Election forensics requires physical paper ballots to detect fraud because electronic evidence alone cannot prove criminal intent; when physical ballots are obtained, investigators can trace the chain of custody, identify who processed ballots, when they were processed, and detect duplicate counting or manipulation that would otherwise be dismissed as 'accidents' under voluntary voting system guidelines.
Install our extension to search inside any video instantly.
Voting Machines Changed The Votes! Or Did They? You Decide!Added:
These are the best in the world, these guys. And there we're going to end up with about 120 the way it looks like.
And yet, and you're right, we have all we have over 200 politicians right now representing over 30 states. And then we have all the media coming. And what we're going to do, Steve, is we're going to have like four different sections set up. One of them is the first thing we're going to do is pass out the states to the cyber forensic expert. What I mean by that is the the raw data that or the data the the packet captures and the data from that whole state. So we give it to let's say a group of 10 of these experts. Now they don't know each other and they're all going to dig in and they're going to go validate this data.
Then we're going to have another section where we I've already had the data validate. I have it all and the packet captures. It's going to call it a cyber center. To the right of the main stage is going to be all these computers where a senator can actually or politician can go up there, put in the name of his state or put in a county or put in whatever he wants the whole election and then out it's going to come the actual the real count what really happened the night of the election. Now he can take that and he can go over to his own cyber guy and say, "Hey, could you look at this thing?" Yeah. Validate this for me.
And they're going to validate it. He's going to go, "Wow, this is nonsubjective evidence, everybody." And also, we're going to have another room where we're going to have these mock elections going on every hour on the hour, these mock elections. And and we're going to we'll go, "Hey, just just in. Let's go in where the mock elections are." We'll have the camera crew in there, and this will be live stream, too. But in there, we're going to show everybody. We're going to have a cyber guy in another room where he can't hear or know anything. We're going to do the flips just like they did the night of the election. And then we're going to show the whole public what a packet capture is. And we're going to pull them off the routers, everybody. We're going to when we do Arizona, it's going to be very interesting why Arizona won't give up them routers because we're going to show you why they don't want to give up the routers. So, we do this flip. We're going to come in the cyber guy. We're going to pull the packet captures out of the routers. And then we're going to have a cyber guy. He'll read it and he'll go, "Here's what happened.
computer ID. Boom. Here's who did it.
Here was the attacker. Here was the attackee. Here's how many votes.
>> Hey folks, welcome to the crap. Yes.
Culture, race, and American politics.
It's really interesting. The reason we played Mike Lindell clip for you. As you know, he's in court for the jury trial at the moment. And so, people have the machines once again at the top of their mind.
At the same time, I've been getting on X many people uh dropping me kind of little tidbits and stuff about the machines, etc. So, I've decided uh to go a little bit deeper for you and put you kind of in the driver's seat.
And the theme of a jury trial, since Mike's going through a jury trial, to put you in the driver's seat and see how far we've come, or are we still where we were in 2020?
Because remember, my job is to share with you, how they do it to you. So, in fact, you can defend against it because you can't defend against it if you don't know how they do it to you. Right? It It's just that simple, folks. You cannot defend against it if you don't know how they do it to you. Today's program is brought to you by the fine folks at Gold Co. I've got a website for you.
Jovonlovesgold.com jovonlovesgold.com.
Folks, you need to pay attention to precious metals.
I know that some of you may think, "Ah, they're just trying to sell gold or they're just trying to sell silver."
I would I would think you need to understand that's kind of making an excuse for yourself not to look because that's not really the goal. The goal is to make sure you don't get clobbered when the government does what it is expected to do. Now, there's a huge difference in that. What kind of friends would we all be with each other if we didn't help each other out and said, "Hey, take a look." That's the deal, folks.
If you again don't know how they do it to you, how can you protect against it?
You've got to understand how there's so much manipulation going on. You think about these big companies that own stock and everybody, right? They go into these corporations. on. We'll just get rid of your stock if you don't do what we say because they can hurt them that way.
Well, they move us around like pawns.
Millions and millions and millions and millions of people in retirement programs and you don't get to self-direct it. You don't even get the full benefit of it. You don't. They do.
That's the system, folks. But what I am worried about every day and I and I and I look at now with the GOP taking their little vacation and not necessarily wanting to codify the Doge cuts and what's been found and get rid of it. That tells you where they stand.
They want their money. And unfortunately, what they call their money is your money.
I'm worried about the time when we go to a digital dollar. I truly am. And it's coming. It's inevitable, folks. It's going to happen. You know, they just finally voted to get rid of the penny.
Did I read that right?
It's coming. I don't want you caught off guard. I don't.
Please, please, please click the link below. Go to the website provided by my fine partners at Goldco and just get your free free gold and silver kit. Just get the information folks and feed your brain.
Let me tell you something about the penny.
You got to be smart. Let me give you an example and I'm going to tell you how you too if you understand the ins and outs and how the system works you can you can outwit the system. But I'm going to use the penny as an example.
How many of you have walked into a mall, a pizza place, it doesn't matter, and there's this, it looks like a big funnel kind of sitting on a floor and you take a little bitty penny and you put it in it and you watch it run around the funnel.
Cheap entertainment, right?
What you don't know is that device is really an excellent device of entrepreneurs.
See, decades ago, the United States of America stopped making pennies out of pure copper.
And so they went to cheaper metals, nickel, zinc, stuff like that, right?
And so where you're kind of playing a little amusement game with a penny, here's what's going on behind the scene everywhere. It says, you know, dump your pennies, get rid of your pennies, give us your pennies or whatever. Well, when you run it in that little thing and running around that you're amused at, when that penny hits the bottom, it's actually hitting a scale, right? A scale.
And that scale weighs the penny. Now, why does it weigh the penny? Well, the newer, cheaper zinc pennies go this way, and the copper pennies go that way. Now, a lot of these say this money is donated to a good cause. Well, yes it is. See, the zinc pennies that go that way aren't really worth a penny. And they donate them all day long. But the penny that goes this way that is pure copper, they keep. Why? Because that penny, depending upon how the market fluctuates, is actually worth four to five cents in copper.
That's a 400% increase in money you got free.
Now, why have people been doing this for decades and decades and decades and decades and decades?
Because they eventually knew the government would get rid of the penny.
Now, right now, to melt that penny down for the copper weight was against the law. You couldn't do that. It's destroying money. However, now that they've raised that, all of these pe people who have saved massive tons of pennies, you're going to see a mad rash rush for them to turn them in for copper.
Millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions of dollars are going to be made over a very short few days of people finally being able to take their pennies in.
See, that's working to understand the system and understand the facts behind it. That's why I tell you, please go to jovonloves.com.
You're going to have to learn this stuff.
You have to learn this stuff, right?
You have to protect yourself. And there are many, many ways to protect yourself.
And by the way, you might get up to $10,000 in free silver if your account qualifies. And by the way, folks, the reason I do stuff like this, even like write the books, I just don't want you caught off guard.
Grow a guard. Plant it once. Plan. P L A N. Plant it. Let it feed you for decades. It can be done.
You love fruit, but you don't want to wait for the right. You don't want to wait for the tree to mature four or five years. You can hack it and do it. Or even planting, you know, you don't you don't want to weed. You don't want to dig. Well, you can do that, too.
Everything I do is to try to benefit your life in some way. By the way, don't forget one of the things I used to benefit my life was trimming down. I've been working on it, right? And I began to use this product, lean, which comes from the fine folks at Brick House Nutrition.
I'm going to read you some descriptions of weight loss. You're going to probably think it's about the uh injection stuff, but it's not.
It came from Lane. Patty said, "I finally found a weight loss product that works. I want to lose 20 pounds and bang, Lean really curbs my appetite."
Lori said, 'I struggle to get weight off and lean has been a lifesaver.
She's losing a couple of pounds a week or more. And Kelly said, 'Amazing. I noticed the energy boost. And by the way, I did, too. I noticed the energy boost. That's what I noticed. See, lean was created by a doctor and university researcher to target the goals of the GLP1s. Did you know you had some GLP1s in there? Yeah. That's what the injections do, but they do it without injections, without a prescription, because the study ingredients and lean have been showed to lower blood sugar, radically reduce your appetite, burn fat by converting it to energy. So, here you go. If you're struggling to lose weight and healthy diet and exercise just isn't doing it for you, lean might be what you need. Let's get you started with 20% off. Use promo code jov20 at takelean.com. That's promo code jovon2020 at takelean.com.
Again, that's promo code jov20 at takelean.com.
Right. By the way, you know we got a code right there. Why don't you just zap that code?
Zap it, baby.
Just use your phone or take a picture of your screen.
Zap the code. Go right there. Don't put it off.
Get going.
It's the way you can take back some control in your crazy life. By the way, I don't know if you joined me on the other program. When I left, I did uh this special on Lindell versus Kumer. I'm going to do a part two today.
Here's how you join me.
Immediately following this program, I'm going to jump to my locals. Jovon Hutton.locals.com.
If you're on Rumble, you'll see a little uh red oval.
Just click that and you can join me.
Also, put the link in chat. People will share it. I've got a very interesting part two and I'm going to push your limits and I want to see what you think.
because we're all in this fight together and we're going to be judged by whatever happens in this court case. Therefore, I'm going to put you to the test, baby.
And if you fail, I might have to assign you some extracurricular stayover late work, if you know what I mean about elections.
So, share this program right now.
We are about to get started.
and we're going to clear some of that cluttering crap out of your cranium and you might see things much clearer than you have in a while. Let's get started.
Warning, the following program has been rated diligaf and is intended for open-minded audiences. If the truth offends you or if you are allergic to focused intensity, intellectual athleticism, or the occasional fbomb or even irreverent humor, please switch off now. If your delicate sensibilities need to be worried about or addressed, might we recommend the underwater basket weaving channel to you? Otherwise, sit back, enjoy the wisdom, insight, and wicked sense of humor.
Cut the crap. How many times a day do you want to say that to politicians, the elite, the looney liberals, the fake news media, and the gender confused emotional socialist snowflake crowd? Cut the crap is your secret weapon for fighting for our freedoms and our great republic. It all begins with a massive mental enema, freeing you from the toxic news and politically correct views which constipate your consciousness with stinking thinking. Your host, Joe von Hutton Fulitzer. He's known for calling out politicians and telling them to cut the crab. You've seen him on virtually every television network and listen to him on Coast to Coast Radio. And now he's here to help you learn to fight for America. Culture, race, and American politics. They all have one thing in common. They all need to cut the crap.
Now, here's your host, Jovon Hutton Piter.
Okay, folks. We're going to do some crap excavating.
It's going to be for your benefit. I promise you. I promise you. I promise you. I promise you. Hey, shout out Jan or Pascal or Michaela, right? I even got a sandwich.
Totally over on Instagram. Do you do you know you can watch the program?
You might not know this, but a good way to carry me around in your pocket is Instagram.
You can do it, right? Shout out to all the folks on Getter. Hey, thanks for being here. Okay, now look, I want you to think about grabbing a pen and paper or at least do this in your mind because I'm going to give you a little bit of a test. You'll see this pop up.
It's called reinforced learning, folks.
And you're going to have choices. A, it's the machines. B, it's people. C, it's paper, right? D, it's programs.
Those are going to be your choice. A, B, C, D. Some of them might be a combo.
You'll answer in chat, right? You'll answer in chat.
And watch the screen down to the bottom.
I'm going to guys in chat. uh like Twitch and X. Uh put ABCD like in your chat real quick. Just pop it in your chat. And for those of you that are just kind of watching, right, you'll kind of see it popping up. There's a delay to it. You'll see it popping up on the bottom of your screen and you'll see how other people vote.
There'll be a little bit of a delay, but but you'll be able to see it. So, we're we're going to do some voting. Thanks, Henry. See ABCD. See it pop up on the tiny bottom part right of your screen.
So, we're going to do a little bit of voting today.
Yeah, they're telling me I need K for knockers, but hey, I uh I can't do that.
I don't have any knockers to show you.
Now, you may have some knockers to show me, but I haven't received them in my programming yet. Okay, first few things. I'm doing this because, you know, Mike Lindell is having a trial by jury regarding the it's the machines and Dominion did it and all that stuff. Okay, here's an interesting thing.
Don't you love Sooner women? I hear Sooner women are wild, but an okay Sooner sent this to me. I think she's more than okay. I think she's awesome.
But okay, says, "Look like we won't get any public statements from the real Mike Lindell for the rest of the trial."
Here's a little clip, and I'm just going to read it. On June 4th, 2025, in the defamation trial against My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell in Denver, Colorado, the court addressed concerns about Lindell's compliance with media orders.
Attorneys for Eric Kumer, the former Dominion Voting System executive suing Ludell. Lindell filed a notice alleging that Lindell violated court instructions by speaking to the press during the lunch break and posting on X via his real Mike Lindell account during the trial.
Judge Nina Wang admonished Lindell for these actions which included texting, sorry I read that wrong, texting, tweeting, and giving media interviews but did not hold them in contempt of court. Instead, she issued a warning.
Lindell's legal team acknowledged he did a poor job.
Imagine that. Following the court's instructions, but stated he did not intend to violate the orders, Lindell and his team agreed he would refrain from further public statements during the trial.
I ask, man, with all the way the media wanted to shove, nothing happened down our throats, why are they not broadcasting this particular trial? And why did they broadcast to P Tina Peters trial and not this one?
Well, this is why I'm going to kind of do a refresh because here's what's going on.
I the deep statement.
Deep statement.
Must know my ex. Deep statement. Now, here's what's interesting. Deep state.
Who does not follow me? Always check when somebody comments something and I look at I always see if they follow me.
He I assume it's a he. Well, well, well, Joan Bulleter. Okay. Now, let me read this. By the way, I want to show you something. You see that where it says Charlie Kirk commentary?
You see a lot things like that like uh Ivanka Trump News, Baron Trump News. Those are not family accounts. Those are somebody creating accounts on somebody's name and only retweeting their stuff. Now, some of these things will get a a few million followers, right? And then after all this is over, they just change it to their name and they get a few million followers. Nifty trick. I kind of think it's crap. Yeah, you're right. You You think you're dialoguing. I see people amplify quotes from Tucker, but it's Tucker News. It has nothing to do with Tucker.
Anyway, ready for this? Breaking Georgia's Dominion voting system declared a wrong winner for the May 22nd, 2024 Dicab County, Georgia District 2 Commission primary.
Even the machine recount was wrong.
A hand recount found the voting machines removed 74% of the real winners.
Now that's a big deal, right? But I've always uh told you and by the way, thanks for the thumbs down. I appreciate anytime Cause of America, you guys can be here with my program and you need to learn too. So, I understand that I'm going to read this again because words matter and I'm going to help you uh define things. Word matter. Now, this picture is not from Lindell's case.
Lindell's case are no recording devices, no cameras, no nada. Okay, but let me read this for you again.
Breaking Georgia's Dominion voting system.
At least they got that right. Declared a wrong, not the judge, a wrong winner.
That's the wrong one. For the May 22nd, 2024 Dabb County, Georgia District 2 Commission primary.
Even the machine recount was wrong.
A hand recount found the voting machines removed 74% of the votes for the real winter winner.
The voting machines removed 74% of the votes for the real winner.
Now, one of the reasons I'm doing this is because I try to help you understand words matter. It it you you just got to understand it. Words freaking matter, folks.
If we were to go back in time, remember we were authorized by the court in Georgia, and I'm going to use Georgia as the basis for this.
in Georgia to get 150,000 ballots now, which we know were never folded, but they called them mail-in ballots, and some of them had absolutely perfect ovals.
Reading the little fine print there, it says the suit sought an outside review, that's me, of nearly 150,000 absentee ballots cast in the county, arguing that people who participated in a hand recount of the election claimed to have seen absentee or mail-in ballots that suspiciously weren't creased and don't look like they were marked by him.
So, when you hear those things, that's my team. That's the forensics we do.
Now, what has it been?
Four years, six, seven, eight months. Right now, we still don't have those ballots.
And I completely don't believe that Georgia has even kept them like they were supposed to.
But when we were on the edge of looking at those ballots, and this is going to relate to Arizona, it's going to relate to every other state. So pay attention.
A so-called Republican who was involved in the quote unquote auditing mix blah blah blah blah blah.
His name's David Cross released something that should have never been released. And it's that we knew we would find duplicated ballots.
I already knew we had them in the images, which I'm going to show you a few things of how you do this. We knew it. I already knew it. The court gave me those images.
So I I don't sit in Georgia. So it was given to the team. The team duplicated the FOB, gave it as a favor to Garland Favarito and who I'm doing it for, which are the actual litigants. I got the copy. I gave my analysis. But Garland passed it a copy to this fellow by the name of David Cross.
E-cross double cross. David Cross.
and he did some analysis which which he didn't do. He hired a programmer to run the images.
And this has kind of been the case all over because he put out on social media, well, we can see duplicated ballots.
Here it is. And a lot of people covered that story. Can con lumberjack, some of these people. And man, I got on the phone real quick and I said, "Guys, you probably just cost us this audit in Georgia and asked them to tape down those interviews." All of them did except one. And David Cros just would not stop talking. Well, long story short, the judge who had everything ready to go and was fine. As soon as the system knew that we could find the duplicates, even using the cheap versions, all hell hit it. They sent incredible amount of attorneys in. And I believe somebody scared the judge and the judge kicked the can. So we lost it.
Now, a lot of what I'm going to show you today is very important because it 100% codifies what we found in Arizona. And that's what you need. Multiple states doing it, not just one.
Well, here it is four years, six, eight months later, right?
and we still don't have them. I don't believe they exist anymore. Oh, no. By the way, the double cross that released it, uh, he's now running for the chairmanship of the GOP in his area of Georgia. So, he's going to be aptly rewarded for what he did.
This is why it's very important. You need to understand how to play this game. defense tactics, battle tactics, war tactics, everything else. But you must you must understand 100% what you're looking at.
Okay, now let's get started. You know that little piece that the person taunted me? Well, well, well, come on.
Lookie lookie lookie. Well, here's what he wanted me to lookie lookie lookie at.
Uh on election night and the days following, it appeared that the results that were coming off the tabulating machines were not accurate. A decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election.
>> Wasn't that the Dicab County Election Board attorney? Play it again, Sam.
>> And a decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election.
>> What? Isn't that what I've been saying for 20 years?
>> Do a hand rec.
>> Okay, I'm just going to play it again outside of the people trying to be social media influencers. What? Play it again, Sam. Anyway, listen. Listen closely.
>> Uh on election night and the days following, it appeared that the results that were coming off the tabulating machines were not accurate. A decision by the board was made to do a hand recount to ensure accurate results of the election. Okay. So, the bottom line is the counts didn't match.
The counts didn't match. Okay. Now, that's a big deal.
What I'm attempting to help people understand is if we want to make this count, pun intended, you have to understand how those counts come in.
If you understand how the counts potentially come in, then you can understand how it was done. And remember, if you don't know how they do it, you can't defend against it. By the way, coffee gal.
Thank you, sweetheart. so so so very much for supporting our program and all of the donations go for just so we can try to keep the evidence alive from the full forensic audit for the use of hopefully ultimately Supreme Court at least for history. Okay. So I'm going to take you through these things and I'm going to get you primed.
Okay. Okay, I'm going to get you primed so you can get your detective on and decide what are you looking at. Is that okay? And don't forget, I'll be doing part two of Lindell versus Kuma right after this. Here's your choices. You might want to write them down. So when I ask you to vote, A is machines did it. B is people did it. C is paper did it. D is programs did it.
A is machines did it. B is people did it. C is paper did it. D is programs did it. And by the way, it can be a combination.
Okay, I'm going to show you a few things.
This is the stuff that got exposed from this fellow David Cross that absolutely made sure with all the little broadcast. Oh, breaking news. Breaking news. I'm stopping my smoke hooch shop to now be a reporter on elections. I quit working Taco Bell so I can show you about votes.
This is some of the information that that got out public that I already knew.
We knew it hands down.
But remember just a very simple thing.
If it's electronic, it falls with under voluntary voting systems.
Remember that if it's electronic in nature, it falls under voluntary voting system guidelines. You get it? It's voluntary. If it's paper, it's not the VVSG. If it's paper and it's found, it's a felony both at the state and the federal level.
Okay? Understand the role of paper. Now, here's what we found.
What we already knew, a lot of people released it as breaking news.
Okay. Now, this is a a very easy ballot to see. Of course, it's not the full ballot, right? Come on. It's just a shot. Do you see it?
Now, the reason this particular ballot is so just easy to use is it's got handwriting on it. So, you see the vote in was a write in for John Lewis at top.
Uh a write in at the bottom, write in was Dubois.
Okay.
Now, here's what we already knew.
We knew in these electronic images this ballot existed.
But many many batches later, this is batch number 11.
This is a batch number 11.
In batch 35 it appeared again.
Now again this is why this is called kinematic detection.
Kinematic only means the physics study of motion. That's what it means motion.
So, if somebody was to write on a ballot, yeah, if somebody was to write on a ballot, is there motion involved?
Yes, there is.
And there are systems involved. But putting pen to paper is motion. There's an impact.
Okay? So, it's kinematic. Artifact is the writing. And you're detecting, okay, what was done with it. Now, get ready.
Okay. Just so you understand, this was batch 11. Let's just look at the dewis.
Look at the B and Dwis. Just use that as your anchor. Right. Well, in batch 35, see? See, it's the same one. You can see it. Right. There it is. There it is.
There it is. There it is.
Now, it's obvious that that ballot, now remember this is what's called the cast vote record. This is the electronic image of the ballot.
This is what's called in this case, this would be the post image.
And I'm I'm doing very easy ones for you so you can pick out the very distinct nature of these things. Okay? Now, I'm going to give you a test and I want you to vote this ballot here.
And you got to be very exact, folks.
This ballot here.
Okay? And just so you know, this John Lewis got a vote here and web DWA DB got a vote. And then when it was run again, John Lewis got a a vote and we Dubois got a vote. Okay, get it.
Here's your quiz. Be very thoughtful about your answer.
Was this was this A the machines? Now this is a digital image. Was it B people oriented?
Was it C paper oriented or was it D programs oriented? Put your vote in.
Okay. put your vote in on on which which one you think. Was that an effect of A machines, B people, C paper, D programs?
Now, most all of you are getting that it's B.
It's people.
Now, this could be called the the Rudy Ruby effect. You're right. Now, let me point something out to you that I I need you to understand.
When you take this kind of evidence and you take it to court and you present it in this format right here, cast record, what is the outcome?
Not a damn thing. Now, do you know why when you take that to court and the outcome is nothing? Do you know why that is?
Because they can say it was an accident.
I didn't mean to do it. It was a boo boo.
I ran them in one way. I thought I already run it. I ran them in again.
Now, these votes counted.
Now, many things you're getting it right, Theres. You're right. Not enough to affect the material outcome of the election. But when you're dealing with humans, things work. It's a glitch. It's a boo boo. It's an accident.
Now, this is glaring, right? This is glaring.
and you you're seeing it with your eyes.
This is why I'm giving you a little prep here. And you were right. That was a people oriented issue. However, if in fact we had the physical ballots, the accident becomes a crime.
Now, how does that happen?
Because what you have is, and you got to understand how all of this works, you have a paper ballot that somebody marked.
This has nothing to do with the voter.
Has to do with the people that run the elections. That paper ballot went in, okay?
And it created a digital image.
This one will have an adjudication piece in between. It will have a final image and then it gets dropped into the elector file.
When it got around to the other one, you'd never find it. Meaning there'd be no paper there. But why is it in the system?
Well, then then you get to go deeper.
who ran that batch, which they know who ran that batch.
And then with this a simple forensic technique like that, you've only got one paper, but you got two pre-im images, you got two adjudications, you got two after images, you got two EMS files, and you counted it twice. Every one of those become potential crimes.
At minimus, it's maladministration.
But see, you got one hardcore anchor.
That one anchor.
Right legal right to look at everything.
But if you don't look at everything and you can't show the physical piece of paper, you can't earn the right to look at everything. So now, do you understand why they hid the paper?
Because it gives you the measuring stick to show it from beginning to end and then you look for the recurring occurrences and that's what takes it from maladministration to malfeasants and that's what makes things widpread.
which is why they focus on but it's not widespread so it's just a boo boo right let me show you a different version of it take a look at this one now at the top of the ballot you are looking at basically the batch run number this was batch 742 it looks like it was tabulator 40 and it looks like it was batch Okay.
>> So, it was prec Yeah. Precinct. Sorry.
It should be in the if it's in the proper format. Precinct 742 tabulator 40 the 11th ballot in sequence. Do you see it at the top? Now, I want you to pick something looking at this ballot. Although you're looking at a digital copy. Once again, you're looking at a digital copy.
I want you to focus in on something on that ballot other than the number at the top that you can recognize and remember the shape.
So, you you either have the vote for Biden on the left or you have the vote for Bryant on the right. But do you see how it's kind of uniquely marked?
Now, this is the same person that voted it. I can tell you as an expert on this, right? Is uh they have a swirl then a scribble. They zoop zip zoop in a circle and then they up and down. Get it?
That's how they start. It's called a reverse stroke.
Now, pick one. Put your eyes on it. Pick one.
Let's jump forward.
Same precinct two batches later.
Yeah. But the second ballot in sequence.
You probably notice it's the exact same mark.
second ballot sequence two batches later.
Now, this is exactly the same ballot.
You can see it. Here's number one.
Here's number two.
Now, the timing difference shows it wasn't an immediate flip. Why? Because it's two batches later, but they're the same.
Okay, one more look.
Ballot A batch 40 ballot 11 in sequence.
42 batch two in sequence.
Okay, now I'm going to ask you a few questions.
You ready?
Time to vote.
You get to vote. A, B, C, or D? A. Was this the machine?
B.
Was this people?
C. Was this paper?
D was this programs?
What was it?
put it in chat.
You're right. It's B. It's paper. Now, how do we know this?
Because that ballot image is created when the ballot is tabulated.
And somehow that ballot, that physical ballot got tabulated twice, but at different times and in a different sequence.
Now, let's get your forensics on.
Number one, this is all digital.
What's the end result in court?
Cuz all I had to show you was the digital image.
What happened in court?
Not a thing.
Why?
Because all of the rules regarding everything electronic are 100% voluntary.
Now, you're right. It's paper. It is C.
It's on paper. But you got to go to the cause. The cause is the paper was fed by a person B into the system. Now, since it was all electronic and all the voting rules are voluntary, what can the system say?
It was a boo boo. It was a mistake.
Now, let me tell you where forensics picks up in this and why we need the paper. See, when you prove it's the paper, you can show criminal intent. Now, let's just kind of play out a theory here.
Let's say that that ballot, we know it ran in twice.
That means Biden got two votes where he should have gotten one. You got to remember they could they can vote 40 times or 50 times on a ballot depending what's there. How does it impact the overall vote? If they're different than the opposing side, it could be 40 different votes difference for one ballot.
It can make a 40 vote difference. Get it? Depending on how many races there are.
Now, let's do forensics on this.
Why do you need the paper? Well, when you get the paper, how does the paper get into the scanner?
If anything, if everything in the machine is voluntary, they can say it's a boo boo. It was a mistake. It was an accident.
But let me ask you a simple question in investigation.
How does the paper get into the scanner or tabulate a person?
So for that paper to appear twice at rudimentary investigation level, what occurred? Some person put that same piece of paper in.
Get it?
Now what's interesting is now you have an identifiable person.
Okay, we're going to keep on playing out this forensics because you got it right.
This is a people issue.
Now, in that numbers up there, and this is going to become important in a few moments, in those numbers up there, those numbers give you what's called time and telemetry.
It tells you when it was done, and it tells you what time it was done, what machine it was done on, and what sequence it was in.
Now, why is that important? And you'll know more in a minute as I go on. Please hang with me. Why is that important?
Well, let's say uh ballot, this first ballot, let's say it was run on tabulator one and then just I mean instantly following on the same tabulator one here it comes in again.
Well, then in your investigation, we're doing numbers here. If it was 100 ballots and ballot ballot number one showed up twice in an investigation, boom, here comes the first one in the machine, this batch, but then you see it a second time immediately following, but it's the last ballot in sequence versus the first ballot in sequence. Now, what you have forensically is you can pretty much attribute that to human error.
Why? Well, it was number one in this sequence. And I'm just picking that number out of my hoo-hoo because it's so small. I got to start with one.
Number one went in. Now, when the ballots go in, it kind of reverses the order because they stack up, right?
And when you look at that, right, and it happens and then there's an accident, you can ostensibly say in these machines, okay, it ran through and somehow somebody just immediately they they they were supposed to set it over here, but yet they set it here. They thought it was new batch and they ran it through. Now you have a physical trail that could lead you to believe it was truly an accident.
I can see how it could happen. They were supposed to take it out and put it over here and but yet they took it and put it here. They got distracted, scratched their butt. Okay. Right. Smoked too much hooch at lunch or whatever. You can get it right.
Okay.
Now, let's play a different thing that actually occurs in these cases.
Do you remember I told you every single fact matters?
Every single fact matters. I know you're saying, "Oh, please. They ran it again."
I know that. But look, we got to give people the benefit of the doubt.
Okay.
Let's say that the first ballot went in tabulator number one, but then when you find it again in the system, it's tabulator number six of 10.
Now, what do you have?
This is forensics.
When it went in the first time, it was tabulator number one.
And by the way, if they say it's a paper jam, it has to be written down. There should be supporting paper. But you see, in that first example, it can literally be said it was a boo boo. You you could deduce that. But let's say that first batch was run in tabulator one.
But when it came up again in the system, the same exact ballot, somehow it appeared on, you know, ballot scanner number six of 10.
Well, now what you have is another measurement in forensics. Well, that machine sit on the left side of the room and this machine is 50t away over on this side of the room.
How' the paper get there?
Now, let me ask you that question. Even dealing with the digital copy, if it ran on tabulator number one and we see it again on tabulator number six, what would have done that?
Well, another person would have done it.
It could be the same person.
It can be two people doing it.
Hold on one second.
Just muted idiots so we don't distract it. This is too important to to do. So, okay.
So, if it migrated, you understand you have another step in the cog, right? You have another step in the cog.
If it migrated that shows what intent see when you anything digital you can say it's a boo boo but when you deal in the physical it proves intent.
Why? Because you intentionally marked the ballot. You intentionally scanned it in. you intentionally carried it to a tabulator or whatever the case may be depending upon how the district does it.
Do you understand?
There you go.
Now, let's go to the next level of forensics.
If in fact it showed up in this ballot batch and it was number one of 100, which means if it was just an accident, it will be number 100 if it just got picked up and went to another machine.
They just ran it in reverse. What if that number's out of sequence down there the second time and it appeared as number 11 as opposed to if it was just an accidental rerun in reverse order, it'd be number 100. That shows what again intent. They shuffled them and they have to explain all this stuff.
This is why you go for the paper. Do you understand?
I've taken you through forensics. So, let me show you a few others.
You ready?
One.
Look at this ballot.
Not yet voted.
What's wrong with this ballot?
Put it in chat. Tell me what is wrong with uh this ballot. And it's crooked by whoever took the shot.
You're right. There's a dot. You see that little dot for Camala?
There's a dot. Now, technically that wouldn't be a stray mark because that has to be done by a human hand.
This is done by the machine. But which machine is it done on?
It's done on the printer.
So in this one, let's look at it. In this one, okay, the ballot printer, whether it be at the high level or the lower level. Now, I can tell you right now looking at the grayscale in this, see where it says president, vice president of the United States. The grayscale is kind of off. So, this is probably a uh ballot on demand, the lower level printer, but there's a dot and the dot was done by the printer.
Now, if this was a nefarious intentional hack, which is it? A is this the machine? B is this the people? C is it the paper? D is it the program?
A is it the machine? B is it the people?
C is it the paper? D is it the program?
Which way would you vote?
Now, it's interesting. Some people are saying A, you'd be right. Some people are saying B, you'd be right. Some people are saying D, you'd actually be right.
So, how would you track this down? Well, number one, you've got it. Now, let's do forensics.
Why? Because we're looking at the paper.
Now, what does forensics do? Well, number one, if you had a hundred precincts and this was only in one precinct, what could you determine?
Well, if it was in one precinct out of a hundred, it was one precinct, then you would ask yourself what how would you track it down in forensics?
Which ballot ondemand printing machines did that precinct use? Did they have one? Did they have two? Did they have three?
Okay.
Now, if you took a blank piece of paper and you ran it through that printer and the dot appeared, what would that lead you to believe?
Let me ask it again.
If you ran a if they only had one machine and you ran the paper through and a random dot appeared, what could you conclude from that in an investigation that there was an issue with the printer? Bad printer. You're right. Now, let me change it.
If you run paper through the machine and no dot appears, what can you assume?
It wasn't the printer.
So, where do you go next? Well, since all of our ballot images to the precincts are delivered electronically, what do you go back to?
you go back to the original file that enables the ballot format for that precinct to be there. Now, all of that, okay, all of that gets sent through the mail.
Okay. Well, what if you go back to the ballot original that was sent there and there's no dot and when you printed from a machine you saw the dot. Well, you could that would be conclusive evidence. It did not exist in the original file.
It truly truly was just a machine acting wonky.
Now, let's say that the dot was in the original file.
Where do you go next?
Well, you look up line. Okay. Where did the file for the precinct come from? Now you head up line and you got some county worker.
You look at the image they received for distribution.
Was the dot there or not? Let's say the dot wasn't there.
But somehow for this worker the dot got there. You see how you do this tracking down?
What if you have right? What if you have no dot there and you look at the precinct and it has a dot in the master and then everyone that precinct rang had that dot there. It basically shows somebody put that dot in and it was ran on every one of them.
What if At the precinct level, you find out somebody put a dot there possibly. What if you find that dot is not on all of the ballots, but it's on 50% of the ballots?
What would that lead you to believe?
That somehow it's turning on and it's turning off.
But see, you got to look at the ballot.
Now, let's say you actually look at every ballot.
And 50% of the ballots have dots, but it's number one, number three, number five, number seven. Get it? What do you have?
You have a program running.
Yes, you have a program running.
So that would prove there's some sort of program here. Now let's get really let's say this precinct half of the ballots had it half of the ballots didn't and they ran a thousand ballots.
Let's say on 1,000 ballots, 100 people, when you get the ballots, 100 people did not vote for anybody as president.
But when you look at the adjudication files, because sometimes people hate the president, I'm just not going to vote for those. I don't like either one, so I'm not going to vote. But let's find let's say on those hundred which are clearly not marked by a human hand which would technically just be an undervote.
Why would you need to know if somebody didn't vote?
You ever thought about that? Well, let me tell you why they want to know if somebody didn't vote. Let's say there was a hundred ballots where somebody didn't vote for president. Did you know that adjudicates it? That you didn't vote for a president? Now, did that tell you when you were scanning it in? Did the person say, "Wait a minute, you didn't vote for a president." Not at all.
But let's say in the undervote adjudication and you look at the physical ballot and there's not any marked by human hands and it throws it as an undervote. Look at this. What is this? What if in adjudication that little dot was read as a mark and gave 100 votes to Camala?
The machines have that ability. Now, in that case, depending on what they use, it's a person looking at adjudication.
Oh, there's a little mark there. They must have put their pin there. They just didn't finish it. Vote for Camala.
Do you understand the combination there?
That was a combination that somebody put the dot there. It's not anywhere from the other precincts. It's only this particular precinct. Somehow they got it modified the PDF file, loaded into the system and has a dot. But when it went to adjudication, who's looking at adjudication? Well, that little bitty dot was enough. And it can be done was enough to say it was a vote for Camala.
Which means every ballot in the system that was an undervote, meaning I don't want to vote for any of the presidents.
I think they're all horrible. One's too orange and one cackles too much.
But somebody allowed it.
They would read that dot as voter intent.
Is that the machine?
Well, see, you're seeing it was achieved by paper, but it required people because it wasn't omniresent everywhere, which means somebody intentionally put that dot there. And if it did, like I said, 50% of them, it's alternating. You know, it's a program.
But did the machine actually do it?
Technically, there's a machine involved.
But did the machine do it? You see how all of this works? This is the subtleties that if you don't understand how it works, and I'm going to give you one before I start showing you some videos. If you don't understand how it works, you call it out wrong. And the easiest way to call it out wrong, it's the machines.
Okay, here you go.
This is uh some people call them a batch header.
Right, a batch header.
And so all of the ballots run in batches.
The batches are usually, you know, they can be anywhere from 200 or a little less or up, whatever it is. This would be a batch header when you're looking at what's in here. There's a little sheet added and this thing would say, okay, here's the stack and there's 481 votes for Trump and there's 187 votes for Biden. There's four for Jorgensson and zero for Over.
And let's say you find this and as you can see up there, okay, it's precinct 411C and it's election day, but they did a recount.
Now, recount can mean they just counted the number of papers again.
But remember, even in a recount, they don't have to show the trail they got there with.
Somebody's just reading the batch header.
Well, let's say they did a recount and here's the replacement batch header.
Requires some math.
Supposedly, originally, Donald Trump had 481 votes.
Biden had 187.
Jorgensson had four. But when you look at the county recounts, it was adjusted to 284 to Donald Trump.
187 to Biden, which was the same, right?
Yep. Four to Jorgensson and zero for overvote. So, where did the votes go?
Same batch, same precinct, same recount.
One is the original and one is the recount.
Where' the votes go?
So, let me ask you a question.
Which one do you believe?
One's done at the level that it was supposedly going on and one was afterwards. Well, you can see they reduced Donald Trump.
We're just going to make it easy. They dropped 200 votes. It's 199, but they dropped 200 votes.
It's about Yeah, 199. It's a It's about exactly a batch load.
Well, where'd they go?
Some people say it went to the chicken fire for nesting, but let's don't use that. How would you track this down?
Now, see, you think when they do a recount that it actually means it's real?
Whose word do you take? Do you take this word or do you take this word?
Because at the end of the day, when they tell you we're doing a recount, all they're doing is reabulating what was written on the box.
One person wrote this at the precinct level. One person wrote this at the recount level.
Now, here's the interesting thing.
How would you verify it?
See this one, the county saying, cuz the county certifies it. This is what we certified happened.
But on the recount by the state, this is what they certified happened.
What you're probably learning is comparing receipts isn't an audit.
So if we got a missing 199 ballots from one end to the other, where' they go?
So what do you need?
You want to get to the bottom of this.
What do you need?
the paper because you see everything in this, the little receipt that they give off the machines, the batch headers, they never talk about they never talk about the batch headers.
Where do you get the absolute truth?
That's 197 ballot difference, which is about the size of a batch. Where do you get the absolute truth?
The paper the paper ballot.
Now, now if you did a paper, not PECAPS, not any of that [ __ ] right?
and you did a paper recount and it matched the first one. What could you conclude?
Well, somebody on the recount end deducted 197 votes from Biden, from Trump. You know, some people think it's adding votes. You know, they can do the same thing by subtracting votes.
So, what if this was correct? What if the really uh absolute thing was Donald Trump got 481 votes, but when the county whatever did their recount of the commissioners, it somehow lpped off 197.
Then you can see somebody at the county level took away those votes.
Or what if it's in reverse? You really only have that many physical ballots, right?
It would mean somebody at this level padded Donald Trump votes.
Now, one of the good things about all of this, if it's done correctly, is hang on, let me find it.
You actually end up with something like this. Now, I'm showing you a little bit different variances here, and I think I'm going to have to Let me see where it is on my screen. Oh, wait. Damn it. What did I do there?
Okay, so these are uh tabulation pieces.
Okay, batch headers. I'm going to pump this up.
Now, this is a little different version of it, but I want to show you something.
This is supposedly a batch.
100% of the votes for Biden, 100% of the votes for Biden.
200 votes, all of them, for Biden. 100 votes, all of them for Biden. 100 votes, all of them for Biden. Now, you're seeing two things here, right? You see the 100 in the slot.
And you're seeing a 100 circled in the confirmation.
You're seeing 100 in the slot, 100 circled in the confirmation. That's a supervisor.
Okay. Now, number one, it's statistically impossible.
I'm going to give you some more on this.
Okay.
Now let's put your forensics on.
Look at the screen.
This is absentee scanner batch number four or absentee scanner number four batch 37. See it at the top.
Absentee scanner 2 batch 22.
Absentee scanner 2, batch 19. Absentee scanner two. Absency scanner two. Get it? Absentee scanner 4. Absency scanner 4.
So what what you can deduce by this is you got two people running this operation.
One's using scanning two, one's using scanning four. You could you could deduce that.
Secondly, there should be two people involved cuz one person wrote it was 100 and a supervisor confirmed. They double checked that it was 100. But what's the problem when the county turned all of this over?
I'm going to pump it up.
Well, what happened in all of this is the county refused to turn over the signatures of who these people were. And if you look at the bottom, it says there were three sets of initials involved in the checkout station.
They failed to put it here. So, you don't know how many people involved.
There were three there. There were three there.
They failed to put it there. They failed to put it there. They failed to put it there. See? So that tells you how many times this was done unsupervised.
This is forensics.
This is why everything matters. The fact that that the trend was to have three, but there's none. Technically, this could be, if you look at my screen, wait a minute, we can't even count this because nobody verified it. Yeah, you have a there. See, there's no confirmation on this one with the red circle. There's no confirmation there.
There's no confirmation there.
This is forensics.
This is the level of work we do. You got a second person involved there. You got a second person involved there. None there. Got a second person involved there. This is forensics.
Now, what if we had all the signatures?
We get to see who these people are.
Do you understand yet how this game is played?
Now, I'm going to give you a test here.
See, everything here has people connected to it. It's all absentee ballots, possibly unsupervised.
They were running two different machines.
Okay.
They're doing it consecutively. Batch number 19, batch number 20, batch number 22, batch number 35. Oh, excuse. Here it is. 21. See it? Batch.
Batch 19. Batch 20. Batch 21.
Batch 22. And then it picked back up again. Batch 35. Batch 36.
Batch 37.
Now, do you even see how much more information we learned?
We learned I'll do it three batches at a time. Three batches at a time. Boom.
Three batches at a time. This is forensics.
Is this the machines?
Vote A in chat. Is this people? Your vote will be B.
If it was paper that did this, your vote will be C. If it was D and and it did this, it would be the programs. Now, which one is this?
Of course, it's B.
But this is forensics just with that sheet of paper.
Henry says it was a big black [ __ ] No, it's just a bee, Henry. But thank you.
BBB. That's slang on the internet.
Look, it's people. It's people.
Now, where do you go from here?
Well, if in fact the only way you can see what happened is what do you have to do? You got to get back cuz statistically this is improbable.
Every single vote 100%.
They never turned over the people cuz we could find out who were doing it. They protected their people doing this.
So right now all you can say is statistically it's impossible.
Well, you can't do anything based on statistically.
So, where do you go to find out the actuality?
The paper, it's the only thing that can prove it.
Let me give you a little background on this one. Here you go.
>> Yeah. So, what we're looking at, Heather and Steve, are tally sheets that were the auditors for the Georgia audit that was conducted on November and 14th and 15th in Fulton County.
Oh, what you mean? This wasn't at the precinct level.
Is that why they're on yellow paper?
This was when the state came in and did a recount, random recount.
>> Yeah. So, what we're looking at, Heather and Steve, are tally sheets that were the auditors for the Georgia audit that was conducted on November and 14th and 15th in Fulton County. They filled these out as they counted the ballot.
>> This is Garland Favarito, the talking head in Georgia for all of this. Garvin Favarito, like Dorito of your favorite, Favarito.
>> Yeah. So, what we're looking at, Heather and Steve, are tally sheets that were the auditors for the Georgia audit that was conducted on November and 14th and 15th in Fulton County. They filled these out as they counted the ballots. And typically you would see uh 37 to 43, 60-1 to 48, something like that. But here we have tally sheets that are 100 to nothing for ballots. So somebody filled this out. But it's not just one of these. We have seven of these. And we're going to kind of scroll through and show you these live. There's another one. 100 to nothing. The actual counts of these are like 5942 in terms of ballot images. Here's one that's 150 to nothing.
>> Yeah. So basically every the people that were filling doing the audit would count the batches and then write in fraudulent numbers because they have the corresponding images for these batches and they do not match these sheets. So whoever was doing them commit fraud. And what I had asked him in the press conference is are these sheets signed by the person that doing them? And apparently they are, Steve. And not only that, the Secretary of State has the information. These sheets that they got, it's redacted. So they can't determine who was doing this, but we know that whoever did commit fraud. Now, I want to switch over to the images of the ballots, right? These ballot images that they obtained through their lawsuit that are the official images from the Dominion machines. Two different ballots right here. Right. This is the ballot number, the batch or the ballot number here. different from here, but as you can see, it's the exact same markings, Steve, on each one. And Garland, tell me, how many of these did you guys find?
>> Well, there are a total there are a total of duplicate reporting of over 4,000. Uh we are still looking at as to find out how many of these are duplicates scanned.
>> This spreadsheet behind here has about 40,000 line items, right? that compares the numbers from the original election to the recount. The error rate on that they said was 59.5%.
>> Okay, now this is physical evidence.
However, the only thing you can prosecute on is the physical ballot.
So, we're fighting in Georgia for the physical ballot. about 150,000 and they're being set aside.
This is where David Cross and others thought this was a social media game.
Of course, we'll see if the GOP rewards him with the new chairmanship there of the GOP.
But this is where people thought this was news and here you go and how you fight it. No, all of this was even more preponderance of evidence to verify we got to get to the paper. But what they did was they released it in social media and it tanked the audit and now it's been four years, eight months later, we still don't have it.
And I'm pretty sure that those ballots that were supposed to be kept, although we keep on hearing they're there done.
This is the GOP, folks.
But this is also the problem with social media that people think news will be a breaking story.
You know what what the only thing that should have broke was the cabal in the system. Not do you have a cool story?
Now, I became the villain because I called all these people out and said, "Pull that freaking interview down.
You're going to cost us." And it did. I told them exactly when it happened.
Other podcasters that had the interview saying, "I'm not taking it down. You're just trying to get credit." You dumb idiot. This isn't about who gets credit.
You just want to claim you discovered it yourself. No, you idiot. This is lawfare. We're fighting a war. This is evidence. And when they see what we know, they're not going to give us the paper. What happened?
They didn't give us the paper.
Simple question.
In that whole Michigan, was that the machines?
Was it people?
Was it paper or was it programs?
See, only forensics can tell you all of this.
And when you get into the forensics and you get the paper, it's only then can you tell did a program manage this?
Because everything else is voluntary, looks like a trend, and it cannot be codified. If you keep on focusing on the machines, which is what they taught everybody in the system to do. Focus on the machines. Focus on the machines.
Don't forget, right when I leave this program, we're going to go ahead and talk about part two, Lindell versus Kumer. It's the live trial that's going on. I'm going to show you a few more things before I show you some other videos. What's this? Hang on.
Boom. Okay. By the way, when you these these were what the votes were, right?
They basically changed everything.
They falsified to 100% for Biden. That took a person to do that. It took multiple people to do it. But even the state wouldn't release the people's names. Now, why would the state black out their names?
Because then you will find out if it was widespread, who was involved, and were they told to do it.
I've always told you there are hundreds of ways it's rigged. What do they tell you? It's the machines. They change the vote.
Here's another one we'll look at. Can you kind of see this one?
at all.
Let me see if I've got it.
Anyway, you can see right looking at the unique marks, the little X right in the middle. Some are X, some are circle and X combos, but it's marked identically.
Same votes, same place appearing batches and batches later. Now, this is an electronic one.
can't prosecute on the electronic.
Now, I'm going to get into some heavy stuff.
All this takes as standards, folks.
That's all this takes. Standards.
Okay.
I believe that SEB 2023025, which deals with the general election count and an official recount of the general election contest, is a case that pertains to the role and responsibility of the Secretary of State.
The complaint is complex and and large in scope. It involves alleged inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and irregularities in counts for a presidential contest in one county that represents 10% of the votes in the state.
The findings in a prior complaint SCB 202181 that was con concluded with a consent order found 4,081 votes that were erroneously given to one candidate and a careful review of a third of the ballots by the governor's team and Mr. Rossi and Mr. Monla.
If one were to calculate the same error rate and a 100% review of that same county, there would be over 12,000 votes given to a candidate in error.
Mr. Rossy and Mr. Mona's complaint 2023-025 questions the accuracy of the recount and the original count of the presidential contest of 2020.
They questioned the veracity of scanner vote totals because of lack of documentation.
Mr. Rossi and Mr. Monla alleged that the recount resulted in almost 18,000 votes short and over 3,000 duplicate vote counts. According to the complaint, 10 scanners have no election documents for 20,713 votes. Perhaps the county or other election officials can produce the proper documents or evidence.
>> Okay.
Thousands of votes.
Here's the question from that testimony.
Was it the machines? A.
Was it B people? Was it C paper or was it D programs?
Based on what she said, was it A machines, B people, C paper, D programs?
And yes, there was only about a 10,000 and change difference, 11,000 difference in the vote in Georgia.
Now, which one would it be?
Well, when it's said like that, now I've already I've already painted you because I've shown you how the people do it. But when it's just read like that, it's easy for people to say, "IT'S THE MACHINE." SEE, THEY'RE SWAPPING BOATS. THEY'RE SWAPPING BOATS.
That's proof. Is it?
Is it?
Is it the machines?
>> It's the machines. Well, see, here's the deal. when it's dealt with at that level and they put their people in screaming it's the machines and if it does actually get to court, they will say it was just an accident.
It was a boo boo. We'll do we'll do we'll do better.
But there's no conviction because it's voluntary voting system guidelines.
Now, do you see why it's always pushed to the machines? Now, what was missing in that? What was missing in that?
The paper. Now, as you've been through this drill with me, if we had the paper, I can compare the paper to the digital, to the badge card, to the chain of custody, and I could eventually tell you with no nothing redacted. I'll tell you everybody who was involved, when they did it, what time, what they were, and how often they did it. That's forensics.
But you can only get there with the paper.
You can only get there with the paper.
Now, this is where people are saying, "But we got to do a hand count. We got to do a hand count. And if we handc count it, paper ballots, handc count it, we'll stop all of this. Now, I know that sounds good.
I know that sounds good because I'm showing you these things.
Sounds freaking great. We just get paper and hand counting, none of this will happen. In a way, you're right.
But I want to ask you a question.
because I'm going to drop two bigger pieces on you. Before I get to the one big piece, let's just go this one. Out of the 25,56 felons that voted in the election, which is their ballot, and who did they vote for?
Put it in chat. Out of the 256 felons that voted, which was their ballot and who did they vote for?
Out of the 66,248 that were under 18 and registered to vote, 66,248 under 18 who were registered to vote.
Which of them voted? Which of them?
Which of them voted?
And were their ballots removed? Well, you could say that 66,000, let's say all of them voted. Do you remove 66,248 ballots from the system? Well, no, because you can't really tell which ballot it was. That's mail-in voting.
24,423 people that voted weren't registered at all.
1,043 used a post office box. That's not allowed. 4,926 votes voted past the registration date. 10,315 died before the election. 395 of them voted in two states.
15,700 of them moved out of state before the election.
And 40,279 changed their county and didn't even re-register to vote. Now, let me give you an example.
One day voter registration, right? You can't register on the day to vote. Has to be eliminated. Dropboxes has to be eliminated. Mail-in ballot outside of absolute you're on your deathbed in the hospital excuse has to be eliminated.
The paper has to be standardized and you have to show ID. But will it fix all of this? No, it won't fix all of this. But you know what will fix all of this?
Embrace the fact we don't have a problem with voter fraud.
10,315 people, let's say if they were dead and voted. They didn't decide to do that.
This is 100% bloated voter roles of [ __ ] done wrong that somebody knows where the fat is and they're allowing a ballot to come in.
See, there's really only one fix truly.
But see, the system doesn't want it fixed. Why doesn't the system want it fixed?
They don't want it fixed because the fat benefits them. Why?
69,000 69 million people voted for Obama in '08, 65 in his second term. Hillary against uh Trump, 65 million for her.
Then we got the Biden nephew, 81 million. And Camala supposedly had 68 million votes. However, since our election, our recent election we had in the months following, a really interesting thing happened. What happened?
Well, a re a really interesting thing happened as they kept on inching up Camala. They're closing that hole.
They're closing that hole.
And actually, we could I can design an unhackable voting system that will not let any of these happen and will audit at the same time. But the system does not want that.
Now, you can see they've moved Camala up to 74,749,891.
This is what's going to hit us in the midterms.
By the way, don't forget right after this I'm doing part two of the Lindell versus Kumer because a lot's on the line for us.
But let me point something else out. Has a lot to do with Mike Lindell. I'm showing you that you can see the numbers. We know where they used this stuff. Here it is plain as day.
But part of Lindell's work was this. that. So you have a centralized statewide voter role that's onworked machines, servers. It has a public facing internet interface. That's it. That's all I need to know to know that it's blown. That that's a a centralized statewide voter role that was mandated by Help America Vote Act.
They have these all over the country.
And it's not just that you have a public facing internet uh interface to it, but but multiple organizations have what's called an API or an application programming interface. In other words, a machine to-achine interface into that voter role. And I'm telling you this because when people say, "Well, we have to clean up the voter roles." It's true that they're not following the law. It's true that they're not in good faith maintaining them in accordance with Title 52 that requires that the voter roles be both secure and accurate.
That's a a requirement imposed on the secretaries of state who've received the Help America Voting Act and CARES Act funding to maintain those voting systems. What nobody's going to tell you, but I'm going to tell you, is you cannot clean those rolls. You're sweeping a dirt floor.
Well, who paid for that?
That was a turning point.
That person went on the road. Who paid for that?
Put it in chat. Who paid to have that person crisscross the country?
I even heard this firsthand when I'm sitting with President Trump. Here's what we got to do. Somebody chimes up from behind, says, "Well, we're told not to do it because they'll just put them back in." That's how far this went in.
Who paid Who paid for that? Well, you're right. Mike Lindell paid to put those people on the road. But was it really Mike?
No, it was you.
You're paying Mike Lindell legal fees right now, which may be up to 400 grand in a separate GoFundMe or send money or whatever. And he's having his trial right now, but will present no evidence of fact based on all he said the election was stolen, but he's not going to present any of it.
You paid $400,000 in donations still coming in thinking the proof's going to come out. all the promotion. Bruce's going to come out. It's about the machines. You're going to see it. It's gonna He's not going to bring any of that.
You paid for it. Now, why do I say this?
Because this is how all of it works.
I'm only going to cover one more, but I want you to suspend for a moment that we were doing going to do multiple full forensic audits across the United States.
teams funded by Lindell went around and said full forensic audits are grifted.
Nothing. All those people got put on the road. One person went to all 50 states, 700 appearances. Who paid for that?
Okay, now I'm going to show you one other.
This is what would have happened if we would have been able to do our true audits in multiple states. Listen.
>> Yes.
>> Do you know why 380,761 ballot images from election day machine count are not available?
>> Okay.
380,000 We're going to call it 400,000 just for shits and giggles. Okay.
400,000 ballots in Georgia 100% specifically on election day.
When you look for the digital images of those ballots, the pre-image, they do not exist.
Put that in your head. 400,000 ballots, all election day ballots.
Okay, do not have the codifying. It went in the scanner, it creates a dead digital image and it goes through the process. You cannot verify that they ever hit a scanner.
You cannot verify that they ever hit a scanner.
Yes.
Do you know why 380,761 valid images from election day machine count are not available?
We subpoenaed Fulton County for all of their ballot images. Uh we received approximately 518,000 ballot images >> from election day.
Those are for the recount.
>> Those are from the recount, but we we have no ballot images for 380,761 ballots from election day. Correct.
What was subpoenaed was the ballot images for the recount because that's what this this case was about, not the election day.
>> Does Fulton County know why there are not 380,000?
Now, as you listen to them, you saw the recount was total hoie pooy, but the county people say, "Well, we only requested the images from the recount." She never answered the question, "Why are approximately, and I'm rounding up, 400,000 ballot images from election day missing?
Now, I'm going to give you a test.
We're going to take a pre-est. We're going to take a post test.
Think of it as a two-finger test.
Okay?
400,000 ballot images missing from the machines, meaning they're not there. Let me take you through. When the paper hits the machine, you got paper. The paper hits the machine, you get a digital image, it has an adjudication file if anything happened to it. It has the post adjudication file to show here's the ballot after it has the electronic version of dropping into the EMS and then it has other counts. That's the cast vote records, which nobody knew.
And I'm trying to educate all these people. They just get the last cast vote record. In this case, the last cat vote record exists. You just can't verify it came first. So, you don't really know what you're looking at. So, first question. Okay.
400,000 ballot images missing.
Is that a the machines?
Is that B the people?
Is that C the paper? or is that D the programs? Put it in chat. There are 400,000 roughly ballot images missing from the system.
Is that a the machines?
Is that b people?
Is that c paper? Is that d programs?
The ballot images are missing. The ballot images are missing. The ballot images are missing.
None of these people have looked at physical ballots.
The ballot images are missing.
Well, one, somebody had to tell them not to store.
But actually, it could be a program that tell them telling them to do it.
But you got to understand there's 300,000 or 400,000 ballot images missing.
Now I'm going to give you a different way to look at this. Now this is Georgia. We've used the whole time.
It's very easy to say it's the machines.
The machines did it. The machines deleted THEM ALL.
THAT'S VERY easy to say in this case, right?
very easy to say in this case. Do you agree? [ __ ] Yeah. They just wiped them out.
So you could in this case say it's the machines.
But was it the machine? Cuz it gets scanned.
Did it say don't save an image for these?
Uh was it the machines and the ballot never existed and they made it up and inserted it?
Well, I'm going to take you through that drill.
Get your dick on. Get your detective on.
Get ready. Oops, wrong button. Happens every now and then.
This is the last little test of the day.
Okay, you ready?
We're going to start here, folks.
Oops. This is Arizona.
Now, what I showed you, what I showed you was Georgia. and they're saying basically 400,000 ballot images are missing from the machines. Now, let me show you something here. I'm going to take you back through this, okay? So, bear with me.
Our team is the only team in the world that has ever forensically audited an election.
I'm one the only person in American history who's actually looked at over two million individual ballots, 189 million ovals.
Now, if you look at your screen, if you look at the screen, remember I kind of showed you this telemetry before at the top.
This was tabulator 3002. See the top line at the left? This was batch 715.
See 00715.
And this was uh image number 00082.
Okay.
And it and this is what's called telemetry.
1522 and 34. And there's the date. Okay.
Now I just kind of want you to understand this.
Now, in Maricopa, we had of approximately two million ballots, we had 1.8 million physical pieces of evidence that show how the machines should run.
Do you understand what I'm saying? You are looking at 1.8 million actual verified documented pieces of physical evidence that prove when a ballot is run into the scanning tabulating system. We get not only a confirmation, we get to understand the who, what, when, and where. Get it?
Okay.
Now, I'm going to show you something else. What interestingly happened in Arizona for 165,000 ballots and I'm going to show you on my screen is this.
Okay, now these are 1.8 million ballots coming into the system that we know absolutely by that little mark on top. Look at the the little mark on top just below the red banner. We know. We know what tabulator did it, what batch it was, what image it was in secret, and the telemetry of the date and everything else. We know it. Okay.
However, for some reason on 165,000 ballots in Maricopa roughly, you notice none of that information is there. Now, the reason I did this this way is you see the red banner I put here.
That's the extra space on the paper.
I did that to so you could see how much space is left on this header. This is basically called the text file, the EMS file. See the red? However, when you look at 165,000 some odd ballots, you notice the header's gone, right? The header's gone.
It just disappeared.
100% disappeared on 165,000 ballots.
You with me so far?
The other thing you will notice is the type is bigger.
See the size of this type on this page.
See the type on this page?
You see how the type's bigger? Well, what they did is they zoomed up the image synthetically so it would cut off the batch header but show the information they wanted to show. By the way, SG, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you for supporting my program and work. Thank you very much.
Okay. Now, why is this important?
Why is this particular piece of evidence important in Arizona?
Now, what this shows is somebody did some sort of programming or whatever, but what they did is they edited the file for 165,000 ballots to cut off the headers. So you couldn't really see when they were run in, what batch they were from, which batch they were in sequence, or where did it happen.
Okay, now this is information in Arizona.
Got it.
This is information in Arizona. This is what uh we know as a result of actually doing a full forensic audit in Arizona. Now, I'm going to take you a little bit further because I've shown you forensics is chasing down everything.
Okay.
First, I want to tell you a few things.
When I discovered this anomaly, why was this missing?
Why did they cut out the space? Why did they zoom up the information?
That's to cut off the head. But why were, you know, 1.8 million ballots not touched that way? And why were 1 point or 165,000 roughly right modified? Well, let me tell you a few things about those ballots.
If anything, I've taught you I've taught you that all of the facts matter.
In this case in Arizona, 100% of those ballots that somebody modified, 100% of those ballots were exclusively election day ballots.
Now, let that sink in for a minute.
You start looking for common denominators. I showed you how much information you can find from this stuff.
Of those that they're modified, they were 100% election day ballots only. Now, I want you to listen.
>> Yes.
Do you know why 380,761 ballot images from election day machine count are not available?
>> We subpoenaed Fton County for all.
>> Okay. Listen to what she says. Listen to the words of what she asked.
>> Yes.
Do you know why 380,761 valid images from election day machine count are not available?
So here's what she said. You caught it's election day. Did you catch that? It's exclusively election day.
But what she's asking is, hey, all of these election day ballots, the image of where the ballot went into the machine is missing.
All of the election day ballots, the image of the ballots going into the machine are missing.
In Arizona, 1.8 million we can confirm hit the machines.
This 100 plus thousand has no way to prove they were in the machines. But you know what is also interesting?
100% of these are not only election day.
100% of the image that is created when it goes in the machine are missing 100%.
Identical to Georgia. Now let me say that again.
100% of these ballots are election day.
that got modified all election day just like Georgia.
100% of the pre-im images when it first hits the machines are missing. So they can't prove that it actually ran into the proper system. They can't prove it even on their own because that image is missing.
So neither can Georgia. Same as Georgia.
Now Georgia didn't get an audit. The GOP made sure of that.
But in Arizona, where they watched my team carefully of what we can find, we got it.
And we got election day ballots. We got the physical ballot. So there is a physical ballot. There is no image of it going in the machine, but there is an after image and there is a drop to the file.
And so that's why the election said, "Well, Biden picked up a few more votes."
But did he?
One thing you need to know is in Arizona, these images that you're seeing here, we didn't get till months and months and months later.
We had to fight and fight and fight and fight and fight and fight and fight. And the subpoenas was going to send them to prison.
And then they say, "Well, oh, wait a minute. We archived them." But that was months later.
And what they gave us back were these images after the fact.
Months later, they gave us these images and said, "Well, we uh sorry, we misplaced them. Here you go."
Georgia has the same problem, but here's what you need to know.
Okay?
Remember, I've showed you this before. Again, nobody ever audited this way before.
And I showed you they never had the numbers in Arizona at all.
Ever.
It was picked right out of their hoohoo.
And I showed you this data.
And they told you I was grifting. And they told you we didn't do an audit.
They told you I didn't do a report.
Right? I'm the only person in the history of the world that's ever created forensics to look at this.
Now, what we find in this is we find this really odd outlier.
Get it up here. It'll be blurry, but we find this really odd outlier. Aside from the we see all these massive numbers of ballots being run in a month after the election. See them right there?
Now, why were they running in ballots a month after the election?
Why?
Well, you got to ask yourself, what were they doing during all that time, right?
And why were they running in ballots after the election, which is what I'm asking, which nobody paid attention to.
And again, guys, I appreciate you supporting our work. Thank you. Thank you, Superb Beth. Thank you so very much.
See, they will let things go to court.
And you're right, they are allowing only certain things to go to court because you can never prove it. But when you see what we do and you see the power of forensics, you get to show that very important thing, intent, and that's what's needed. But if they keep it to the machines, it's voluntary.
K2, thank you so very much. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you.
So, we have Georgia. We have this information that they would not let you see. I mean, Arizona. We're going to get one in Georgia. Now, why wouldn't they let you see it? Let me tell you why they wouldn't let you see it. Because They did the same exact thing in Arizona.
I'm going to just zoom this up.
You're looking at the dates. It is all 100% election ballots.
100%.
But you can only find this by getting everything.
Look at the dates.
They were running these in fast and furiously knowing we were going to get an audit.
screaming, hiding them in every nook and cranny they could.
And you can see how they did a lot of this and how many different people were involved. They're running these suckers in the system so they can have a piece of paper that matches cuz they know an audit's coming. Well, that's why there wasn't a pre-image. There was only a post image. And by the way, that was not the machines. It was a digital insertion. But as soon as they found out that I'm going to look at the paper, they go, "Fuck, we're in trouble. We got to start making paper." Which they did.
Which is also why in forensics I told you there were 1675 boxes which should have been sealed. Every one of them are supposed to be taped with security.
Each batch is in there supposed to be secure. There's about eight batches per box. When we got there, 1675 boxes, all of them were in disarray. All the ballots were all over the place. Ballots were stacked in top out of sequence.
What were those ballots? These ballots they were making.
However, there were 52 boxes that were sealed the proper way by law.
Were exactly right. It's 52 boxes. Oh, by the way, when I showed you earlier in the beginning when the state did the audit in Georgia, the numbers were different and even the state numbers were wrong and they faked it. Well, those 52 boxes in Maricopa County, Arizona, not only did those 52 boxes mathematically match the outcome of the election they chose, it had none of the forensic problems from bleeds to overdups to uh bad printing. None. zero of the forensic things we saw in all of the other ballots.
Susie, thank you.
That was a risk limiting audit. I've always told you it means it limits the risk of getting known.
Those B those boxes that Katie Hobbs and those guys decided to audit 52 matched the election.
All of the forensic tools we used to discover, they were right, meaning they were technically correct, the rest of the boxes, all kinds of errors, all kinds of problems, all kinds of disarray, no chain of custody, all kinds of printing errors, all kinds of bleedth through stuff all over the place.
How did they manage to pick exactly 52 boxes that would have none of those issues? because it's all decided in advance and you never find it. You never find it if you can't do a full forensic audit of everything and look at the paper, guys.
And yeah, you're asking the question, why wasn't the chain of custody challenged in court? I'm going to tell you why. I'm going to tell you why.
This was the same in Carrie Lakes's case.
And they brought in the chain of custody and had a so-called expert testify.
Well, they didn't sign it right.
The court said, "Well, the the county guy said, well, that was just a boo boo.
It was an accident." But it wasn't signed right. But because they didn't do the forensics, they couldn't point to every ballot and show everything. They didn't bother it. I gave it to them and the attorneys in Mike Lindell didn't let them use it in Car's case because they're the ones that funded it.
Make of that what you will. But the only requirement the state of Arizona had in doing an additional audit in Arizona of the Kerry Lake stuff, which he didn't win, they had one requirement. You cannot work with Jovon and his team.
Guys, thank you for all of your support for what we do.
It's cost us millions, but we're fighting for our country.
This is why we so desperately have to have your help on locals or all of this hard physical evidence gone. We're hearing testimony right now in front of a jury. Mike Lindell and all this stuff. Mr. Machines, it's the machines here. Why? It was a call. He said he was going to do it. I'm worried about Mike is going to get his hat handed to him. I'm going to do part two right after this. So, make sure you join me on locals. I just need a PB break, but you'll get a etc. And those very auditors that did that second audit which the state forbid me and now those auditors are got positions within the GOP and the state big whoop-deds teaching people how to secure elections on YouTube where I'm not allowed.
Think about that.
You are probably the only people in the world that that follow this that absolutely know the truth. But let me give you the kicker now. Do you understand why they had to suppress the full forensic audit in Arizona? Because they deployed the same tactics in other states.
If it matched, which it does, the tactic they did in Arizona and we found it in Georgia. What do we have across state lines?
Common theme, common methodologies, federal racketeering.
Federal Racketeering, otherwise known as RICO. This is why I'm the most hated man in the room. And this is why you folks are hated.
You're hated.
You're hated because you know the truth.
You're hated because you demand the truth.
This is why the only things they let go to trial are >> these are the best in the world. These guys and there we're going to end up with about 120 the way it looks like.
And yet and you're right, we have all we have over 200 politicians right now representing over 30 states. And then we have all the media coming. And what we're going to do, Steve, is we're going to have like four different sections set up. One of them is the first thing we're going to do is pass out the states to the cyber forensic expert. What I mean by that is the the raw data that or the data the the packet captures and the data from that whole state. So we give it to let's say a group of 10 of these experts. Now they don't know each other and they're all going to dig in.
>> He says you're going to get all the data from all the states.
Only thing I ask is did you did anybody and now there's a jury trial but uh we're not going to present any evidence of what happened.
Did the machine change the votes?
I love you all. I am headed to locals next.
Please join me there. Watch the chats for the link while we get set up. Take care.
Do you have your copy yet of Jovan Hutton Pulitzer's bestseller, Countdown to Chaos: The Silent Federalizing of Elections? November 3rd, 2020. Something happened for the first time in history.
And as a result, America became something many of us no longer recognize. But first, this book will make you mad, then sad, and then you are most likely to become pissed off. Anger is good, and feelings are good. If you know how to channel those feelings, this book will help you do that. But do not open this book if you can't handle the truth. If you just want to take the blue pill and stay in the matrix, that is your choice. The book is carefully researched and presented in chronological order. You will be taken on a journey back in time to see how the system and machine was devised, developed, manufactured, and deployed.
Once you see it, your eyes will be forever open, and you will never be the same person again. You have been warned.
Let's continue.
On November 3rd, 2020, the world, your world, changed. The official counting of votes for our general election, specifically the votes being counted for president, was stopped at approximately 10:30 p.m. Red flags went up everywhere.
Over the next few days, American voters sensed something was horribly wrong. The events of the month of November 2020 forever changed American history, American media, and social media. All and were forever harmed, as was American voters trust and confidence in our elections. As time passed, Joe Biden was sworn in and America had descended into deep chaos. This book is a deep research dive into the who, what, when, where, why, and how of some critical questions such as, was this chaos intended or manufactured?
What happened in the election when there was such a clear, bold movement for Donald J. Trump?
How could someone like Joe Biden, who really did not campaign at all, and when he did, there were only a handful of supporters present, ever win the election to become president of the United States of America.
One side cried out, "The election was rigged, and the other side shouted out, "You're poor losers." Or, "There is no such thing as election fraud." Americans became split even further and deeper at a time when we were already split more than ever before in modern times. To determine if there could ever be nefarious activities within American elections, we need to find solid factual answers to questions which can no longer remain unanswered. Is there even any way to know the outcome of an election before the results are called? In fact, this question needs to be both asked and answered because if anyone or any country was going to materially change the outcome of an American election, they would have to have some form of reasonable advanced knowledge of how the election was going at any one time. Is there even the remote possibility that bad actors could peak into our elections as they were in process? For the moment, let's say there was a way to see the predata of our elections across the United States. Is there even a way for our voting systems and machines to be compromised? Could votes even be changed after they were cast? Could votes be inserted into our machines? Even if a bad actor wanted to undermine the American elections, how could they ever do it? Would we ever be able to detect such egregious and nefarious violations of the American voting systems? Wouldn't it take thousands of thousands of criminals to pull something like that off? How could it even be done when the media tells us there is no such things as election fraud? Why, if so many people and professionals have looked, has no hard evidence ever come to light?
You need facts. You need answers. Find those answers in Joan Hutton Pulitzer's bestseller, Countdown to Chaos: The Silent Federalizing of Elections.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29
