MAGA Fumes as Iran chooses OBAMA For war Negotiations instead of Trump

Added: 2026-05-21

[00:00:01]Breaking news, breaking news, y'all. Oh, this is hilarious.

[00:00:05]Iran said to Trump and his administration, "We're not going to do any negotiation.

[00:00:13]We'll only talk to Barack Obama."

[00:00:16]They said, "We want to talk to Barack Obama for negotiation or nothing."

[00:00:21]And Trump is mad as [ __ ] right now because Iran respects Obama.

[00:00:27]>> [laughter] >> Obama is the OG. Iran said, "We want to negotiate only with Obama, not you."

[00:00:35]WOW, Y'ALL. OBAMA, get yours. come to speak to you about the end of the war in Iraq. America negotiated from a position of strength [music] and principle.

[00:00:46]We have stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in this [music] region.

[00:00:50]Because of this deal, the international community will be able to verify >> [music] >> that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon.

[00:01:02]This deal meets every single one of the bottom lines that we established [music] when we achieved a framework earlier this spring.

[00:01:09]Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off.

[00:01:13]>> [music] >> And the inspection and transparency regime necessary to verify that objective >> [music] >> will be put in place.

[00:01:21]Because of this deal, Iran will not produce the highly enriched uranium and weapons-grade [music] plutonium that form the raw materials necessary for a nuclear bomb.

[00:01:31]Because of this deal, Iran will remove [music] 2/3 of its installed centrifuges, the machines necessary to produce highly enriched uranium for [music] a bomb, and store them under constant international supervision.

[00:01:45]Iran will not use its advanced centrifuges to produce [music] enriched uranium for the next decade.

[00:01:51]Iran will also get rid of 98% of its [music] stockpile of enriched uranium.

[00:01:56]To put that in perspective, Iran currently has a stockpile that could [music] produce up to 10 nuclear weapons.

[00:02:02]Because of this deal, that stockpile will be reduced to a fraction of what would be required for a single weapon.

[00:02:09]This stockpile limitation will last [music] for 15 years.

[00:02:14]Because of this deal, Iran will modify >> [music] >> the core of its reactor in Iraq so that it will not produce weapons-grade [music] plutonium.

[00:02:22]And it has agreed to ship the spent fuel from the reactor out of the country for the lifetime of the reactor.

[00:02:29]For at least the next 15 years, Iran will not build any new heavy water reactors. [music] Because of this deal, we will, for the first time, be in a position to verify all of these commitments. Hello, brothers and sisters.

[00:02:45]Why do many analysts and even Iranian officials often point to the diplomacy pursued by Barack Obama as a more credible framework for negotiations than the confrontational approach taken by Donald Trump?

[00:03:00]Under Obama, the United States and Iran reached the 2015 nuclear agreement.

[00:03:07]They are questioning now, why has DT not reached to an agreement now to end the war?

[00:03:13]And they are coming with lots of uh debates. Some say that they prefer the Obama's way.

[00:03:20]So, guys, let's just listen to these clips, and then we are going to have a quick discussion.

[00:03:25]So, Iran just tweeted out that they will only negotiate with Obama.

[00:03:30]Yep.

[00:03:31]They said, uh "Sorry, we're holding out for the goat.

[00:03:35]Yeah, we're not talking to you. We were going to wait for President Obama, the greatest president of all time.

[00:03:44]We ain't [ __ ] with you, but we're chilling here by the Strait of Hormuz until you send in the varsity team. We will only negotiate with Obama. Oh my, Trump's head is going to explode. He's I'm sorry.

[00:04:04]Oh my god.

[00:04:05]Trump, there will be ketchup, french fries, and cheeseburgers hitting every wall of the White House tonight cuz Iran is straight trolling Trump you McDuffer pants. He's Wiper! Wiper, clean up on aisle Oval Office. Yeah, he he got a big load right now after this one. Uh Yeah, Iran is trolling Trump. They said they're only they're going to negotiate with Barack Obama. All right, you guys know I'm not the biggest fan of Trump, but credit where credit is due. Because I just read through the terms of the new agreement with Iran, and it is a massive win for the United States. First, he got them to give up 11 tons of enriched uranium. That's 98% of their supply.

[00:04:48]They agreed to dismantle 13,000 centrifuges used to enrich nuclear material. And they agreed to cap the purity level of the little enriched uranium they still produce at 3.67%, which is 1/30 the level you'd need to make a bomb. And to ensure they don't go off the rails, they agreed to allow independent inspectors who conduct on-site inspections of all of their nuclear sites, including undisclosed locations we discovered through surveillance. On top of that, the Strait of Hormuz stays open, and Iran gets no additional cut of oil that flows through it. Wait, hey hang on a sec.

[00:05:17][ __ ] you guys, I'm sorry. I read that wrong. Those were the exact terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, also known as the Iran nuclear deal signed by President Obama. That deal was so thorough and so well executed that in every single one of the more than a dozen independent inspections, Iran was fully compliant, including all of the inspections conducted by Donald Trump's own State Department. And on top of that, Obama's deal took the Strait off the table as leverage. Because in exchange for giving up their nuclear weapons program, they got relief from sanctions on oil sales. So, closing the Strait would have hurt them just as much as anyone else. But Trump tore up the deal anyway because, just like with the Affordable Care Act, any policy that proves Obama was a thousand times the president Trump will ever be is an unacceptable living reminder of Donald Trump's incompetence and inadequacy because there is nothing Trump hates more than a mirror that tells the truth about his reflection. Of El Vida Cheeto who is somehow simultaneously both twice the man and half the man that Obama continues to be. So, with the deal torn up, within a year Iran had enough enriched uranium to be a problem. So, sanctions were reimposed and the strait was turned back into a hostage. But because Donald Trump can't make a deal durable enough to serve as President Obama's toilet paper, he painted himself into a corner and had no choice but to turn to the military to try and bury the problems. Overnight, Donald Trump posted dozens of times on Truth Social calling for President Obama's arrest, calling President Obama the most, quote, demonic force in American politics, suggesting that President Obama received $120 million from Obamacare, and more in a lengthy tirade that spanned over 30 posts in a matter of minutes. It's not a surprise to see the president struggle to stay awake during the day when he's up all night ranting on Truth Social and reposting just absurd claims. None of his claims are actually true. And the reason I even make these videos are because for years the right attacked President Biden for not being fully fit to serve. Staying up all night and posting radical claims calling for the arrest of President Obama, saying that President Obama's treasonous, all of these things.

[00:07:16]I mean, that is any media person else should look at that and say, "That's not fully fit either." And this is not a just let Trump be Trump moment.

[00:07:23]Presidents should be held to a higher standard.

[00:07:26]Let's not forget that Barack Obama reached a deal that prevented Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

[00:07:36]Trump ripped that deal up. Now we're at war with Iran to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon, which Trump said he obliterated their capacity for it late last year.

[00:07:56]Uh Obama said what 2 weeks ago that Netanyahu came and said, "If you don't attack Iran, we're going to use nuclear weapons." And Obama said, "Go ahead.

[00:08:05]Go ahead, use them.

[00:08:07]We need to operate utterly independently of the Israelis. I've said a a million times, I'm going to repeat it.

[00:08:14]Starting in the mid-1980s when Ronald Reagan was president, every single Israeli prime minister, no matter who it was, when they came to the United States, and they come all the time, they would say, "Please attack Iran. Please attack Iran. Please attack Iran." And every single [music] president said, "I'm not going to do it."

[00:08:31]Obama said what 2 weeks ago that Netanyahu came and said, "If you don't attack Iran, we're going to use nuclear weapons." And Obama said, "Go ahead.

[00:08:40]Go ahead, use them."

[00:08:42]>> [music] >> He called the bluff, and they didn't use them. Since 1986, the Iranians have been 6 months away from a nuclear weapon. Well, guess what?

[00:08:50]No, they're not. That's a lie.

[00:08:53]There've been two, count them, two national intelligence estimates. What a national intelligence estimate is is it's a sense of the community of the intelligence community, formal paper.

[00:09:06]And this is important. If the CIA writes a paper, uh okay, congratulations.

[00:09:10]>> [music] >> This is The CIA believes this, or DIA believes that, or State Department believes this other thing. An NIE, national intelligence estimate, is you have all 18 intelligence agencies sitting around a giant table [music] in the offices of the National Intelligence Council, and they're going sentence by sentence.

[00:09:30]Okay, the first sentence is, and the the national intelligence officer reads it.

[00:09:35]Anybody have any objections? And all 18 people get to weigh in. It takes weeks normally to coordinate a paper like this.

[00:09:44]All [music] 18 intelligence agencies concluded decisively twice that the Iranians did not have a nuclear weapons program. 2003 and the other one was like 2009, something like that. And in addition, Ayatollah Khamenei issued a fatwa saying that it was a sin to develop a nuclear weapon. And that's why they were not enriching to weapons grade levels. Yeah.

[00:10:13]And the Israelis said they didn't give a [ __ ] They want us to bomb, bomb, bomb.

[00:10:17]First off, I'm surprised that any >> [music] >> You fill a room with 18 different agencies, I'm actually surprised anything ever in the world gets accomplished.

[00:10:24]>> exaggerating when I tell you I'd never hated anything in my entire career as much as coordinating an NIE. I was the Deputy National Intelligence Officer for a while. Um, and then to get promoted to GS-14 I had to write an NIE. So, I wrote this NIE in 19 97.

[00:10:49]And it was called Iraq: Saddam's Saddam's next 12 months.

[00:10:55]And we coordinated it in 8 hours.

[00:10:59]And the the National Intelligence Officer, Ben Bonk, God rest his soul, terrific guy, he came to me afterwards and he said that was the fastest coordination session for an NIE >> [music] >> that I've seen in 25 years.

[00:11:12]And I said this one was actually pretty easy, Ben.

[00:11:15]Saddam could threaten Kuwait, Saddam could threaten the Kurds, Saddam could threaten the Shiites, Saddam will probably The conflict between the United States and Iran did not begin in Obama or Trump. It stretches back decades. For years, the two nations have disagreed over Iran's nuclear activities, regional influence, sanctions, and security concerns.

[00:11:35]Successive US presidents tried different approaches. Some relied on pressure, others relied on diplomacy. The central question remained the same. How can the United States prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons while avoiding another devastating war in the Middle East? That question defined one of the Obama's most significant foreign policy efforts.

[00:11:59]When Obama took office, he pursued a strategy based on negotiations with Iran and other world powers.

[00:12:06]The result was the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly known as the JCPOA.

[00:12:13]The agreement placed strict limits on Iran's nuclear activities and established extensive international monitoring. In return, some sanctions were lifted. Supporters argued that the deal significantly reduced the risk of war.

[00:12:27]Critics argued that the agreement was temporary and imperfect. But even many critics acknowledge that the deal imposed real constraints and created verification mechanisms. For Obama, diplomacy was practical tool.

[00:12:42]The subjective The objective was not friendship with Iran. The objective was to reduce the chance of conflict and to replace Iran's nuclear program under close inspection. The agreement was the product of years of negotiation.

[00:12:55]It required technical expertise, coordination with allies, and careful diplomacy. The central achievement was simple. Create Create enforceable limits to buy time.

[00:13:05]Instead of bombs and missiles, negotiators used inspections, verification, and international operations. Obama supporters viewed this one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of his presidency. They believed the agreement made the world safer.

[00:13:20]Trump strongly opposed the JCPOA.

[00:13:24]He argued that it gave Iran too much and not permanently end all nuclear capability. He repeatedly called it the bad deal. In 2018, during his first term, Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement and reimposed sanctions. Supporters praised this as a firm stance. Critics warned that warned that abandoning the deal would weaken trust and increase instability. His decision remains one of the most consequential foreign policy choices of the past decade.

[00:13:55]Once the United States left the agreement, the diplomatic foundation deteriorated.

[00:14:01]Trust declined, tensions declined, regional uncertainty intensified.

[00:14:06]Iranian officials repeatedly pointed to the withdrawal as evidence that US commitments could be reversed by a new administration. This issue of credibility became central to all future talks. If one president signs an agreement and another president cancels it, why should the other side trust in your promise?

[00:14:26]That question continues to shape negotiations. After returning to office, Trump adopted a forceful strategy toward Iran. He combined pressure, military threats, and negotiations.

[00:14:37]And in these years to 2016, tensions escalated into major crises involving military actions and economic disruption.

[00:14:43]The Strait of Hormuz one of the world's most important oil routines routes became a central concern.

[00:14:49]Gas prices rose, markets reacted, Americans began asking whether the objectives of the conflict had been clearly explained.

[00:14:59]Yes, diplomacy depends on credibility.

[00:15:02]Both sides must believe that commitments will be honored. Iranian officials have emphasized that trust is one of the most and the biggest obstacles to ending the conflict. And their concern is straightforward. If the United States can leave an agreement after one election, any deal may be temporary. This does not mean Iran is endorsing Obama personally.

[00:15:24]It means many officials viewed the Obama era agreement as a more predictable and stable framework. Obama favored multilateral diplomacy, technical negotiation and alliances. Trump favored public pressure, maximal demands and highly personal deal making. Supporters of each approach see strengths. Obama's method emphasized consistency and international coordination. Trump's method emphasized leverage and unpredictability. The challenge is that unpredictability can also make counterparties less confident that the deal will endure.

[00:16:02]And when commentators say Iran preferred Obama, they are usually referring the structure of negotiations, not ideological agreement. Iran and the United States remained adversaries during Obama's presidency, but the JCPOA established a functional diplomatic channel. That agreement was seen by many as a practical mechanism to manage conflict.

[00:16:25]The preference, therefore, is about predictability and enforceable commitments.

[00:16:31]Many MAGA supporters supporters view Trump as a strong negotiator.

[00:16:35]They believe his willingness to use pressure gives the United States greater leverage. So, when analyst analysts compare current negotiations to Obama's diplomacy, some supporters interpret that as a criticism of Trump.

[00:16:50]These views intense reactions online and in political commentary.

[00:16:56]So, what carries immense consequences?

[00:16:58]That is human suffering, economic disruption, regional stability, high energy prices, global uncertainty. And one of the main argument in favor of diplomacy is that it is seeks to reduce these risks. The Obama era deal was designed to limit Iran's nuclear program without direct military conflict.

[00:17:16]Whether one supports or opposes that argument, its core purpose was to avoid the war.

[00:17:24]So, this has brought uh tensions among the people in among the Iranians.

[00:17:31]They are saying that they prefer the style They prefer the style of uh of Obama instead of of Trump.

[00:17:50]So, So, that agreement that 2015 provided a structured and very favorable system that many viewed as predictable.

[00:18:01]Trump has rejected that framework and pursued a tougher strategy arguing it will secure a better deal.

[00:18:08]Years later, the same core issues remain unsolved. That's why this debate continues to shape American politics, and that's why comparisons between Obama and Trump provoke such reactions.

[00:18:19]Peace is about diplomacy and a way that can prevent wars.

[00:18:25]It's not just comparing the different presidents. And you find that Iranians say that uh that they they they would make a negotiation with with Obama. That's causing tension among the American people. So, guys, what do you think?

[00:18:39]Let's just have a good discussion in the comment section.

[00:18:42]If you're a new member, make sure you subscribe, and we're going to meet in the next video. Thank you for watching.