Money is an accelerant, not a cure; it scales success but only subsidizes failure. This is a necessary reality check for founders who mistake a large bank balance for a viable business model.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Problems Money Can't Solve
Added:If you believe that the more money you have the more unassailable >> [music] >> um your chance of victory is >> Yes.
>> you should give up because Apple and Google won. [music] >> They have the money.
>> Right? They have more money than you.
>> Yes.
>> And so, thank god that more money doesn't equal more success.
>> Yes.
>> So that any startup has the chance to succeed, right?
>> Exactly.
>> This is Dalton plus Michael and today we're going to talk about the startup problems that money cannot solve. I can't [snorts] count the number of times I'll talk to a founder and they'll say, "Well, we have a competitor. They just raised a big round. I'm freaked out. They're going to have all this money to do dot dot dot dot dot."
And I always love these conversations cuz my starting point is always "Uh that competitor is scary. What about the incumbent in your space that's a public company with a couple thousand people and infinite money comparatively?
Are you afraid of them? Like didn't we start this with them [laughter] there?
This idea that we can convert money into success.
Our industry would be so much more profitable.
>> [laughter] >> Well, if it were true.
>> We've talked about this in the videos before, but basically if you believe that the more money you have the more unassailable um your chance of victory is >> Yes.
>> you should give up because Apple and Google won.
>> They have the money.
>> Right? They have more money than you.
>> Yes.
>> And so, thank god that more money doesn't equal more success.
>> Yes.
>> So that any startup has the chance to succeed, right?
>> Exactly.
>> Exactly.
So, we've made the high-level point, but maybe we should go into some of the details.
>> some of this because it's often the case, hey, I'm guilty of this too when I was a founder, where I'm like, "Man, once we raise this next round, we're on easy street. We can just like throw money at this problem and like now there's no more problems.
And the exercise I would do um with office hours with a startup is to be like, "Oh, let's break it down. Let's enumerate. What are the problems? What are the bottlenecks in your business that you can throw money at that will that will be solved?"
>> Yes.
>> And so kind of the goal of this video is let's just let's go line by line >> it.
>> about problems that more money doesn't actually help you solve.
>> So Dalton, when I try to sell customers my product, they don't want to buy it.
>> [laughter] >> So the most fundamental problem of course with any startup is making something people want.
>> Yes.
>> And sadly, more money in your bank account does not make people want your product more.
>> No.
>> But but but oh advertising, marketing, billboards.
Those might lead some to some top of funnel.
>> Yes.
>> You can't make someone want something that they don't want. No amount of money does that. Like remember all like the wearable things that people all the like bad hardware things. Yeah, yeah, no amount of money made people want to use those things.
>> I mean I'll go a step further. If you've got a bad product and you're spending advertising dollars on it, you are wasting those dollars. Like I almost guarantee you are not making more money than you're spending on that advertising.
The only company that's winning is Facebook and that's it.
>> Yeah.
>> [laughter] >> You're deluding yourself too. You're actually hurting yourself and if you didn't have the money because you may be faking yourself that you think people want your thing.
>> Yeah.
>> Like if you're dumping tons of money into Facebook ads, you're like, "Oh, we're growing. Here's our graph." But then if you plot the graph against your burn and it's the same graph, what are we learning exactly? Invest in Facebook.
That's what we're learning.
>> That's what we're learning.
>> [laughter] >> And your company is going to die. So um competitor, now that we have this war chest Oh god, the number of times I hear, "Well, we can we can buy we can make some acquisitions or we can buy this fancy exact, you know, we can compete with this competitor better."
>> Again, sadly, um the way that you win against a competitor is to be growing faster than them and to have a better product. And that anything that's a distraction from growing faster than them is probably not the panacea that you hope.
>> We have lots of companies on both sides of this particular debate over the years where they're either the underdog or it's the company that's raised more.
>> Yes.
>> And, um yeah, money doesn't really fix that. You don't just win by fiat when you raise more than a competitor.
>> You know, it's funny, I was talking about um, Workday the other day.
Workdays.
Yeah, an older company. It was interesting cuz this founder was basically telling me the Workday product absolutely sucks.
And it's like full on, "It sucks. It's the worst product out there."
And what was so interesting is I realized at this moment that this founder was a startup founder and had no context for what the customers of Workday want, what they're looking for, and in fact almost everything that this person hated about Workday was a thing that Workday's customers liked [laughter] about Workday.
And, you know, and the things that he cared about, like nice UI, his customer the Workday customers did not give a about. And so I think what kind of blew my mind when I was thinking about this was just like "Oh, wait, you want to spend money to make something better and you don't even know what the customer wants to buy."
>> Yep.
>> Like this will not work out. Like your imagination of what the customer wants not correct. And so often times when I think about this spending money I mean, how many times do we tell people don't spend it? Because it's like you you don't know how to convert it into value.
>> yourself into a deeper hole. It's actually going to be harder to course correct if you spend it on the wrong things.
>> Yes.
>> Like spending money on the wrong things and then stop spending it >> It's so hard.
>> It's like being unaddicted to something, you know, you're like, wait, you already >> [laughter] >> You got used to it. Like, oh no, it's much harder to get back off of it once you've been on it.
>> What about execs? That's a common place to spend more money. My CRO is going to change the revenue trajectory of my company.
>> Again, it's certainly possible, but more money alone does not mean it's going to work. Um if anything, if you're tempted to start hiring these people before you're ready, it's value destructive.
Like hiring executives ahead of where you need them is notoriously value destructive. And let me extrapolate this a little bit cuz you might be like, well, Dalton, you know, yeah, whatever, you guys are making points, but hiring is one, more money means you can hire more people, right? And I have a nuanced point to make here.
>> Okay.
>> Certainly having more money is good in the recruiting pitch on why they should work there. If you're like, hey, we have $10 million in the bank versus a million, >> Yeah.
>> I think a job candidate would want to hear that.
>> Yes.
>> Also, if you're like literally going broke and you don't have enough money to hire someone, >> Problems.
>> it solves that issue. But here's the very nuanced point.
Is that if it seems like you have a lot of money, you might be tempted to recruit candidates who are entirely mercenary and all they care about is their cash comp and they don't actually care about your startup and mission.
And so instead of bringing in people that are really aligned with your vision, being aligned with what you're trying to do, you're just like throwing money at getting people to work there. Seen a lot of that not work.
>> The other thing that I see with hiring is I see hiring by spreadsheet. We have money, manager says, I need a team of N people to do things. You add N people to the headcount spreadsheet, the math works out.
That's the end of your oversight.
>> Yeah.
>> And then the manager hires eight shitty people.
>> Yes.
And and >> But the machine you're like you put money in the machine and what pops out is like not quality.
>> Not quality.
>> Yeah. And but the money spent.
>> The money spent.
>> And so it's interesting cuz it's like well if you want to spend that money on hiring like did you care who was hired?
Were you following up? Were you interviewing them? Were you involved? Oh you money doesn't do that stuff. The money can't buy your attention.
>> Yep.
>> And so that's another area where it's like uh it's it's so painful to see it's like oh I just need three sales pods. Uh just spend two million dollars get these three sales pods up and then enterprise sales is going to work. It's like no.
>> [laughter] >> No.
>> I'm sorry.
>> Let's talk about culture cuz I think that's one that's a tricky one.
>> with hiring this is actually the way money can help with hiring is if it increases the chance you build a culture that people want to work in it in a place that people want to be a part of. And so if the money goes to your bank account and somehow we could draw a line to >> [laughter] >> working at your company is awesome then okay thumbs up that makes sense. Like I don't know maybe um having a nice office or something. Okay yeah that's that's check. Like you got it.
>> But go ahead talk talk about the culture bit.
>> Yeah.
One of the things that I see a lot is that you can spend a lot of money on your office and on your perks and so on and so forth and still have a culture where the average employee doesn't care whether you win or lose.
On the flip side you could be running this company out of a class C basement and have a culture where every employee comes in every day and wants to kill it.
>> Yep.
>> And so, certainly it helps to pay people a livable wage.
>> Yep.
>> Right? Certainly it helps to give people health care and so and so forth, but I wish that there were ways kind of above the basics that you could actually get a multiplier effect by spending more money. And unfortunately, I haven't seen it. And I think the other thing when it comes to hiring is that you might be able to delude yourself in how good your product is.
Your employees, they're a little bit less biased.
>> Yep.
>> And so, even if they come in super hyped and super excited, you know, 3 months in, when they're interacting with customers, when they're looking at the product, when they have more intimate knowledge, they know.
>> Yep.
>> They know. And money doesn't Oh, well, I'm really well paid, so I'm just going to lie to myself and tell myself this product's good.
It doesn't work that well. What about focus?
>> So, focus is really important. Um, when you're at the earliest stages, you're forced to focus.
>> Yes.
>> [laughter] >> And everything we taught people at at YC was focus, focus, focus. And it and it works. And you would see people fall off of that once they got a bunch of money >> Yes.
>> because it suddenly became possible to do multiple things at once, >> Yes.
>> to hedge, and to hire enough people to like Yeah, just do a bunch of stuff. And counterintuitively, this tends to not work. And it tends to be counterproductive >> Yes.
>> to to lose your focus.
>> It is so painful to watch a founder hedge because like you will inevitably in an off-hour, they'll be like those There's always one thing they're in the most excited by.
And inevitably in a company that's hedging, they're putting like less than 20% of their effort on the thing that they're objectively the most excited by. And you talk to them about why, and it's either like, "Oh, well, we have these other things that we can't stop working on." Like, "Why not?" Like, is some boss telling you?
Or it's it's safety. I don't feel safe not working on three things at the same time. Which always confuses me cuz I'm like, you have a limited number of great people, you have a limited amount of attention, you have a limited amount of time.
Why would you dilute those things?
>> Yeah.
>> Like, what Like, do you Are you safer? I understand you feel safer. [laughter] Like, are you safer? I always encourage people. It's like, I don't mind experimenting or hedging serially, right? Like, you learn something and then you adjust and you iterate.
But, man, it's really hard to be learning on three different parallel things. Especially I mean, what's interesting is that way later than I would have thought, I think hedging is hard. Like, >> Yeah.
>> even companies generating a billion dollars in revenue, I see situations where they're >> riff on this is it's big company-itis.
>> Yes.
>> bring big company-itis, the earlier you get that way, the worse.
>> Yes.
>> And it's very hard to go back. Like, once you get a case of big company-itis in your startup, >> Yes.
>> it is very hard to ever get it back out.
And so, you want to keep that out as late as possible.
>> Yes.
>> Yes. Before that starts to seep in, right?
>> Yes. Yes. And this is one of these weird ones where I think hedging is a common thing that screws big companies. And you're trying to >> You're copying the exact wrong thing.
>> Yes.
>> You're trying to bring that infection into your company.
>> [laughter] >> Like, really, really bad.
>> Why you should someone raise money?
Okay, you guys are enumerating all these like horror stories. Maybe I should just, you know, raise a million dollars and never raise another dollar. Like, what Maybe that's the right thing.
Why Why isn't that the right call?
>> So, I'll I'll start with the depressing thing.
There are so few situations I see where a company is actually doing really well.
And think it's like not talked about enough. That that that it is somewhat rare that a company is significantly helping customers and doing it in an interesting and kind of good way. And I think in those scenarios, there are often a lot of things that money can help with. Like one, that incremental hire often times is extremely helpful.
Two, marketing.
When you're telling someone about a product that's good and predictably if they know about it, they'll try it and they'll start using it and they'll like it and they'll retain, that's very very good.
>> Yeah. [laughter] Again, maybe to riff on that, I think that's exactly right point. Is I think about this in terms of payback periods.
>> Yes.
>> Where if you have the machine working really well, >> Yes.
>> you're like, oh, our customers pay back in 10 months.
And it's like, we know this for a fact.
We have so much data. We are, you know, >> Yes.
>> totally convinced we have a 10-month payback period, then you should raise every dollar to do that. Like Like pl- >> [laughter] >> But I'll I'll even caution on that because I work with a number of companies where they would say their payback period is 10 months because the person signed up for an annual subscription.
>> it's there's too many asterisks. I I hear you.
>> Exactly. Yeah. No aster- Like at 10 months, when you've working with the customer, the customer loves you, >> Yeah.
>> can't imagine their life without you and will pay you indefinitely, >> Yeah.
>> then all incredible.
>> And the other one I would make is just I think it's an important milestone if you want to build a big company that goes public someday.
>> Yes.
>> There are rounds of funding and there are they're just like core economic things that if you're sophisticated are part of doing it. But I would think them think of them as a trailing indicator that you're doing awesome and not the goal itself. Like it's like the good hearting thing where people are turning fund raising events into the goal >> Yes.
>> as opposed to, oh, we're doing amazing.
This is a side effect of doing amazing.
>> Yes.
>> Yes. I'll throw a couple others in. I think that once you have a machine working well, there are forward investments that you >> Yeah.
>> can actually plan for that can create significant value for you, right? And I think that fundraising can help. So, uh I'll give example. Tell me if this is too messy, but um you know, Uber comes out, it is working on black cars.
>> Yep.
>> It invents this space.
And then Lyft comes out and it is working with normal people's cars and normal drivers.
You know, if I'm Uber in that position, it's kind of like, "Oh, I understand the space is great. I understand that's a maybe a better model that I want to iterate towards. If I want to raise money to help me get there, >> Yes.
>> I know a lot like, you know, like I'm doing this as a very intelligent investment.
That makes sense."
>> Yep.
>> Um another example is, you know, DoorDash getting its first uh like 12 markets profitable and then being like, "All right, we understand how to set up stores, how to do promotions, what types of markets to go to, da da da da." Let's go do our next 50.
Okay. Like that's the, you know, like those types of intelligent investments when you actually have some expertise, when you have ex- an aggressive amount of proof that your customers love the product, awesome.
>> Yeah. And >> Awesome.
>> To be super direct, what we're saying is hand-waving, "Oh, we have $10 million. We're going to like hire some people and we're going to do some billboards."
That is hand-waving. Versus the examples you just gave are super precise and specific.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> And I would just encourage the viewers to to delineate between those examples.
>> Yes.
Yes.
>> How specific um are are your uses of capital?
>> I want to throw in a last cautionary tale here. I think there's two things that founders don't realize when they raise capital and they're not in this position.
One is more often than not they bring on a board member who thought the company was doing better than it is.
And then they have to interact with that person quarterly. I cannot tell you how often I do office hours where like a top two stressor in a pre-product market fit CEO's life is the fact that they have an investor board member who doesn't like the company.
>> Yes.
>> And like as much as I tell them those are words, they can't do anything yet yet yet, it's just like hard to have like a negative cheerleader as a significant shareholder in your company. [laughter] >> yes.
>> It's like not fun. Like not fun. It is It's like It's hard to not have a little bit of a respect, but like >> I understand.
>> you want to see them as like this aspirational or something helpful and they're kind of like, oh, I up investing in you. That's not fun. And then the second is how employees' expectations change when there's a lot of money at I cannot tell you how many YC companies I talked to you where the founder knows the company is not doing well.
And the employees think because Sequoia gave them $20 million that they are.
And they start treating the company like it's Google.
>> Yeah.
>> And like when people think the company has made it, they actually start thinking how can I get mine?
>> Yeah.
>> Whereas when they realize the company hasn't and they believe in the mission and the team has a good culture, they think about how to sacrifice for the company.
And the worst case scenario is you have a bunch of people in your company who are trying to get theirs and your company's not working. Good luck. Good luck. Money, hell, that's not a problem that money doesn't solve. It's a problem money creates.
>> [laughter] >> Amen. I mean, look, I think my parting thought is my suggestion is to treat money as a tool if you're a startup founder and you have a whole box of tools. There's lots of tools that you have.
>> Lots of tools.
>> And there are certain types of problems that you can use this tool to fix or to hack. And if you're very good, if you're good at using this tool, good for you.
Like if you're good at fundraising, hooray.
But it is not in itself the answer. It is not the panacea. And if you start hitting everything with a hammer, right?
If >> [laughter] >> If all you have is a hammer, if all you have is money and you try to fix every problem with it, it's not going to work.
>> Not going to work. It's so funny cuz sometimes I think to myself, you know, startups, the kind of theory behind startups is that like ambition, intensity, intelligence, and scarcity of resources is a better environment for invention.
And so only startups can like, you know, big companies like pretend like they can create that, but it's really hard for them to do. But startups can create that.
And it's interesting when people want so much money that there's no scarcity.
Yet they still want invention. I just think if I could bottle up what I've seen the best companies do when they're low on cash, and if I could put that into a pill, right? Like it's like >> [laughter] >> man, the gun to your head when you're low on cash, that creates so much more invention than the the 6 months after you raise that round when you're like, now we can spend money on things.
>> [laughter] >> It's a gift. It's a gift to be resource limited when you're when you're early.
>> Great shot.
>> All right, thanks Michael.
Related Videos

Drop the Loser Mentality
houseitlexi
180 views•2026-04-20

Arrête de louer en Floride Tu passes à côté d’une opportunité énorme !
thierryburtincfde
104 views•2026-04-21

SINGAPORE UNCOVER INVESTIGATION - Eco Ring Japan luxury goods buying centre in Singapore
PaulPlutaPrestige
5K views•2019-03-29

Humanizing Data | Stan Lee | TEDxUTAR
TEDx
472 views•2019-03-07

Mastering the Restaurant Industry - From Dive Bars to Michelin Stars
RestaurantRockstars
118 views•2025-04-06

Ep. 35: How to Send Lots of Satellites to Space (for Cheap)
crossingthevalley
188 views•2025-03-05

Ford CEO Jim Farley on the Future of the Essential Economy
markets
56K views•2025-10-04

Motivating Behavior
GreggU
5K views•2019-11-08
Trending

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23

Bitcoin Social Interest: Dozens of us Left
benjaminjcowen
12K views•2026-07-23

Tesla Profits Plunge & SpaceX Stock Continues Fall
TheJohnJohnstonLounge
6K views•2026-07-23