This video clip demonstrates a fundamental principle of moral reasoning: that certain actions remain morally unacceptable regardless of the ends they might serve. When asked if he would bring back slavery as the only way to ban abortion, Charlie Kirk firmly rejected the premise, stating he would not use one evil to stop another. He then turned the question back on Julia, asking whether she would ban abortion if it were the only way to limit human suffering, and she also answered no. This exchange illustrates that ethical decisions should be based on consistent moral principles rather than utilitarian calculations that might justify morally reprehensible means.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Install our extension to search inside any video instantly.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Charlie Kirk Was Shocked By Her Answer #charliekirk #debateAdded:
If the only way to ban abortions forever would be to bring back slavery, would you do it?
No.
No? No.
I I I I wouldn't bring back slavery to try to limit murder. No.
>> Okay.
What What kind of outrageous question is that, by the way?
>> I'm just curious. Just yes or no. If the only way to limit human suffering is to ban abortion, would you ban abortion?
No.
Related Videos
BSA Goldstar - I gave up! And why animals beat humans!
thebingleywheeler
102 views•2026-05-31
3 Dreams That Changed Philosophy Forever
mommyplus24
731 views•2026-05-31
I Cringed Watching These Protestants Critique Catholicism
jaynijackson
458 views•2026-06-05
Scholar Explains: WHAT IS A GNOSTIC?
fightbackpodcast
965 views•2026-05-31
Why Allah Created Marriage? The True Purpose of Marriage in Islam | By Hamza Yusuf
Noblelessons
471 views•2026-06-05
When They Ignore You, Do This Instead | Stoicism
ZenithWisdom-e3k
615 views•2026-05-31
Why Pure HEDONISM Is IRRATIONAL
qnaline
12K views•2026-05-31
East Meets West #18: Answers to Overthinking #Shorts
universal_sage
268 views•2026-06-01











