Government transparency and intelligence oversight can face significant internal resistance when agencies attempt to declassify sensitive information, as demonstrated by the reported intelligence community opposition to Tulsi Gabbard's efforts to release JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination files and MK Ultra documents, which allegedly led to her resignation as Director of National Intelligence.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Tulsi Gabbard RESIGNS From Trump Administration As CIA AND DNI Intelligence Civil War EXPLODES!Added:
witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold. Tulsi Gabbard. Uh what they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going up all the way going up to 2020 of the election, they tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be very severe consequences for that.
>> Getting a bit of uh breaking news in here to our newsroom. sources are telling us that the director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has resigned from President Trump's cabinet. The circumstances of her resignation not clear at the moment, but you know, there have been a lot of questions about uh where she has been uh and how effective she has been in that position. She's received a lot of criticism. We will continue to track it and try to bring you some more answers.
>> Boy, oh boy. Oh boy. Oh boy. Oh boy. So, we got to talk about some shocking but not so shocking news. If you listen to certain people like Laura Loomer, and I'm not saying that I actually do. I'm just saying like I I've seen her talk about this um on X, right? U basically she swore it down that Tulsa Gabbard was going to resign, right? That it was not a matter of if but a matter of when. And lo and behold, uh it is happening. Now, the reason why it's happening, okay, I think maybe uh where Laura Loomer is wrong, but who knows here at this point, uh regardless, um it is a very very very sad time for uh Tulsi Gabber and her family. Her husband uh apparently has bone cancer. Okay? And that is her stated reason for why she is resigning as the director of national intelligence. Now, this comes as I've covered the intelligence civil war.
Okay, you have the CIA allegedly uh trying to stage a coup on an organization uh that is supposed to be their boss, right? Uh the DNI is supposed to have superiority over the CIA, but the CIA apparently has some issues with some of the information that Tulsi is trying to potentially declassify or get exposed to the public.
And I want to talk about that because that has been going on in the background and I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it. Some people are speculating that it has more to do with Iran and you know Tulsi's opposition to regime change wars.
Who knows, right? We don't know. The only thing we we know now is that she put out the statement she has her stated reason her husband has cancer. That in of itself is enough, right? I think most people agree that regardless of what the real reason is, her stated reason is enough, right? I mean, if your spouse has cancer, yeah, it's kind of more important to deal with that, right? And having to, you know, do a job like be the director of national intelligence plus uh worry about that at the same time. It's a lot, right? It's a lot. So, regardless, my thoughts and prayers are with Tulsi uh and her husband and her family. Uh it's sad. Uh but we got to talk about it. we got to cover it because again behind the scenes apparently uh there's an intelligence civil war. Okay. And I want to talk about it. So without further ado, let's go ahead and get into this.
>> All right. We are following some breaking news out of Washington. The director of national intelligence Tulsi Gaburn announcing she is resigning.
White House correspondent Libby Deed is live there in Washington with the very latest details. Libby.
>> Another to top Trump official Nicole on the way out. Director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. She's resigning after her husband Abraham was recently diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer. This all coming in her resignation letter that also states that will take effect on June 30th. Gabbard is the fourth cabinet official resigning in this year of Trump's term. Uh Gnome was the last one.
You'll remember the first one rather the homeland security secretary. Then we saw the attorney general Pam Bondi, Lorie Chavez, Durmer Chavez, who is the labor secretary, and now Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi has been outspoken about uh and against rather of US military action in the Middle East. And one of her deputies in March resigned in protest of the war.
That was Joe Kent. He sent a letter as well. And he said that also Iran didn't pose an imminent threat to the United States. We actually just got a reaction from the president. He posted on true social about this and he complimented uh Tulsi Gabbard. I do want to read part of the president's post here where he says, "I have no doubt he talks about Abraham, Tulsi Gabbard's husband. I have no doubt he will soon be better than ever." He compliments Gabbard. He says, "Tulsy has done an incredible job and we will miss her. Her highly respected principal deputy director of national intelligence, Aaron Lucas, will serve as acting director of national intelligence." So Aaron Lucas will be taking the helm as the top spy in the United States. This is a major shakeup at the White House here with the director of national intelligence on the way out. You've seen President Trump be very complimentary even in that post of Tulsi Gabbard. But we knew heading into this long before she was even part of the Trump administration. She had her concerns with Iran and conflicts when it came to the Middle East. President Trump had even acknowledged that they differed when it came to that. And now you're seeing Tulsi Gabbard on the way out.
We'll see if more details come as to why Tulsi Gabbard has resigned, aside from the fact that unfortunately her her husband, according to Tulsi Gabbard, is suffering from an extremely rare form of bone cancer. Nicole, >> well, I mean, again, regardless of all that other stuff, right, I mean, just her husband having cancer is enough. And I usually like to pay attention to what the president says when these resonations happen. uh because I I think that kind of tells you a lot in regards to how the president feels about that individual and whether or not um you know Tulsi and Trump on bad terms or whatever. I mean, President Trump is not the type of guy to compliment uh people that he doesn't really like or to pretend to like people that he doesn't really like. Uh, you know, I think that if Tulsi was so bad and so terrible, right, and if they were really at odds so much, I don't think he would be putting out a statement like this, but who knows? Maybe he's putting it out there because he knows that there's a significant portion of the MAGA base uh that really like Tulsi, and maybe he's not trying to rock the boat. Okay, maybe that's it. Maybe it's a political calculation. I don't know. I I just kind of feel like when it comes to the rift, right, between Tulsi and Trump or the issue of Iran or, you know, whatever, I just feel like the media is playing it up for more than what it really is, right? Ultimately today, uh there could be a number of factors, but again, when you look at the fact that her husband, again, according to her, has a rare form of bone cancer, that's serious, right?
And that in of itself, in my opinion, is like, okay, regardless of everything else that may or may not be going on behind the scenes, that in of itself, I think would be the primary reason. Okay?
But, you know, again, the media likes to speculate in regards to what happened because ultimately they want to play up some type of internal conflict, right?
This is what they want to do all the time when it comes to Trump administration. Okay? Uh but you know I mean a lot of times Trump does end up firing people and it if Tulsi was actually forced to resign which is what Laura Loomer says uh that this was coming that you know the Trump administration want to force her out okay fine at the very least you know we can say that if the administration feels like an individual is doing a bad job which we don't know when it comes to Tulsi to be honest with you again it's speculation um you know he tends to get rid of people who are doing a bad job right if he feels like they're doing a that job. Uh we can't say that about Democrats, right? We can't say that about Biden, right? They they will do a terrible job and then they'll get rewarded for it, right? They they'll get promoted. Uh they'll try to run for president, right?
Like Kla Harris, right? That that's how Dem Democrats operate, right? Uh when it comes to Trump administration, again, if Tulsi was actually fired for doing a bad job or, you know, not being on the same page with the administration or whatever, at the very least, you can say, "Well, at least the Trump administration, they get rid of the people." um when they're issues, right?
Again, not something you can really say uh for the Democrats and the Biden administration. So, uh again, the media loves to play this up for obvious reasons, right? And she has never been really in line with the new sort of interventionist Trump foreign policy.
And there were reports that she was kept out of the loop when decisions were made on issues like Venezuela and Iran. So her leaving would not be a huge surprise even if there were no important family uh reason like this. Uh, also, by the way, just a couple of months ago, uh, an ally of hers, Joe Kent, uh, had resigned in a very kind of splashy way, and he accused uh, President Trump, uh, of being led into war, uh, by Israel. Uh, and he was quickly shot down by a lot of administration officials, including the president himself. So, that didn't help really uh, Gabbard's uh, standing. So, uh, I even if there weren't this serious family reason, I don't think it would be a huge surprise for her to leave the administration.
>> Now, that being said, as you just described, some saw her as not, uh, fitting in, uh, with the current administration, uh, uh, policy, foreign policy, uh, policy as it pertains to Iran. Uh, could her departure signal a shift?
>> Well, that's that is unclear. I mean, what she did fit in with was the 2024 Trump campaign foreign policy of no endless wars, not starting new wars, uh that kind of thing that the president has made exceptions to uh now that he's president. So, my guess is this does not uh signal any sort of shift. Obviously, we've seen the president uh first of all uh attack Iran uh alongside uh Israel and then have negotiations and a ceasefire which he's continued to extend. He's been threatening a new attack in the last several days. Uh but he's really holding off and clearly would prefer not to resume uh active hostilities in this. So the president is trying to figure this thing out obviously. Uh, and I don't think that there's going to be any huge turn in direction because of the Gabbard thing.
>> As President Trump detailed in that post, uh, Aaron Lucas will serve as the acting director of national intelligence.
>> Yeah. So, you seen that? You heard that.
Now, regardless, I think that Tulsi still has a future as a Republican. Uh, because I do think that there's a large amount of bag of Republicans that really like Tulsi, uh, that like what she brings to the table. uh she has experience within the administration now. Uh I think that that's a good thing. Uh and I'm hoping that her husband uh gets healthy and who knows, maybe she will run in 2028. I definitely think that she would be a dark horse candidate to be VP. I thought that she was a dark horse candidate uh back in 2024. I thought that she would be the perfect kind of uh opposition to Kla Harris, right? um you know having somebody like Tulsi on the team who quite literally destroyed Kla Harris uh during the 2019 Democrat primary. So again, we're going to see. I I think that she represents a a significant portion of the base uh that Republicans uh should not uh take for granted, right? And she should stick around for sure as a Republican. And I'm hoping that she does, right? Because I think that her voice is valuable, right?
Especially when it comes to the anti-war stuff. Uh I think having dissenting voices in the room is good. I mean ultimately the day I mean if you are going to go to war uh you should have everybody on the same page in regards to making sure that the war is successful and you should not have turn coats working within the administration actively trying to undermine the effort.
Uh again if you're going to make that decision um and there's no indication that Tulsi was actually doing that. Now the Joe Kent stuff who knows right what's going on with that? Maybe she should have fired him a little bit sooner. I don't know. But what I do know is that again she in her position was in charge of intelligence and she was helping to oversee the declassification agenda from the president of the United States. Okay?
When it comes to UAPs, when it comes to JFK, when it comes to MLK, uh RFK, all of these files, right, uh that hopefully have answers to the questions that the American people have, okay, on those issues. Uh apparently she was in a full-blown intelligence civil war with the CIA. uh over these documents, okay?
And there's speculation about the CIA actually seizing some of these files and what has been called an internal coup.
Okay. And I briefly covered this story uh I think about a week ago. Okay. But we have some more reporting on uh the intelligence community spying on each other leading up to Tulsi resigning, which could also have something to do with it as well too. Right. So, I don't know. But let's go ahead and get into this.
>> CIA whistleblower testified that the US intelligence covered up information that pointed to a lab leak. That's right. It wasn't bat soup that caused the whole world to lock down. It was the government and a reckless and experimental lab in Wuhan, China. So why would our own intelligence community cover up for China at the expense of American lives? Earlier today, I spoke with Florida Congresswoman Anna Pina Luna to see what she had to say. But first, she came to us with some pretty shocking breaking news. It's about files pertaining to the assassination of JFK and MK Ultra, which was the CIA's human experiment experimentation program. We have learned since our interview with Luna the CIA marched into the National Reconnaissance Office warehouse in the middle of the night and took files under the jurisdiction of DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
It was not a raid and it did not happen today, but it did happen and the files were not given back. Take a listen to my interview with Congressman Luna when we first heard the news.
Before we get to the CIA whistleblower about the COVID 19 pandemic and Dr. Anthony Fouch's role in the cover up, you also have some news coming out of the CIA that you'd like to share.
Yeah. So, we were actually just notified that the CIA went in and took documents out of OD and um multiple boxes pertaining to the JFK files as well as MK Ultra. The reason why this is troubling is a there was an executive order that the president had directed the full declassification of JFK, but then also to the MK Ultra files. The CIA famously has said that, you know, all documents were released and other documents had been destroyed.
So, these are allegedly those documents that apparently never existed. And so, very troubling. Um, I did just talk to Chairman Comr and we are sending in the next hour or so a preservation of documents requests to the CIA. I have calls in to the White House to the director of the CIA himself. And so, obviously, as this develops, we'll keep everyone up to date. But strange times we're living in, that's for sure.
>> Does the CIA have jurisdiction to go into Gabbard's office like that and take documentation?
Uh well, the CIA does not have jurisdiction to work against an executive order by the president. And so the fact that someone did this when the president is out of country. Um from what I gather, I believe that director Radcliffe is with him. And so this seems like it was an internal coup to be honest.
>> Yeah. So you seen that internal coup.
Now again, she's not the only one that is suggesting there's a coup currently happening in the intelligence community.
We have Katherine Herage who is an amazing independent journalist uh who uh is now reporting that there's strong indicators that the CIA was tracking DNI Gabbard's team. So let's read about this because this in my being could also have something to do with what's going on here. Based on my reporting, it was well known in national security circles that a CIA investigative unit had sent emails to several members of DNI Gabbard's Directors Initiatives Group or DIG demanding they come in for questioning.
While the CIA unit routinely conducts polygraphs and investigations, the timing of the request was concerning, it did not appear to be a part of a standard security clearance review. The alleged CIA monitoring of the director's initiatives group was described as tracking quote every keystroke on their government computers and devices. While there is no expectation of privacy on government computers and users often see a log on warning, it did not appear to be routine counter intelligence work by the CIA. Yeah. Yeah. It appears as there really is an intelligence coup, right?
that there's an internal coup and you have members of the CIA who believe that they have more power than their alleged superiors. Right now again, last time I talked about this topic, I say John Ratcliffe, the CIA director who also was in charge of DNI uh during the last Trump administration. Yeah, I think he needs to answer some questions, right? I think he needs to answer some questions about these allegations because either he's in on it, right, or he has some rogue um members of the CIA, officers, agents within the CIA um that are involved in this and ultimately they should be fired, right, if this is true.
In recent testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee chaired by Senator Ran Paul, CIA senior operations officer and whistleblower James Erdman III alleged that the CIA illegally spied on the computers and phones of the director's initiatives group along with their investigations and contacts with whistleblowers. Note, the dig investigated the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassinations, the origins of COVID 19, Crossfire hurricane, the Biden administration's domestic surveillance, anomalous health incidents, and unidentified aerial phenomena. Erdman provided detailed testimony about the Diggs investigations into directed energy attacks, also known as Havana syndrome or anomalous health incidents.
This is not the first time the CIA appears to have been monitoring dig communications. Individuals involved in our AHI investigation discovered third parties were listing in on secure phone calls at intelligence community facilities. In one instance, it was doing a conversation with a whistleblower. Wow. Wow. Amazing.
Absolutely amazing. So you have the CIA allegedly spying on Tulsi Gabbard's team that again is designed to get answers uh to the questions that the American people have about some of these key issues and also she's trying to execute on the president's declassification agenda which clearly the deep state does not want. Right? Um I I've talked about this. Um, it seems as if there's certain portions of the intelligence community who may be in the know about certain topics like JFK for example or UAPs.
Clearly, they don't want that information getting out there despite the president's declassification agenda, his executive orders. They're trying to slowwall it, right? and it was Tulsi Gabbard's job uh to get the information uh requested by the president and they're trying to stop her. Okay.
These incidents were also reported in counter intelligence channels and DNI IT experts confirm that reproducing what occurred on the secure phone calls require an IT engineering work order.
someone had to request a technical change to the infrastructure during its investigation of AHIS. My reporting reveals additional allegations that the CIA denied DNI gabbards investigators access to key analysts and officials still working in the CIA building as well as relevant highly classified intelligence held in compartmented programs. I also understand that the request to review internal CIA correspondents communications regarding the Biden era AHI intelligence assessments included whether the intelligence was manipulated and the findings altered were blocked. The Biden era intelligence community assessments concluded it was unlikely that a novel weapon or foreign adversary was responsible for the debilitating brain injuries suffered by spies, diplomats, military personnel, and some civilian injuries that can lead to brain cell atrophy and death. Yeah. Yeah. So, uh this sounds like something that could be related to the UAP stuff. Okay.
Apparently, you have um this Habana syndrome thing where spies, diplomats, military personnel, civilians are suffering these dramatic and debilitating brain injuries and they don't really understand uh what exactly is causing this or who's doing this, right? But the Biden intelligence community basically concluded that hey, it's unlikely that it was some type of, you know, novel weapon or foreign adversary. Um, but again, this continues to happen, okay, to spies, diplomat, uh, military personnel is happening to a certain group of people that, um, makes you ask questions about what's going on here, right? As I reported in February, a dig report in findings into directed energy attacks or AHI's anomalous health incidents were finalized and prepped for release, but there was strong intelligence community resistance to revealing it. The report is still not public and this week, Judicial Watch sued the federal government for the records. Based on my reporting, the dig DNI gabage task force into weaponization and politicization found that the analytic trade craft used by the intelligence community under the Biden administration was quote unquote defective.
I also understand the DIG's recommendations include the recall of the 2023 and 2024 intelligence community assessments or AHIS.
DNI Gabbard committed to a new review of so-called Havana syndrome after our 2025 independent investigation. Our reporting revealed that brain injuries suffered by US spies, diplomats, military operatives, and civilians can cause progressive damage to the brain and nervous system. In response to my new reporting and questions, an ODNI official said, quote, "We have confirmed that the intelligence community inspector general is aware of the allegations and is working alongside ODNI and inter agency partners to uncover the truth about any potential wrongdoing." A CIA official said the agency quote has been and will continue to be supportive of any IG investigation into past conduct by CIA on this issue.
The official dis disputed allegations that the agency had frustrated the investigation by DNI Gabard's team. CIA worked to provide the DI with access to information responsive to the executive order prior to its disbandment by the DNI on AHIS or Havana syndrome. The CIA official said the CIA director has been clear, including in sworn testimony before Congress, that CIA defers to ODNI leading an inter agency analytic review of AHIS.
Thank you for supporting independent journalism. Yeah. So, this is the context of all the things that are going on in the background. And I personally don't know if any one of these things are the reason why Tulsi is resigning.
What I do know is that her husband uh needs our thoughts and prayers, right?
Um I'm hoping that he pulls through uh regardless of the reason, right? That in of itself is enough to say, "Hey, okay, well, you know, maybe we should give her some space." Um I personally believe that um because she's still in the good graces of the president, it seems like there's still on, you know, good terms.
uh this opens up the possibility that if she wants to uh she could possibly run uh in 2028 as a Republican. Um we're gonna see, but I think a voice like hers is a very important voice and um that is why I'm hoping that she sticks around and uh this is not the last that we see or hear of Tulsi. But in the meantime, she definitely deserves privacy. She definitely deserves space while her husband uh fights this battle, which again I'm hoping that he wins and he pulls through. So, let me know what you guys think. Make sure you like, comment, and subscribe. Most importantly, share a black conservative perspective. Peace.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











