💥OMG💥 Is Brian Entin being SERIOUS!?! #idaho4 #bryankohberger

追加: 2026-05-30

[00:00:00]Well, hello there, you beautiful, beautiful, amazing, wonderful people. I hope you are all well. You're looking well. You're looking amazing. So, I'll take that as a win for you. Well done.

[00:00:10]Love you all. I'm going to get straight into it because Well, actually, I'm not going to get straight into it, but what we are going to be talking about in this video is Brian Entin. Now, we did start to cover Brian Entin's video the other day. I'll put the link to video one in the description of this video.

[00:00:26]>> [snorts] >> Cuz what I wanted to bring to people's attention is the way in which some people, and I'm talking about big voices around the Adnan Syed case, how they like to frame things. And this is a bit of a public service announcement, I suppose, to be careful about who you entrust as being your conduit to information because sometimes it seems to me that they have this way of framing certain things that make you perceive certain elements of cases in a certain way that may not actually be accurate. And it seems to me that they have a certain way about them. Whenever there is something pertinent that comes out that may shed doubt upon the system and how that operates, they seem to step up their game in trying to convince you that other elements are the things that you need to focus on. Well, simultaneously trying to drown out the noise of those trying to bring issues to your attention. So, again, I get it. I get that some people just they want to listen to certain things. They trust certain people to tell them certain things. But in my experience around the true crime community and the true crime niche, which has been around for years now on pretty much a daily basis, sadly, some people who I know are highly regarded, I've seen them purposefully mislead their audience into believing that certain things are important while not even willing to discuss things that are being raised. And when they do, they raise it in such a way that they try and bend it and make it malleable to fit into their thought construct, which seems so way off base that you kind of lose what's actually going on around these cases. And it it concerns me. But, before I do that, for those of you who have been around the channel, you know that I've recently changed my entire setup. Changed it because various things. One thing that I needed to free up some equity in what I had in the the setup I had. The the yeah, we had to do that. So, I got rid of everything, sold absolutely everything, started from scratch, streamlined things down, and also to make it a little bit more aesthetically pleasing.

[00:02:54]Um but but I also what is very important to me, sorry, is is a chair. And I had a parcel arrive, new chair from FlexiSpot. For those of you who have been around the channel a while, I I'm not affiliated with FlexiSpot. This isn't a sponsored video. I just come to you from someone who spends a lot of time sitting at his desk. I'm talking about 8, 9, 10 hours a day sometimes sitting at the desk. I had a Herman Miller chair. I had to get rid of it because it wasn't comfortable. I was starting to get pain in the lower back. And I headed back to FlexiSpot cuz I'd had a chair from them previously. I don't even know why I changed it actually. I think again it was more of an aesthetics thing. I I I kind of thought that it didn't look right and I wanted something that was more aesthetically pleasing in the house because apparently I'm an idiot. And [snorts] yeah, I came unstuck. But this chair I've received from them, I had to talk to you about it because I know that there's people out there that you may work from home, you may spend a lot of time sitting at a desk, and you may be like me. I know that my audience is a more mature audience, and for that reason we start to ache in places that we didn't even know existed. And the chair that they sent me, the C7 Morpher, they have because FlexiSpot this is kind of like their birthday month, they have got some discounts on the chair.

[00:04:30]And this is it, the C7 Morpher. I'll put some links in description and things like that. But honestly, I can I cannot praise this chair enough. The amount of things that this chair does, the adjustments in just like the the hand pads, the arm pads themselves. You know, something as simple as that. If you've been sitting at a chair, you'll know that sometimes it's just so frustrating just getting your arms to sit comfortably so you can type without putting pressure on your elbows or putting pressure on your wrist and things like that. Again, I'm not a tech YouTuber, I'm not a sales person. I am just bringing this to you as layman's terms as I can, and tell you that I've got a chair, and this chair to me has been the best chair that I have ever sat on. You can have the this here, this bottom section with the the leg rest.

[00:05:23]That is an optional extra, you don't have to have that, but it's there if you want it. Again, for some people that would be absolutely fantastic to have.

[00:05:31]But where the magic happens is all in this back section. Again, I'm someone who can suffer with lower back pain, and this completely contours from head to butt, and this whole back section slides and becomes malleable to the back. This lumbar section here, believe it or not, has got little airbags either side that you can pump in air to make it more prominent, release the air if you want it less prominent, and as you move, this whole back section, as you can see in this video here, it actually glides down and moves with you. So, you don't end up with like lumps in your back. You can get comfortable, and then as you move the chair, the chair moves with you. So, if you're in the market for a chair, honestly, I cannot cannot recommend a chair more highly than this. And again, I'll put links around the channel, but this isn't sponsored. This isn't anything but me coming to you as someone who feels that I have had enough time with this chair to know that if you're someone who needs a decent chair, and you're suffering with your comfort, honestly, the I I cannot I cannot stress enough that this is the best chair that I have sat on since I've been creating content, and I don't think that you would be unhappy with it. I've been scrolling through the bits and pieces on the screen, so you can stop the video and pause it anytime to get the information on the chair that you may need to see whether it'll fit in to your surroundings. But, yeah, again, I cannot stress enough if you're someone who needs a chair, get involved, because that is one decent damn chair. So, well done, FlexiSpot, yet again, for another fantastic bit of equipment. But anyway, let's get straight back into the video.

[00:07:27]I I just I needed to say it. I know some of you are like, "Ah, you're talking about things like this." This ain't sponsored, mate. This is me talking to you about something that you may need that may be a life changer for you.

[00:07:40]But, let's go go over to Brian Entin.

[00:07:44]Brian Brian to the N to the Entin.

[00:07:47]He's that He's the tiny tiny little reporter from NewsNation, and this is him talking about Brian Kohberger and the Idaho 4 case. Again, we're starting at about 6 minutes in, and the video was Brian Kohberger's defense strategy revealed in new book, but accomplice theory doesn't add up. That's his interpretation. This is a long video, um so we'll see we'll chop some bits off it, and then we'll probably do another video just to close out. But, let's get back into it. we accept Kohberger's plea, we must go back to that awful night in Moscow and re-examine the case for ourselves. Yes, justice remains the realm of lawyers and courts, but we are now all a jury of Kohberger's peers with every right to weigh the evidence as presented. Truth beyond a reasonable doubt is our objective. What seems to be one of Whitcomb's biggest points is he has questions about the knife sheath that was found at the murder scene. And remember, uh the sheath had DNA on it that connected back to Brian Kohberger.

[00:08:48]Remember they did the genetic genealogy.

[00:08:51]S- See, he's very clever what he does here, because he he's telling you in one breath he's saying that there's an issue with the chain of custody, and that has been raised, but he very quickly goes into let's not forget that this this had Brian Kohberger's DNA on it. So, it's almost like the chain of custody is irrelevant. That's not important. What's important here is that you must remember that Brian Kohberger's DNA was on it.

[00:09:19]Now, what Brian Entin should do here is really turn around and say, "Look, if we've seen in this book that there are issues with the process, then would it be beyond the realms of possibility that the process around the DNA acquisition itself should be potentially questioned to its integrity as we start chipping away at the integrity of the overall case. Now, we've seen Sy Raee who has come out.

[00:09:50]Now, Sy Raee seems to be a bit of a a guilt still, but he's doing it with integrity because what he's basically saying is, "Yes, I feel that Brian Kohberger is guilty, but their information that they were pushing forward was inaccurate. It wasn't right.

[00:10:07]Brian Kohberger didn't even go in this direction. Where they're telling you he traveled, he didn't travel there."

[00:10:13]But, Brian Entin frames this as the important piece of information to not forget is the DNA tying back to Brian Kohberger, not the fact that the knife sheath itself is now in a precarious position where the chain of custody, it looks like it's been fabricated. The actual chain of custody for the sheath has been fabricated, which is part of the entire process of its acquisition.

[00:10:45]But, he likes to glaze over that.

[00:10:48]And the DNA connected back to Kohberger.

[00:10:51]That that is just a fact. Uh but, with Kohberger That is just a fact. That is just a fact. How is it a fact? How do you know it's a fact? If you know the chain of custody, there is an issue with the chain of custody and it makes the knife sheath then questionable about where or when, who handled it when it was traveling around its different locations to eventually come to a conclusion that yes, this sheath has Brian Kohberger's DNA on it.

[00:11:22]We done this tree. But yet, the very chain of custody that follows its journey through that seems to to been manufactured.

[00:11:32]How can you then, with a straight face, say that the DNA be on the knife sheath was in fact Brian Kohberger's and claim it to be fact?

[00:11:43]Because that situation, that that point, is to bring the entire knife sheath under question. And if he's being honest, it does, it raises questions around this. But, let me know down below what you think.

[00:11:58]questions whether there was a chain of custody issue with the knife knife sheath, whether police uh didn't properly document who was handling the knife sheath. You know, there's like a whole little um grid where they're supposed to write the name and the date and anyone who was handling the knife sheath. And this is This is what Wickham says about that. Here's the problem. The problem is the knife was placed in a bag, the bag was sealed, initialed underneath the tape, and it went to the crime lab. The crime lab said, "We can't process it. There's no chain of custody." And a chain of custody is a cornerstone in the rules of criminal procedure that document the provenance. In this case, it's particularly important because we're talking about a few cells of human DNA on the knife sheath, and that's the foundation. So then, it goes from there to photographs of the bag afterward, days later, where suddenly there's a chain of custody on the bag.

[00:12:58]Then the issue becomes for the defense, the issue becomes that the chain of custody form appears to be written in the same pen, a black felt tip pen, and it appears that all names on that chain of custody were written in the same handwriting. Which is massively important. It's like, "We want you to test this."

[00:13:19]They send it back and say, "Well, we can't We don't What What the issue is is they're saying, 'Hold on a second, we're not touching in because we don't know where that's been.

[00:13:29]We don't know who has handled it. We don't know what is going on with this. You've given us You've given this and this could have been anywhere. I suppose what And I think you've got to be honest here and think why are they reluctant to do so?

[00:13:46]And I believe that the reluctance comes from with that being missing, there is a potential that evidence has been planted on it.

[00:13:58]That That is a That is, in my opinion, a fact that they don't want to touch it because they don't know what's happened to it before it's got to them. And they don't want to be brought into a situation, should this situation become problematic later down the line.

[00:14:18]>> [snorts] >> And what then happens is because they need them to check it, it goes to some individual and that one individual says, "Well, what I'll do, I'll just fill it all in.

[00:14:28]I'll fill it all in and then I'll send it back to them so it's got what they need."

[00:14:34]But again, the problem comes is how do you know if one person has filled that all of that information in, that it hasn't gone to all of the or it has gone to everyone else? Because they're not the ones who had filled it in.

[00:14:51]That is hugely Hugely problematic and anyone downplaying that is either stupid or they're purposefully downplaying the relevance of this very important issue.

[00:15:06]>> [snorts] >> And this is like what I said at the start of this video. This is what mainstream media and these big voices tend to do. They tend to real downplay the relevance and importance of situations such as this where you've got a the the very case is built upon this knife sheath, and the the the fact that it's got this DNA upon it.

[00:15:33]And when you've got a chain of custody that seems to have been fabricated for the purpose of getting it to where they needed to go, and the initial reluctance of them to accept it for the aforementioned reasons that there is a missing chain of custody, and they're very likely understanding that hold on, you're telling this that this is this thing, and we don't know. We don't know who's had it. We don't know what's happened to it. You could have done something with that. We then put our name to it, and we're not willing to do that. So, they then push it back to them. That is so important, so important.

[00:16:07]That's true.

[00:16:09]The defense at trial would have challenged the admissibility of the sheath because of the chain of custody issues and the discrepancy about where it was found. And if the judge, and many, many people in my experience would say the judge would had to have excluded that.

[00:16:27]>> And what he's talking about the discrepancy on where it was found, we all we learn that the knife sheath was seemingly at one point on the floor. And then it was then placed in the bed after the crime because we know that where it was sitting was seemingly it been placed on top of a dried area of the red stuff instead of having been put on the the wet red stuff, and then seen an abundance of >> [snorts] >> because of the porous nature of leather, that would have soaked all through it, but it didn't.

[00:17:05]>> [snorts] >> And yeah, it's it that's a those two pointers of the discrepancy on where it was found, and the seeming placement after the fact, and pair that with the chain of custody being missing, and then filled in by one individual, you've got a real problem. And how is Brian Entin going to voice his thoughts after the fact here?

[00:17:31]That evidence. If that knife goes away, all the prosecution has is the white car and the cell tower pings in a death penalty case where you have to have proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So, that's that's a big deal. It's a real big deal. So, why do you think he took the plea then? Why did Ann Taylor let him take the plea? That's a And this is your default now, isn't it?

[00:17:55]Because this is the default that I see so many guilters go down. And this shows a bit of ignorance here on Brian Entin's part. I don't know whether he's being intentionally deceptive in raising that question or it's showing a degree of ignorance. I would think more of Brian Entin.

[00:18:17]If you are someone who is around the 04 case and your default is just to when you're given real evidence that is problematic and that your best rebuttal is to just go, "Oh, why did he plea then? Why did he plea? Oh, if that's so important, then why did he plea?" To completely ignore historic data that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that people have historically admitted to doing crimes that they have not committed to avoid the death penalty. If they are facing an abundance of public scrutiny, public bias, you think you're going into a trial with even a a biased judge, definitely the potential of a biased jury because of the sheer volume of stuff that has gone out there, and then we we later that it sounds like his legal team had visited Death Row and then gone back to him to feed him the the >> [laughter] >> almost like a holiday report. Oh, this is where you're going to be sitting until you're executed. Can you imagine on top of believing [snorts] that these are people that you can trust, you've got 2 years of not really having any communication with anyone outside of that circle, you trust them, and all of a sudden they're telling you that you're heading to court and you're unprepared.

[00:19:44]And Taylor is literally stood in court and said she's unprepared.

[00:19:48]But, she's clever with it because in one hand she's saying to them in court that she's unprepared, but she seems to be able to have enough of Brian's trust that he turns around in the plea deal and says that he trusts her.

[00:20:02]Well, why wouldn't he trust her? Because she's said in open court that she's not prepared. She can palm that off as if the judge is just biased, Brian.

[00:20:10]Everybody is biased. I've got your back, and I just have to say I'm not prepared.

[00:20:15]I'm not prepared, and I don't know where to go from here. You could go to trial, and you could end up on Death Row. It's it's down to you, but I I think it's very likely that you could get found guilty here.

[00:20:27]People plead guilty because they don't want to die. They don't want to be executed. And it's a horrendous thought to only I I can't I can't fathom it. And I don't think that anyone without true skin in the game can really truly understand the the magnitude of the effect that that could have on someone's mental health in that moment when you are really truly facing execution by firing squad.

[00:21:03]Just let that sink in. I was watching a video yesterday and it was playing audio of an execution from the the late 80s.

[00:21:10]It was audio file of an electric chair execution and it's horrendous. It's it's it is it is horrendous.

[00:21:20]And and it's very easy for people to turn around and comments on YouTube and go, "Oh, if he won't guilty, he wouldn't plea. He wouldn't plea if he didn't do it." When you have not got two years of what has happened up to this point behind you and then rarely being told that you are going into a room and they are going to decide whether you are executed or not and they perhaps don't like you, they don't trust you, there is bias, the judge is not on your side and your legal counsel is unprepared for what's to come.

[00:21:55]That's a lot to take in and it's and this is what I mean by people like Brian Entin who his his best rebuttal here, he didn't address it, he didn't say, "Yeah, that's shocking. That is not good." All he turns around and says, "Why didn't Brian Why did Brian Kohberger plea then?" That is no different than an ignorant person in the comments of a video >> [snorts] >> who have no idea what they're talking about, they're rebuttal and I find that weak.

[00:22:22]And if you are someone who is entrusting this person to be your conduit in this case, you are you are sitting front and center of someone whose best response to what he's just been told is, "Why did he plea then?"

[00:22:35]Unless he want Christopher Whitcomb says back to him.

[00:22:38]question and and I I think my answer is this. I don't know, but I know what Anne Taylor said. Because I wrote in the book that a person one of one of my sources called her and talked to her and recorded the call. So, she did not tell me, but I have heard her statement in her own words why she did it. And her answer was that the Kohberger did it himself. She did not change his plea or he didn't, you know, he made up his own mind and she doesn't know why. She said number that number one. So, Whitcomb is saying that the knife sheath could have been thrown out And [clears throat] he cuts away here, right?

[00:23:14]That is then cuts away. He leaves it as Brian Kohberger um changes mind. Changes mind. But what he what he purposefully, I feel purposefully, omits from that segment is that comes off the back end of what I said. And that was off the back end of there was an accusation that Anne Taylor had visited death row and taken Brian Kohberger around death row.

[00:23:42]Now, she rebutted that and said no, that didn't happen. We I didn't take him round there. Um someone from our office went around death row and then came back and they sat down and had a conversation with Brian about death row, when where he would be going and where he would be spending a length of time prior to his execution should it go that route. And it was off the back end of that that Brian Kohberger then changes his plea.

[00:24:11]Which again, you then have to answer the question as to and what I think I'll do I think I think I'll finish up with this point and then I'll do another video to continue into it because this is important.

[00:24:23]Um you have to then consider the mental issues that this causes. What duress does this cause? And this is something that was um vocalized in Christopher Whitcomb's book. It what they claimed that they had taken into consideration his his mental health, his mental well-being while they had these conversations.

[00:24:47]But I believe that it's very very likely that it was just a a build-up of things.

[00:24:54]He had been in a situation for a period of time that saw the bias, saw everything that was happening. He saw what the general feel around his guilt and innocence. He was aware of the Dateline NBC stuff that had come out and these the likes of Brian Entin, Coffin Dodger and and the others, you know, and Butterfield and Co., Nancy Disgrace. And you just know and we know that he was watching them because they had a list of the the channels that he watched. Um he even watched me because I'm a legend.

[00:25:29]Um But the point being, you know, there was an issue with the chain of custody on that sheath. There was an issue and it was and it was downplayed by Brian Entin.

[00:25:41]Um and his best rebuttal to that was, "Why did he Why did he plea then?"

[00:25:47]And it shows either that he didn't fully read that book and he didn't read that segment upon what happened around the change of plea.

[00:25:55]And he also fails to address the fact that it was the prosecution that approached the defense for the deal.

[00:26:03]In accordance with Christopher Whitcomb's book. Now, we had been pushed out previously that it seemed that it was the defense that did, but Christopher Whitcomb seems to voice that in a different way. And then when you pair that with this situation around the accusation that Ann Taylor had taken Brian Kohberger around Death Row, it it paints a different picture.

[00:26:25]And it does and it does paint a very manipulative situation around the what would end up being the plea deal. And there seems to, in my opinion, be a series of events that are highly questionable and raises questions around the integrity and the intent of >> [snorts] >> particularly Brian Kohberger's defense counsel. Um and also, there's the these little the devil's in the detail. Again, I can't stress enough the importance of Anne Taylor standing in court and saying that she's not ready, and then Brian Kohberger in the plea deal having to admit to being happy with his counsel.

[00:27:10]Who in their right mind would enter into this style of plea deal um saying that you're not going to attempt to appeal at any you know at any time, given up all of his appeal rights, when you've just watched your defense counsel in court say that they're not prepared for trial?

[00:27:31]And then subsequently seeing all these things come out about the the knife sheath, the chain of custody, the issues that Anne Taylor should have at that stage been aware of.

[00:27:42]It it's it's crazy to me.

[00:27:45]But let me know down below what you think. You've just seen this small segment. Again, it was only a small segment of his video, but it shows very clearly an unwillingness to address the real issues around the I-104 case and a clever way of trying to take the take your attention. The Kansas City shuffle, don't look over here, look at here.

[00:28:04]What's important about the knife sheath is that Brian Kohberger's DNA on it, that is fact. And then, you know, going off and to to rebut for one last time, the rebuttal being why did Brian Kohberger take a plea? Why does anybody take a plea deal in the the vast majority of US cases?

[00:28:25]Because they are offered a better deal if they admit to doing the crime. And in this instance, this was to stay alive.

[00:28:34]And unless you've walked in those shoes, I don't think you're in a place to comment on it. Not to just say that you wouldn't ever admit to doing something that you hadn't done if you hadn't done it.

[00:28:48]Love you all and I will catch you all on the next one and don't forget C7 Morpher Chair. If you're in the market for a chair, you won't be disappointed. Love you all.

[00:28:58]Mwah.