Faris Al-Rawi Fully Exposed in The Parliament By Minister Wayne Sturge!

Added: 2026-05-20

[00:00:03]If we can also have to pronounce upon that.

[00:00:06]So he uses witness statement, which was his second misbehavior.

[00:00:12]So that he could get his political opponents charged and brought before the court for misbehavior and conspiracy to commit fraud.

[00:00:20]Because you see, Faris Al-Rawi, he's a crafty guy.

[00:00:23]Faris Al-Rawi understands politics.

[00:00:25]Faris Al-Rawi understands that the courts in this country are slow. And Faris Al-Rawi understood that once he got rid of two of his opponents, who he saw as a thorn in his as thorns in his side, and who were far better lawyers than he could ever be, then it would be smooth sailing there on.

[00:00:43]Faris Al-Rawi tried to do what was done to Basdeo Panday.

[00:00:48]Because they used the courts, they used the Anti-Corruption Bureau, and they got Basdeo Panday charged.

[00:00:56]And Basdeo Panday was only finally exonerated two months before his death.

[00:01:03]So he spent 20-something years in the wilderness.

[00:01:07]That is how the PNM uses the courts.

[00:01:10]That is how the PNM uses propaganda. And if they had evidence to charge Basdeo Panday in 2001, 2002, whenever he was charged for the airport business, how come all of a sudden the evidence was not good enough to proceed with? How come they had to drop the charges against him? And Faris Al-Rawi understood that once he could do that to two of his political opponents, then the PNM would be in power for as long as possible. Once he could broad-brush and paint people on this side with that sort of conduct, that is how the PNM operates.

[00:01:40]So he understands misbehavior better than anybody else, better than John Bacchus.

[00:01:46]Never mind he is not much of a lawyer.

[00:01:48]He is referred to as a petty fogger, because all he engages in is petty foggery.

[00:01:54]Foggery.

[00:01:57]Stop laughing. Petty forgery.

[00:02:01]Yes.

[00:02:03]Well, yes, you are singing it, isn't it?

[00:02:04]So, Faris Alrawi, as a public officer, because he's a senator, he cannot be exonerated. You cannot There is no way you can bring a sane argument and say that the person who did who did the wrongdoing was John Bacchus, because Faris was not a member of the committee.

[00:02:27]That That won't wash. That can't fly.

[00:02:29]That argument cannot fly. You want me to tell you why? Because he is a public officer.

[00:02:33]He is aware that John Bacchus was on the committee. He is aware that the committee was examining the conduct of the former Minister of Health, Terrence Deyalsingh. He was aware of what the issues were. And with that awareness, knowing what the issues were, knowing fully well that Senator John Bacchus was a judge of sorts in the matter.

[00:02:57]He sat down with Senator John Bacchus.

[00:03:01]And if it were a court, he sat down and perverted the course of public justice. That's what That's what That's tantamount to what he did.

[00:03:10]So, in Vincent Nelson, not only did he misbehave in public office, he perverted the course of public justice, and he breached provisions of the Plea Discussions and Agreements Act.

[00:03:20]And now he's back again.

[00:03:23]And now all of a sudden, it really was painful to watch the cowardice, the nauseating, sickening cowardice, the stench of that behavior from Trinbago Maloney.

[00:03:39]Because I would have thought she would have, at the very least, tried to make an argument to mitigate against the conduct of John Bacchus.

[00:03:49]It seemed as though she was here to do two things.

[00:03:53]One, to protect her master, because that's what it is.

[00:04:01]And two, to see how she could antagonize everybody else. That's what she comes here to do. My friend um Shevonne as you see she will tell you.

[00:04:09]She's hardly ever here.

[00:04:11]And then long before the tea break starts, she gets like a either a whiff or she got to smell like the food is ready. And then she disappears very early.

[00:04:20]And then when we go down, we realize there's a food shortage.

[00:04:23]>> [laughter] >> Because like she packing it for the weekend and then she disappear.

[00:04:30]I had to shout out at her one time and say there's not she pepper and take it out.

[00:04:33]This is not a URP job.

[00:04:38]You come here.

[00:04:40]You just come. You don't say nothing.

[00:04:41]You come here and then you try to talk thing and say things that That's why I didn't withdraw it.

[00:05:09]To say that she's an attorney at law.

[00:05:12]I have never seen her in practice.

[00:05:15]Yeah, it really is mind-boggling that she's an attorney at law.

[00:05:18]She and and what's his name again? Lup you know, I will call whatever his It really is funny.

[00:05:24]But she came here and instead of dealing with the matter, she came here to defend, to see how best she could defend the owner of the PNM.

[00:05:32]Because that's one thing that is clear today.

[00:05:35]That is one thing that is clear today.

[00:05:37]That Penny Beckles cannot touch Faris Al-Rawi.

[00:05:42]She wouldn't dare.

[00:05:43]And that shows you who owns the PNM.

[00:05:50]You know, this senator Irwin from 2010 to 2015 stood up in the parliament and talked about in every speech, even if you talking about dangerous dogs, he had to slip in campaign finance reform and how he going to bring it. You know, they had 10 years and they still haven't bring it.

[00:06:11]10 years.

[00:06:13]You know why he wouldn't bring it?

[00:06:14]Because with one campaign finance reform is dead weight, he has no value in the PNM.

[00:06:20]His only value is the money he could bring because he is totally useless when you hear his contributions in the Senate, totally useless.

[00:06:29]So, let me deal with two things about what she did. Um remember for I will go Sorry, Prince City Maloni.

[00:06:42]I mean, this had to be either rank dishonesty or the epitome of cognitive dissonance.

[00:06:54]>> [laughter] >> Because she basically had no contribution to make. She came here to read from the minority report, kept quoting and saying the minority report say X, the minority report say Y, and the minority report say Z. Right? But who is the minority?

[00:07:12]She.

[00:07:13]Isn't that dishonesty?

[00:07:15]Well, if you're talking about the minority report, say I was the minority and this IS MY REPORT.

[00:07:21]RIGHT? OWN IT.

[00:07:23]YES, it would be himself to himself.

[00:07:26]Yes, it would be what lawyers call self-cooperation, but the rule against narrative, but apparently she doesn't know the rule against narrative. She's not not much of a lawyer.

[00:07:34]But if you are quoting from something, don't pretend you are quoting from a minority report when you are one who wrote the minority report. But guess what?

[00:07:47]I don't think she did write that minority report.

[00:07:50]She doesn't strike me as intelligent enough.

[00:07:53]She can hardly string an intelligent sentence together.

[00:07:56]It's only costs and quarrel and insults.

[00:07:59]And then go and eat the people's food and disappear with a few boxes and then you have to eat well with the bread God.

[00:08:05]And we love God.

[00:08:06]>> [laughter] >> She treats this house with contempt.

[00:08:11]Like Alrawi, like John Braithewaite.

[00:08:14]Just in a different way.

[00:08:16]She treats this as as She treats this house as you are being and probably well that's school feeding parliamentary feeding.

[00:08:25]Because she has nothing valid to offer.

[00:08:30]But you know So that's one thing about not mentioning that she was the minority. But the other thing is having regard to her conduct, one day I have no minority report and then within 24 hours it was You produce one?

[00:08:48]Is that really her? Maybe that's why she was citing the minority report because it's not hers.

[00:08:52]Maybe that's another one that Faris typed up.

[00:08:56]I think the only difference between Faris and the acting is um the acting has um technological challenges so he doesn't know how how to come out of the document so that when you forward it the track changes and the evidence of the track changes don't become apparent.

[00:09:08]Because had it not been for his for him being computer illiterate for want of a better term, we might have never known all of this.

[00:09:16]Thank God for Hank's stupidity which reveals Hank's dishonesty.

[00:09:20]>> [laughter] >> There's no other way.

[00:09:25]And no seriously, there there's no other way to deal with this.

[00:09:29]And and then as if it's a big point. She wants to attack the speaker.

[00:09:39]And say, "Well, um you and unblemish yourself, you know, you do something wrong, too.

[00:09:45]You didn't disclose."

[00:09:47]But that utterance of his need only be stated to be rejected. Because she only knew about that because the speaker disclosed it.

[00:09:58]And he disclosed it during the meeting.