Climate change discourse functions as a vessel for social reorganization rather than purely scientific inquiry, where the same entities advocating for environmental protection simultaneously pursue contradictory interests like building massive data centers that consume enormous energy and resources, revealing that the primary goal is control rather than environmental preservation.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Climate Change: The Greatest Power Grab in HistoryAdded:
For 10 years, Donald Trump has been the face of the Republican party. But very soon, we will be facing a very different political landscape. Love him or hate him, it's time to talk about America after Trump. So join me, JP Sears, Florida Governor candidate James Fishbach, Harrison Smith, Pastor Dale Partridge, Father Calvin Robinson, Alex Stein, and Joshua Haynes in Dallas, Texas on November 12th through the 14th to talk about what the right must do in order to win in the years ahead.
Register by May 31st and you'll save 50% off your ticket by going to newchristianite.com/conference.
But hurry, tickets will not be discounted like this ever again. Again, go to newchristian.com/conference today.
>> You are now entering restricted broadcast territory. They were planning to use the term fake news to drive a censorship program.
>> Some members of the media, some members of the media use their >> They were always going to intend to crush independent extremely dangerous.
>> I say it's like a like a fractal image, right? You the more you zoom in, the more you see and it's like you can zoom in.
Welcome ladies and gentlemen to Offlimits News. I'm your host Harrison Smith. We are on NXR Studios and we have a special episode for you today.
Normally we do a weekend review, but occasionally we have these sort of standalone episodes that will tackle a certain topic or, you know, cover, you know, one certain thing rather than a whole swath of what's happened uh over the week. And I've got a special presentation for you here. We're going to be talking about a topic that frankly uh doesn't get talked about as much as it used to or probably as it should and that is the topic of climate change. I know it's it's maybe not the most like invogue topic to discuss right now but it's actually still very important.
There are still major climate change agendas in operation and really the way that the powers that be have moved away from climate change in and of itself is illustrative of what the climate change agenda was really all about. But I bring this up because we're going to play a video. We're going to play a segment of a video from a YouTuber named Mini Minute Man. Now, Mini Minute Man is sort of a uh debunker, I guess you could say.
He finds videos of people claiming ancient aliens, and he explains, no, here's how archaeologists say the pyramids were built or or whatever it is. And I don't hate this guy. I'm not making this video because I hate this guy or even dislike this guy. actually like him a lot, which is one of the reasons why I want to talk about this because I find so often in life. There are people that I think I generally agree with that I think I could hang out with and we'd probably be great friends and you'll see in the in the video. I mean, the guy's he's sort of an outdoorsman. He's, you know, hunts and all this sort of stuff. And it's he seems like a cool guy, but then they'll believe things that I consider completely insane. And I want to sort of explore this idea with you here because again I I see this with a lot of people and I see a lot of people that while they seem to have the head on their head on their shoulders and can understand things in most cases when it comes to something like climate change, they go off the rails. And this is sort of a phenomenon that I'm I'm constantly investigating and curious about. And I I see that here. So we're going to I'm going to show you some clips from this video. I'll set it up for you and then we'll go to a few clips. It's only about 5 minutes uh that we'll go over of this video, but I think it's illustrative for a couple reasons. I think it's important to address for a couple reasons. One is to address the method by which propaganda is used to create a false consensus and manufactured consent for things that people should not be in favor of. Uh they'll allow to happen because they've been uh indoctrinated with a lot of fear quite frankly is is sort of the the top tool being used. Uh but also to explore the religious aspect of this and the way that some of these agendas and some of these interests have like replaced religion in a lot of ways and are like a weird kind of dark reflection of religion. And I I think you'll see exactly what I mean because what's happening in this video is Milo Rossi the host who again I'm you know is it is an attack on him to be honest. you know, I'll probably be attacking him quite a bit, and you'll see why. I I think he really sort of goes off the rails here. Uh, but I like the guy. I I think he's a really interesting I I watch his channel because I find his content entertaining, so I don't want to attack the guy. At the same time, the way he reacts to the article that he's reading, I think, is indicative of a mindset that a lot of Americans have.
And and again, this is you'll see you'll see how sort of the extreme reaction he has is evident with a lot of people and probably a lot of people in in your own life where it's like you might say something that you think is totally benign and they go off on you. I mean, I've had this experience in my life where you just, you know, you say something that you think is totally normal and they just like have this reaction and you look at them, you think, you've been programmed. you you have been like somebody's implanted something in your mind and I hit the trip wire here because the alarm went off and now you have completely changed.
It's strange. It's bizarre. And for somebody who is a Christian, there are some spiritual considerations to uh to bring into all of it.
And so the video that that we'll be responding to is Milo Rossi, Minminute Man, and he is going over a bunch of different articles from a I guess young earth creationist website, but he gets to an article about climate change and he sort of blows this top and you can see there's this kind of strange overlap of like the anti-Christian mindset and the sort of seething hatred underlying all of it. I think you'll see what I'm talking about. So, we'll go to we'll go to clip one here. This is uh we have about 15 clips of this guy. And again, it's only about five minutes of video. And I'll try to actually re like what I want this video to be is something that like maybe Milo Rossi could watch and maybe understand a little bit better the perspective that he seems incurious in truly understanding. So here's Milo Rossi as he intros uh this particular article that's talking about climate change and basically saying that the climate change agenda as it exists now is built on falsehoods. So here's uh Milo Rossi the many minute man breaking down climate change. Let's watch. How about this article for you? Anthropogenic global warming AGW a biblical and scientific approach to climate change. I'm sure this is going to be full of some wisdom.
Biblical and scientific evidence shows that human generated carbon dioxide will produce some warming, but there's no climate emergency. Guys, everything's totally fine. There's nothing to worry about. All of those scientists, all the unanimous scientists that are uh um coming up to the same conclusion, they're a bunch of liars. They're a bunch of liars that are paid by the woke liberal neo-Marxist agenda.
>> Accurate. Yes, that is accurate. Yes, we know. I will be proving that here. Uh that is actually what's going on. So there, of course, you know, the the intro that is u the other reason that I wanted to to show this video is because I feel like the way that Milo goes through this argument, he sort of it's sort of a great distillation of all of the arguments about climate change. And he's just hit the first one that we hear all the time, which is consensus, the scientific consensus. All the scientists in the world all totally agree. The question is, what do they agree on? And is that even a valid metric for determining what is the truth? First of all, I'd say we have all of us, everybody listening to me right now h has in their personal life experience with the exact phenomenon that he is trying to claim is ridiculous. This idea that all of the experts, all of the scientists, all of the doctors were wrong. No way. That's impossible. But of course, we all lived through CO where they were all wrong about almost everything. And it's not me that's saying this. Of course, we knew they were wrong before they did it, which exposes that they also should have known they were wrong. Because what happens is you'll have an event like CO 19 and all of the experts will be wrong and you'll have people on the fringes like myself and just all sorts of people throughout CO who are telling the truth who are right about what's happening who are silenced and discriminated against and you know uh basically told that we're killing grandma for you know actually telling the truth. But that's fine. But that's fine. What it is is it's evidence that like, you know, we're not all realizing. All of the sudden now everybody's going, "Geez, those lockdowns were a bad idea." It turns out it's like, "Yeah, we were saying it at the time. You were calling us terrorists and locking us in our home. It's ridiculous."
>> Warning, this product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical. What happened to this country? Well, I'll tell you what happened. We apostasized from the Lord Jesus Christ. We flooded the country with millions of third worlders. And we bought into the propaganda that nicotine and tobacco are somehow super super bad. But marijuana that's great. Well, marijuana increases your appetite, gives you the munchies, makes you fat, out of shape, and lazy.
It also causes you not to be sober minded. You lose ambition and focus. And it lowers your testosterone, making you affeminite, soft, and gay. What does nicotine do? Oh, precisely the opposite.
So, if you want to try nicotine, my suggestion is to use Knickknack. I know the guys who own this company personally. They are America first and they are Christ is King Maxing. You've got a picture of the foot of Jesus crushing the head of the serpent right there on the cover. They're manufactured here in the good old US of A. And you can get 20% off your first order by simply using the link in our description for this episode or by using my promo code. You go to nicknack.com and type in with the promo code Joel20 exclamation point. You can also get $5 off your first can if you're buying Knickknack in the store again by using the link in the description to claim your offer. So, Knickknack experience nicotine perfected.
This is one of those stories that just keeps on building. Saga Metals trading as S A GMF right here in the US and a Saga Saga in Canada. They've just released news that confirms it may be sitting on one of the largest titanium venadium systems on the planet. To put it into perspective, the Panawa deposit in China, which is a state- linked system supplying over 40% of global venadium supply, is a cornerstone of China's critical minerals dominance.
This is a market worth a combined 50 billion plus per year. Now, Saga Metals with its radar project stands out as a potential replacement. North American Mineral Exploration is making a powerful comeback with government mandates driving the sector. Strong drill results coming through and teams like Saga Metals executing at a high level year round. If you want to learn more about this critical mineral story, then check out the link in the description for this episode. A special thanks to Saga Metals for making today's video possible.
>> But now, now that we have been through it and can look back, it's everybody who recognizes. I mean, BBC COVID serious failures in WHO and global response report finds the week says, "Was shutting school during COVID a mistake?"
Uh, yeah. I mean, not really a mistake as much of an attack, but yeah, it was a mistake. And they say, you know, the consequences for children weren't properly taken into account. No, those of us that were saying, hey, this is going to be detrimental for kids were smeared as radicals and silenced. Were what were the worst avoidable mistakes in America's COVID response? Asked the New Yorker intelligencer, which implies a couple things. The worst avoidable mistakes, in other words, there are lots of mistakes. These are just the worst of them. And yeah, they were all avoidable because they were all obviously bad. I mean, they sent infected people into nursing homes and then you had a massive rise of nursing home deaths. Was that did nobody expect that? Was that a coincidence? Was that a mistake they've made? I mean, it was an attack. It was this was all deliberate. But the point of all this is that Milo presents the argument as all of these scientists are lying. And it's like, well, some of them are lying. Absolutely. I mean in in injubitably it's undoubtable certainly some of them are lying but the vast majority of them are simply responding to incentives and uh responding to pressures responding to a fabricated sense of uh monolithic agreement amongst their uh uh you know fellow scientists that they feel compelled to you know comport themselves in line with Atlantic the COVID mistake no one talks about enough And in this case is from the Atlantic.
Deaths in isolation have been treated as a painful memory, not a problem that hospitals need to address. So again, you know, they say the CO mistake nobody talks about. It's like, yeah, we're talking about all the other mistakes. So again, what what I'm saying is that during COVID, whether it was the lockdowns, whether it was the forcing people to die in isolation, which again is like one of the crulest things you could do to anybody, right? their their parent, their spouse is laying there dying and you're having to watch them through a plexiglass wall like you can't give your father or mother a final hug. I mean, this was one of the most brutal things you could ever do to anybody and it was done at a systematic scale for an entire year. I mean, the brutality that we were subjected to. Again, it's it's indicative of sort of what the powers that be can accomplish when they have monolithic control of the media systems.
When they can push one particular, you know, fear story on everybody, you can get people to do utterly brutal and horrifying things to one another uh and think that they're being virtuous while they do it, even if it's based off of lies, which now it's perfectly admitted that it all was. So whether it was the school lockdowns, the economic crash from the lockdowns, the you know mental illness that has cropped up as a consequence of the isolation that was forced, the masks causing respiratory issues and never stopping the virus, the vaccines. Are you still getting your booster, Rossy? You still getting your booster, Milo? You still trusting the science? Or did you determine that all of that was fraudulent like all of us did? Because yeah, it's possible that you can have an entire scientific community all being wrong about something all at once. Yeah, that's possible. And it doesn't necessarily mean that they're lying, even though some of them certainly are. The other thing about this is you have to ask what do they agree about? Because climate change is not strictly an aspect of scientific inquiry.
climate change as a concept comes along with it all of these prescriptive measures. And it's it's sort of obvious, right? Because as I understand it, the climate change uh formula goes something like this. Humans create CO2. CO2 warms the earth. Therefore, human existence is causing the heating of the earth. And if you believe that to be true and you believe to the extent that climate change fanatics say that the world is being totally destroyed by climate change, then you would have to believe that that it has to be the top priority. I mean, if what the climate alarmists say about climate change is true, then like it does have to be the number one priority of everyone on the earth because we all die if it's not taken care of. That's the assumption that's baked in to the claim of climate change. It's sort of impossible to have the the fact of climate change without the solution to climate change.
Otherwise, you're saying, "Yes, human behavior is destroying the earth and will kill us all, but we shouldn't do anything about it." That doesn't really make any sense. So if you accept the premise that climate change is an existential threat to the planet incumbent with that along with that is so we have to massively change really upheave the entire construct of human society in order to remake it to deal with this issue. So when you say scientists all agree, do they agree the earth is warming? Do they agree that it's anthropomorphic warming? Uh, you know, caused by, you know, man-made sources, if they believe that, do they believe that we have to, you know, destroy farms to stop it from happening?
Do they all agree that cow farts are the number one, you know, threat? What do they all agree on? Because this is this is something that people do. I I see a similarity between this and what people do a lot with feminism where it's like they'll take what is in reality a giant swath of policy prescriptions and worldviews and morality you know uh foundation like foundational morality about things. They'll take all this stuff and they'll impose it on you and then if you say, "Hey, I'm not in favor of this." They'll say, "Whoa, so you don't think women and men should be treated equally?"
As if that's what feminism is. They'll they'll take this big giant, you know, array of changes to your life and, you know, forced whatever uh uh prescriptive measures and they'll say, "Well, wait, feminism is just men and women being equal. You're against that?" And if you say, "No, I'm for that." They say, "Okay, great. So, you're a feminist. So, now you think that, you know, trans men should be able to compete on women's basketball teams." And it's just like, "What? Why would So, again, I'm sure there's a term for this.
I'm sure there's some psychological, you know, vocabulary word that I don't exactly know." Uh, but it's essentially taking this giant idea, boiling down to one very easily acceptable phrase, and saying, "If you accept this phrase, you have to accept all this other stuff. And if you don't accept all this other stuff, it must be because you don't agree with this simple phrase." Do you understand how this works? So with feminism, it goes, "Well, men and women should be equal." And you go, "Yeah, I agree with that." And so then all this other crap that comes along with it, you apparently have to agree with. If you're against that, it must mean because you think women are lesser and should be enslaved. And so it's like, okay, that's crazy. With climate change, it's a little bit different, but it's basically like, well, you know, don't you think that, you know, the climate is here? We can show you data showing like temperature is rising and CO2 is rising.
Like, don't you understand that? It's like, yeah, I I can understand that.
Okay, great. So now you have to eat the bugs and you have to, you know, no longer own a car and you have to not have a gas stove anymore. And it's like all this other crap. If you say, "Whoa, whoa, whoa. This is nonsense." I go, "Whoa, you don't believe in climate change? You can't understand that the earth is getting warmer." It's a conflation of these two things. It's a false dichotomy also that that we'll get into in just a second. So climate change is about a heck heck of a lot more than simple scientific inquiry. It's actually about it. It actually is nothing more or less than a vessel to reorganize all of human society. That's what it's being used for. That's its purpose. And I I think I can prove that out. The difference between things like CO and things like climate change is while masks may have caused respiratory illness, they may have affected, you know, the speech patterns of children when they're not able to see the the lip movements of their parents while they're learning to talk.
It had a lot of negative impacts the, you know, forced masks during COVID, but you could always take the masks off, right? Uh they can, you know, try to inject you with something that's kind of permanent. You can always not do that or you can not get the boosters. At a certain point, the lockdown ends and things get back to normal. That's not really the case with climate change.
With climate change, the corrective measures they're taking are permanent and cannot be reversed. So take what we take the lessons we learned during COVID which is that the expert class and all of the scientists and all the doctors they can all be wrong. They can all be objectly wrong and they can all force us to adopt measures that make things worse. That's what happened during COVID. We all saw it. Luckily we were able to end those measures. The damage that was done some of it's permanent but much of it will be mitigated or go away over time. What happens when you're spraying particles into the atmosphere to block out the sun? How do you reverse that? If that's a mistake on the level of the lockdowns, if that's if that's has negative consequences, on the level of the vaccine having negative consequences, how do you reverse that?
How do you undo that? We're creating problems that we can't undo that you can't reverse.
This is a big issue. So, just like CO had bad uh prescriptive measures that made everything worse. Same thing with climate change. Only in climate change case, climate change case, there's no going back. There's no undoing it. And of course, that is exactly what's happening with people like Bill Gates spraying particles into the air to try to block out the sun. From this Daily Mail article, Bill Gates backed plan to block the sun and reverse global warming. You know, like a super villain, like a completely psychotic, you know, Mr. Burns type character or something.
We're we're like cartoonishly evil here.
And of course, again, when we say climate change isn't just about the purely scientific inquiry and measurement of CO2 versus temperature over time, what it all actually boils down to is this equation that Bill Gates presented, but he's not the one that came up with it. And the equation is this. P * X * E * C equals CO2. and they're trying to get that CO2 the you know the answer to the equation down to zero.
Now how do you reach zero if you're multiplying a bunch of numbers together?
One of those numbers has to be zero. So these numbers represent P is people. So you time the number of people times S which is the uh services used by each person right? If you drive a car that increases. If you have a private jet that increases even more. So the person times the services that they use times the uh energy needed to power those services times the carbon dioxide created by that energy. So there will always be as long as there are people there will be services. So that number is non zero. That has to be an integer.
Uh e energy services will always require energy. That number is a non-zero number as well. And then you've got carbon which energy production will always produce carbon at least in the methods that we currently have. So that's a non-zero number. So you're trying to get zero by multiplying a bunch of non-zero numbers by whatever the value of P is, which I guess would have to go down to zero, which I guess would mean that this is kind of like a genocidal like we want to kill all humans kind of operation.
That's if you actually take the equation that they publish and the goals that they state which is they say they want CO2 down to zero and they calculated by calcul uh by multiplying all these different numbers and that is of course this has been Bill Gates has pushed this he's been a main spokesperson for all of this but of course it's you know he wants everybody else to eat bugs and you know live in tiny hvels doesn't exactly apply to him which is where you get the you know are they all lying aspect of this. Bill Gates as private jet does not conflict with his climate change philanthropy. Uh but then as of this year, actually it was October of last year, Bill Gates from the CNN article makes a stunning claim about climate change. He's basically said climate change not that big of an issue anymore. Actually, we're going to put away all the doomsday. So what has caused the number one purveyor, the number one like spokesman for the fear generation for climate change? Why would he reverse that stance all of a sudden? What did he learn that made him decide that climate change is not the priority that it once was? And the answer is data centers. The answer is data centers because data centers use an unbelievable amount of energy. Now, what do data centers do for us? Nothing.
Nothing. Is your life going to be improved by a data center? How how would it is it going to deliver Netflix faster? Is it going to give you a better route on Google Maps? Like, no. It's it's not being built for anything for you. So, think about this. These are people who are willing to destroy nuclear power plants in Germany, destroy coal power plants all over Europe, totally upend the world order to deal with this existential issue of climate change caused by power production. And suddenly, these very same people want to build data centers, every one of which uses more power than entire cities.
That would be totally contradictory if climate change really was what they say it was. If you understand the reality that climate change is simply a vessel for control, then you understand that they have simply found a better method of control that ironically is in total contradiction to climate change. So they've now abandoned climate change in favor of building data centers, ignoring all of their supposedly firmly held belief about the fate of the earth and the you know desperate need to lower energy production. It's not actually that important. Now we have these data centers which can collect massive amounts of data which can be manipulated to control people. That's the better method of control. So forget the whole climate change agenda we are doing.
Let's create a billion times more energy so that we can have the data centers whose only purpose could ever possibly be to control you. What other purpose do we have for data centers? And why are they why are the very same people who have spent the last three decades hyperventilating and and freaking out about climate change? These are the very same people that are now building these data centers. A planned 10 gawatt softbank data center in Ohio will require a $ 33 billion natural gas plant which will produce energy equivalent to nine nuclear reactors to run one datab bank in Ohio.
Sort of at odds with the whole climate change agenda, isn't it? According to Wired, new gas powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than entire nations.
But the very same people that want you to not drive a car because of climate change are the ones building these data centers because they don't actually care about the climate. They don't actually care about energy production. They care about controlling you. And if they think they can control you by forcing you to give up your car and give up your um you know meat, then they'll do that. If they think they can control you by using tons of energy to manipulate information, then they'll do that. It's about control and it's always about control and that's all it's ever been about. In addition to the energy production, San Antonio D uh data centers guzzled 463 million gallons of fresh water as area faced drought. 463 million gallons of fresh water gone going specifically to cooling one data center in San Antonio. So again, tell me that the people doing this are environmentalists. Tell me they care about preserving resources. They don't give a damn about any of that. They know you do. So they'll use that concern, that care, that virtue of yours that you're a caring person that cares about the environment, and they will weaponize it against you. All right, we need to get to more of these clips, but I could go on and on and on. And eventually, you end up with something like this. The piece at the Atlantic, which they now title, the Malthusians are back. It used to be called population control movement uh sees you know reignition. Malthusian that's that's population control um essentially we have to lower the number of humans. Climate activists who worry the world has too many people are joining this tradition the tradition of population control and Malthusian manipulation. Or as the New York Time puts it, Earth now has 8 billion humans.
This man wishes there were none. So again, like don't tell me that like Christianity is a death cult. You people are in a death cult. Climate change is a death cult. And you've got people being celebrated, honored, treated like, you know, really, really wise thinkers for being like, "Yeah, I think all humans should die to save the planet." That's crazy. So, I've rambled a lot about it, but but the point of this is that in this initial clip from Milo Rossi when he says that, you know, scientists all agree on this, the question is, what do they agree on? Do all scientists agree that all of humanity should be eradicated for the sake of the earth because that's what some people think is the inevitable conclusion of climate change. So when you say, you know, you got to accept climate change, like it's just it's as if we're just like denying that the sky is blue. No, we're denying that a bunch of radical anti-human psychopaths should be able to completely destroy human society because they've manipulated some models that show it's gonna get hot. What? No. This is ridiculous. Let's go to the next clip here. Uh, in this clip, pay attention to what he's reading and then his reaction because they're sort of out of whack. Uh, clip two. Let's watch.
>> Many Christians have been asking CMI, Creation Ministries Institute, to comment on global warming, climate change, said to be caused by human generated carbon dioxide. This happens particularly at ministry events where we have a Q&A. It is certainly a hot topic and they say that biblical literalists don't have a sense of humor. Until now, CMI has largely avoided the issue. For one thing, we don't think it's a core creation gospel issue. Also, some people get quite emotional about the subject, so it could be risky thing to comment upon. No matter what view we take, some of our friends are going to disagree, and we understand. They're just so they're so neutral and balanced.
>> All right, so there you sort of he's mocking the idea that they could be neutral and balanced. Now, I didn't cut anything. So, we're going from the clip you just saw to the clip you're about to see. He flips out in the clip that you're about to see. So, I want you to pay, that's why I said, you know, pay attention what he's actually reading because all he read there, all that they said is, "Hey, look, this is a sensitive topic that people can get emotional about, and we understand that. We're going to try to take it sensitively."
And this, for some reason, like pisses him off and he just goes insane, which is kind of hilarious because this is exactly what they're talking about.
They're literally I mean I've got the the transcript here. They're just like look we don't think that climate change is like a core component of our religion, right? They're basically like you can believe in climate change or not. We don't think that you know your your Christianity is dependent on that, you know, which they may have something different to say about like creationism, something like that. They're just saying like look, this is not our wheelhouse exactly. This is not something we're super into and like dedicated to. It's just we want to talk about it and we understand it's a sensitive topic and we want to try to, you know, treat it uh with respect. And he's just like, "Oh, how dare you." It's crazy. So, I didn't delete anything. Let's go to the next clip now. Clip number three. All that all that they've said so far, all that he's read so far is that they're like, "Look, we don't really believe in climate change that much, but you know, we understand it's a it's a sensitive topic and people get emotional." Here's his response to that.
>> I like that. It's not a core creation gospel issue. We live in the Garden of Eden, mother. Look around you. We have everything we could ever want. This planet is perfect, and you are watching it burn in front of your eyes. I don't give a if you believe there was something better before this, but this is God's creation. You look it up at all those stars, and you think that each one of those is a planet, and we're the only one that has his creation on it, and you don't give a about saving this. You're okay watching oceans turn black and the rivers run to mud and you're gonna sit there and say, "This isn't my problem.
Give me a break.
>> Okay. All right. Okay. Do you see what I mean? It's like, okay. Kind of crazy. Now, there's also something like deeply ironic about this, right? Cuz he's making fun of Christians. This whole thing is sort of motivated by this like underlying sort of hatred and and looking down on on Christians. But it's like, yeah, you know, we want to treat this respectfully because we understand people have emotions about it. He's just like, EMOTIONS, PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONAL about this. THE EARTH OR THE SKY WILL TURN RED. Like it's it's insane. And this is the thing. He's like mocking Christians and he and it's it's the next clip I think where or or one a little bit after this. It gets very confusing. Like what does he even what does he think he's talking about? What does he think Christians believe? He obviously has no concept of Christianity. Like he does not understand. He has no curiosity about it. Which again is is kind of a projection, right? Because this whole thing is considering Christians are morons. They're they're unnuanced.
They're shortsighted. They're stupid.
They're gullible. Like that's his idea of Christianity is that, you know, we just don't understand science because we won't even look into it. And it's like the reality is he has this cartoonish view of Christianity that he is not intellectually curious about whether it's it's an accurate view or not. Uh it's a biased and discriminatory view that he has. That is of course exactly what he would project on a Christian.
But what he's really presenting here is the ultimate false dichotomy at the heart of climate change, which is that all environmental concerns have now been subsumed into climate change. And the dichotomy he's presenting is you either believe in climate change, right? In other words, you believe in everything.
You believe that men are causing it and that governments have to crush it, you know, by force. Or you hate the earth.
That's the dichotomy he's presenting. So if I say, "Yeah, I'm not really sure about, you know, Bill Gates blocking out the sun." And and in his mind, that means that I just don't care about nature, that I just am happy to see, how did he put it? Uh, rivers turn into mud and the oceans turning black, which again, it's like here's a guy who is mocking Christians and yet he sounds like an endof timed rapture preacher.
He's going, you know, he's going, "You, you apocalyptic Christians, you don't understand that the oceans will turn to ash and the rivers will run red with blood." And it's like, dude, I think you're the one who's in an apocalyptic death cult here. And it gets crazier because it is this religious, it's a faximile of of the religious order where it's like it's because of our sins. We're being punished for our sins. and he's furious that we refuse to alter our behavior to avoid the punishment of of the god of nature for our our horrible sins against him. There is a pseudo religious aspect of this that he's totally blind to which is why he he falls into it completely.
And the thing is as a Christian like I'm an actual environmentalist. I actually believe that God gave us his creation and we have an obligation to safeguard and preserve and and foster it and that climate change is completely at odds with that desire. I mean right now as we speak like white rhinos are going extinct. There are two white rhinos in existence right now. They're both female. Okay. So the last male white rhino died in 2018. I think it's kind of a collective sin of ours that we of as humanity has been incapable of preserving a species that was alive and now is gone. That's that's crazy. So you're telling me that we couldn't do anything about that? Where was the concern there? What part of climate change would have preserved the white rhino from extinction? Was it climate change that killed the white rhino or was it poaching? Was it uh you know destroying their environment? Was it all this other stuff that is not addressed by climate change is actually exacerbated in many cases by climate change. Especially the fact that the climate change agenda is limiting like third world and and lower developed countries from accessing the energy they need to build their prosperity and actually create functioning societies that could do things like protect white rhinos. Not that I think that we have to wait on Africa to build a successful nation state for us to save uh species from extinction, but this is the type of thing that goes totally unressed by climate change. How is climate change going to prevent the white rhino or other species from going extinct? Have you ever heard of the Chinese fishing fleets? There are Chinese fishing fleets that are as big as cities that are tens of thousands of boats large that never land at any ports. They have a mothership system where they send everything back to China and they get everything from China and they go through the ocean and just denude entire swaths of the ocean of life. They have methods of fishing where they drop electric cords to the bottom and just kill everything that's underneath the ship. They do it in a way that is completely unsustainable. Like they will wipe out the entire population of like, you know, crabs and that's it. They're gone. Like it's not like another swath of crabs is going to come the next year.
They kill them all and they are doing it at a systematic degree constantly literally destroying all life in the ocean. It is far and away in my opinion the number one ecological threat the world faces right now. Is climate change going to stop that? Is climate change going to address that? for is all of the concern about environmental uh and and ecological concerns at all.
All of them have been taken over, pushed out of the way, usurped by the climate change agenda, which they're not going to deal with pollution. They're not going to deal with poaching. They're not going to deal with the Chinese fishing fleets. They're not going to deal with the fact that the trash in our oceans, 90% of it comes from rivers in India, China, and Africa.
They're not dealing with any of that. In fact, they're the ones responsible for that. The same people who are pushing the climate change agenda are the same people that run the big tech companies that offshored all of our manufacturing to China where there's no environmental controls and they pour toxic waste right into their rivers. They wanted to save a couple bucks, so they offshored. And the same type of thing like when it comes to immigration, the first world, Europe, America, we care about the environment.
We have laws to prevent pollution. We have laws about animal welfare. Third world doesn't have that. And when they come here, they trash our rivers. I mean, in Canada, they they're poaching the salmon. The Canadian government is so paralyzed by claims of racism. They won't stop the Indian poachers. They're going to destroy the salmon runs.
There's going to be no more wild caught salmon ever again because these people will not, you know, preserve nature. Or you look at the UK where just like all the swans have been eaten by third world immigrants.
Our culture preserves nature and up upholds and uplifts nature and will you know uh we'll put limits on ourselves if you know we need to preserve nature and and not build something or not you know do something. We'll we'll actually preserve the nature. That's our culture.
That's our mentality. That's our mindset. That's not the mindset of people from the third world. And yet people like Milo Rossi in the in the socialist leftist side of things, they're the ones who are maximizing the damage that's being done by the third world uh because they're so desperate to force all of us into the climate change agenda which doesn't address any of these other major actually devastating problems.
So let's go to the next one. Uh clip four. So again, he flips out and goes into this like the the end is nigh sort of uh apocalyptic rant and all of it is with the assumption that Christians for some reason just don't care about the earth and don't care about nature.
What's in that beer? Wow. Holy. Haven't done that in a minute. Also, scientifically, the issue is very complex as I have found diving into the literature and many colleagues inside and outside CMI have critiqued and contributed to what follows. Oh god, this is a very long article.
>> So I just I just like that one where he's like laughs at the very concept that they're you know the person says this is very complex and I've you know found that by diving into the literature and Miles was just like yeah right like this person reads anything and then is immediately like oh this article is super long. I'm not going to read this.
It's like well okay you clearly they did their research clearly they've got plenty of information and sources to back up their decisions. And it's just kind of ironic that he's like, "These people don't know how to read." Oh, wow.
This article is really long. I will not be reading this. It's like, great. So, you'll remain ignorant and you'll be able to perpetuate your preconceived and false biases uh by not actually giving any respect to the people that you're mocking. Great. Wonderful. Let's go to clip five here. So, he's not reading all this. He's not reading the literature.
He's not reading the article, but he is going to judge them. Let's watch.
>> I'm not I ain't reading all that. What's at the bottom? Give me the conclusion.
Okay. A Christian approach. Final thoughts. In summary, the politicization of climate change has led to the corruption of the science. Yeah. Like maybe the science and data being misrepresented uh by oilf funded state media um controlled by a cristofascist government to make uneducated people not believe in climate change and believe that it's a political issue. I would have to agree with that. Okay. What?
Like what are you talking about? So he starts off the video by saying every scientist agrees on this, but now he's saying the oil companies are controlling the science and manipulating it so that it doesn't say that. How does that work? That doesn't make any sense. He also thinks we live in a christofascist society, which again, I mean, this is the radicalism. This is the insanity of these people. Our entire society is like suicidally dedicated to climate change.
Like every media outlet endlessly crows about it. Every industry run by black rockck and the worst, you know, richest, most rapacious, you know, capitalist scumbags out there are the ones forcing this on us. Our government, you know, with Trump is a little bit less, but still to this day motivated, directed, compelled entirely by the climate change agenda. And yet this guy thinks that the oil companies are manipulating things, that they're the ones in charge. It's madness. It's m it's it's mindnumbing.
It's ridiculous. I don't know how anybody could possibly look around the world today and think that the anti-climate change agenda is somehow manipulating things and and controlling what people think. It is bonkers. It really is bonkers uh that that people believe this sort of stuff. It's completely crazy.
And again, you know, when he laughs at the idea of this being a complex issue, that's because to him it's not. To him, it's very simple. To him, it's if you're smart, you believe in climate change, and you don't question it, and man warming the earth, man has to be stopped. Like, it's very simple to him.
The reality is it is complex. The reality is nothing about this is settled, and it's all being warped, you know, beyond recognition.
And so just to emphasize, you know, what he read there about the politization of climate change. Now again, he completely inverts this and says that it's a political issue that it's being stop.
It's just let me just read some headlines. Let me just read some headlines about the claims that are made about what is caused by and what causes climate change. Okay, let's just run through this. So the German health minister says climate change is the root of health crisises.
They say climate change may uh cause increased rates of heart defects in babies. Climate change will cause waves of migration into Britain that will make current levels seem like nothing. You've been affected by climate change. Your long-term finances might be too. Uh so it's costing us money. And they actually ch it's funny they changed these headlines. That headline originally just said uh like climate change damage. It's happening everywhere all the time constantly. Like it's just like everything is being destroyed by climate change. Climate change is destroying the earth. You're destroying the earth by living because of climate change. And every breath you take is destroying the earth. And earth won't survive because you exist in climate change. And they're telling this to like little kids and you know empathetic, you know, caring people. And then you've got Euro News reporting the silent impact of climate change on mental health. What is eco anxiety?
Wait. So, and like this again, this is how climate change works. They lie to you. They tell you you're destroying the earth. They tell little kids the earth is dying because you exist. And those kids believe them are an anxious. And these people turn around and go, "Look at what climate change did to these poor kids. Look at what climate change is doing to these poor, anxious children that now think that they're responsible for the earth ending. I can't believe climate change would do this." And I've no joke I've seen Al Gore give speeches where he actually says this with no sense of irony, no sense of cognitive dissonance where like in the same sentence he'll be going, "We are destroying the earth. The oceans are going to dry up. People are going to be eating each other when we run out of food." And for some reason, the mental health impact this is having on children is going unressed. It's like, no, the mental impact is you people fear-mongering endlessly, relentlessly.
Dead babies are because of climate change. Migration's because of climate change. Heart attacks are because of climate change. Every tornadoes and hurricanes and just everything is because of climate change. But it's not political and there's no ulterior agenda. Okay? These are serious scientific inquiries that are telling you uh that the child mental health crisis is now caused by climate change and it's also causing climate it's also causing child uh malnutrition. How about this from the CBS News? How climate change helped strengthen the Taliban.
Nothing political though. This isn't politicized at all though. No, no.
Climate change is responsible for tornadoes and hurricanes and mental health collapse and uh diabetes and heart attacks and everything and your wedding day getting rained on and they also help the Talib Taliban. But all of this is just pure scientific inquiry. There's no this is not a political at all. No way that the proclimate people would ever use climate change politically. It's just those bad oil companies that are telling you not to believe in climate change. They're the politicized ones, not us. We're just fighting the Taliban by not letting you eat meat anymore.
Okay, great.
Uh let's go to the next one. Uh clip six here. Two. Over the last 100 years or so, the CO2 level has been increasing.
However, the temperatures over that time have not been consistent with the hypothesis that human generated CO2 is the prime cause of temperature increase.
That is literally just bull. I'm not going to read into this to see where you got that from because it's wrong. It is simply wrong. It is simply wrong.
Okay, great. No need to uh explain anything. Just uh curse and say it's wrong. Wonderful. What he says is wrong is that CO2 levels uh have been increasing, but it hasn't been consistent with the hypothesis that human generated CO2 is the prime cause of temperature increase. I guess what I would say is you can look at literally every prediction ever made about climate change and it's always been wrong. So how how could they be wrong by saying that? I mean you look at the predictions of Al Gore and whoever else in the '9s I mean they said that there'd be no more polar bears. They said that the you know ice caps would change and they were basing all of that on the computer models that were predicated on human caused rise in CO2 causing a corresponding rise in temperature. So, if those didn't happen, then those models weren't right. Those weren't correct, and that's an undeniable fact.
But I guess just curse and ignore that, Milo. Uh, let's go to the next clip here.
>> The science is not settled, or there would be one model, not over a hundred, that attempts to predict the global temperature. It's a model making a prediction. We're predicting something over an incredibly long period of time.
Okay. and you're you're expecting us to change the fundamental construct of our society on the basis of those predictions. But then it's like you can't predict that.
They're like, "Yeah, so well it's those predictions that you're basing everything on." But then when those predictions are called out, you're just like but it's a really long time though.
How are we supposed to be able to predict this? I don't know. You're the ones who say you can predict it and you're making policy on the basis of those predictions. He also scoffs at the idea that they say the science is not settled. Now, I didn't bother to find it, but earlier in this video, he goes off again about somebody who makes claim about science and he's like, "You don't understand science. Science is always changing. There's always new information and science. Science is changing to f to fit the new information. You idiot. You morons don't understand how science works." And then it's like, we're sitting here going, "Well, then is the science of climate change settled?" And he's like, "Of course it's settled. It's over. It's done. There's no more science needs to be done for climate. figured it out. And it's like, so which is it? So which is it? It's just the hypocrisy runth over. It's there's almost too much. Now we can go to clip nine here.
This is a this is a very interesting one. Let's watch this one. Little things like this make me do hope that there's some kind of divine thing going on. Not in the way of big bearded guy in the sky with a, you know, lightning bolt or whatever, but like I I I'm a spiritual guy. I think the earth is an amazing place. I see God whenever I'm looking at the sky, too, you know, but it pains me to know that all of the people who deny climate change and who spread all this propaganda about it are never going to have to suffer for what they've caused.
And a little piece of me wishes that I could believe in something like hell because I think that there's some people that deserve it. Do you see the sort of pseudo religious aspect of this? But but this is also it's the projection based on the misunderstanding of Christianity because again he's got this idea of Christians that he is trying to like reflect back to Christians but he he doesn't understand Christians. He's not curious about it. He obviously is not willing to actually learn about it. Like his understanding of spirituality is like I what does he say? He says uh I'm a spiritual guy. I think the earth is an amazing place. I see God whenever I'm looking at the sky too. It's like no you don't we believe in like actually spirit spiritual things like spiritual depth like we actually believe that the god of the universe is living and that our consciousness has an effect like we believe like really deep profound things his view of spirituality is like yeah I get a good feeling when I look at a tree it's like okay that's not like spirituality I don't I don't know what you're talking about exactly it's not spirituality that's basic appreciation of beauty like that's that's pretty normal So like his his understanding of like spirituality, this is the way a lot of people think about Christianity. This is why they they like think it's it's a slam dunk or something to like equate God to Santa Claus. Like what do you say there? Some some guy with a beard and a lightning bolt in the sky.
It's like, okay, you don't understand.
This would be like me arguing against climate change by just being like, "Oh, you think that because I drive a SUV, the Earth's going to explode."
And like, you know, Rossy Milo would sit there and go, "What a what a ridiculously amateur-ish understanding."
Like, no, that's not we. That's that's such a cartoonish exaggeration of what's actually happening here. So, of course, when if you're talking about climate change, you have to understand it. You have to treat it with respect. You have to try to comprehend what's being said so you can argue against it. When it comes to religion, you can just create your own straw man, fight that, and then act like you win. We don't believe that there's a man with a beard and a lightning bolt in the sky. That's a cartoonish misrepresentation that you seem to have uh fallen for. The other thing that again causes the hatred of Christianity, that is a complete misconception, is this idea that like we want them to go to hell cuz that's what he wants. Like you just heard him there.
He's like, I wish there was hell. So you freaking people could go there because again, you're a sinner, right? You're a sinner in his religion. His religion is worshiping Bill Gates and the liars that manipulate science. That's his religion.
And if you disagree with them, if you have a different view of them, if you disagree with the prescriptive measures that they demand that you accept, uh, then you're a sinner and you deserve hell. And he would he would relish the idea of you being tortured for all of eternity. Obviously, he thinks that's what Christians believe, too. He I don't know why it's difficult to understand this for people. For Christians, hell is just a fact. It's just a a reality. We aren't sitting here saying, "Oh, people who disagree with us, I can't wait till they're burning in the lake of fire."
We're saying you're going to hell if you don't correct yourself. Just like if somebody was walking towards a cliff, I'd be saying, "You're walking towards a cliff. If you keep walking, you will fall off the cliff." I'm That's not me throwing him off the cliff. That's not me saying I can't wait till he falls off the cliff. That's me saying this is a fact of reality. If you keep behaving the way that you are, you will come to disaster. And I don't want you to come to disaster, which is why I'm telling you this. I don't want you to go to hell, which is why I would tell you about Jesus Christ and, you know, try to enlighten you about what real spirituality is. He has a different view. His view of Christians is that we just want people to be in hell because we, you know, demand that they listen to us. That's him. That's all projection.
We don't believe that. I don't believe that. I don't want him to go to hell. I want him to have his soul saved. He wants me to go to hell because I don't believe in climate change. It's insane.
Let's go to clip 11 here. Don't get me wrong, I do what I can to reduce my carbon footprint. But you and I, we don't do anything. It's the corporations. It's the big oil. It's the CEOs. It's the government surprise who are not just primary drivers of the unfolding climate apocalypse, but are literally the ones that are ensuring that it's going to happen. They're also the ones pushing all the climate change agenda stuff. Like, what does he not understand about this? The World Economic Forum, head by Larry Frink, CEO of BlackRock, is the number one primary driver of climate change agenda government programs. It is literally the number one top most important, most powerful, most wealthy capitalist in our society that are the ones most viciferously, most aggressively pushing the climate change agenda.
Has he not noticed this yet? That might, you know, be worth looking into a little bit. They're not the ones who are, you know, trying to destroy the earth to make the most amount of money. They've found that climate change, you can just summon money out of thin air. you could just force the government to give you billions of dollars for ridiculous nonsense. And should we go through some of the ridiculous nonsense that they want to push for climate change? Because again, climate change is not a scientific inquiry about temperature of Earth over time corresponding with uh you know quality of CO2. This is not what it's about. It's about this giant program to try to reshape life on Earth.
And of course the, you know, one of the greatest ironies in all of this is that yes, these big corporations, these government programs have all been the major, you know, cause of climate change. And things like this, China opens its doors to the world by kicking off the first in-person summer Davos since the pandemic. So you've got China, the worst poller in the world by a factor of a hundred, hosting a World Economic Forum program.
So they can all come and tell us about all of the measures we have to take to fight climate change when they're building a new coal power plant every two days. But they want Western countries to destroy the currently existing power plants or build a bunch of windmills or something nonsense. So, they're uh launching particles into the atmosphere to fight climate change, of course, because what could go wrong with blocking out the sun? Corporations have begun geoengineering the climate with basically no one's consent. Things like make sunsets, again, spraying medical metal alloys into the atmosphere to block out the sun. The White House has signaled openness to manipulating sunlight to prevent climate change, which is different than just blocking the sun. This is solar radiation modification, which sounds like something a wizard would do, which is kind of crazy. Uh, but there's even there's even better ones. California, uh, what if we, this is how Bloomberg puts it, what if we blotted out the sun to stop climate change? So, they've gone from let's spray particles in the atmosphere to stop climate change to let's manipulate sunlight itself to stop climate change to now they're just saying, let's blot it out. Let's blot out the sun to fight climate change. And if you don't believe it, you deserve to go to hell. According to Ro, if you aren't okay with blotting out the sun to save Earth from the sins of man, then you deserve hell. According to Milo Rossi, how dare you not want to blot out the sun, California will allow human composting after death to combat climate change. So yeah, there you go. you can turn your body into manure to be spread on, you know, food people are going to eat. Uh because climate change, because there's no ulterior motive here. There's no no there's it's this isn't a ridiculous antihuman crazy policy that's being shoehorned in by claiming it's to fight climate change. No, no. Let's just compost your humans into manure and spread it on the food you're going to eat because climate change, right, Milo? We got to have we got to fight climate change. We have to we have to eat people because climate change. Uh America's western water crisis is so bad that Colorado is going to start drinking recycled sewage. Okay?
So you can be drinking poo water to deal with the climate change while simultaneously pouring 423 million gallons of fresh water into the data centers because really it's all about human control and degradation and humiliation. Uh the mainstream media has officially called for killing your cats and dogs to fight climate change because obviously cats and dogs are living. They therefore create CO2. So kill your cats and dogs to fight climate change. What do you What are you a a science denier, Milo? Kill your dog. Kill your dog. Kill your cat. Eat the bugs. You're fighting climate change after all.
Meanwhile, you've got things like this rain water everywhere on Earth. unsafe to drink due to forever chemicals because yeah, there's plastics and hormone uh manipulators, estrogen mimickers in all of our drinking water because the earth is being destroyed in a billion different ways. None of which have anything to do with climate change.
It has to do with pollution. It has to do with uh plastics being, you know, poured into the ocean by China and India and all these other places that don't abide by climate change regulations in the first place. I mean, it it goes on and on. the number of problems like ecological concerns that we could actually have that go completely and totally unressed. But this is where it gets really crazy and really goes off the rails. Uh, clip number 13 here.
This is where you can see the the sthing hatred of Christianity come out and it makes what he's saying not even make sense anymore. Let's watch. But again, morons like this think in black and white that there is the apocalypse not happening and the apocalypse happening. One day we're going to wake up and it's going to just be really hot out and we're going to be like, "Oh, the climate change happened." It's not going to be like that. We are the frogs in the pot of water. Christians, he thinks, believe in just a black and white. There's no nuance. There's good and evil. And you know, because Christians are like children. We have no ability to understand. It's not like if you read the Bible, there's any nuance. No, there's no there's no nuance in the Bible. Everybody's very clearly good or evil, right? Nobody goes from being good to being evil. Nobody goes from being evil to being good. It's all very it's all very cut and dry in the Bible, right? It's like the dude has clearly never cracked a Bible. He has no idea.
He has this again cartoonish view of Christianity that is just completely and utterly wrong. Christianity has infinite nuance. I mean, do you think people have been arguing about this stuff for 2,000 years? Like monks dedicating their entire lives to studying like small passages in the book, but there's no nuance. There's no nuance. It's all very sim. It's like Santa Claus, naughty or nice. You're on the list, one or the other, right? Because his view of Christianity is cartoonish and petulant and childish and ridiculous. and he wants to impose that on you so he can call you stupid. Well, he actually believes in the black and white construct of the world where you're either on the side of the scientists and the powers that be and you're a smart enlightened, you know, progressive ethical human being or you are suspicious of the powers that be using climate change to reorganize the world and you're a complete idiot [ __ ] that deserves to go to hell. He's got the black and white view with no nuance.
He's wrong and he projects that onto Christianity because he's a um scumbag.
I do want to point out that right there he's like he's like you think the apocalypse is not happening but the apocalypse is happening you're going to wake up and it's going to be really hot and you're going to be like oh the climate change happen. Like I don't even know what he's talking about. It seems like he's trying to like mock the idea of like revelation and the end of the world and sort of the biblical apocalypse by conflating that with climate change because he thinks that the apocalypse is going to be like the earth is on fire or something. I I don't even know what he's talking about. Like this is the thing. I think he's I think he's trying to mock Christianity, but I don't even know what he's trying to mock exactly. So this whole thing about like you believe in the apocalypse but not the apocalypse.
You are the apocalyptic freak yelling about the rivers running dry and the ocean turning to ash. Please stop projecting onto Christians. We again have once again another nuanced view of what the apocalypse looks like, what the end of the world looks like, something that is probably of interest to all of human beings. But he would rather just um project this black and white childish view of the world and then you know claim we're the ones that believe that.
So let's go to the next one. This one I again I'm like what the hell point is he even trying to make? Because there's a common refrain that it's like you know they'll people will make fun of climate change deniers. They'll say you know uh they'll be mocking them going well if it's global warming why is it cold outside? Like I think that's what he's going with this whole idea of like it's cold therefore global warming isn't happen. Like you're so stupid. How do you believe that? But then he immediately does that. I'm very confused by this. Let's watch the next clip where he is just clearly in a state of like manic insanity and is saying things that contradicts the very thing he's saying.
It's wild. Let's watch.
>> This was one of the harshest winters in Vermont in the last 10 years. See, it snowed a lot. Climate change isn't real.
It was 60° 2 weeks ago. That doesn't happen. This past summer was a 100redyear drought, and the summer before that was a 100red-year flood.
This is how the climate apocalypse is going to happen.
>> This was one of the harshest winters in Vermont in the last 10 years. See, it snowed a lot. climate change isn't real.
It was 60 degrees two weeks a like I'm very that doesn't happen. So he's like, so he's taking this sort of, you know, projection thing where it's like it snowed in Vermont. How could it be climate change? So he's trying to mock the idea of like, you know, this this individual anecdote somehow disproves climate change. But then he immediately says it was 60° 2 weeks ago. That doesn't happen. This past summer was a hundred-year drought and the summer before was a hundred-year flood. That's how the climate. So, he's like, "You stupid idiot. Your personal experience about climate isn't climate change. My personal experience about climate is climate change. You're stupid for thinking that snowing in Vermont disproves climate change. I'm the genius for knowing that it being 60° proves that it is climate change." It's like, "This is crazy, man. You're crazy.
You're crazy." There's another clip earlier. We didn't we didn't play it, but you know, he's he's against you effing morons. If things if the temperature rises one degree, it would have cataclysmic consequences. And you look it up and the earth has gained a degree in the last hundred years.
There's no real difference. I mean, yeah, maybe the weather is a little bit crazier, maybe it's a little wonky, but the thing is they have people like this programmed to see every all weather as indicative of climate change. When I go out and I I it's like, "Wow, it's, you know, I got bit by a mosquito in February. This is weird. This is messed up." I'm thinking like about solar cycles. I'm thinking about the earth's atmosphere and and the changing of the um you know uh magnetic field over the earth. Like I to me a lot of different things or what they're spraying in the air and in the atmosphere as they do weather modification and geoengineering.
Like there's a lot of things I'm like man things are kind of messed up. Like yeah there things are a little wonky.
things are not as as sort of predictable it seems to me like as they used to be.
But I'm not the one that's been programmed to come to a pre-established conclusion about that. I actually want to know everything that's going on and what we can do to to solve it. But that makes me the uh the idiot. And and just to finish off the the final thing is him saying there's no climate emergency and he's he gets so mad and he basically says we all need to be sent to Mars. So, so they can deal with Eden without us snakes who are just like, "Yeah, I don't think we need to kill everybody to save the earth. That's crazy. We're the bad ones." Number six, there is no climate emergency. This is where I get really cynical, guys, where I'm like, we deserve this. Weing deserve this. It just sucks that we are part of we I really think we should send all these to Mars. Let the rest of us sort Eden out without the snakes. I just want to lay out some some facts, some some headlines that you probably uh haven't heard that show how ridiculous everything about climate change is.
Thousands of old wind turbine blades pile up in West Texas as windmills don't last very long. In fact, they almost never last long enough to offset the carbon it makes to create them. And so after a while they have to be stored somewhere and they leak toxic waste and entire miles and miles of fields in Texas are now uh decrepit. They're they're dead because they have all this toxic waste on it courtesy of windmills. Wind, solar, and batteries require 1,000% more steel, concrete, and glass. 3,000% more 300% more copper. 4,200% uh more lithium, graphite, nickel, and rare earths respectively than fossil fuels. So again, while you may be lowering the amount of natural gas or oil that you're using, you're increasing the lithium and all this other stuff that all takes carbon, it's none of it's actually carbon neutral. Uh my favorite story of all of this, and we'll we'll end with this, but we got things like this. Dozens of giant turbines at Scots wind farms powered by diesel generators because, hey, windmills are great unless there's too much wind, then they break. Or if there's no wind, then they freeze. And so you got to have diesel generators to keep the windmills going because everything is [ __ ] Uh but what about solar panels? California went big on rooftop solar. Now it's now they're filling up the landfills as solar panels are poisoning the ground and uh causing pollution everywhere. And then there's climate change agendas like the C40 systems where they're literally saying that you will no longer be able to travel. You'll no longer be able to own a car. You'll no longer be able to even buy things like clothes without their permission because of climate change.
This is a giant agenda to constrict humanity and enslave us. And they're really giving up on it because they've moved on to data centers. But it's worth looking back and remembering everything they've tried to do. And there's it's just so crazy. You've got World War II style rationing of meat, clothing, and energy needed to fight climate change, says UK academics. Germany shut down its last three power plants uh nuclear power plants because of climate scientists told them to. Now their economy is collapsing and their industry is collapsing because they can't get free energy or cheap energy because they followed Greta Thunberg down the road to hell. Uh there's such a thing as too much sun for solar panels. So like literally windmills work great unless there's too much wind. Solar panels work great unless there's too much sun. Like these are actual problems with the so-called green energy.
There's also giant carbon sucking machines now. You know, trees taking carbon, put out oxygen. Now they have gigantic air conditioning units that do that job instead because they're actually killing all of the trees for climate change. Hundreds of trees to be felled for Cambridge bus route to tackle climate change. Huge swats of the Amazon forest were destroyed so they could hold a climate change agenda meeting. A stealth effort to bury wood for uh carbon removal has just raised millions.
Bill Gates raised $6 million for a company called Kodama. Their plan to fight climate change is to chop down trees and then bury them.
They're going to chop down forests and then bury them because they're environmentalists. You understand?
They're going to chop down trees and then they're going to bury them under the dirt. And if you don't think that that's a good way to save the earth, then you deserve to go to hell. You're an idiot. You're a [ __ ] You're a stupid Christian that doesn't understand the real religion of the earth, the real sin that we're committing by not going along with this absolute nonsense. They literally have a headline from Forbes that says, "Chop down forest to save the planet."
And they think you're an idiot for not going along with it.
And the best the best one of all, Drax power plant in the UK. Biggest coal power plant in history. A couple years ago, they had a big celebration. They said, "We just went for the first time 24 hours without burning coal. We went 24 hours carbon neutral, zero carbon produced." So the question is, what did they burn? And you look, they say instead of burning coal, we burned biomass.
Now what is biomass? Well, the Drax power plant gets its biomass from America. It's old growth forests in British Columbia and Virginia. They go into old growth forests. They log the forest. They chop down all the trees.
They grind those trees into pellets.
They ship those pellets across the Atlantic Ocean. They burn them in a power plant. And then they tell you it's zero carbon because it's not coal.
This is the type of stuff that the climate change adherence want us to be okay with. It's completely insane. It's utterly backwards. It has nothing to do with whether or not you love the earth and love God's creation. It has to do with whether you're a sucker that's going along with tyrants that are manipulating your fear, manipulating your love of the earth to convince you to kill yourself and kill the earth in pursuit of some ultimate goal that is illdefined. and practically impossible to achieve. The total and absolute reduction of carbon production by human beings. It doesn't actually happen. The people pushing it are the same ones offshoring sites to China where there's no environmental control at all. the actual environmental threats that we're facing like the continent of India, the country of China, the rivers that discourge 90% of the pollution in the world, the Chinese fishing fleets denuting life in the ocean as rapidly as they possibly can, the poaching again out of China, hunting down white rhinos to make bootleg Viagra, killing entire species. None of this goes addressed by climate change. All of this gets ignored and gets pushed down to lowest priority status by climate change by people that want to take over the stock market, take over the food you're allowed to eat, the car you're allowed to drive, the fuel you're allowed to burn because they want to enslave you. And now that they've learned that it's more effective to have data centers, then they're sort of dropping this to the side. But you can't forget, and it's you can't overstate the informative aspects of a video like this in the pseudo religious, extremist, illogical, and frankly biased, hateful, and discriminatory view that the climate change adherence have. To those of us that are a little bit skeptical, I remind you again, CO was bad enough. The things they're doing to try to fight climate change are not reversible.
They're permanent. and they're significantly more damaging than anything that happened under COVID. But the same processes are taking place where the expert class and the media class are conspiring to censor alternative views and convince everybody out there that you're only smart and intelligent and you only love Earth if you go along with their utterly ridiculous scam to enslave the planet force you to eat bugs.
Forments News, I'm Harrison Smith. Make sure you're following us in XR Studios on Rumble and YouTube. And I'll see you next time.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











