The Israel Lobby Is Seriously Desperate

Added: 2026-06-02

[00:00:00]And it says here that the race between Massie and Mr. Gallerine wound up being the most expensive House primary in US history. In US history.

[00:00:16]So, you're telling me that Apac and its acolytes, its its allies, created the most expensive super PAC in history, in American history, just to beat one guy in Northern Kentucky. Do you see how desperate they are? They are desperate. You would think, okay, Kentucky, right? It's full of Zionist. full of pro-Israel Christians. Okay, we'll just we'll throw some money here. No big deal. No, no, no, no, no. They wanted to make sure that Massie would be defeated.

[00:00:56]And they ended up creating the most expensive House primary in US history to beat some guy in not just any place in Kentucky, Northern Kentucky. Dolvin, Kentucky, a place that no one until recently really gave a damn about.

[00:01:20]It really just goes to show how desperate these people are. These people are desperate. Israel is desperate. Apac is desperate. The whole pro-Israel lobby is desperate. They're [ __ ] desperate these people. I mean, really, like, how obvious does it need to be that these people are desperate? They really are.

[00:01:38]They see the writing on the wall. They see hm let's see at least 60% of Americans are anti-Israel. For the first time in US history, the majority of Americans are actually more pro Palestine than pro- Israel. Pro-Israel evangelical Christianity is dying, is going down. They see the mass Zionist media empire declining. They see that Ben Shapiro had to do massive layoffs in his in his media company, the Daily Wire. They see all of this just coming down. They noticed that Mr. Charlie Kirk himself was becoming anti-Israel that he himself was beginning to become disillusioned with Israel. And he told Mr. uh what's his name? Jonathan, whatever, Mr. um oh, I forgot his name, but he told his producer, "Man, these pro-Israel donors, they really do fit all of the stereotypes." He said this in a text message. He said, "They really do fit all of the stereotypes. I'm really getting sick of them. They have left me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause." This is what Charlie Kirk said.

[00:02:39]And the pro-Israel people, they want you to think that none of that happened. It was just a slip of a tongue. Poor Charlie was having a bad day, so he decided to take it out on the pro-Israel donors. No, no, nothing to see here.

[00:02:52]Nothing at all. Charlie Kirk was 100% pro-Israel, hardcore Zionist, Israel's best friend. But they were seeing that the top figure head in the American conservative youth movement, the guy whose sole job it was to guide America's youth into becoming pro- Israel himself was becoming disillusioned with Israel and he was himself beginning to get sick and tired of the pro-Israel movement and he was going to abandon the pro-Israel cause. When you saw that happening, when you saw that even this Charlie guy who was this hardcore Zionist was himself getting sick and tired of Israel, the writing was very clearly written on the walls and it was becoming very conspicuous that the whole thing was beginning to crumble. The whole pro-Israel media empire was beginning to was beginning to crumble. And as the pro-Israel media empire crumbles, that is a canary in the coal mine for the Israelis because the media empire of Israel, the media empire of the pro-Israel movement is a reflection of the power of the Israelis.

[00:04:11]It's a reflection of the influence that the pro-Israel movement has. In other words, if the pro-Israel movement can convince the majority of Americans to be pro-Israel, that means that the majority of Americans are either going to be watching pro-Israel media or they are going to be at least sympathetic with what is being said on pro-Israel media.

[00:04:32]Case in point, Fox News, Fox News was very, very powerful. It was very, very popular. Not so much anymore. They got rid of Bill O'Reilly. They replaced him with Tucker Carlson. Then they got rid of Tucker Carlson. And now Tucker Carlson is bigger now than he ever has been in the entirety of his whole career. People are watching Tucker Carlson and more people are watching Tucker Carlson than they are watching Sean Hannity. More people are watching Tucker Carlson than they are watching uh Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire.

[00:05:04]So with the decline of the pro-Israel media comes the very decline of Israel itself because Israel needs America. And if the vast majority of Americans are not watching pro-Israel media, they're watching anti-Israel media, which is which is really what the case is right now, which means that support for Israel is declining tremendously and dramatically, and that will eventually be reflected in the political landscape of the United States.

[00:05:31]So, the pro-Israel media, the Daily Wire, and those like it are the canary in the coal mine for Israel.

[00:05:39]Once that starts going down, the pro-Israel political base will go down with it. It's very, very obvious. So, they're very desperate. The whole thing is is just desperation.

[00:05:53]The whole thing is desperation. And it says here, "The pro-Israel lobby was once a formidable force in the Democratic Party.

[00:06:03]It's now one of the most toxic brands for the party's base. So toxic that even unproven tenuous ties to the group is enough to take primary candidates. So even if you are not being funded by Apac, if you are just if you are perceived to be attached to Apac from one degree to the next, it could actually ruin your whole political career. That's what this article published by the Washington Post is saying here. And it says, "The dynamic was on display in one of the bluest districts in the country where Allah Stanford, a pediatric surgeon and former Department of Health and Human Services official, lost her bid yesterday for the House in Pennsylvania.

[00:06:56]Her run to represent Pennsylvania's third congressional district faced attacks alleging that she was backed by Apac, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, boosted by millions of dollars. So Alice Stanford, she's running for office in Pennsylvania.

[00:07:17]And then what happened? She's getting backed by Apac. She's getting millions of dollars in campaign funds from Apac.

[00:07:24]She didn't win. It didn't help her. So, so is it really the money? That's the question. Is it really the money that gets you to win an election?

[00:07:37]The money is only as effective as how many people believe in the cause that you are actually financing. That's just a fact. I could be a Saudi billionaire and I could want to fund for the spread of Islamic fundamentalism and Wahhabism.

[00:07:57]I want more and more people to become Wahhabist. Well, if I'm pouring in money to get people to become Wahhabist and nobody wants to become Wahhabist, my money is useless. I could pour in billions of dollars into the world into various countries to get people to become Wahhabists. If nobody has any interest in becoming a Wahhabi, I lose money. It means nothing. It means jack.

[00:08:22]You're not going to get a damn thing.

[00:08:24]So, your money is only as powerful as the number of people who actually believe in what you are financing or who are at least susceptible to believing in the cause that you are financing. It really is that simple. It really is that simple.

[00:08:42]So, why did Mr. Massie lose.

[00:08:46]Was Apac responsible? Sure. Yes. Apac definitely shares responsibility pouring in so much millions of dollars against him. I'm sure it plays a degree of influence in that. But I believe the reason why Massie lost is because Donald Trump went against him. Because if it was solely about money, then Allah Stanford would have won the election in Pennsylvania. But Allah Stanford lost.

[00:09:12]And the reason why she lost, at least one of the major reasons as to why she lost is because she is getting Apac money and because of that association, she got the unfavorability from Pennsylvania voters.

[00:09:30]And it says here she lost to progressive candidate state representative Chris Rub, a staunch critic of Israel. So, she lost to an anti-Israel uh running mate or not running mate, she lost to an anti-Israel politician.

[00:09:47]And it says here, "The powerful pro-Israel group is known for masking its involvement in high-profile races, as we covered a few months ago during the Illinois Democratic primaries. The group set up shell organizations with names unrelated to Israel." So, Apac right now is working incognito. They're not saying, "Oh," they're not entirely coming out and saying, "We're giving money to this person." They give money to shell organizations that do not appear to be Zionist organizations. Those shell organizations then funnel those very funds to the politicians that Apac wants to win. So that's how Apac is operating right now because they know how toxic their name is.

[00:10:32]And this is really another sign as to what I've been telling you guys about that the whole AP pack, the whole AP pack operation right now is in desperation mode. If they were not so desperate, then why are they hiding? Why are they hiding their name behind these shadowy shell companies? if they're so strong, if they're so influential, if they're so popular, if being if being pro- Israel was so popular, and if the majority of Americans just love Israel like Charlie Kirk before he began to see the light, then why in the hell are they hiding their name behind shadowy shell companies? Because they know damn well that the writing is on the wall. And they know damn well that the roaring tide against Israel is so loud and it's rising up so loftily that they have no choice but to hide behind shell companies. They want for their agenda to succeed. They're not giving up yet. They want for that agenda to succeed, but they have to hide behind shadowy shell companies in order to reach the politicians that they want to finance.

[00:11:47]And I think this is a great sign. It's a very clear sign of the downfall of the pro-Israel empire in America. And it says here that the group set up shell organizations with names unrelated to Israel to spend heavily in support of Apac's preferred candidates, often touting them on issues such as health care or affordability. So, they're playing a very smart strategy. They're not saying, "Oh, well, tell the uh the people to vote for you because you're pro- Israel. Tell the people to vote for you because your opponent has bad policies in this regard and that regard.

[00:12:24]Tell the people, "Oh, vote for me because if you vote for me, I'm going to be better when it comes to this policy, let's say healthcare, and this other policy, let's say crime. Oh, well, under this politician, the crime rate's going to be higher. Or under this politician, uh, your medical bills are going to be higher. Your grocery bills are going to be higher. So, hire me because I'm going to make everything better. I'm going to make your I'm going to make your uh cost of living much more easy and I'm going to lessen your cost of living. I'm going to make I'm going to use government funds to help uh provide financial support for your medical needs, blah blah blah blah. So, they make it about different issues other than Israel in order to get their pro-Israel politician to victory.

[00:13:05]That's how they're doing things. and it's very strategic and it's very clever and it's very um it's very effective.

[00:13:14]But is it invincible? Is it ironclad?

[00:13:18]Is it guaranteed guaranteed to solidify a victory for the pro-Israel cause? The answer is no.

[00:13:27]Because people are going to figure these things out. You can make all these little shell companies and all that, but all that people have to do really is just look at the history of the politician. And if they notice, well, in the past before uh there was this massive stigma against Apac and against Israel, this politician gladly received Apac funds. Well, the politician is now saying that he's not he or she is not receiving Apac money.

[00:13:52]Well, then who's giving you the money?

[00:13:54]Well, it's this super PAC group. Oh, it turns out that this super PAC group is actually ran by Zionist who are who have ties to Apac. So, you're still getting money from Apac, but it's through a proxy. You're getting it through a third party, which is how a lot of these uh donors work, by the way. And so, people are figuring this out already.

[00:14:15]And so because people are figuring this out thanks to publications like the Washington Post, thanks to other independent investigators, people are now seeing, okay, well this politician, even though he or she claims that that they're not getting money from Apac, they're still getting money from Zo donors. That's all that really matters.

[00:14:37]And this could actually destroy and ruin someone's political career.

[00:14:43]So, it says here, "Apex critics say the group hides its activities to still be active in primaries where swads of voters are turned off by the group's brand." It goes right back to what I said just now. If they are so powerful, if right now Israel is so popular and the American people love Israel and they're not in desperation mode and Apac is not in desperation mode, then why are they hiding?

[00:15:08]Why are they hiding?

[00:15:10]That makes no sense, right? If you are not desperate, if you're very secure, you're not going to hide. You got nothing to hide. You're going to say, "No, we're Apac. We're giving money to these politicians. We want these politicians to win. Yeah, we got billions of dollars. Yeah, we got a we got a whole circle of uh pro-Israel billionaires backing us and giving us all these funds and and we're going to support the pro-Israel politician." And you wouldn't care, right? You wouldn't be hiding anything because in this case, the vast majority of Americans are pro- Israel. And that was the case for the longest time. That was the case for decades. But it's not the case right now. And so they have to hide. They have to hide because they're scared. They're scared of being seen because they know once they're seen, once the light is shed on them, they're like roaches. Once they see the light, they scatter.

[00:16:00]So you have the apac roaches hiding in the darkness.

[00:16:06]They're hiding away from the light. But once light is shed upon them, they flee.

[00:16:11]They're scared. They are scared of being seen because they know once they are seen, there is a massive potential of their candidate losing. And that means Apac losing a potential agent who will do their bidding once they are in office.

[00:16:31]And they don't want to lose those politicians. They don't want to lose those officials. They don't want to lose those people because they enact policy or they influence policy through their politicians whose campaigns they fund. That's how they operate. If they don't have their politicians in there, where's their power? Where's their influence?

[00:16:54]So, they have to hide.

[00:16:57]Uh, so it says here, Rob, Rob is the guy who beat Alice Stanford. So Chris Rob who is anti-apac anti-Israel defeated a pro-Israel Apac funds receiving politician named Alva Stanford and Chris Rub accused Stanford of benefiting from a similar arrangement. Her bid was backed by a 314 action fund an organization that spent more than $2.5 million on ads in support of Stanford. It was the largest spender in a race by a wide margin. The next biggest ad spender, Progressive Group, American Priorities, said it spent more than $400,000 supporting Rob. So Rob had less campaign funds.

[00:17:44]Do you see what I'm saying? Rob, Rick Rob or Chris Rob, sorry, had much less campaign funds than Ala Stanford did.

[00:17:54]And Rob still won because the people in their district are more anti-Israel. And if I had to guess, if you were to go to Thomas Massiey's district, there's a lot of Zios, a lot of Christian Zionists who will say, "No, they're the chosen people. They're the chosen ones." And so, and also, there's a lot of people in Massi's district who worship Donald Trump. They're diehard Maggites. And so, they saw Donald Trump going against Massie, and so they voted against Massie.

[00:18:22]But as the pro-Israel tide gets bigger and as the boomers begin to dissipate away from the political realm and the millennials and the zoomers begin to really take over, this whole thing is going to change in the Republican regions of America as they are already changing dramatically uh seismically in the Democrat regions of this country. So, it says here that 314 Action drew considerable attention after spending more than $1 million, including 1 million from an Apex super PAC. So, she got millions in campaign funds from uh Zo donors and people found this out and they didn't vote for her because the people in that area where they were running are for the most part anti-Israel.

[00:19:06]And so, it doesn't, like I said, it doesn't m they could have poured in a billion dollars. Alb Stanford still would have lost. That's my whole point.

[00:19:14]Because Mr. Chris Rob, he got only $400,000 in campaign funds. Whereas Stanford got millions and yet Rob won without anywhere near the amount of money that Stanford had. So is it really just about money? No. The money is only as powerful as the people who are willing to believe in what the money is financing. In this case, the money is financing Zionism. But the majority of people in that region in Pennsylvania are not Zionist. They're anti-Zionist.

[00:19:47]So a Zionist politician, a politician receiving pro-Zionist money is not going to win. They could have poured in a billion. They could have poured in a trillion dollars. They still wouldn't have won. So the problem with these Zios is that they think that money is power.

[00:20:04]Belief is power.

[00:20:06]Money is a means to power. Don't get me wrong, but belief is more powerful. And by that I mean these donors, these pro-Israel kosheria law donors could pour in trillions of dollars.

[00:20:22]And if the people hate Israel enough, that money still will not be enough to change the minds of those people.

[00:20:31]That's just a fact because belief at the end of the day is more powerful than money.

[00:20:38]So it says here, let's see, hold up.

[00:20:42]What else do we got? Stanford has called Rob's ACU. Okay, so Stan Okay, so Rob Rob stated that Stanford has ties to APEC. Stanford called Rob's accusation a cheap shot. She accused Rob of essentially creating a conspiracy theory that has ruinously impacted her candidacy and life. So, she's basically saying that because my ties to Apac were exposed, my political career is now ruined. That's what she's saying. Again, if the Zios are so powerful, then why is this happening?

[00:21:28]That's the question. They're losing their power. And you could see it in these seemingly small and obscure situations.

[00:21:37]So it says here uh so this is what Stanford said. She said, "Thanks to you stating that Apac and about Okay, sorry.

[00:21:44]Thanks to you stating about Apac and about me taking money from them." She said during a conversation with the Philadelphia Enquir editorial board, quote, "People physically try to assault me. I've gotten hate mail in my inboxes as well as on social media.

[00:22:01]So the ant see here's the thing is the anti-Israel stuff is very correct in pretty much everything it says. Israel is doing genocide. Israel's doing war crimes, atrocities against Palestinians, etc., etc. All that is true.

[00:22:17]But what I fear is this anti-Israel wave being used to promote racism against Jews. That's what I fear. You could say, "Well, Zionists deserve all the hatred in the world." Well, average Jews don't deserve hatred.

[00:22:42]My point is people shouldn't be attacked just because they're Jews.

[00:22:46]And that's the danger that we are facing here. That is the danger that we are facing here. It's basically, and people are going to think that this is cringe or whatever, but you know, it doesn't really matter. But what we are seeing is basically something of a revival of how people used to think in the the 20th century. It's basically a return to how a lot of people used to think in the time when Nazism became very popular.

[00:23:13]Nazism became very popular. And this is going to sound crazy. It's going to sound whatever cringe, but Nazism was very popular because at that time a lot of people didn't like Jews. Even in America, a lot of people didn't like Jews. Jews were not popular. And one of the reasons as to why Jews were not popular is because they were associated with communism because there were a lot of Jews who were Marxists. It's a fact. It's an historical fact. Even one of the most prominent historians on the Holocaust, uh Mr. Michael Brerle who wrote a whole very large volume on the history of the Third Reich says in this book that I read uh that it is very true that there were many Jews uh in the ranks of Marxist groups and organizations and that uh Jews were quite over represented in the Marxist/Bolleshevik movement and boleism was very destructive. This is a historical fact as we all know it was the biggest killer. The biggest killer of the 21st century was Marxism. That was the biggest killer and they killed millions of people as you guys already know Ukraine, Russia, China.

[00:24:24]And so Jews because there were a lot of Jews who were Marxist, Jews became they became to be seen as synonymous with Bolevik.

[00:24:35]And so this is one of the main reasons as to why Nazism became so popular. So fast forward to our own time and what do you see? You see Jew becoming associated or becoming synonymous with Zionism. Jew becoming synonymous with with Jeffrey Epstein. Jew becoming synonymous with the atrocities done by the Israeli government. Jew becoming synonymous with Apac and the and the pro-Israel lobby.

[00:25:02]And the danger of that tribalistic way of thinking is that it it it leads us to becoming very susceptible to Nazi propaganda and it leads a lot of people and it already has led to a lot of people uh becoming very open to the Nazi worldview, the Hitlerian worldview. And that is the danger that I'm seeing. The danger that I'm seeing is that the mustache man is coming back. He's gonna have a comeback. That's what I fear for the future.

[00:25:32]So, you know, people being violently assaulted because they're pro-Israel.

[00:25:39]What is that about?

[00:25:42]What is that about?

[00:25:44]It's a violent hatred.

[00:25:47]It's a violent hatred that can most definitely pave a path forward to bringing the mustache man back from the dead.