SAN FILTÈ Marco San FÒS KOTE demonte ak reponn Rudy SANON

Added: 2026-05-26

[00:00:03]It's media that's peeing in terms of age, it means that his little baby, 5 months old, is 5 months old and that's why little baby, 5 months old, everything that's being debated publicly, that we do in the ure, that at 2 am, but his who comes, my jealous one, all that nonsense, it's yes, it's the gou who wants to eat the baby, there it's the werewolf, but me, it's outside, dad shows me, makes me in a pile, little one, but me, who does it to take the ball to put in clairin for little p, it's not who shows who leaves to take malf, not to scare because not afraid malf, and besides, citizen, it makes us launch, entered on Friday, makes us launch to make our first show on Monday, which was January 12th, and that, yes, indeed, on Monday, January 12th, to make the first show, well, we can make the show, citizen, it starts to attack, we say that, no, attack, P, who doesn't answer, doesn't answer, doesn't answer, doesn't answer, but each one who doesn't answer, to answer that because if who can say that, no, I didn't say that, no, and not afraid, nobody, even I have that Knowing great love, Buddha, myself, all his Buddha, the microphone, talking about subjects, and my who lives with, knowing, talking about anything, Marco, dealing with any subject.

[00:02:57]But look, it's so mean, don't do anything, says Dominique, anything about me because Dominique says publicly that not, not that, not that, address minister, not ask minister, job, not make me sing, and if so, for that, think about the profession.

[00:03:51]But, says my, after, I talk about that, no, here again, said that, put sal in entrails, us, who are more serious, to settle us by broadcast, talk, and then, says that there is no good time to answer, says that, no, except that obliged, they do point, Dominique, but Dominique, I, from there, Dominique, are foreign, Dominique, are Canadian, yeah, yeah, like the Voltaire, you say that in transition, it makes us experience there, start doing the double nationality, so Dominique, minister, nobody says anything, but everyone knows Dominique, are Canadian, that, a secondly, for whom, that, for M, fixation on Dominique, Dominique, you, Minister of Foreign Affairs, as much as, to remind me, for, v, candidate for the presidency, for, v, minister, for, v, prime minister, for, v, senator, for, deputies, busy, busy, in office, who, mandate, for, g Charges, you minister, you have charges and discharge there, technical report, there it's accounts that are done after that before parliament, Dominique is not a presidential candidate, that's for fixation on Dominique, but as Grimel said the day before, everything, Dominique's problem, and just not there, Mr. Alcohol for the broadcast, video call, but yes, everything done, Mr. Fa, it's no Grimel, but myself, it's not that, but notice in a pile that journalist here puts sensation in a pile, journalist here, fixation on my who did the same job with, well, talking about Assad, broadcast before broadcast, in fact, Mr. Pourexliquer, to say, but who, well, takes that to heart, yes, well, he says American embassy refusal, pile, journalist, visa, so, myself there, but Ass as a journalist who, key, littominique, it's a big journalist for writing conditional information, as if, as if, journalist, it's colleagues cited, name, access, phone number, all instead of conditional information, but it's because, head, by, it's not, me, made, no, formal desire, desire, bag, to make, blasé, because we, me, journalism, so happy, between two worlds, if, who, rel, h, who, b, version, bal There, as a professional journalist, in front of it, it's re-listening to the other person, asking for a version, not there, but as very Dominique does, he makes a phone call. But yes, phone, Mr. F takes that, Mr. All-Gaga, Mr. All-Gaga, and says next time, so sweet, even does them, for example, woman or problem that passed, but no need to run to beat, but my friends, by the fact that before, it's all said, next time, answer.

[00:08:37]We, everything takes, everything takes place.

[00:08:40]Dominique there, generally, it's not, and if it's a question, piss, but the fact, but does, and Mr. Bloger, everything, Mr. Bloger, fa for vi, but you have to avoid exactly that, says Mr. Bloger, does that, but explain there that Assad conditional information because conditional information, and maybe that Saturday and in the show, it doesn't talk about that, we again, whatever the subject, my, no need to answer there, no need to answer, no need to answer, no need to answer, no need to answer, no need to answer, besides, not chosen to enter into worlds that you supposed to do work with, that, first reason, second reason, if Mr. says, s mono, because the, says that, no, guer, hen, tel, strong, we, of, mand, he has said for my Justin for DCPJ invited yeah and hope to explain Mr. V the next morning Mr. said for whom it doesn't take place Mc Justin so did that answer even there so that means that like corruption for whom it doesn't take place takes place work there So I myself haven't decided to do that again and then everything gets used to me with journalist here who has done the job and too much who the morals of the journalist's job pass Me Marcus Garcia H who is director owner Melody FM 103.3 Mr. Minister during the minister always on the radio does editorial every morning does my firm morals Lilian Pierre Paul takes me seriously because big journalist Lilian Pierre Paul Marie secretary general in the national palace he always does a show every afternoon every Sunday he criticizes my book salv except that the other power that says de facto power he says and he contested the marches there not I said power contested because Marie secretary in the palace Lilian to regret memory who makes the sound there months like François junior Mr. Minister on my Mr. F Minister radio huh h j there but Val Madam Minister cit platform every shows as if Nothing was, but after that, it's this, but who's not a journalist, but who's this, but as if, is it, here in Haiti, who gives lessons, gives lessons, my friends, with my, their, who tells you that, says nonsense in the media, it's not normal, but the parataquer is when there, attacked as if it's who's not in space, side for the other to exist and dry, that sir, who's in sports, as a sportsman, we, sir, integrate into sports, here, come, he finally takes his place, they do to cut that, for, for, not again, who's not the other side? It's finally passed, a closed door, so, and that it pays, the side, side, to moralize there, who knows that it's nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, who turns the microphone for every morning, microphone, either sing or do a show, yeah, that, all tomorrow, his, but, who's the photo, problem, well, so, his country, like nonsense, we want to accept that, we don't reject it because who, for, to fit, all, part, intimidated, in the street, morning, p, his, sing, he reflects that, all, keep, imagine, and keep, imagine, that there But photo released morning pita f at his podium photo released morning Pard m talk but while that not because he said stupid things while he himself does stupid things there is no problem that not mat yet it is me who says stupid things many journalists who can work not say for me and nothing for Lilian fa everything and as if Assad works I work it's that Marie lu and in post that no Marie was in post because Marie you Marie was director president president electoral council h and then he does a show in the morning they make camp manage that yes my yes yes g that in fact like all d m d for because the impression my of world who d down live there he says from time to time several times given that it's the last time he talked about the file said that no no last truth to understand that not taking essence for v as if supporting his m and then for v to grow as if there because who not we does show says that does not do video says it is it's of thugs who are there the money to defend government to make government attack us since before but listen Listen in phone mo unless number that's not audit number no that for lu 37 480037 that you tell me to check the 6 among all online media we as if that online broadcast ourselves since n not online in the context of an invitation but it's an invitation said in fact there under name says that no then me on phone pam writes me prison message to invite me to the launch cap made on the 9th invitation fasting on the 6th with name n name with four invitations while sir the 6th was that day? It was the 9th, it was Friday, Friday the 9th, Monday the 12th, so sir, since before we did the show, he didn't respond to the invitation, no problem, his, but is it that if we invite him to the launch, it's in relation to recognition, to do the same network or there, he invites us, so he doesn't respond to that, no problem, but he attacked forward to say it's propaganda, he makes his money, joins us, the worst is that it seems upside down, sir, it's the first one who advises, who says in relation to 50,000 that touch does, every young boy, time, who, it's first, who, it's sir, that his strategy because he doesn't say, but meet, passed in front of the, hello, Peter, we receive Peter, all in Galilee, that means head, that real, each way, does, moreover, no comparison between show, does show because show by us, not us, and we give what we said, does, does, doesn't, does, does, does, does, does, does, do... do, does, do, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, to, work, as, as, to, not, to, bother, does, bother, sir, all, because, even micro already talking badly, s malander to talking badly, s attacking me, blackmailing me for bagail, but tap work since before in micro, continuing work because each world, because that to understand if formerly who in micro who not the work but to understand that I seem young boys who do faculty, school who micro and that makes everything that obliges them to camp, but family to occupy a time, it's a show and then so much need more responsibility, responsibility to work and that for sir to understand to denounce wrongdoing, theft, corruption, g but the other is that it makes us and in the end, does attacking all the press at some point, the rest to against him, does that no longer work, don't believe me, don't believe me because personally I don't take attacks if sir does to tell me his staff, but too easy, everyone says or says bagail and then he expects to back down because suspending does desgars and does it several times and then not for example simple 2013 by particular story but said tomorrow morning tz Laurent laam by with his but not obliged his because it's that's as if it's a balance of sorts, as if to force someone to do that, to make sure that among those under the network who comment on Joseph Neline Valcour's campaign, it's like he comments, analyzes me, and then makes the first cry that identifies Galileo, who is n't friends with me but followed, even impressed, disturbed him, and broadcast as if for a moment that I, for a job, that's it, it's like that, and tells me two ways, job here, or refer, or hello, and for whom it criticizes me, facade speech that Dominique du Puit spoke of, feminist and so on, but listen to us, it's in Haiti, boy, not woman, but that's false, but Laurent, metro, ambassador, then a foreign minister who quoted in the presidential council, Claude Joseph, didn't say boy, woman, chance, that because the fight, woman, woman, it's not as if such a type of woman, woman, that it's all women, that fight, woman against boy, boy against woman, because for balance and not to enter into logic 50/50, because for me, even of the world that agrees together, woman 70 30 but as I honestly point out, if it's because, like a little boy, I felt embarrassed that it's f 70 m 30, it's not comfortable, but that's how we get up, but I don't think it's a question of battle, that's what I myself dismantled with arguments, Dominique's speech from the well, that surface area and battle for integrated diaspora, passport displayed, defend who, foreign passport, moreover, minister, defense minister, country, Canadian passport, battle, minister, passport, if we start to accept, accept, we are Minister of Defense, Dominique, Minister of Foreign Affairs, we, the other again, who, Minister of Defense, we, pass, Minister of Defense, not American, Canadian pastor, where is the problem, where is the problem, men, fight, that, that, it doesn't feel, speech, that before, as if, Minister, foreign boy, by country, defend, feminine, it's the woman, while, diaspora, we have several shows, bear the cause, that, moreover, bear the good, my Potter, the good, done, team, for work, that, with, assume, and then, even if, you have, gag, truth, or project for, v, president, it's not a bad problem, if, v, president, because, his, his, right, but, not even, talk, presidency, because Article 35-6 of the constitution, which is being amended, states that one must have received responsibilities because managing a position from ambassador to foreign minister requires talking about this. No, it's not a candidate because my analysis shows that it's not a candidate positioned for the new transition, and you have the right.

[00:26:12]But the question is, with arguments, we attack, present, and then, as if angry and forced into lies, that's nonsense.

[00:26:19]He passed, and then it showed that it's not the state at all because, in fact, it's not a good cabinet, even if not an official one, etc., or rather, time, but they still gain experience, they gain experience, learn public administration. There are people there who, well, don't continue too much because Naik is with us, and she is beautiful, pretty, understand, so, but all of course, well, on electoral matters, it's part of the news for the weekend. Well, it's a draft decree, it's not a decree yet. So far, there are many effective ones. We know if it's really him who adopted it, but he knows us very well that he is decreing it and agreeing with P because until now, Thursday, it's under That's not the one that was signed recently, it's the one that made our transition work, it's certain that it was based well before we moved forward. Good Friday, earlier, we had to greet each other, greet each other before we enter into the debate. Well, yes, oh well, in fact, greet the entire audience, the public debate there, and especially, and I'm very happy that it's there with, and then, well, and me, my campaign, I don't have us. But clarifying something, that's what puts the bars on the teas and the dots on the good, it's interesting and it's fair game, however, it means that we don't, because the debate makes the matter, it's that we analyze the profile of who each world is, who each world is, what interest each world represents, so that's what we keep there and it was for even its very interesting because each time to take care of the functions in the country, it counts, to speak, to defend and so on, because even the country is for us, all, yeah, country, which political family, which sensitivity, yes, if Haiti is considered as a business, well, its business Who wins 12 million shares, that is to say 12 million Haitians, each with the same force, not just now, but also now, a public thing, there are people who are entrepreneurs, people who are political leaders.

[00:28:52]It's even what seems so, and so on, but every Haitian has the right and is capable of questioning anyone, every Haitian has the right to question anyone now. If we return to a period of absolute monarchy by divine right, that it is good God who chooses who puts them there, and then well, nobody asks questions about the monarchy by divine right, and since they are chosen by God, they don't ask questions about majesty.

[00:29:21]But if it's democracy, as society tells us, we, all Haitians, are equal in rights, okay, we have the same privileges, okay, not since that's where we are, so we are capable of questioning everyone, and especially those who have served the state, and that makes it a public thing, so since we are public, they talk about you, for example, we ourselves do programs, there are debates, public debates, so we make them public, and I know Jean-Baptiste, not for myself only. Since my word is committed to the other, to society, so I am able to ask questions under the guidance of people who function because my word is to commit me, but to commit society in general, so I question myself and for myself, these are normal things, and that's what makes everyone who does work. It's extremely important micro because micro is very fragile; it builds and it destroys, and I think I need to clarify this question to make it clear and allow society to truly enjoy the privilege that we have here because, in a way, allowing us to face each other is because our word has participated in building the national edifice here, and perhaps that's the meaning of this word. I think we need to allow debate on public matters, OK, national issues, issues of interest, and that makes everyone keep everyone talking and everyone able to carry this, even as we build the national edifice. That's very important, and I spoke of deaths that we have, but maybe that's it, that's very, that's what... Launching the show with Marco and the campaign.

[00:31:18]But there are questions that deserve clarification, and that's what makes me very happy every time.

[00:31:24]Yeah. For example, there's this decree, so much for those who are well-versed in what we're talking about, and then discussing it, and who is good, and sometimes the people who are useful in taking traps, it makes you think about whether there are denunciations somewhere, which is good, but in the meantime, do we not have the possibility to lie because of the distraction, and then we don't have time to discuss and reflect on national things, and yes, in a week, indeed, there's a discussion about what was done for a decree that was even in harmony with the national government, which itself is aware of, with a number of political parties and organizations, to be able to go towards elections, obviously the first proposal that was sent on April 24th, and the governments have passed or done it, yes, done it, and made the other proposal, and certainly there are things that are interesting, but everything that is asked to be questioned, and for example, things that are interesting are especially the APCarifié under conditionality for my candidate, yeah, so that the constitution and then strengthening what, it's, I know, is that decree capable of passing in relation to that constitution, for example They make the hierarchy of norms there, the constitution, and then all that after law, decree, etc., passed down and clarified the campaign. Look at article 35 of the constitution, which clearly states the conditions for a presidential candidate. So, until now, I have a foreign passport, which is a shame, and well, president, but there, so there is no contest, yes, many times done for there because I myself sincerely don't believe that who doesn't have a foreign passport with a Haitian passport, the other one there myself, but it's the constitutional name there that says for president of the Republic you must not acquire another nationality in the election, you must not have another nationality, it clearly says, even I have held all the functions, it says you need management responsibilities, which means that you show that you are well managed, so certainly I, who, the theory of the functions, the theory of impossibilities, that is to say, no impossible formalities, thank you, that's exactly what I was looking for, the theory of impossible formalities, all there, I am dismissed, my brother, attention, huh.

[00:34:24]No, that's it.

[00:34:32]Consistent speech in any case is very good and we all do eff that we generate and to analyze political data you need in economics in sociology in you and in international relations important political sense. Yes, we told him during the campaign, for example, he said he managed public funds and especially positions that were requested, or even the word of an administrator or a public accountant, and so on, and well, you have to deal with expenses, and we know about expenses, it's Parliament that... but if we take the theory of impossible formalities, not Parliament, but in the meantime, the constitution says there must be expenses, yeah, and in that case, it's the Constitutional Court, we don't have a Constitutional Court yet, so that means we're obligated with that, so it's a shame for people who are victims, but that's life, you understand, so it says maybe wrong place at the wrong time, maybe thought of the president at the right time, well, if a minister, like no Parliament, and no possibility for expenses, the president doesn't think about the campaign, the president needs the government, that's the Minister of Communication, Culture, National Education, but like the president, there's no possibility for discharge, there you say as you wish, my dear, both need ministers at the same time, and then there's still the president, but the president says there must be expenses, so always more, well, you say everything, well, like me, presidential candidate, we made up of public funds, well, there, you have to refuse so you don't have a minister, so you can have a candidate instead, but he takes on the post-ministerial role there, and why not some responsibilities there, and then after that, he knows, anyway, like, because it's a current issue, so, project to create, yeah, project to uncreate, it's a question, chapter that deals with the question, and he creates his own, so on the side, that body makes decisions, orientation of decisions, and in fact, every decision that he makes, and according to several articles there, if I have article 8, 14, 16, 17, he will show that he has, it's as if I have an executive secretariat, the nine members he trained at the ODEAN, and then, well, general management, general management, there he himself, in fact, who is the executive secretariat, there he himself who sends the report there and the details that morning, for example, men, hum, you have to consider that if I have an electoral advisor who is not present, who is not there, so it's the director general there capable of his report, well, the prime minister, executive there, to cut all privileges, so that means that in the end, talking about a general management or a very powerful director general who has control Is this a debate on several sides, but is it possible to keep this question open? Is it possible with a director general, and if indeed a decree has been passed, Jean Li, the director general, is he himself the authorizing officer and president of the government, even with the same authority, or not even with the same powers?

[00:38:06]Because in this project, it started, but the electoral council's powers are there, but going down further shows that the general directorate is there, but it does it, and the process is supposed to resume. Do we think so ourselves? In fact, it's about the feasibility of this. Is it possible for the general directorate to have this document, or at least do we think about it in relation to the agent keeping the executive control of this country through the general directorate? Or does he say that even if it's permanent, it says it's independent, but it's provisional, but it's independent then? And in section 6, the Amandia constitutional campaign, he was talking about independent institutions.

[00:38:58]In the constitution, by independent institution, he cites the permanent electoral council, the OPC, the State University of Haiti, the audit of accounts, and the administrative content.

[00:39:13]He also mentions the State University of Haiti and the Creole Academy, so that's his set of independent institutions.

[00:39:20]For an independent institution, it's the executive branch that makes the independent institution. The only room that works with an independent institution is capable of designating my head, occupying a position, participating in all matters. It's not the executive branch that chooses, that chooses any independent institution. So, not just under the same name, but especially completely autonomous, etc. And even then, it's always the parliament and the executive branch, and sometimes even the judicial branch intervenes. For example, in the case of the Constitutional Court (CP), after the Court of Appeal (CPA), these three branches participated in the process, and the CP had nine members according to the 1987 constitution, which was amended in 2011. Now, the directors general of the public administration are designated or appointed by the President of the Republic. The Council of Ministers plays a role, and the President of the Republic... Now, he will ensure that the director general, since it is the President of the Republic who appoints, and the authority of appointment is also the authority of dismissal, so he will... that the executive, you say, influence or even control over your deputy director general today, if it's decided that we're going to move from executive director to director general, and that's cool, say that it's true and that not just anyone, but by project creation, all the time in the campaign, all the time, going down, feeling the director general, strengthening it, taking it, taking it, taking it, taking it, taking it, and then all-powerful, okay, now what is not a problem? And in the party that was talking about the independence of the C, now these are questions that we ourselves have asked and think, perhaps lawyers and constitutionalists capable of even continuing the debate on this question, now an element to keep us in the campaign, certainly there are problems that in the CPA, indeed, what to think, the presence of a director general with a set of functions, it can do good, can do good, for example, questions that stick, sometimes questions, there is not enough agreement to decide or not a majority, etc., to decide in relation to the attribution that the director general has, there is a draft decree that will facilitate that question, going much faster, and then well, but now these questions It's been a question for me, and it's causing groups to start looking into whether this isn't an attempt at a takeover or control of the electoral apparatus by the executive or the government. And don't forget, you've already been through the fire that's been ignited, you understand? And between the Provisional Electoral Council and the government, at a given moment, and you even have a course that's being replaced, and so on within the council there. And yeah, now the question isn't on the agenda, which raises the question: isn't it a strategy, given that the government says there's a problem, and already there, okay, we're with it, but we're using strategy to be able to control it, so it's stupid, and that's it, that's what we're keeping there, and certainly we ourselves, we think that the proposed decree, like the previous decree, has very interesting elements, but we're analyzing part of it, yes, yes, in fact, I'm approaching Article 8, right?

[00:42:59]Okay, Article 8, which says it includes a body, a steering and decision-making body made up of nine members of the CP, says it's nine councilors, exactly, a body of one executive body we know that if we compare together with g that that before well we say decree which was decree December 2, 2025 there we know that organigram cep g executive director and below g all the other directorate administrative directorate finance legal affairs and so on and but decree that is like decanting remove in organigram put next. OK, that's what I'm talking about here and then very much it's a contentious body which is who has that other body again. as if n g ne ne mbi who od and then who then n g executive body there and then n g litigation body it's as if 9 good mount organ that how much its novelty that is so it's as if gag three bodies that at the same time not only advisors that g in ball all the staff that are part of the organizational chart cep that v head me it's caused side before CPIT judge and party at the same time because CP who was committed nine advisors and organizational chart n join right after one advisor and executive director there and down there all management legal affairs department so if who manages litigation all that that I have with election so all the problem that I have during election it's as if it's nine m manage that but it's as if decree that remove that attribution 9 it's as an independent body capable of saying or interdependent because it has work together that to manage cause that exa if it's under if that's it it puts that new project of cr that that that its b because problem that posed campaign side that kp it's The election is done, it's the result, and then contesting the result is before and it's deciding the same result as what it means, the model before the campaign, okay, the election is done, it's the result, even contesting the result is before KP again, it's as if exactly the novelty that there is this project and and the problem is that we need it especially because the question on the political field is very quick.

[00:45:52]Certainly it's police. Yes, but he's keeping it as an attempt at control, quite simply, but we'll look at the positive aspects. For me, it's positive because the election result is his own, and he's contesting the result again. That is to say, he's contesting the election result himself, and that's okay, okay, the difference is if it's the general management, hmm, hmm.

[00:46:25]But even if it's in front of him with the draft decree, he's creating an electoral dispute body, that is to say, an institution that can simply settle everything so that it can judge soon. Not exactly, because you have to learn from experience, and very often it's experience that makes an institution grow because experience makes an institution. The former electoral advisor, the case of Gérald, Gérald, with everyone intervening, agrees that on the political level, keeping control of the executive of the CP, but a step back for those who might be disturbed.

[00:47:23]But should there be an organ that makes it all clear, that does everything without anything, because looking in terms of principle, or discipline, uh, the electoral council, because it's disturbing, because there has to be an institution that's there for Planning the mission is good, I do this for the side that works for me, which is by mission. He prepares checks to prepare logistics, everything for the electoral council, even the assembly chosen for the mission. The head means the choice is made, the number of days is done, so is it not an aspect of looking beyond politics that takes control, but perhaps discipline that helps to avoid some mess because the assembly is each electoral council that does its own thing, of course, and the president doesn't have too much power. Is there a desire to put a general management there for each council, or is it a council there, each council its own council?

[00:48:37]But in all, as a project, this is for the political parties that participate in the election.

[00:48:45]Sorry, is there no problem with the political parties? First, we have to look at increasing the 100,000.

[00:48:55]We've already debated this. There's a real political party that has been there for years, not supposed to have 30,000 members, of course, but listening to Clarence this morning, I envy her for the hindsight to keep her position, given that every Haitian knows perfectly well each political party. I organized the question, seemingly in a good way, I don't know, but it's difficult. For 30,000 registered members, and already a majority of political parties, not local, there's no badge, no training for members.

[00:49:43]Isn't that the door that opened everything in question of fraud on the part of the whole party, untangling the electoral process, searching in all institutions for who, number 4, electoral and so on, knowledge, searching for 4, we know perfectly well that it's difficult and ask, isn't that the door that opened for shady dealings, for the swindle done in this because the majority of Haitians are stupid, they know which party to join, even there again, who, is it through bad or meeting, who writes, who, people, who, as a member, to be a member of a political party in Haiti, what does it mean? To answer that question, first of all, what exactly does it mean to be a member of a political party for 1 year, 2 years, 3, up to 15 years or 20 years, who identifies as a member, know, logical, okay, that first time we, a political party, not, who to vote for, that's what's done in every country, clearly agreed on that, it's logical Now, on the other hand, when we face reality, who is deliberately doing this political party that we are fools for, who is this, but this has been this for 15, 20 years, but how, how can it be, how can we prove that it is, who knows, how to prove over time, parties, these, for example, and generally, a party tells me to register, then meetings, then states and assemblies, initiation, and then to leave from that moment, for example, who goes abroad so that what is done outside, there is no need to take steps to know the political party and then that the country is asserted that it is in relation to political persecution that leaves Haiti, sometimes looking for who is doing it, no, but there is also that, in reality, that's the situation, yeah, and that's how politics campaigning is now with campaigns, thinking and declaring, indeed, but for us 10 in Haiti, the tendency is that we don't, not like, not like it's Haiti, we still don't, but be careful, we have to stand on this side, we have to start on this side, we have to stand on this side, we have to stand on this side, we have to say the election is done there, say for the presidential candidate 150,000 members, which even France says is a good candidate.

[00:53:08]Sponsorship requires 500, how many sponsorships?

[00:53:11]If not the exact number, but there are planes with 500 sponsorships for sponsorship. These are mayors, elected officials, and so on. To prepare, well, if I'm a presidential candidate in Haiti, I need 150,000 members. The party has 150,000 members, so there's no other choice but to ensure that the presidential candidate has at least 150,000 registered members. But the advantage is that I can use the ONI and ONI campaign system. I congratulate you on the work done on this. At a certain point, it showed that the subsystem had almost 10,000 members, which exceeded the number that was registered twice. And that's the work that made it happen. It started on the system, not going back up on the system, on any system. The first one lost automatically, but the declaration was made. And now, it means that even there, it means that if a political party is based on donations, with this system, well, it's easily possible to go up on the registered system. The other party Politics, and that's what it is, it's all about institutions and so on, and then there's data, but strangely, if it's already registered in the political party system, and now that's what we and Marco are doing so that KP can arrange everything for the system because that's technology, and some brilliant young people there.

[00:54:51]B job, work on that system, 3 weeks, correct system, set up and then check all that, good problem, who knows, why not computerize the country, and then after that, it makes such and such people, but the country isn't computerized, a system that puts in place, imagine a good electoral system that isn't on the side for the apparatus, even the state, which has no apparatus to check if there, well, so that means that's it, for us to understand, so is it about voting, is it about the council, there's a number out of 4, taken to put the register, the number, then they click, system, subsystem, no, to say if number 4, that, or 4, that belonged to such and such a group already, and under that, it said earlier, my, who isn't 4 in the political party and not a party, there it's kept, keep, is it My, it's not time to register a political party from the 4th electoral period because it's just electoral, who votes for which party is available? The question to ask is which party was registered before, now, and the political party does that, it's a big meeting and then takes everything, everything is registered with 100,000, 100,000, there, not that, it's because they take gatherings on the side and then each strong bag present, yeah, that means that the political party doesn't know, it means that we, the political party, don't know the political leader, so go, just use that as a database and then everything in Haiti, all institutions that sell everything, yes, everything takes, and then 100,000, 100,000, there, yes, who is available, and then this time 80,000 US dollars to join 100,000 US dollars, but that's done because it's for a system like that, organized, not organized, nothing, and that makes everything written in reality, we don't do that because there's no preparation, that does all that, and the other one, like there, and Naik who You spoke there of an organ which occupies content so it is to this beautiful decision really but I wonder if it is not washed hand on earth since it takes it if there article 5 there article 5 there paragraph 3 it says that the CEP is the litigation of all disputes raised on the occasion of either elections, or the application or violation of the electoral law subject to any legal proceedings to be undertaken against the guilty party or parties before the competent courts. These disputes are settled by the electoral dispute bodies, which is important, the CP is the dispute for all disputes.

[00:59:07]That means that even the v with the other organ that's occupied with all bag last resort there it's the CP yeah that in a big way for good for it's not CP to continue to separate you have to separate and fa the other organ for example the other organ that the other baggage than the Haitian justice for example the constitutional court for example yes the constitutional court for example in the United States problem in election there the supreme court Yeah. Yeah, that means he left this time.

[00:59:39]Yeah. Who is the electoral college there in the supreme body at the highest level?

[00:59:45]But that's not what it says, and the organ, but these are bodies subject to the electoral council. That has always been my question, and on the same side, the director general, yes, but under the control of the electoral council.

[01:00:07]But that's normal, yes, that's normal, no. But on the article side, it says that, for example, the ODD is the members of the electoral council, the orientation of decisions.

[01:00:20]Now, if a meeting is held, who issues an injunction for everything? If a member is absent, the director general, the executive report, all times absent, all times, that means that the director general, it's his mission, he takes over, control.

[01:00:44]But it's more than that because the problem posed between the two is as if, on the side of the electoral council, who makes a decision against the director general because of any appointment, not the execution of the presidential decree, or the director general himself, a decision against because of the decision, there is no decision against, no, is it a decision that is made or rather, noting that it is not, ah no, I, that's it, on the side during the election, there is the advisor who can perhaps, for us, contact, who is chosen, department, and each departmental council, general, yes, each departmental council because often chooses department s so for debate that department south Well now and is it not noted to note that council not ven that which minister of public works there rospradelou it was who was confusing we can no more my friend councillor councillor in 2006 yes who s pag yes and let's imagine council we there jaus Joseph sir does Jacqu is your sir worth 8 or 9 votes because let's imagine that council there that decided by majority of 5 yes many let's imagine the council there takes decision 6 7 to look for Jacques séis oh do you agree do you disagree said but that means Jacques agree Jacques disagree majority my who agree period end yeah but sir That's all. Google.