International diplomatic relationships are complex and often involve multiple competing interests, where external powers may influence domestic political outcomes through covert channels, and countries frequently balance relationships with multiple global powers to serve their own strategic interests.
Approfondir
Prérequis
- Pas de données disponibles.
Prochaines étapes
- Pas de données disponibles.
Approfondir
Pakistan’s Leaked ‘Cypher’ Fuels Claims of US Role in Imran Khan’s Ouster | Vantage This Week | 4KAjouté :
Hello and welcome to Vantage this week, a show where we recap some of the biggest stories from the week gone by.
The conflict in West Asia continues to drag on, but now there are signs of a possible deal between the United States and Iran. Reports say an agreement could be close. So, what does this deal look like? And what are the biggest sticking points remaining? We break it down.
Meanwhile, a leaked diplomatic cipher from Pakistan has reignited questions about the 2022 ousting of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. Did Washington play a role? We take a closer look. Also on the show, why are foreign tourists ditching Goa and where are they going instead? We have the details. And as graduation season begins in America, why are more Gen Z students turning against AI? All this and more lined up. Let's get started.
>> Go to Iran. As you know, no ship is going or out of Iran without >> Can they keep their highlyenriched uranium?
>> No. No. we get the highly enriched, we will get it. We don't need it. We don't want it. We'll probably destroy it after we get it, but we're not going to let them have it. Okay?
The United States and Iran have technically stopped fighting. There is a ceasefire, at least one on paper since the 8th of April. Peace talks are ongoing. Pakistan's army chief Aimuner, a key mediator in the talks, is on his way to Iran. A negotiating team from Qatar is also in Thran. And now there are reports that a draft deal could be announced soon. The key terms within the draft, if agreed upon by both the United States and Iran, will include immediate, comprehensive, and unconditional ceasefire on all fronts, mutual commitment not to target military, civilian or economic infrastructure, end to military operations, and a halt on media war. Guaranteed freedom of navigation in the Arabian Gulf and the straight of Hormuz in the Gulf of Oman.
Negotiations on outstanding issues would begin within seven days. Gradual lifting of US sanctions in exchange for Iran's commitment to the terms of the agreement. But keep in mind these points will take effect only after Washington and Thran officially sign this draft.
There is one thing this draft does not include. Uranium. It's one of the most important issues and a key sticking point. Trump has repeatedly sought to hinder Iran's nuclear program. He had previously mulled the idea of extracting uranium from the country and he repeated it again on Thursday. This came after Iran Supreme Leader Moshtabakami reportedly said that the country will not hand over its stock.
>> Can they keep their highlyenriched uranium?
>> No. No. We get the highlyenriched. We will get it. We don't need it. We don't want it. We'll probably destroy it after we get it, but we're not going to let them have it.
Iran is believed to possess roughly 441 kg of uranium. They're reportedly enriched up to 60% purity. And here's what that means. To develop a nuclear weapon, you need to enrich uranium to at least 90%.
So Iran isn't quite there, but it's one step away. Because going from 60 to 90 is not a tough task. And that's why America is worried. The issue here isn't whether Trump wants to seize this uranium. It's whether Washington can.
This raises two questions. One, could the United States destroy or disable Iran's nuclear infrastructure? Two, could team Trump physically seized the uranium? The first is feasible. The United States had already done it in June last year, bombing on facilities like Fordo and Atans. But the second, that would be an extremely complex military operation. And here's why. The material is likely dispersed, hidden or underground. Some sites are buried deep inside mountains. Uranium hexaflloride is hazardous and difficult to transport safely. Iran would almost certainly resist militarily. Analysts say such an operation would require over a thousand American troops on the ground. Recent reporting also suggests Western intelligence is uncertain about the exact location of some of Iran's higher enriched uranium.
There are other concerns as well, such as America's depleting weapons stockpile. A report by the Washington Post states that the US fired more than 200 THAD interceptors to defend Israel.
That's roughly half of the Pentagon's entire inventory. THAD means terminal high alitude area defense. The interceptors are made by the American defense firm Loheed Martin. They are designed to intercept and destroy missiles. They can intercept missiles inside the atmosphere and even outside it. The interception range is around 200 km and altitude goes up to roughly 150 km. TAD travels at hypersonic speeds often estimated at around Mac 8 plus meaning the interceptors can travel at speeds much higher than that of sound often catching up to 10,000 km an hour.
Here's why depleting stocks matter of these interceptors and why that could be a problem. Number one, the inventory for is limited. Number two, replenishing the interceptors takes time. And then of course there's the cost. Each THAD interceptor cost between 12 to 15 million.
One battery, including radar launchers and fire control, runs up to $2 billion.
So now Washington is scrambling to restock. The Pentagon is rushing to expand production from 96 interceptors per year to 400, but analysts are already warning. In a prolonged missile war, consumption will always outpace replenishment.
That's the math no one wants to talk about. And to add to Washington's wars, intelligence reports now suggest Iran has already restarted drone production during the six week ceasefire. Officials believe Thran could restore significant drone attack capability within 6 months.
That is happening due to a combination of factors such as support from Russia and China. For example, Beijing is continued to provide Iran with components during the conflict that can be used to build missiles. Iran is also reportedly pushing a plan to extend its control over the Strait of Warm Moose.
This is despite just the reported draft proposal. Iran's plan includes extending oversight into nearby foreign territorial waters. It will have a new transit and control framework for ships, possible tolls, possible inspections, possible restrictions. Iran and Omar are also reportedly discussing a permanent toll system for ships passing through Hormuz, formalizing tighter control over maritime traffic. Secretary of State Rubio has said Hormuz tolls would make a deal unfeasible.
No one in the world is in favor of a tolling system. It can't happen. It would be unacceptable. It would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible if they were to continue to pursue that. So, it's a threat to the world if they were try to do that. And it's completely illegal, by the way. Go ahead.
>> And even the International Energy Agency chief has warned oil markets are nearing the red zone. Here's where things stand.
Trump wants a deal, but also wants leverage coupled with a win. Iran wants sovereignty, but also wants relevance.
Israel wants security, but not at the cost of a deal which benefits Theran.
There is an old principle in diplomacy.
Wars end not when one side wins, but when both sides finally agree on what losing looks like. So, are we at that stage? We will find out soon.
They say leopards never change their spots and Pakistan it seems never changes its ways. A leaked diplomatic cable has just revealed open secrets about the country. I'm talking about conspiracy to remove former Prime Minister Imran Khan. I'm talking about secret conversations between Washington and Islamabad and how Islamabad is desperately trying to woo all sides while silently betraying its all-weather ally China. Of course, to serve its own interests. Allow me to explain. The leak classified diplomatic document in question known as a cipher in Pakistan details a March 2022 conversation between then Pakistani ambassador to the United States Assad Majid Khan and US diplomat Donald Lu which allegedly triggered the removal and eventual imprisonment of Imran Khan.
US-based investigative outlet Drop Site, which published the original document identified as cable I0678, suggested that the State Department under former US President Joe Biden, encouraged Islamabad in a meeting on the 7th of March, 2022 to remove Imran Khan as Prime Minister. Why? Over his neutrality on the Russia Ukraine war.
Before we go any further, let me put this in context. We cannot independently verify the authenticity of this leaked cipher. But if this is true, it would mean that this meeting took place a month after the Ukraine war started in February 2022.
And in April that year, Imran Khan was ousted at the prime minister of Pakistan by a parliamentary no confidence motion.
Coincidence?
Islamabad would of course prefer you not ask too many questions but remember Khan has repeatedly insisted that the United States worked handin glove with Pakistan's dynastic political parties specifically the Pakistan Muslim League PMLN and the Pakistan People's Party PPP to remove him from office. Why? Because of his refusal to fully align with the United States on Russia and perhaps more dangerously against China.
In an April 2022 statement, Khan had claimed that America wanted, and I'm quoting, personally, gone and everything would be forgiven.
He argued that Washington resented him for his relentless criticism of the US war on terror and his refusal to let Pakistan once again become a launchpad for its over the horizon US counterterror operations in Taliban ruled Afghanistan.
Washington unsurprisingly wasted no time in refuting those allegations. The then US State Department spokesman Ned Price dismissed the claims saying there was no truth to them. Price insisted that the United States respected Pakistan's constitutional process and rule of law.
But according to the leaked cable, Washington had allegedly suggested that if Iran Khan were removed through a no confidence vote, America's problems with Islamabad could simply disappear.
Just like that, the American diplomat also apparently warned that if Khan is not removed, his isolation from Europe and the United States would grow stronger.
And a month later, on the 9th of April 2022, Khan was gone. removed through a no confidence vote with the backing of Pakistan's military establishment.
The rest is history. Within a year, Khan and his wife Bushra would be convicted in a series of cases ranging from corruption to national security. The man who once led Pakistan would be put behind bars where he continues to be.
His party, the Pakistan Theik Insaf was crippled, stripped of its electoral symbol and effectively sidelined ahead of the 2024 election.
Independent candidates linked to PTI1 seats only to find that winning apparently did not necessarily mean governing.
But to understand why Khan became so inconvenient, you have to look at his so-called neutrality.
For years, the United States had seen seen right through Pakistan's double game, accepting billions in American aid while simultaneously sheltering the Taliban. The Abdabad raid that killed Osama bin Laden in 2011 only deepened that distrust. After all, when the world's most wanted terrorist is found living near Pakistan's nerve center, questions tend to ask themselves.
Donald Trump in his first term punished Pakistan by cutting military aid than Joe Biden was hardly more enthusiastic about Imran Khan. Then came Afghanistan. After the US withdrawal in 2021, Khan had publicly rejected American requests for military bases for Washington. He became a headache. And then came the Ukraine war in February 2022.
On the very day Russia sent its troops into Ukraine, Imran Khan landed in Moscow despite alleged US pressure to cancel the visit. To make matters worse, Pakistan abstained from condemning Russia at the United Nations.
To Khan, this was about asserting Pakistan's autonomy.
But to Pakistan's generals, this risked isolation.
And that may have been the real turning point.
Pakistan's general got busy then. The leaked documents suggested that as early as 2021, Pakistan's military was working on lobbying channels in Washington without Khan's knowledge. And once Khan was removed, Pakistan's generals became closer to US priorities, including alleged ammunition flows connected to the Ukraine war, Saudi defense cooperation, which Khan had resisted. It also moved forward.
Now, don't be fooled into thinking Imran Khan is some martyr here. He's not. He gained power by coing up to the generals. Khan's rise to the premiership in 2018 elections was due to direct assistance from Pakistan's intelligence agencies and the military establishment.
But when he stopped towing their line, he became an inconvenience for them, a nuisance. And then there's China, Pakistan's famous iron brother or perhaps a brother of convenience. The leaked document shows that thanks to Pakistan's generals, even the key China Pakistan economic corridor project lost momentum.
Other major projects were also slowed down. The ML1 railway upgrades stalled.
No new flagship Cpek initiatives emerged. Officially, this could be blamed on funding, security, bureaucracy, but these reports suggest that this was a deliberate attempt by the Pakistani military to keep the United States on its side. Quick question, does anyone in Pakistan really run the country or its own foreign policy? Or does it simply just operate by auctioning itself to the highest bidder?
Because it certainly seems that way. To be clear, there's no official proof that Islamabad deliberately sabotaged CPEC.
But questions remain when a country calls China its all-w weather ally while simultaneously wooing and seeking approval of its biggest rival. Is that called balancing or double dealing?
Because once again, Pakistan appears to be doing what it has often done best, playing every side while insisting it is playing none.
For decades, the Gulf sold the world an image of limitless wealth. Skylines, luxury hotels, mega projects, and billions made from energy exports. But now, the Iran war is testing Gulf economies like never before. The straight of Ormuz, one of the world's most critical shipping routes, has been partially or completely disrupted for weeks. And the Gulf is feeling the pinch. From Qatar to Kuwait to Bahin to the UAE, Gulf's energy flows, shipping networks, tourism industry, and business confidence have all taken a hit. And nowhere is that damage more visible than in Qatar. Qatar has built its modern economy on natural gas. That gas transformed Qatar from a small Gulf state into one of the world's richest countries per capita. Today more than 60% of Qatar's government revenue comes from gas and gas related exports. And Qatar has used that money to build massive infrastructure. The Doha Metro who sell smart city even hosts the World Cup in 2022 and a sovereign wealth fund worth about $600 billion. But then came the Iran war and the subsequent tensions over the Strait of Hormuz. It slammed shut Qatar's door to the world. First there were the attacks. Gulf countries have borne the brunt of the fighting between Iran and the United States.
Iranian missiles and drones have struck Qatar's Raslafan energy complex. It is the very heart ofQatar's LG industry.
The Iranian attack damaged critical infrastructure and reportedly reduced production capacity by about 17%. Then came the blockade of Hormuz. Unlike Saudi Arabia or the UAE, Qatar does not have major alternative export routes that bypass Hormuz. Its economy is geographically trapped behind the waterway. Within 24 hours of the Hormuz blockade, Qatar Energy declared it could not fulfill some export contracts.
Reports say Qatar Energy could have already lost billions of dollars since the war began. And every day the strait remains disrupted, the country continues losing hundreds of millions more through lost export sales and shipping costs.
Now, even if the straight reopens immediately, analysts say it could take years for output to return to pre-war levels because the numbers are just starting to show the extent of the damage. The war has also hit the part of the economy Qatar was trying to build beyond energy, tourism, aviation, and international business. Hotels and boutiques in DHA have reported sharply lower footfall. In one of Qatar Shopee's development projects, tourist activity has collapsed. In recent years, Qatar invested heavily to position itself as a global business and tourism hub. But since the war started, international visitor numbers have fallen sharply.
Multinational companies have reportedly move staff out of the country. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council, tourism revenue across West Asia has been falling by an estimated $600 million a day. According to the International Monetary Fund, Qatar's economy is expected to shrink by 8.6%.
But Qatar is not alone. Kuwait and Bahrain have also declared force majour on some energy exports. It's a clause in contracts that release parties from liability during extraordinary or unforeseeable events beyond their control, like a war.
The UA has also faced tourism slowdowns and lower business activity. In Dubai, reports describe light traffic, quieter hotels, and reduced tourist movement.
Earlier reports said that some businesses cut salaries or place staff on unpaid leave. The International Monetary Fund or the IMF now expects some Gulf economies to contract this year while others are bracing for sharply slower growth. And the impact is no longer staying inside the Gulf. You know this, oil prices have surged sharply across the world. Brent crude is now hovering around $110 a barrel and that is hitting consumers far beyond West Asia. In the United States, petrol prices have jumped more than 50%. Diesel prices are near record levels. According to a new Brown University study, Americans have already spent more than $41 billion extra on fuel. This is of course since the war began. That works out to about $316 per household. And it does not stop at the petrol pump. Higher energy costs are pushing up the price of transport, food, airfares, and everyday goods. But for the Gulf States, the issue is long-term.
I told you this earlier. US President Donald Trump says he delayed a planned US strike on Iran after requests from leaders in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE who believe a deal with Thran may still be possible. But even as talks continue, the core issue remains the same. The future of the straight of Hormuz. If anything, this war has exposed a major weakness of the Gulf.
Too much depends on a single waterway and that is why countries across the Gulf are scrambling to build alternatives, new pipelines, new port links, new storage facilities and new export routes that can bypass Hormuse.
Because this conflict has delivered a hard reality check, even the world's richest countries are not immune from the shock of war.
For years, the world trusted America with its money. Countries across the world, from Japan to China, bought US government debt in massive amounts because US treasuries were seen as the safest bet in global finance. A place to park money during crisis. A place that always paid back. That trust helped America borrow trillions of dollars cheaply. that also helped Washington fund everything from tax cuts to wars to stimulus packages. But now, world's biggest foreign buyers of US debt are slowly pulling back. And the timing could not be worse for Washington. The US is already facing higher borrowing costs, rising deficits, and a global energy shock triggered by the Iran war.
And now, even the bond market is starting to flash warning signs. So, what is happening? Our next report tells you >> for years US government bonds were seen as one of the safest places in the world to keep money.
Countries like China and Japan invested hundreds of billions of dollars in them.
But now that confidence may be starting to shake. China, Japan, and several other countries are reducing their investments in US government debt. So is the world starting to trust US markets a little less?
Data shows that in March, as the Iran war pushed oil prices higher, several countries came under economic pressure.
So they started selling some of their US investments to raise cash. At least seven of the top 10 foreign holders of US treasuries reduced their holdings in March.
You see, when the US government needs money, it sells treasuries. These are government bonds bought by investors, central banks and foreign countries.
For years, Japan and China have been two of the biggest buyers of that debt. But in March, both countries cut their holdings.
Japan, the largest foreign holder of US debt, sold about 47.7 billion worth of treasuries. Its total holdings fell about $1.19 trillion. China also reduced its holdings. Beijing cut its US Treasury exposure to about $652 billion.
Overall, foreign holdings of US government debt fell from about 9.49 trillion to 9.25 trillion in just one month. And this was not limited to China and Japan. It also included countries like Canada, Belgium, and France.
So why is this happening? A big reason is the Iran war. The war pushed oil prices sharply higher and that created a huge problem for countries that import large amounts of oil. Like Japan, when oil becomes more expensive, countries have to spend more dollars to buy energy. That put pressure on their own currencies. In Japan's case, the yen weakened sharply against the US dollar.
Simply put, countries like Japan and China keep a lot of their money invested in the United States because it is seen as safe and stable.
But when the Iran war pushed oil prices higher, countries like Japan suddenly needed more US dollars to pay their massive energy bills.
So they started taking some money out of their US investments. That is not unusual during a crisis. But this time what is making markets nervous is the timing because right now America itself needs a lot of money. The US government is spending huge amounts and borrowing heavily to pay its bills.
So it needs people and countries to keep lending it money. But if some of the biggest lenders start pulling back then America has to make the deal more attractive. How? By offering higher returns.
That is why these bond deals are rising.
Now, this may sound like a Wall Street story, but it does not stay on Wall Street because these US bond rates influence borrowing costs across the entire economy. So, when they go up, banks also start charging more interest.
Think costlier home loans, higher car EMIs, expensive credit card bills, and businesses cutting back on expansion or hiring. People spend less, businesses slow down, and economic growth can take a hit.
That is why people are worried that inflation or the cost of living may stay high for longer.
Now, to be clear, the data for April is due next month. When it comes, it could show whether countries are still pulling their money out of American investments or not. But it is that anticipation that is raising fears.
For now, the US treasuries are still seen as one of the safest investments.
But some of America's biggest foreign lenders are no longer buying with the same confidence they once did. And if that trend continues, then borrowing money could become far more expensive for the United States with consequences that could spread far beyond Wall Street. The big question now is not whether America can still borrow money. It can. The question is whether the rest of the world will keep putting money in America as easily and as confidently as it has for the last few decades.
>> Prime Minister Modi, why don't you take some questions from the freest in the world?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is on a five nation tour. His latest stop was Norway. He arrived in Oslo as the leader of a country that has become indispensable to global supply chains, technology, defense, and geopolitics.
The prime minister was in Norway to deepen strategic ties, explore energy cooperation, Arctic partnerships, and green transition collaboration. He received Norway's highest civilian honor. That should have been the story.
But somewhere between the handshakes and the joint statements, something else was now the focus. A Norwegian journalist decided that the most important thing she could do was shout at the prime minister. Take a look at this.
>> Prime Minister Modi, why don't you take some questions from the freest in the world.
>> That moment deserves a response and we have it. So, who's this journalist? Her name is Ellie Lang Swenson. She works with the Dark Season. This is a Norwegian newspaper based in Oslo. As Prime Minister Modi and his Norwegian counterpart concluded their joint press statement, she shouted from across the room and I'm quoting, "Prime Minister Modi, why don't you take some questions from the freest in the world?"
Now, let us be clear about what this was. This was not a formal press conference. It was a joint media statement. It was not an open Q&A.
>> And the media knew this. No questions were to be taken by either leader. This was a diplomatic event between two heads of government >> and a journalist chose to heckle the prime minister of India. Swenson later went on social media. She shared a footage of this incident and noted that Norway ranks number one on the world press freedom index and India ranks 157.
India did not fume. It chose class over crass. The Indian embassy in Oslo invited her to attend a formal press briefing where she could ask her questions properly.
The same journalist tried to interrupt when the Ministry of External Affairs Secretary CB George held a press conference. This was how he handled it.
>> Let me answer the question. Please don't interrupt me. Please don't interrupt me.
You ask me a question, please. This is my press conference. You ask why should a country trust India? Why should Why should a country Why should a country trust India? Why should a country trust India? Let me answer that question please. A country which believes in rule of law. We have always been following rules wherever it is. We play by the book. So and that is what India's reputation.
>> That was India's response. Direct and diplomatic. No drama, no outburst, just a clear defense of India's institutions.
And that is the difference between asking a question and trying to create a moment.
Press freedom matters, but so does professionalism. And speaking of professionalism, we have another example for you from the world's free press on display. Take a look at this cartoon. It shows the Indian prime minister caricatured as a snake charmer.
This is by a well-known Norwegian newspaper.
So much for the world's number one press freedom because nothing says serious journalism like recycling a colonial era stereotype for a visiting head of state.
And someone on X summed it up aptly.
Racism has a new name, free press. And Oslo was not even where it started. It started at the H when India rejected remarks attributed to the Dutch prime minister on concerns raised over press freedom and minority rights. The Ministry of External Affairs called it out.
>> We face these kind questions basically because of the lack of understanding of the person who asked the question. India is a country of 1.4 billion people. The largest populated country in the world.
>> Now let's talk about the index that the journalist highlighted. Norway is number one on the world press freedom index.
India is 157th. These are the numbers Swenson invoked as if they were scripture. But here's a question worth asking. Who makes this index. The World Press Freedom Index is produced by Reporters Without Borders. This is a Paris-based NGO. And what's their methodology? It relies heavily on surveys and subjective assessments by a network of correspondents and partner organizations. It is not a scientific measurement. It is an opinion poll dressed up in the language of data.
India has over 900 television channels, over 300 million internet users consuming news daily, hundreds of newspapers in dozens of languages, and a robust opposition.
But what a Paris-based NGO says is supposed to end the argument.
Also, take a look at the countries ahead of us. the likes of France, the country that gave the world liberty, egality, and fraternity.
It is France's national moto, rooted in the ideals of the French Revolution.
In simple terms, it means people should be free. They should be treated equally and should stand together as one society.
But this is a country that banned all conspicuous religious symbols in public schools in 2004, banned full face coverings in public in 2010, banned the abaya in classrooms in 2023, and attempted to ban the hijab in all sports in 2024.
It does not stop with France. Look at the United Kingdom. In 2024, anti-immigrant riots swept through English cities. Mosques were attacked.
Hotels housing asylum seekers were set on fire.
The government used emergency powers to contain its own citizens.
In the United States, pro Palestinian student protest rocked campuses. What did these students face? They were met with dried police, mass arrests, and academic suspensions.
Law enforcement officials were sent into university libraries to drag out the students. Here's the pattern. When a western country has a problem, it's a complex social challenge requiring nuanced understanding. When India has a problem, it is evidence of democratic decline.
>> When a European journalist shouts at a head of state, it is brave journalism speaking truth to power.
>> When an Indian official firmly asks her not to interrupt, it is suppression of the free press. The rules are different.
They've always been different.
And the reason they are different has a name. It's called a colonial hangover.
It's a lingering assumption that some countries are qualified to judge and others are qualified only to be judged.
But here is what has changed. The India of 2026 is not the India of 1956.
It has a space program that landed on the moon's south pole before anyone else did. It has a military capability that commands genuine respect.
From Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and beyond, India now sits at tables where it was once lucky to be in the room. And it is increasingly unwilling to accept the moral authority of countries that cannot manage their own democracies.
The era of nodding politely at Western lectures while quietly accepting their premises has ended. Did the West not get the memo?
Every great franchise needs a new release. Marvel has its films. Taylor Swift has her albums and the internet it has melody. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is in Rome. Italian Prime Minister Georgia Maloney is ready. And 45 million people just watched them laugh over a toffee. Season 3 of the world's favorite diplomatic duo is officially underway. Take a look.
Let us set the scene. Prime Minister Modi arrives in Rome. The last leg of a five nation tour. Serious geopolitical agenda.
And then Prime Minister Modi hands Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Maloney a packet of Melody toffes. This is an iconic inexpensive caramel chocolate candy. Maloney holds it up to the camera and says, >> "Prime Minister Modi brought us a gift, a very, very good toffee."
>> Mel.
>> Both leaders burst out laughing. The clip crossed 45 million views and got 3.5 million likes across social media.
This is the Modi Maloney cinematic universe. And here, diplomacy occasionally breaks character.
At one joint press moment, Meloney reached for a Hindi phrase that translates to hard work is the key to success.
A small moment, but one that quickly traveled far beyond the room. You see, every great franchise has an origin story. For Melody, it started in 2023.
Maloney posted a selfie with Modi captioned simply, "Good friends at COP28 #Melody."
The internet immediately understood what was happening. Melody was not just Modi plus Meloney. It also sounded exactly like India's iconic Melody Toffee.
Two world leaders, one selfie, one hashtag. The memes arrived within minutes.
Someone posted just looking like a W.
The sequel arrived in 2024. The G7 summit that was held in Italy. Meloney posted a video waving next to Modi and said directly to the camera.
>> Hello from the Melody team.
>> This is the Melody team.
Two sitting prime ministers, one shared social media brand. Modi later said he was glad that the first visit in his third consecutive term was to Italy.
And now Rome 2026.
Maloney welcomed Modi with the words, "Welcome to Rome, my friend." And shared the photos online herself. The two leaders had dinner together, visited the Colossium, the world's most famous amphitheater, and gave the world candid laughing moments.
The internet immediately turned it into reals, edits, and meme templates.
Hashtags related to the duo began trending within minutes. Netzens flooded platforms with witty captions, fan style posts. One user posted pre-wedding photo shoot feels. Here's the interesting question. Why does this work? Because world leaders meet all the time, shake hands, sign documents, smile for cameras. But Melody hits different. And the reason is surprisingly simple. They appear to actually enjoy each other's company. In a world of tense geopolitics and cold diplomacy, the melody moments offer something softer. A reminder that chemistry, warmth, and personal rapo still matter in global leadership. The laughs are not staged. The toffee moment was not in any briefing document. And that's social media oxygen. There are melody fan accounts. There are highlight reels of every interaction edited to Bollywood music. There are X threads analyzing their body language. That kind of energy is only reserved for Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce. And in a news cycle full of wars, recession, and geopolitical anxiety, two world leaders laughing over a toffee packet is genuinely the most wholesome thing right now.
Now, behind the memes and the fan edits, there was also some serious boost to bilateral ties. The two countries have signed a joint strategic action plan running through 2029.
Bhat Italy joint strategic action plan 2025 to 2029 practic billion Italian companies bat growth story last year India Italy trade reached 16.7 billion so the partnership is substantive the chemistry it just makes it more watchable because the 12-cond toffee video generates more engagement than a 12-page trade agreement.
Meloney has already been invited to India, which means another chapter might be coming. More candid moments, more viral clips, more memes. And somewhere out there, a fan account is already waiting, rating the chemistry, and asking the real question. What will they gift each other next time?
Large parts of India are getting baked under intense heat waves. Across North India, roads are empty by afternoon. Air conditioners are like are wheezing like exhausted marathon runners. And even the wind feels like someone opened a giant oven door. In parts of Uttar Pradesh, temperatures have hit 48° C. Delhi is racing towards 46. Punjab and Hana are crossing 462. In southern India, Hyderabad and Chennai saw daytime peaks in the mid to high 30s. Coastal Mumbai remained relatively cooler in the high30s but humid and Kolkata reported high30s temperatures. On 19th of May, all of the world's 100 hottest cities were located in India. The India Met Department has issued a clear warning.
Severe heatwave conditions will continue across northwest India, central India and East India. The only people catching a break, those in the hills, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, where isolated showers are providing some relief.
You must assume this is just summer.
This is how it is supposed to be. It has always been this hot in India. Just move on. Brave the heat. But let me draw a contrast. In many European countries, temperatures in the mid30s are enough to disrupt daily life. But here in India, similar or higher temperatures are often treated as routine summer. Yes, April and May are always warm. Solar radiation is at its peak. Intense summer sunlight heats the land surface rapidly. Hot air rises from the surface creates a low pressure area over Rajasthan and adjacent regions of Pakistan. Air from the upper atmosphere causes sinking air. Meanwhile, meaning that air moves downwards towards the ground. This prevents cloud formation.
It reduces cooling. The result extreme heat and heatwave conditions. So much so that it has disrupted daily lives across states.
That's seasonal. That's normal. But why is drive but what's driving this heat is not normal. And the implications are even worse. Prolonged exposure to heat waves can cause a heat stroke. It's a medical emergency that stops your body from cooling down. It can also cause dehydration and increased risk of death.
India's average temperature is increased by about.7° C between 1901 and 2018.
This is the latest available comprehensive data. There's a global force at play here and it has a name, El Nino. It is a Spanish phrase meaning little boy. But don't let that name fool you. This is one of the most powerful weather systems on Earth. Here's how it works. Under normal patterns, cold war water rises from the east Pacific Ocean.
Trade winds, the winds that blow towards the equator, they follow east to west direction. In the western Pacific Ocean, warm water gets collected causing rain.
But during El Nino, the central and eastern Pacific Ocean becomes unusually warm. Trade winds weaken or even reverse. Warm water shifts back towards South America, weakening the rain pressure near the Indian subcontinent.
Its counterpart Leninia or little girl does the opposite, bringing cooler and wetter conditions for India. The implications are serious. El Nino tends to push warmer Pacific waters east and south, which means Asia gets drier, which means India's southwest monsoon could arrive late, perform poorly, or both. Remember 2024, the hottest year ever recorded in human history. El Nino was the engine behind it. The same engine is warming up again. But when you have when you think of heat waves, you imagine a burning sun and hazy streets.
You think of humans devoid afternoon streets, but scientists are now increasingly worried about something else entirely. What happens at night?
You know, your body is remarkable. It can take a beating during the day. Heat, exertion, stress, as long as it gets to recover at night. Cooler temperatures allow your core body temperature to drop. Your heart rate slows. Your organs rest. You wake up the next morning ready to do it all over again.
But what if the night never cools down?
A new study tracked temperatures inside 50 low and middle inome homes in Chennai. The findings were alarming.
People were regularly sleeping in temperatures above 32° C, sometimes even above 35.
Temperatures that match peak daytime heat in many cities. So why is this happening? Think about what our cities have become over the last three decades.
We have replaced trees with towers.
We've replaced ponds with parking lots.
We've paved over everything that once absorbed or reflected heat and replaced it with concrete, steel, glass, asphalt, materials that don't just absorb the sun's heat, they store it and radiate it right back at night. The result is what scientists call the urban heat island effect, where cities run up to 10° hotter than the rural land surrounding them.
Compound that with below average pre-monsoon rainfall this year. Clear skies with no cloud cover and stalled atmospheric circulation, meaning the cool, moist air from the ocean simply can't penetrate inland. And then there's the quiet multiplier underneath all of this, climate change.
Greenhouse gas emissions from human activity are steadily rising baseline temperatures year after year, which means heat waves don't need exceptional conditions to form anymore. On top of that, there are air conditioners. Every AC unit pumps hot air onto the street.
In dense urban neighborhoods, that adds up. The streets get hotter. The next building heats up faster. And the families who can't afford an AC pay the price for everyone else's cooling.
Nighttime temperatures in Indian cities are rising faster than daytime temperatures. And we've barely begun to study what that means for public health.
India in the summer of 2026 is caught in a perfect storm. Urban heat islands cooking cities from within. A weakened atmosphere that can't bring in relief.
El Nino threatening to steal the monsoon. And nights that offer no escape. Power grids are straining under the demand for cooling. And tens of millions of people in small homes without ventilation, without air conditioning are simply enduring. If this is 2026, what will 2036 look like?
because the trajectory is clear and the time to act was yesterday.
Picture this. You've saved up for your holiday. You've heard about beaches, the sunsets, the seafood, the vibe. You land in Goa, and then the taxi driver quotes you a prize that would make your eyes water. The beach is packed. The shack is overpriced. And Baga looks less like a paradise and more like a very hot, very loud street fair.
This is the story of how Goa lost its foreign tourist. Let's start with the data. Foreign tourist arrivals in Goa dropped from nearly 900,000 in 2017 to around half a million by 2025.
In 2019, 8.5 million foreign tourists visited Goa by 2023. That number had fallen to just 1.5 million.
Meanwhile, domestic tourist numbers shot up from 68 lakh to over 1 cr in the same period. So what does this tell you? Goa is not empty. It is fuller than ever.
But the foreign tourists, they've quietly started booking somewhere else.
Ask any foreign tourist who has been to Goa recently what their biggest complaint is. And the answer is almost always the same. It's the taxi. Here's the thing. Goa does not have a fully regulated app-based taxi service. Local transport unions have strongly opposed them. This is a heavily politicized issue and that has created a major problem for tourists. Many travelers say they face unregulated and often exorbitant pricing from private taxi operators. This has been described as a transportation monopoly and has created a serious reputational challenge for the state's tourism board. In Thailand, you book a cabin seconds. In Vietnam, you tap on an app and go. But in Goa, you negotiate with a man who has decided that your desperation is his pricing strategy. So before you even take your first sip of cheni, which is a local drink, you are haggling over taxi fair.
Goa's tourism authorities are not unaware of these problems. The government is enhancing technologydriven services. Platforms like Goa Miles and the Goa taxi app are aimed at improving tourist experiences.
We are calling these new guidelines as a 3G model. 3Gs means goan taxis, go on drivers and government fairs. What we are trying to do through these guidelines is ensure that the convenience of app based taxes is available for everyone whether it is a local Goan or whether it is a tourist visiting the state of Goa.
>> Then there is the overcrowding problem.
The old Goa, the Susigard, slow, quiet, unhurried lifestyle is gradually disappearing.
Beaches once known for their laid-back charm now often feel packed, noisy, and overwhelmed with tourist traffic. Add to that endless traffic jams, noisy streets, and littered shorelines.
The foreign tourist who came to Goa in 1995 for the quiet and the one who came in 2010 for wives is not finding either anymore. And then there is the cost.
Back in the day, Goa was the backpacker's dream. Cheap stays, local seafood, motorbike rentals, stunning sunsets. Now, budget travelers often find themselves priced out. Goa's growing domestic tourism economy has pushed hotel rates higher. And here's a question that should worry Goa's tourism board. Where are those foreign tourists going? Several international visitors pointed to more affordable alternatives, including Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Thailand, Turkey, and Egypt. Travel operators say easier visa policies, cleaner beaches, lower hotel costs, and better package deals have made these destinations increasingly more attractive to European tourists. Direct flights to far east destinations have expanded dramatically.
Earlier it was only Bangkok. Now flights are easily available to places like Krabby, Fukquet as well. All beach destinations that compete directly with Goa. A European tourist choosing between Goa and Bali or Goa and Vietnam is increasingly choosing Bali and Vietnam.
And the price difference is making that an easy decision. But here's the more interesting part of the story. Some of those foreign tourists are not leaving India entirely. They're just going somewhere else in India. Travelers are increasingly turning to quieter, more authentic destinations. Kerala is the biggest winner. It has experienced 35% growth in bookings last year. Kerala's Varcala beach is a major attraction. The same goes for Rajasthan. The western state too has logged 35% growth in bookings in 2025.
The rich cultural heritage, historic landmarks, luxury resorts in cities like Jaipur, Udapur and Jodapur. These are major draws. These places Valpes Goa and yearon-year growth. Then there's Himachal Pradesh slides and flight searches for Manali and Shimla. They surged by 40% last year. But Goa is not it's not gone from India's tourist map.
Not entirely in any case. One cr tourists visited the state in 2025. The beaches are full. The shacks are busy.
But they are full of a different kind of tourists now. While the European backpackers who once came for the quiet and cheap beer and the long empty beach at sunrise have moved on. The question is does Goa want them back? Goa was always sold as an escape. A place where time slowed down. Everything felt effortless. But escapes don't survive pressure. They don't survive crowds.
Endless negotiations. So Goa is still there. But the tourists, they just stop recognizing what they once came to find.
Getting a job at Meta means you've won in life. The campus salary, free food, and stock options. These are status symbols. Parents brag about them at weddings and friends secretly envy you.
It's the creme de la creme job of the modern world. But today many of the employees are waking up with a sense of anxiety. Meta has started notifying staff about a fresh round of job cuts.
It affects nearly 8,000 employees globally and it began with a simple instruction. Work from home today. The first messages were reported from the company's hub in Singapore. Employees there reportedly received the mail at 4 in the morning. Further notifications are being sent in waves aligned to time zones of different countries. So the sequence stood out. Work from home first, layoffs next. Think about that precision for a moment. This was not improvised. This was engineered. Meta had about 78,000 employees before this exercise. Now thousands are out.
Thousands more are being moved. In an internal memo, chief people officer Janelle Gail said 7,000 employees will be reassigned into new AI native teams and reportedly told employees that the company aims to create a flatter structure with smaller teams that can move faster and operate more efficiently. Managerial layers are being flattened. Engineering and product teams face the biggest cuts and more may follow. At the top sits chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg with an estimated net worth of around $200 billion. He has made artificial intelligence the company's northstar.
Meta plans to spend between 125 to 145 billion this year largely on AI. It's the kind of investment that tells you exactly what a company values and what it no longer needs. Because as thousands of employees deal with the layoff email first thing in the morning, the tech giant has reportedly been hiring aggressively for AI focused roles, including engineers working on AI agents, recommendation systems, and large language model infrastructure.
Analysts estimate the layoff could save Meta nearly $3 billion annually in operating costs. The math is clean. The human cost is clearly not. Meta had confirmed the layoffs last month after details leaked. And inside the company, the morale dipped sharply even before the formal announcement. Some employees reportedly began connecting collecting free snacks, spare laptop chargers. And then came another revelation, a new internal tool reportedly tracking mouse movements and keystrokes to help train AI systems. Over a thousand employees signed a petition opposing it. The very people building the future were being harvested to train their own replacements.
However, this is bigger than meta. The pattern is same across the tech industry.
4,000 jobs were cut last week. Standard Chartered will cut more than 15% or around 7,800 of its back office roles by 2030. In April, Oracle laid off an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 employees through early morning emails across geographies. Cognizant is expected to cut 12,000 to 15,000 job cuts globally.
Microsoft backed LinkedIn is planning to lay off around 700 employees. The method is becoming a blueprint.
In the first three months of 2026, the tech industry shed more than 52,000 jobs. That is 40% jump from the same period a year prior. In March alone, AI was cited as the direct cause behind more than 15,000 tech layoffs. 25% of all tech job cuts that month. In February, that figure was at 10%. More than 93,000 people have already lost their jobs in the tech industry this year. This latest round of cuts adds to multiple layoffs Meta has announced since 2022.
Under Zuckerberg's year of efficiency strategy, the company in 2023 eliminated more than 20,000 jobs across separate restructuring rounds. This was done amid slowing digital advertising growth and rising operational costs as tech growth cooled after the co9 pandemic boom. But this moment is different. It is not a market crash or a pandemic. The cause this time is the arrival of tools that cannot do what mid-level managers and entire teams used to do.
Pardon me, they can faster at scale without friction, without vacation days, and without a hefty salary. For years, big tech sold more than compensation.
Its older promise, the promise of stability, of prestige, of a well, of a life well built. That promise is now being quietly, efficiently, systematically withdrawn.
There is a word for what is happening and it is not disruption. That word has been scrubbed clean of its meaning by too many keynote speeches. The word is reckoning. A reckoning for workers who were told that knowledge and skill were the only job security they would ever need. We talk a lot about the future of AI, the investments and capabilities, the models that write, reason, code, and create. And those things matter. They are real and they are remarkable. But here's what also matters. Every technology that has ever changed the world has also broken something. When the industrial revolution displaced millions of workers, it took decades for the world to catch up. New jobs emerged, but not overnight. Not without enormous human cost that history books now summarize in a single paragraph.
We're at the start of a sentence and the people living inside it don't get the luxury of knowing how it ends.
There was a time when graduation speeches used to be about following your dreams. Now they are about surviving the chatbot apocalypse. And Gen Z are front and center. are ready to clock it and they're not being subtle about it. It is graduation season and across American universities this year, commencement speakers started mentioning AI and graduates had a response. Nothing like a good old booing crowd to make the Gen Z displeasure be known. At the University of Arizona, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was reportedly booed while talking about artificial intelligence and the future of innovation.
There is at Middle Tennessee State University.
Scott Burketta, who is the CEO of Big Machine Records, got heckled after telling students AI was rewriting entire industries and they would simply have to deal with it.
>> Tool.
>> Hey, like I said, you can you can hear me now. As far as graduation ceremonies go, that's just not the vibe. Nothing says congratulations on your future like a billionaire explaining that software now performs half the task your degree trained you for. And that's the real story here. The AI backlash is no longer theoretical. It is cultural and increasingly it is generational. For over a decade, Silicon Valley trained itself to believe every new technology would automatically be greeted with standing ovations. Apps disrupted taxis.
Streaming disrupted television. Social media disrupted human attention spans.
They love that word, don't they?
Disruption. Disruptors.
Each time tech executives frame the chaos as innovation. But AI feels different because people can now see the replacement happening in real time.
Graduates aren't being told AI might change work someday. They're watching entry-level work disappear.
Junior coding roles are shrinking. Media companies are automating copy. Design departments are downsizing. Studios are experimenting with AI generated content.
Even internships require AI fluency, which is corporate code for congratulations, your competition is now automated and robotic. The timing could not be worse. The post-pandemic graduate market has been deteriorating since 2023 with young workers struggling to find stable white collar jobs. Surveys now show Gen Z's enthusiasm for AI has dropped sharply while anger and distrust towards the technology are rising. But one recent study found nearly half of Gen Z workers admitted to resisting or undermining AI initiatives inside their companies because they fear the technology would replace them.
That's an astonishing statistic if you think about it. Imagine building the most expensive technological revolution in modern history only to discover your youngest employees are quietly treating it like a workplace infection.
and Gen Z. Honestly, that suspicion makes perfect sense. This is a generation that grew up watching every digital promise become psychologically exhausting. Social media was supposed to connect people. Now, everyone needs therapy because of Instagram face and algorithmic doom scrolling. The gig economy was supposed to create freedom.
Instead, it created adults delivering burritos at midnight while listening to finance podcasts about escaping the matrix.
And now AI arrives with another utopian sales pitch. Don't worry, this technology will liberate you from boring work. Except companies hear something different. We found a cheaper version of you. That's what they are hearing.
That's why these commencement boos matter. Not because Gen Z is anti-technology.
They use AI constantly. Many students already rely on it for studying, brainstorming, coding, job applications, which is a conversation in itself. But my point is this.
The issue is trust. Young people no longer believe disruption automatically benefits them. And culturally, you can already see the reaction spreading everywhere.
Remember I told you last week, film cameras are back. Flip phones are back.
Vinyl is back. Going analog has become less of an aesthetic trend and more of an act of resistance. So when executives stand on stage and enthusiastically announce that AI is the future, graduates are increasingly responding with one question. Okay, but whose future?
If you're fluent in corporate jargon, congratulations. Chances are you're not that good at your job. I am not the one saying this, or rather, I'm not the only one saying this. There are actual studies to back this. Modern workplaces have been infiltrated by AI slop. But let's not forget the OG, the corporate word salad, the let's circle back, the synergy, the deep dive, the passive aggressive by EOD email signoffs.
Corporate jargon is what happens when a thesaurus gets promoted to middle management. It is as though every office runs on an invisible agreement that nobody, and I mean nobody, will speak like a normal human being ever again.
You can't simply talk to a colleague.
You must touch base. You cannot revisit an idea. You must circle back. You cannot investigate a problem. You must deep dive. And we've made a list of some of the most hated, most irritating corporate jargon. Here it is. Circle back, touch base, lowhanging fruit, synergy, leverage, pivot, deep dive, move the needle, we are a family, bandwidth.
And under absolutely no circumstances are you allowed to say use the easy option when you could instead say it's leverage some lowhanging fruit to create crossf functional synergy and really move the needle before we pivot. Now think about what I just said for a second. What does that mean? I could not tell you but it sounds important right?
Researchers from Cornell University attempted to study this phenomenon scientifically. They have something called the corporate followed by a word I cannot say on air receptivity scale.
Now just that name alone deserves a performance bonus.
Researchers showed participants fake corporate phrases generated entirely from business jargon. Things like pressure test adaptive coherence or actualized scalable credentiing paradigms. I'm having trouble just saying this. which sounds exactly like something a consultant says moments before billing a company the price of a small submarine.
Participants then rated how insightful the phrases sounded and the the results were devastating for anyone who loves corporate jargon and not so much for us who've known that these were just irritating words for years.
The people most impressed by corporate jargon consistently performed worse on tests involving analytical thinking and workplace decisionmaking.
Meaning the employees most likely to nod enthusiastically during a sentence containing the word synergy are also statistically less likely to stop and ask, "Sorry, what does that actually mean?" And that's the genius of corporate jargon. It is not designed to clarify. It is designed to intimidate.
Clarity. How to thousands of us to expect clarity. And this culture of pretending to understand things has occasionally produced catastrophic results as well. Let me give you an example. Back in January 2012, a set of transactions straight from hell by a JP Morgan trader spiraled. Losses grew because of permissions granted by the bank's senior leadership. How did that happen? Reportedly, those with oversight had no idea of what they were giving permission for.
The request they got read something like this, and I'm quoting here. Sell the forward spread and buy protection on the tightening move. Use indices and add to existing position. Go long risk on some belly trenches, especially where defaults may realize. What in the good lord's name does that even mean? I don't know. And neither did those at JP Morgan. JP Morgan Chase lost more than $6 billion dollars during this infamous fiasco.
Nobody stopped to ask what any of it meant because corporate culture has trained us to believe that understanding is optional, but sounding sophisticated is mandatory.
Another study from the University of Florida found jargonheavy workplaces also make employees less likely to ask questions or collaborate, especially younger workers who apparently prefer silent confusion over the risk of admitting that they don't understand leveraging stakeholder visibility, which is fair. Nobody understands leveraging stakeholder visibility. That phrase was assembled in a lab.
And honestly, maybe that is the true genius of corporate jargon. and it allows people to sound endlessly productive while saying almost nothing at all. A linguistic smoke machine for middle management. Somewhere along the way, corporations stopped rewarding clarity and started rewarding whoever could turn a two sentence update into a TED talk about synergy.
In Bangladesh, a buffalo has gone viral for looking exactly like Donald Trump.
The buffalo, famous for its golden tuft of hair and very serious expression, has become a superstar online. Social media users say the resemblance is uncanny.
Same hairstyle, same facial structure.
Honestly, somewhere in America, Trump is either deeply offended or is telling his inner circle how the buffalo pleaded to cop his style and he obliged.
Hey, hey, hey.
Heat. Heat.
Vidéos Similaires
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











