The Democratic Party has shifted from its traditional values and policy positions, becoming more radical than Republicans on issues like immigration and border security, while prioritizing identity politics and optics over actual governance results and economic outcomes, which alienates moderate voters and prevents the party from returning to the political center.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Democrats In Chaos: Where Did They Go Wrong?Added:
Mr. winner, I mean, you ultimately lost this. Do you take personal >> Who lost? You lost in the Who lost? Did the voters lose? It were Democrats then you lost. Did the voters lose? Do you take personal responsibility for investing so much time and resources, tens of millions of dollars in ultimately foolish effort? We did the right thing and this effort is not over.
Do you trust people like Pete Buttigieg?
Do you trust Donald Trump? Do you trust people who are known either to be liars or to just kind of make a lot of stuff up?
Well, I mean, that's what that's what Reagan said, you know, trust but verify.
I want to see that. But 100% I trust, you know, the Trump administration administration and Trump a a hell of a lot more than I would ever trust the Iranians or the Chinese or the Russians or for any of that thing to be be honest. We are all Americans too. That's what we're that's what we're forgetting.
You know, the Democratic Party can't become the TDS party. We cannot be defined by the we have to oppose every single kind of a thing. Yeah, and clearly that's where where we are right now. So, in terms do I trust this? Yes, I do trust that. I do trust those people and and I have similar views on focusing on to prevent Iran becoming a nuclear power. Every single Democrat also agreed with it now too. That does not mean you agree on every tactic that's happened. I don't appreciate the gamification of the Iranian war. I don't I don't agree with some of these bizarre things that he'll say on social media now too. I don't engage that too. But I do trust them be because they we are the Americans and I'm never going to trust the Iranians. I don't even think it's a Democratic Party. I don't think we should even use that term anymore. It's a Jacobin Party.
It's just like the French Jacobins.
That was the revolutionary party that hijacked the French Revolution. It was run just like the Democratic Party, by very wealthy people. The Robespierre brothers and some of the turncoat landowners, the aristocracy, and um it it it was holistic. It was culturally 360°. It wanted a name that rename the days of the week, the days of the month, the foundational day, year zero, just like the 1619 committee. Just It was an iconoclastic movement. They tore down statues.
And they wanted open marriage and >> [snorts] >> all sorts of stuff. Just same thing.
This Democratic Party Uh I've said that so many times. If you look at the 1992 and 1996 Democratic platforms under Clinton, they would be called racist and fascist, you know.
Uh teens that commit murder will be tried as an adult, secure borders, no illegal immigration, deportations, etc., etc. Balanced budget.
This is a This isn't Democrats. This is something completely different.
>> What's going on, world? It's Sauce Keyn here today. As you saw from the intro, this just proves my point that Democratic Party has the more radical party. If you look at their movement, you look at the energy that's supporting this party, they're not here to actually better Americans' lives. And they prove that every day. They're here mad about gerrymandering. They lost their little gerrymandering war. The math ain't mathing for them.
And they're crying out, "Who lost?" As you saw from the intro, the leader, Hakeem Jeffries.
Then you see Gerald John Fetterman pointing out like, "Hey, we're one team.
We're supposed to be Americans."
We The goal of politics is to better Americans' lives. How is gerrymandering in your in your party's favor helping the American people?
Now, you know, equally assured destruction is only way you can get someone to change their behaviors, and that's what we're seeing with the Democratic Party. But the Democratic Party is not a value-based organization. What What's hard to understand? The Democratic Party is not a value-based organization. It's an identitarian transactional coalition. And I agree with this this point here because as you saw from as you're going to see in this intro in this segment, Kamala Harris is the frontrunner yet again, apparently.
And this identitarianism is really hurting the Democratic Party because in my estimation, I have also pointed out that Matt Mayhan doesn't have any identity points and he does not assure any Democrat that they will be more goodies if he wins. Finally, he doesn't feed anyone's emotions either. His best message to Democrats is what ultimately sinks him. The best way to fight MAGA is for Democrats to govern well, aka focus on the outcomes and the results, not the appearances, not the optics.
This is my number one criticism criticism of the Democratic Party is they like they like to look good but not actually do good. They want to look like they're governing well when they're not actually governing well. And you can see the outcomes, you can see the results, right? You see Gavin Newsom trying to fluff up his record but he leads the he leads the nation in unemployment. Oh, I got the largest economy. That's not because of you. That's despite of you.
But you know, I digress. I don't want to ramble too much on this point because I want to get into other topics because this identitarianism is I believe is what's truly holding the Democratic Party from actually returning back to the center. And let me know your thoughts in this respect in the comment section below. But without further ado, let's take a quick look. I'm not saying she's going to win the presidency although I am nervous that that could happen. Unless they can find another candidate that has appeal to black women, which I don't think there's going to be one. Wes Moore is a disaster. He just said he was fine with his 14-year-old getting his penis chopped off. Yeah, good luck with that.
Maybe AOC because she has like minority female appeal, but I don't think black women are going to go to AOC. As good looking as Gavin Newsom is, he's got to compete with Mayor Pete, which sounds silly, but white women love gay guys, right? They love Oh, this is my gay friend, Mayor Pete. We love him. Black women are going to show up and they are voting for Kamala, and she's going to be the nominee. Say, look, this is a moment where there are no bad ideas of no bad idea brainstorm is what I'd like to call it.
And in that no bad ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College.
We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multi-member districts.
We talk about what look that that if we win the Senate, which we should and we will, then the Senate Judiciary Committee should have rules that they put in place so when these people come before as nominees to the Supreme Court and lie, that they are held to account and consequence. Not just that somebody goes on cable news and says they lied, but that there are rules in place to actually penalize people for lying to a Senate Judiciary Committee.
That we agree that it is right to have ethics rules for Supreme Court justices.
And let's put those in place. Let's talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and D.C.
These are the things I think that we've got to do. We've got to neutralize these red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. And all of this I think is is Look, we got to fight fire with fire.
These folks are playing to win. We got to play to win, too. If we are ever going to get back to the old America, that's got to be the Democrats' part of the bargain. Stop coming up with radically new and often terrible ideas and then in the next breath insist there be no debate about any of it. That if you don't see it right away and go along, you're bad, stupid, and deplorable. As if he were saying, "Duh, 2 + 2 = 5, isn't that obvious?" Yeah, it's obvious you can't add.
You can't just say Math is racist, queers for Palestine, looting is cool, healthy at any weight. If the men's football team played the women's team, it would be a tie.
You can't just say And that's that's the truth, guys.
Democrats are in the way of returning to normal, right? As I pointed out in this video, I think I painted a good picture here, an accurate picture, actually, is that the whole party's brand is about resisting Trump.
Uh Xavier, is at How would he crack down on healthcare fraud in California? Becerra, Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump.
These These people are just relying on people's emotions to vote for them. And this identitarianism that they call out, I think is a very important point to make about why their party why the cream doesn't rise in the top in the dem in the Democratic Party.
Because you've seen uh Trump had the China trip, right?
And instead of focusing on the trip, what Trump got out of it, whatever, I think it was the Wall Street Journal's or the New York Times. I think it was the New York Times, actually. Let me see if I can find this.
Here's the article that I was talking about. A painting of the end of meritocracy, a meeting of two largest economies and not one woman at the table. This proves meritocracy, guys.
This is This is the This is the perfect example of the left-wing voter. And this is why I think the Democratic Party is being held back by identity politics.
And I talk about this.
Using identity Oh, I want to make history. I want to I want to give what Treating power like it's a participation trophy.
Like if everyone knows about the distribution, right? The dumbest the dumbest people in your society will will will tend to be men, and the smartest people of your society will tend to be men. Most people are in the middle.
And a lot of that time, women have a what? They say that women have most of the in the average they cluster in the middle of the IQ spectrum. Men tend to be on the ends, the extremes.
This is an example of this. This is meritocracy.
Meritocracy is being proven that is not equally representation. And this is the point I I try to make and this is where it it filters down into the gerrymandering stuff and Democrats making this case that, oh, uh uh we need more we need more black representation.
No, you need more qualified people.
Ironically, the fact that there's no women is evidence of meritocracy, not the lack of it. That's why the largest economy you guys are so bro. You guys are wild in the comment section. But, this is this is what I think is holding the Democratic Party back. Is that they're not running a true meritocracy.
They're not letting the cream rise into the top of their party.
Look at California. California is a issue for the Democratic Party. But, Sara is your leading candidate? Really?
The guy that can't can't give you no solutions California. He's He's being asked, how you would you solve healthcare fraud in California and he keeps bringing in Trump. Trump has nothing to do with what's going on in the state of California. Trump has little [clears throat] influence of what's going on in the state of California because you guys are a Democratic stronghold.
But, somehow it's about Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump. Sacrifice what's in your life, right? And this is the problem that I I'm pointing out about the Democratic Party and why as a voter, I'm a continuing advocate not to vote for Democrats.
It's because they don't govern well.
Look at the outcomes. They don't govern well.
They like to give up a show. Oh, look at Zohran Mamdani. Well, Zohran Mamdani is getting bailed out to the point where now for Kathy Hochul to make up the money that she gave uh Zohran here, Hochul agrees to lower the threshold on second home tax from New York City. Sneaks in a new levy uh on property purchases.
No new taxes, they said.
Shane Fitzgerald, I remember on a show I told Destiny that whenever they uh introduce a new tax on just the rich, it's only a matter of time before it applies to more people. Turns out the tax on second properties over $5 million quietly became a tax on homes over $1 million within weeks. And soon it will lower to 750,000.
If you don't stop injustice on one, don't get mad when no one stops injustice on you.
And this is the point that I keep trying to articulate here in this channel. I'm I'm trying to tell you it's coming from an American first perspective, not just because I'm a conservative, though I do have my preferences and I do acknowledge that maybe in some way my bias filtered information, who knows. But I'm giving you my honest opinion of what I think is actually correct for the country. And I want to show you this the this discussion from I believe she's a Democrat. I don't quote me on that, but this Democrat's pointing out exactly what's wrong with the current people in Washington cuz as you know, Washington state, they have a socialist mayor in one of their cities, Seattle. Uh Seattle mayor's a socialist and she's chasing out businesses. Businesses are planning and plotting their move. Starbucks is plotting their move to move out of Seattle. And the fact that Democrats don't see is that it's due to their own governance, due to their own policy, and they don't have the ability to self-reflect. I think it's the number one issue. I think many moderates and many people, many Americans have with the Democratic Party. But without further ado, let's get into it with my honest with my commentary throughout the video.
Do you think majority leaders understand? Do you think our legislature understands the impact of the policy environment as it relates to the economy?
No.
>> [laughter] >> I I really don't.
Uh as evidenced by you mentioned the estate tax.
Uh I argued to some folks about the estate tax.
We were the highest in the country tied with Hawaii at 20th.
So, this lady here is the former It was a former Washington uh the Washington state governor.
And this is what I'm talking about.
Democrats, they pretend like they're so open-minded, they're so uh smart. Oh, they're very open-minded, calm, cool.
They they they they push all these narratives about themselves, right? And this is one of the eye- I opening things. And this is why I I always see when you look at the hashtag walk away and you see so many people talk about how they walked away from the Democratic Party, this is one of the reasons why.
Because when questioned, they're quick to dismiss, downplay, minimize, gaslight you, call you names, try to label you with something with some kind of negative connotation to downplay or to prevent you from questioning them in either for even further.
And this is why I made videos saying that the left-wing does not like critical thinkers because they like their their stuck in a cult-like dogmatic way of life. They have a conclusion and they just want to prove the conclusion to be true. That's it.
The no information or no question you're asking is reaffirming or validating the preconceived conclusion they already have of how something's supposed to work, right? Like getting angry that during the Chinese US meeting, there was no woman present in the seats of power.
Oh my god. Oh, meritocracy, but where are the women at? Where are the women at?
Who cares where the women at?
We do We care are they are the best people there that's supposed to be there in context?
Are they supposed to are they there and they are they giving us good results?
That's all we should be caring about.
And this identitarianism from the from the left from the Democratic Party, I think it's truly hindering them. I showed you in the intro Victor, he points out articulately how much the Democratic Party has changed to the point where Trump damn near platform is pretty much Bill Clinton except tariffs.
It is baffling to me.
In the 19 in the 1996, the year I was born Democrats used to be against mass immigration because it hurt labor unions. That's when the Democrats used to be called Blue Dog Democrats. They used to be the labor union Democrats.
Now they just wear that that that label that branding as a skin suit now.
Democrats pretend, oh I work for the working class.
Work for the working class, they wear as a skin suit, but every all their actions, the results is negative towards the working class.
You're bringing in illegals, how that's going to help anybody? Here, I'll give you one as an example here with this clip here. And Mayor Young says, we don't have an immigration problem here.
Do we?
Quite frankly, I believe he's wrong. I believe we do have an immigration problem because any illegal alien that is here that is working takes a job away from a Memphian. Any home that they rent, they're increasing the rent because that we have a shorting shortage of housing and so if you got it people who shouldn't even be here trying to rent homes, then it raises the cost for Memphians. Is it Is it that simple though because you can be undocumented in this country but allowed to seek asylum through a legal process. Well, first of all, I don't even know what undocumented I don't even know what undocumented means and there is an asylum process, but part of that asylum process is you have to stop and seek asylum in the first country you come to, and they're not doing that. They're coming through multiple countries to get to the United States. And the illegal migration is putting a tax burden upon the citizens of Tennessee as well as as well as Memphis. That's why when you have the inflow that we had through the previous administration, that's why we're suffering what we're suffering now. And Congress for 40 years hasn't done anything about migration.
>> We will talk more about So, instead of focusing on the result, they're focusing on appearances, optics. Oh, look, we aren't Don't you feel good about voting for us? You voted for the first woman president in history.
But her policy is ish.
She called America racist and sex- Sorry, sorry. The people around her called America sexist and racist because they didn't want to vote for her because of her sorry excuses for policy.
You put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig. You put a woman in front of the policy, the policy is still bad. I ain't going to vote for her.
And these are the games that Democrats are focused on. They're focusing on the game of optics instead of the game of execution and results. Hawaii at 20th, 20 20%.
We went to 35. We're not just the highest. We're beyond the highest. And I said, "Now, do you understand the consequences of this? Can I see your fiscal note? Because I'd like to help it.
Because here's what you can expect.
Those people are not homeless. They will not pay. They're leaving. When they leave, they stop paying cap gains. When they leave, they stop giving significantly to philanthropy, which would otherwise be necessary by government. So, do you understand? Do you see the consequences of what you're doing? And the And I think that's one of the Achilles heel of the Democratic Party. They don't see the consequences of what they're doing. They want to give illegals all these Oh, we want illegals have health healthcare access through Medicare.
You're putting more burden on the Medicare system. And this is one of the reason why Gavin Newsom cut them off in January 1st, 2026 when Trump passed the laws or a an executive order saying that, "Hey, the federal government will no longer reimburse Medicare if you cannot show us or document to us if illegals are on the on the thing or not.
We're not going to reimburse you for illegals being on your Medicare system.
That's something that your budget will have to eat." And Gavin Newsom was like, "Oh, no, no, no, no. I don't have the budget for illegal immigrants.
Take them off. Take them off the state CaliCare, whatever they call the the state level Medicare. Take them off.
And it seems like you the the like common sense is not common anymore on the Democratic Party. I think that's what I'm trying to highlight here in this video.
And Democrats like her, the sensible ones, the ones that I think center-left people, like the Stephen A. Smiths of the world, would vote for, they're losing their position and influence in the party.
And who's gaining that? Who's replacing that position and influence?
People like David Hogg. He lost his position anyway, but Zohran Mamdani. And I imagine that Zohran Mamdani was able to influence Kathy Hochul into giving him a bailout by taking tax money from the rest of the cities and districts in New York State, so that way they can bail his ass out of his budget crisis that he artificially created, by the way.
Cuz last time I checked, Eric Adams was saying, "Hey, I left him $5 billion." He said, "Hey, everyone said, 'Hey, Zohran Mamdani increased his spending for the budget next year.' He moved from $117 billion, and he moved the budget up to $127 billion, and somehow blamed Eric Adams for that.
What a charlatan. What a scam artist.
And people want to get mad at me, or sorry, leftists want to get mad at me when I say socialism is a scam, because it is.
Socialism is so big of a scam, they said, "We're going to tax the rich."
Like the rich don't have any say in that. Like the rich can't respond to that. Make it make sense.
Democrats, y'all need to start making sense. And in my estimation, Democrats won't start making won't start making sense until they start losing.
Answer is no. I left office with a budget of 33 billion.
And the budget today is 80 billion.
Uh I think that's a little bit too much of a growth.
And yet, how we find ourselves And and this is the warning I said about Zohran Mamdani, right? You got bailed out this time, but Zohran Mamdani's going to increase his spending. He's going to.
Especially if he's especially if he's following through with the things he promised in his campaign out of the video I reacted to.
With him saying, "Oh, I want universal daycare, universal this, universal that, cheap grocery stores." Okay, that's government spending. That's all I heard, government spending.
And he's going to pass the budget again.
And then what he's going to do?
You already created an incentive structure. He He know where to go. Kathy Hochul, bail me out again.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's going to be his whole uh tactic, his whole term. Every time he goes over the spending budget, go to Kathy Hochul, bail me out some more.
The New York Hey, at this point, Kathy Hochul has to lose because Kathy Hochul is going to enable a big big big big big problem in your state. Let me know if you agree or disagree with that statement. ourselves at the end of every legislative session now is in the hole and projected to be in the hole.
I would suggest to you we don't really have an income problem, we have a spending problem. And we're answering And we're answering it by stacking one more tax, one more rule, one more regulation. And the one thing that the business community doesn't need is that lack of predictability. How many people in either of the Democratic caucuses have come from a business past.
Okay?
So, if you haven't come from it, you don't know it, you don't understand it, and therefore And imagine Zoran Radomi never had a job.
All Zoran's jobs was been in the creative space, which is fine.
But you you're influencing infrastructure. You you you don't understand the ramification and the cascading effects you're doing with these policies. You don't understand the incentive structure you're creating. And Capitol Hill also is creating structure for Zoran Radomi, enabling him like you enable a spoiled child.
Show me the incentives and I'll show you the outcome. What good outcome can come from that?
You had a budget of $30 and then somehow you skyrocket it to $80 billion? Nothing Nothing changed about the state. You just wanted more spending.
And this is something that Democrats don't want to like come into acknowledgement. They're doing wealth taxes all across the states, from California, Massachusetts. They They They're trying to push all these estate tax for what?
What you raising money for? When you don't even want to deal with the fraud that's going on in your in your in your in your in your states?
You don't even want to send any type of indictments. You're not trying to protect the resourcefulness of the taxpayer. You're allowing people who are not paying taxes, illegal aliens, to come into your state and take up space in your social programs, making it harder and more expensive on everyone else.
Or to me, only we all collectively, and Chris and I have talked a lot about this, have to educate from the outside in.
We have to explain things like sales tax on services. You thought was a a nice attack on big business. And here are the small businesses that have been tremendously adversely impacted, as well as the customers.
And I keep telling about this thing with the tax stuff. Only big business, like these mega national corporations, they can easily handle increases in minimum wage, increases in taxes, they can absorb that.
But if you a mom-and-pop shop trying to, you know, you a mid-tier business, you're trying to come up, that those are roadblocks, those are gatekeeps. I joke around.
The reason why nine out of the 10 richest counties in in the country vote Democrat is that Democrats' policies act like a a gatekeep.
Act as a way of closing the ladder behind you. Oh, you was able to grow your business in a low tax, pro-business environment, and then you got to you got big, and now you you want to cartel competition, you vote Democrat, so Democrat makes it harder for your competition to come up. And the only way your competition can reach your level is if you already bought them up by this point, and they become a subsidiary of your mega corporation.
That's how I look at it.
But you know, I digress. Let me know your thoughts and perspective in the comment section below because this is some craziness.
You got Kamala Harris out here, leading candidate, right? Their identitarian politics is stopping them. They're talking about doing all this stuff, but I ask you how this benefit the American people? This doesn't benefit the American people, this benefit Democrats.
Making Puerto Rico into a state benefit Democrats. Packing the Supreme Court benefit Democrats.
Abolishing the the Electoral College.
How is this benefiting anyone in the middle? How does How does benefit the moderates? It doesn't.
That's why I'm saying, moderates, man, you may not like tribal politics, but tribal politics is coming for you all of us.
And if you don't know how to recognize what's going to offer the better trade-off cuz any day we can only change this country in steps, but these radicals over here in the Democratic Party are being pushed to do all these things.
And what you think you're going to do when they get power?
And this is the number one I think this is the number one reason you got to vote Republican 2026.
Or at least don't vote Democrat. If you used to voting Democrat, don't vote Democrat.
If you don't like what the Republican Party doing, I understand, but at this point they seem to be the most reasonable party. The R stands for reasonable with the Demo- uh with the Republican Party.
The D for Democrat stands for delusional and desperate. And you see how they operating themselves today. But let me know your thoughts and perspective in the comments below. I'd like to hear your thoughts and your opinions on this matter. If you like, comment, subscribe.
Please share this video if you feel so inclined. It really does help me out on the algorithm. And I'll catch you guys on the next one.
Peace.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











