This video reveals interconnected governance failures in South Africa, including a 260 million rand SAPS healthcare tender corruption scandal where the National Police Commissioner delayed action for 54 days despite warnings of fraud, the ANC-SACP alliance cracking as the SACP prepares to contest elections independently, and the South African Human Rights Commission losing its legal fight to have binding powers, highlighting systemic institutional corruption and power struggles across multiple government sectors.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
Trump wants more Afrikaners | ANC Tripartite Alliance BREAKS | SAHRC's PLAN to get POWERS BACK追加:
Well, ladies and gentlemen, it's Monday morning and I really pray that you have a blessed week that it's not as difficult as last week was for me. Wow, what a week last week was. Anyway, Monday morning, let's get on to the news. But before I do, can I yet again remind you if you haven't already, please subscribe to the channel. So, first news story rather important. The Trump administration is reportedly considering more than doubling the US refugee cap to allow more white South Africans, that's how it's framed in the news, white South African, especially Africaners into America. The current cap is 7,500 refugees, but officials are considering discussing adding an additional 10,000 places. Trump had previously paused most refugee admissions and then prioritized officers on the basis that they were facing race-based persecution in South Africa.
As you know, South Africa's government, the ANC, strongly denies the claims, but around 4,500 South Africans have reportedly already been admitted as refugees in the first 6 months of the fiscal year. Now, the article that I'm referencing also suggests that almost all refugees admitted under the program this fiscal year were white South Africans, apart from three Afghanis. At least four refugees who went to the US have also reportedly already returned to South Africa, though I can't confirm that. The political significance is that America is treating South Africa's racial politics as a human rights issue, whilst Ptoria insists that the claim is false. In other news, Earnest Roots of Lex Libertas is going to the United States in order to drum up support for self-governance.
Now, in an ENCA interview, a reporter attempted to suggest that Ernest was probably being racist for wanting, you know, self-governance, and he had the following to say.
>> If you go to the United States and you say that we have a legitimate pursuit, self-governance, and you want a special envoy to be um sent to look at Africana interests, surely you went armed with numbers. How many people support you support this pursuit?
>> Well, well, we're going to present a petition with 100 thou 100,000 names to the US government when we do the vigil.
But but the the the funny thing is that somehow when you argue in favor of self-governance, you have to defend that position. Self-governance has been the default position of politics since the ancient Greeks and the ancient Romans.
That's the fundamental position of politics is self-governance. Now, we're at this weird point where if you say self-governance, then people get upset with you. People try to attack you and try to vilify you when you say, "You know what? Actually, I would like for my community to have a say over our own affairs. We'd like to to make decisions in terms of how we run our own schools and so forth." It's only in the last few years, the last two decades perhaps, where this idea has become antagonized or fundamentally discredited. And we're not very concerned about what the the Overton window tells us. We're concerned about what is right and and what is what is just.
In other news, the ANC has told its members who belong to both the ANC and the SACP to declare in writing which party they intend to campaign for. Now, I actually covered the fallout from the ANC and the SP last week. If you haven't already watched that, please go watch that video. And this all comes as the SACP prepares to contest elections independently. Now the SACP's general secretary Sulli has told us members not to panic, resign or make rushed decisions because of ANC pressure. He said that members must remain calm, organized and consult the party before making strategic decisions. He said that the SACP would respect members who choose to stay with the ANC and also argued that the ANC cannot enjoy the benefit of SACP campaigning and votes and then isolate the SP afterwards. The key point here is that the ANC's old alliance structures are cracking. The SACP is no longer behaving like a junior partner willing to simply fall in line and the tripartate alliance is firmly over which I for one completely welcome.
Anything to hasten the demise of the ANC is aokay to me. But talking about the opposition, the DA, the DA is still dealing with the fallout from a leaked report showing that senior party figures received salary topups in addition to their government salaries. Now, John Stein reportedly received just under 40,000 rand per month, bringing him roughly in line with the deputy president's salary. Now, the deputy finance minister reportedly received around 50,000 rand per month for his role as ANC's national campaign manager.
Now action essay complained because these payments were allegedly not declared in parliament's register of members interest as DNA argues that MPs naturally perform party duties and that this should not be treated as outside paid employment. Now the new DA leader John H Lewis defended the payment saying that the party came from DA donor funding and not from taxpayer money. Now Jordan Lewis argued that it was an internal party matter and that the DA was now working on a standardized policy for these kind of payments. Now the issue is not simply whether donor money was used but where the senior public representative should have disclosed the payments. Now let us not forget that John DNA in his old seat as you know the opposition leader probably would have promptly criticized the ANC for not declaring these. So you know what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Now in the main news story of today, news has emerged that the National Police Commissioner was reportedly warned in January 2025 that a 260 million SAPs healthcare services tender awarded to the gangster CAT was irregular. An internal audit allegedly found signs of misconduct and procurement irregularities fronting and possible fraud. The audit said that the cat's company Medicare 24 swing district should not have been awarded the tender.
Now auditors recommended further forensic investigation and possible criminal investigations with the police commissioner allegedly having the authority to cancel the contract immediately but waited a full 54 days before merely threatening cancellation.
By mid January, subs had already paid the cat 18.5 million. And the article says that the tender was not advertised for the required 21 days, which makes the awarding of the tender irregular.
But it also says that bids were not properly safeguarded and that due diligence on bidders was weak. The tender specifications allegedly failed to meet proper standards and do not promote broad competition. They never do when the caterer deployed. and that the cat had already been linked to the wider 10 visa hospital procurement scandal and so should have been excluded from the bidding process. So why did the National Police Commissioner delay action whilst being warned that a massive police tender was potentially corrupt? Now remember this is the same individuals that we're told we must trust with all of our safety. Surrender your firearms to the police. They're the only ones that should have it because they're trustworthy. The police are corrupt beyond all imagination. Now, as you know, if you've been watching the news, Robert Porza did a press conference where he placed this individual on suspension whilst appointing a new acting national police commissioner. Now, the new acting police commissioner, a female, is the first female appointed to this role.
Now, this individual was previously appointed as SAP's CFO. She was also the official who submitted the audit report flagging the irregular tender and it was her report that warned that the tender had procurement irregularities and should be investigated for possible criminal prosecution. Now the previous national commissioner the one who's being suspended is due to appear in court on procurement fraud related charges. Now he's also expected to appear alongside the cat and 15 others.
Now the appointment of the new Nashville commissioner is unusual because her background is mainly in finance, governance and administration rather than frontline operational policing with many critics saying that she lacks operational policing experience. Though Ramapora defended her saying that she has nearly two decades of SAPs experience and a reputational professionalism integrity so it will be fine.
Now the argument in her favor is that SAPS's corruption is deeply tied to procurement. So a finance and a governance person may be exactly what's needed. But the broader picture here is that SAPS is not facing a crime crisis.
It's facing an internal corruption and procurement crisis. Now one journalist went out of their way to actually challenge Ram Paula on this directly and ask him what he planned to do and they said the following.
>> Xander, >> thank you very much. Good afternoon Mr. president and the national acting national police commissioner and the acting police minister. And Mr. President, that's the note I want to start off with. You have a lot of actings uh currently. When are you making a decision regarding the police minister? Um you still have Senzum Kuno on a leave of absence. That decision lies with you. But also, how long is it going to take for you to make a decision? Are you contemplating instituting an inquiry to look into the fitness of Fi Masimula to hold office?
But also, Mr. President, what do you make of the charges that Masimola is facing? Uh there's been lots of commentary around this. Do you believe that it's worthy of uh him actually being in the dock with criminals like Vumuziat Matlala? just your thoughts on the nature of the charge in light of and the context here is of course what we've heard at the commission of inquiry that there is a battle with IDAC and there's fighting amongst the law enforcement agencies. Thank you. Three questions there.
>> Not three question, it's a speech.
>> Don't worry.
>> It's refreshing to see an actual journalist attack sura and ask him whether he's just going to sit there and procrastinate. Now, in a final news article, the human rights commission, which I covered in a video last week where I went through the judgment that effectively rendered it powerless, has effectively lost its legal fight to have binding powers like the public prosecutor. probably a good thing because the human rights commission is ultimately a kangaroo court. Now, as you'll know from my video last week that the constitutional court ruled that the SHRC recommendations were not legally binding and that the South African Human Rights Commission remains a constitutional body with investigative and subpoena powers only. But if someone ignores his recommendations, the commission may go to court to enforce them. Now, a commissioner at the South African Human Rights Commission says that they are disappointed but not finished in their fight. They said that the commission still has around a 90% compliance with his recommendations order. Though I must highlight that this is probably only because people thought they were binding, now they're not. We'll see how long that lasts. And he warned that the ruling will increase litigation costs and delay enforcement. Yeah, that's the idea. It just means that the SHRC can't be a kangaroo court and just do whatever it wants like it does right now. Now, the South African Human Rights Commission says that they will approach Parliament to change the law and actually give it binding powers. And the commission says that it's not just a glorified NGO. They argue that South African Human Rights Commission can investigate and recommend, but can't directly enforce compliance without going through the courts. They're saying that's not good enough and they need to be able to enforce the filing powers.
Though I must highlight they're going to need a twothirds majority to change the constitution which I do wonder if they'd actually secure. Anyway, that's the news of today. Let me know what you think in the comments section below. And until next time, bye.
関連おすすめ
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











