"SILENCED!" | Watch Carney GOES MUTE as Lastman & Poilievre Asks Him About $500M Brookfield Deal

Added: 2026-05-23

[00:00:00]BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT, MR. SPEAK, MR. SPEAKER, THE PEOPLE in Winnipeg understand you need to invest in infrastructure. The people in Moose Jaw understand you need to invest in our military. The people in Regina understand we need to invest in housing, MR. SPEAKER. CANADIANS UNDERSTAND THAT WE NEED TO invest in this country. ON THIS SIDE of the house, WE WILL ALWAYS FIGHT FOR Canadians because every [laughter] day is a good day to FIGHT FOR CANADIANS.

[00:00:23]JUSTIN TRUDEAU killed a pipeline in 2016 and backed a West Coast shipping ban.

[00:00:28]They now want credit for reversing their own damage. Reality finally caught up and Canadians don't know which Prime Minister THEY MIGHT GET. ONE DAY he's a climate crusader who wrote himself into green stardom and now he's scrambling to review the very projects he spent a decade sabotaging. Will this government admit that their keeping in the ground crusade strangled our economy, weakened our sovereignty, and left workers with the bill or will he keep pretending that it wasn't all self-inflicted as they dance around A PIPELINE ANNOUNCEMENT?

[00:01:00]THE ELITE JUST GOT CAUGHT ON camera and they had absolutely nothing to say.

[00:01:04]Prime Minister Mark Carney sat before the House of Commons projecting the calm authority of a global central banker dismissing questions about his $25 billion sovereign wealth fund. Then Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Deputy Leader Melissa Lantsman stepped to the microphone and detonated a single devastating reality check. When confronted with the massive conflict surrounding the $500 million Brookfield deal, portfolios tied directly to his own performance pay, the Prime Minister and his entire government went completely mute.

[00:01:37]>> Meeting of these mega claims came in the wake of the member for Calgary Midnapore questioning the Prime Minister's loyalty to Canada. I think we can all agree that those are comments that no Canadian can take seriously. My question is, does the leader of the opposition take them seriously? If he doesn't, which he must surely not, would he tell the house and would he tell his member to apologize for those comments? The Prime Minister already apologized to President Trump.

[00:02:08]It was one of the many areas where he backed down and capitulated after claiming that he would be elbows up. He promised he'd have a deal by July 21st, no deal. Promised to negotiate a win, no wins. Mr. Speaker, he promised elbows up, elbows are gone. And now, when he's asked about the state of the talks, he says, "Who cares?" Why should he care? Days after he met with the president, Brookfield got an $80 billion contract with the White House.

[00:02:35]Is that really what he cares about? Does he not care about the hard-working Canadians that are counting on him to keep his promise?

[00:02:42]This is the moment the elite officially stopped answering to you. Is this leadership or a desperate attempt to hide a systemic collapse? Before we go further, I need you to hit that subscribe button. It is the only way to ensure this story doesn't get buried by the algorithms. If we don't build this numbers game together, they keep winning. Once we hit 20K likes, we are taking this footage directly to the conservatives to force a confrontation with how broken this system truly is.

[00:03:09]Don't just watch, take the first step and subscribe now.

[00:03:16]>> [bell] >> The traditional power dynamic in Ottawa completely inverted in that moment. For months, the governing alliance had treated Carney's international prestige as an unassailable defensive wall, assuming the public would quietly defer to a veteran financier. But the second Poilievre and Landsman dropped the real-world math showing that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies are entirely excluded from his ethics screen. That technocratic advantage dissolved instantly. natural resources Mr. Speaker, I know the member opposite is nostalgic for the previous government, but that's not who's working right now.

[00:03:55]Canada will be a leading global energy superpower in both clean [laughter] and conventional energy. We did not ask for this trade war, but we will win it. We got elected to build strong nation-building projects. We got elected to grow our economy. We got elected to reinforce Canadian autonomy [laughter] and independence. We will do that in conjunction with indigenous peoples [laughter] and environmentally responsibly.

[00:04:20]Honorable member for Thornhill.

[00:04:23]THE PREMIER OF Alberta is expecting an East-West pipeline. THE MEDIA IS ALSO reporting on the announcement of an East-West pipeline, AND THE ONLY ONES WHO HAVEN'T SAID IT ARE THE ONES WHO ARE directly responsible for it. They can't even utter the word pipeline. SO, I'VE GOT A SIMPLE QUESTION. IS THE GOVERNMENT IN favor of an East-West pipeline? YES OR NO?

[00:04:44]>> YEAH.

[00:04:46]THE FRONT BENCH EXPECTED a standard debate over interest rate projections.

[00:04:50]Instead, they were forced to defend why corporate executives receive private access to the Prime Minister's office while everyday Canadians get crumbs.

[00:04:59]Poilievre and Lantsman's heroic intervention stripped away the corporate armor entirely, exposing the cold reality underneath. A domestic economy running on academic autopilot while real-world public trust is completely compromised. They want you to believe these structural failures are just a temporary global phenomenon outside of their jurisdiction. They want you to ignore the concrete data while you watch your savings erode. If you value documented facts over high-status rhetoric, click that subscribe button right now. We are building the data archive they are trying to look past. To understand how Canada arrived here, you have to trace the long-term pattern.

[00:05:39]This isn't an isolated communication failure. It is a permanent feature of a specific ideological framework. The operational routine repeats every single time a conflict of interest is uncovered. When senior executives from connected asset firms fly into Ottawa to lobby the highest offices, the response isn't transparent public disclosure. It is to claim those private meetings weren't technically related to active policy files, bypassing scrutiny entirely. When core infrastructure programs conveniently align with major corporate holdings in modular housing and nuclear energy, the administration doesn't lower the tax burden on local builders. They introduce complex debt finance state funds that pick specific corporate winners while regular taxpayers foot the bill. It is a consistent strategy of substitution.

[00:06:28]Whenever a real-world crisis demands a precise solution, the government replaces it with a vague promise of future stability. Because a plan that stays hidden can never be measured against its failures. The public record tells a damning story.

[00:06:42]Verified ethics committee records confirm that the official conflict of interest screens leave thousands of connected corporate entities completely unmonitored.

[00:06:51]The parliamentary budget officer has repeatedly confirmed that Canada's lagging productivity is directly tied to a severe lack of domestic business investment, meaning capital is actively fleeing the jurisdiction. At international financial forums, elite advisers have openly admitted that national economies must endure painful structural realignment to meet international compliance indexes. When you align those international admissions with a domestic silence, the contradiction becomes undeniable. They are fully aware of the capital erosion.

[00:07:24]They simply view it as an acceptable casualty of a grander macroeconomic experiment. Every single time we publish these facts, the institutional algorithms attempt to suppress the video. But your financial reality is the only metric that matters. Help us maintain absolute editorial independence. Click that subscribe button right now and signal to the platform that clear data-driven analysis is what this community demands. The entire system relies on what can only be called the expert shield. If an economic spokesperson deploys enough complex terminology, sovereign wealth structures, asymmetric market corrections, the average viewer tunes out assuming the problem is too advanced to analyze. They count on your fatigue.

[00:08:07]The institutional media cooperates by framing a massive capital deficit as a sophisticated long-term transition rather than a basic failure of domestic competitive advantage. But notice what happens the moment sharp critique introduces unyielding investment data, the academic shield drops completely.

[00:08:25]The vocabulary stays elevated, but the policy delivery is exposed as hollow.

[00:08:30]They need the public to feel unqualified to critique leadership even as that very leadership mismanages the baseline metrics of national wealth creation.

[00:08:38]This reflects a broader structural shift across the Western world toward prestige politics.

[00:08:44]Under this model, a nation-state is no longer an economic home built for its own citizens. It is an administrative unit within a global portfolio. When an advisor's success metrics are determined by international compliance indexes rather than the domestic standard of living, the average citizen is structurally sidelined.

[00:09:04]They are playing an entirely different numbers game. One where global reputational standing among international elites matters far more than whether capital stays inside the country creating high-paying jobs for regular families. The verdict is now impossible to ignore.

[00:09:20]The strategy of using elite presentation to mask a complete lack of domestic competitive substance has reached its absolute limit. Canadians are no longer willing to accept academic jargon as a substitute for measurable economic stability. The choice is clear. Canada can either continue down this road of vague strategies managing domestic capital decline for international applause or demand a transparent commitment to the financial security of the people who actually build this nation. Hit that like button to help us reach our 20K like goal. Subscribe to Current Canada and select the notification bell to stay fully informed. Do you believe Canada's capital flight is an unintended consequence of poor policy or a deliberate sacrifice made to satisfy international compliance indexes at the expense of the Canadian taxpayer? Let us know in the comments below.