpret what is paid work and we go again into the code of ethics which speaks of remunerative work basically interpreting what is in the constitution and we analyze that and we come to the conclusion that the president did not undertake paid work but rather has financial interest in the close cooperation.

[00:22:05]>> [clears throat] >> However, I would like to say that I'm a farmer. I'm in the cattle business and the game business. And through that business which has been declared in parliament and all over.

[00:22:25]I buy and I sell animals. Sometimes people buy these animals and some of the people who bought some of the animals some of them are here. I do it. Yes, I do it through the sales are sometimes through cash or sometimes through transfers. Some of the people who are offshore customers and who are sometimes local, they come through and buy animals and some of them come also to hunt on the farm. And so this that's being reported was a clear business transaction of selling animals.

[00:23:08]Well, we interact with that in our report and we take that in line with the evidence that was before us. The president has members interest >> which translates into financial interest into the farm. However, he does not run the operations of the farm. There are managers who manage the farm. There are farm workers who work on the farm. It is the manager even on the day in question uh who handled the transaction of sale.

[00:23:40]It was not the president. He was not present at the farm.

[00:23:43]>> They also gave information that he actually goes to the farm rarely. He's not always at the farm.

[00:23:52]>> Now when you look when I read pardon me, pardon me for coming >> the information he was told about the sale and a lot of what Mr. said.

[00:24:01]>> Allow me to finish. Allow me to finish and then you'll get there.

[00:24:04]>> But I just wanted to just get before we run out of time.

[00:24:07]>> No, I'm going to attend to that. He was told of the sale, but does that amount to a dayto-day operations of the farm?

[00:24:15]The definition says he must be involved into the dayto-day operations and more time must be put into that for us to be able to prove.

[00:24:25]>> How sure are you that he's not involved in the day-to-day runningings of the farm? How sure?

[00:24:30]We had to deal with interviewing witnesses and take the evidence before us. So it is not a matter of being sure but it is a matter of relying on evidence that is before us. So your report says that you considered the meaning of concepts of paid work or remunerated workers gleaned from various sources and the overarching conditions which arise from most definitions refers to an employment relationship or a selfmployed person who provides work or renders physical or mental labor for remuneration or payment in money or in kind. He says in that clip, I am a farmer. I sell. When you sell, you sell to get money. You don't sell to not get money. So, is that not a job? Is a farmer not a job?

[00:25:21]>> No, it is not.

[00:25:22]>> It is two phrased. You can either have financial interest or you can perform it in terms of sell.

[00:25:30]>> But the information that we have before us in terms of selling is that he doesn't physically sell. And at the end of the clip, if you listen carefully, he says they go to the farm to purchase. So in this instance, if you look into this instance which we were investigating at the time when the sale took place, he was not at the farm. It is the manager who conducted the transaction and who further confirms that >> if he if Lov is not there, Fanve is there to be able to interact with the buyers. So we do not have information that the president interacts with the buyers. So yes, he says he sells, but does he physically sell? Does he put his mind and physique into the runningings of that firm on a day-to-day basis that we can prove >> Mr. Novo according to also even your report gave him quite a detailed report at length about the money how it was to be you know handled and he says I'm going to go on holiday we'll handle the money when I come back and all of that now that the handling of the money why does it wait have to wait for him to come back from holiday if he's not involved in the dayto-day because if you're not involved in the dayto-day you don't you don't want to know how the money is banked you say is it banked?

[00:26:53]Yes. Why must Miss Andrew go to such lengths of telling him this is where I'm going to move it from to move it there to move it there and there? Is that not an operational matter?

[00:27:04]>> Remember the farm manager who is Vona was not available at that time. He was on leave and Mr. Enovu is fairly junior um in terms of the operations there. But in terms of our assessment of the matter, you cannot say that a person who's of course has got a financial interest in a business and there is a large sum of foreign currency not being informed that there is this money that we have received and they say wait for me to come back from holiday. Now how is that a dayto day? also decided to go very narrowly and just answer a narrow question in the executives's code. And we were still none the wiser about why would this man have this cash in a couch. But then on the 21st of August 2023, the South African Reserve Bank also released a statement and it basically said, "We only asked one question. Was regulation 61 triggered?" And we conclude that the cash is real enough to receive, to keep, to hide, to steal, but it's not real enough according to our legal ease to trigger exchange control breach. So, we call it a transaction that was not perfected. So, regulation 61 was not triggered. And by the way, we're not a cop. Don't ask us anything else. Hear him for yourself being grilled by parliamentarians.

[00:28:52]>> You mentioned that Mr. Hazim left the money as a security deposit. Where is the contract? Why was cash taken and not a bank guarantee?

[00:29:04]>> Member of parliament guang adds that it's especially suspicious considering that the deal was not concluded. The investigation that we are dealing with, everybody had been saying this thing. The money didn't go through the banking system. So that doesn't even doesn't even arise.

[00:29:22]Once again, our responsibility in this investigation had to do with the possible violation of exchange control regulation. How can it be that 2 3 years later you have bought so many buffalo but you have not collected? In fact there is no buffalo saying here.

[00:29:44]This is just money doning. Why is the Reserve Bank not investigating this matter as a money doning matter is my question. It is for the FIC and the law enforcement authorities. It is not for the S. The S's responsibility ends with the institutions that we oversee.

[00:30:04]>> So after the Reserve Bank, we were still none the wiser on the man, the cash, the couch. But then in October 2023, Ipid competed their report and they stamped it top secret. They did an investigation, but they said, "You can't read what we found." The iPad report on Pala Pala was classified by the head of iPad. Am I correct?

[00:30:35]>> That's correct.

[00:30:36]>> Not by yourself. So based on your response on what the mandate of IPID is.

[00:30:42]Uh can I then confirm that IP would not be investigating the president? They are investigating police conduct.

[00:30:50]>> That's correct.

[00:30:51]>> Now how does one get a report declassified? Minister, if somebody was looking for a report that IP would have classified, >> you you you will need to wait until um IP declassifies it. In other words, they they review their decision and they come to that conclusion when there was a a question from parliament on the classification which um was mistakenly um assumed to be me who had done that. I actually took the question went to um IP to say did you did you classify what were the reasons? I'm facing a question in parliament and they told me that it is them independent of the minister and some of the reasons they touted were other parallel investigations that were going on in relation to Palapala and therefore they then classified for that reason until uh they come to another conclusion maybe at the conclusion of some criminal cases that were going on and another entity that time.

[00:32:06]>> Thank you, Minister. So, I would be correct then um based on what you said if I was to advise honorable Scossana that if he is looking for information about an IPID report that does not investigate the president despite his repeated assurances to that regard, he has to approach IPIT for the classification of the report.

[00:32:30]>> That's correct, honorable.

[00:32:32]>> Thank you. So I trust that will bring the matter to a close. Honorable Scossana on Palapal.

[00:32:37]>> Now before I tell you what happened next with the next institution which is the NPA, they had come out 13th of June the year before saying >> my understanding is that that docket is not with the NPA yet but I stand to be corrected. But again it's the same the same response. The police must be allowed to do their investigations and at the end of the day the rule of law means if the evidence is there to prosecute the NPA must take a decision to prosecute.

[00:33:09]>> Well 2 years later the DPP of Limpopo came out and said we are not prosecuting anyone. Saab couldn't help us. SARS couldn't help us understand anything.

[00:33:26]the public protector couldn't help us understand anything. Now, the NPA >> announced that they've taken a decision not to prosecute the president or anyone else in relation to the Pala Pala Farm case. In that statement, the director of public prosecutions, Ivy Tanganger, that's in Limpopo, says the decision not to prosecute was taken after a careful assessment of all available evidence presented to the prosecutors by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation. The complaint laid by Arthur Frasier requested police to investigate the conduct of the president and major general Willie Rooda alle beg pardon alleging that it amounted to the commission of money laundering and corruption. But now on the 25th of April 2025, Action SA started putting pressure. They said, "Remember that iPad report that's been classified?

[00:34:24]Declassify that thing? We will embarrass you. We will harass you until you declassified."

[00:34:31]>> What do you want from iPad? What do you want? Why do you want the report of their investigation?

[00:34:35]>> We want transparency. We want accountability. Stephen and I think these are two things that have been kept from the South African people throughout this entire Pala Pala scandal. IP has gone and classified this investigation as top secret. uh and they have cited two provisions of the minimum information security standards policy for that basis. The first is that it may cause disruption with another institution of government. Now that's an astonishing claim. In other words, one government institution may offend another and the South African people don't have the right to know what's in that document or it might disrupt an ongoing investigation which is a tenuous claim six years on when there's been no action of any variety. Ultimately, what we're concerned has been a cover up.

[00:35:14]Those presidential protection unit members are charged with the protection of the president and they investigated that crime with our concern being that they were protecting the president about the $580,000 he had stuffed in his couch rather than independently investigating a crime of robbery like the detective services of our country would ordinarily do. We want to know what is in that report either because we believe there was political instructions given to them to go ahead and operate outside of the law or uh there needs to be accountability for these law enforcement officers operating as a law unto themselves. But we've seen it too many times in our country where law enforcement officers uh get protected for doing the wrong things because they're covering up for their political masters. So on the 10th of April 2026, iPad's hidden declassified report finally gets published. How it happens is Action SA says we want that report.

[00:36:10]Puts in a P, takes them to court, keeps harassing, following, pushing, and then finally they go, if you don't release that report, you don't know what we're going to do to you. And iPad goes, "Uh, actually it's been released for over a month." Actions says, "Then give it to us." And they go, "Uh, well, it's released, but but finally they got the report." The report basically said, "Remember how the public protector pinned it all on Wally Roder, the president's head of security?" Well, actually the president's head of security who was investigating without opening a case was actually traveling with the president's advisor and representative to Namibia and Appington and Wally Roa was doing his investigation in the name of the president. So the IPID report said discipline Word, discipline Ricardo because what they did was really out of line. They used the president's name.

[00:37:18]They traveled with the president's man who was not allowed to be in police vehicles and police budget. And this is the report that was buried and had to be pulled out of the hands of iPit by force. I guess the cover up kind of gives us perspective on the scandal which is the man, the cash, the couch.

[00:37:47]And then of course now recently the constitutional court said, "Hey, your initial vote in December 2022 is null and void. Let the impeachment process go forward." And so a few days ago, IPID and SAPS appeared before the police committee in Parliament. And guess what?

[00:38:11]They asked many simple questions.

[00:38:15]They just got fog. [snorts] >> As the meeting dragged on, MPs across party lines grew increasingly frustrated, accusing officials of dodging questions and failing to provide meaningful answers on critical aspects of the investigation, including allegations of bribery and activities in Namibia. That frustration ultimately led to calls for a full in-person parliamental session with both IP and SUPS. So chair I had other questions regarding the bribery the motive what happened in Namibia however because we're not getting answers my proposal let us have a session in physically if we are agreeing that we are going to meet physical if we are saying the responses that we are getting are not proper and we should be meeting physical I need from you chair >> with tensions mounting in the virtual meeting acting police minister Feroh Kashalia agreed that a physical engagement with the committee was necessary.

[00:39:15]>> The committee needs to um have a a longer meeting, a physical meeting. Uh we we we we will comply with your request.

[00:39:25]>> Colleagues, with that I'm going to close the meeting and we will uh send the necessary notice and arrangements as soon as we can.

[00:39:32]>> Particularly the role played by the presidential protection unit head major general wrote. But MPs were left with more questions than answers, setting the stage for another highstakes confrontation. When IP and subs returned to parliament in person, no one around the president was fired. His staff members weren't fired. Wally wasn't fired. Bejani Chawuk wasn't fired.

[00:39:58]Someone says, "Oh yeah, but of course President Ramaposa would keep Wi. He never fires anybody." Well, remember that when the DA minister went to America within 2 months he was fired. So we do know that President Ramapora is able to take decisions. So if Wiiro was just a loose cannon doing things on his own, well he's still the head of his security even after the iPad report came out. But the iPad report was squashed and then the police then said, "Oh, we've disciplined Wii and we found him to be completely innocent." And saying that to a public who had not seen what was in the top secret iPad report. But now that the we've seen the iPad report, the question becomes why would President Kamapora not fire these two people who on their own use these name? The report says did some really scary stuff, crossed borders, traveled without authorization, apparently gave wrong information about where they were going, apparently did all of this off the books and never reported it, but ran it on their own without a case. Now, this is Pala Pala explained. It is not about a burglary.

[00:41:33]The burglary merely exposes palapal.

[00:41:38]Palapala is this particular man with this much cash in the couch. And what helps us to kind of get a perspective is how the cover up, how all the institutions have acted till now. Do we know why this man had this cash in the couch?

[00:42:06]No, we still don't. The delay tactics are still going on. As we know, the president in this video is taking the section 89 independent panel report on review. So, whatever it is, is to make sure that we never get to know why this man had this cash in that couch and why all the institutions seem to have all conspired for a cover up. My biblical reaction. Then the children of Israel could not stand before their enemies, but turned their backs before their enemies. In other words, ran away from their enemies because they have become doomed to destruction. Neither will I be with you anymore unless you destroy the accursed from among you. Get up, sanctify the people, and say, "Sanctify yourselves for tomorrow." There is an oursed thing in your midst, oh Israel.

[00:43:17]You cannot stand before your enemies until you take away the oursed thing from among you. Sometimes nations struggle because there is an oursed thing among them. I don't think the oursed thing is necessarily President Raaposa. I don't even think the thing is necessarily the cash in the couch. I don't think the oursed thing is per se the institutions and how they seem to have been involved in a cover up for close to 6 years. The cursed thing is deeper than that. And we are working, we are strategizing. So much happening behind the scenes because some things just need the removal of the oursed thing because for as long as the oursed thing is in a nation, it just can't win.

[00:44:25]No jobs created. Cities collapsing, going bankrupt. The corruption the worst almost in the world.

[00:44:36]The crime and murder worst almost in the world. How do we get to a place of prosperity where we start to see that the unemployment percentage keeps ticking down all the time? that things are getting better and better, that more people are moving closer and closer and closer to the soft life. We have to remove the oursed thing and sanctify the people and that is what we are committed to. And that's why I want to thank all of you who are on the prosperity pledge.

[00:45:21]And so if you want to support this channel and help us remove the oursed thing, cuz that's our commitment, please go to the bottom. If you're not a prosperity pledger, it's in the first pinned comment.

[00:45:37]Go and click it. It'll take you across and we'll appreciate you holding up our hands as we go on to remove the oursed thing. Not just with these videos to keep you updated, but so much more happening behind the scenes. So, no man can serve two masters. Either you love the one, hate the other, or you despise the one and honor the other. You cannot serve God. And K marks. So let's make history together and we will remove the occurs thing and South Africa will prosper. We will win. We will in the end see a turnaround in a positive direction. I hope you enjoyed seeing the Pala Pala scandal finally explained.

[00:46:31]It's the man, the cash, the couch, and the light on it is the cover up. Let's make history together. Cheers.