Q&A: Visas, Asylum, Mass Deportations, Trump's Successes & Failures

Añadido: 2026-05-27

[00:00:29]Welcome. Welcome back to the broadcast, guys. Hope you're doing well out there.

[00:00:31]I'm your host, Rod, as always. And in this video, we're going to be doing something a little bit different from my regular videos. And that is because I'm going to be doing a response video to comments and questions that viewers have posted on my channel. Now, this is a new thing that I've never never done before, but um there's some questions that I really want to answer sometimes, and I don't feel like typing out a whole paragraph. So, I think this is a better format for me to answer you guys' questions because there's some really good qu questions and comments that are posted, but I don't get to respond to all of them. I don't I'm very low on time. I do have a little bit more time now uh that I'm on vacation, but uh when I'm working on regular around the year, uh this is the first vacation I've taken in literally like a decade. So, I'm a workaholic, so I have very little free time. YouTube is not my job. I have other obligations, family obligations and um career obligations. So, I don't have that much time for YouTube and definitely not to respond to every comment, okay? But I do skim through the comments here and there um to see what people are saying and if there's a real like real urgent comment that I really want to respond to, then I'll do it. But I think this is a better format to respond to viewers and what they have to say. Um and so if you want your comments or questions featured, make sure to write in complete sentences and use proper grammar. I will not be responding to people who can't even speak English.

[00:01:48]Okay? That's a a common criticism I have of the illegals and the immigrants. So if you're an American and you want your question featured, please write in complete sentences. Be respectful to yourself and to me when you post comments on my comment section. Okay, so that's just a simple basic request that I have. So the first question here comes from one of my members. Sippy girl asks, "Random question. I've read about cases where an illegal is able to be given legal status if they agree to be a witness in court in a court case and they don't necessarily need to be a victim of the defendant. they would be testifying against. Is this true? And if so, is Wawa the mechanism behind this or is it a separate law that would be used to allow the witness to stay here in exchange for their testimony in the case? Uh, no. Wawa is not the mechanism for that. If you're not a victim of domestic abuse or some other kind of abuse that qualifies under the Violence Against Women Act, you cannot be given any remedies under it. And so, Huawei is not the mechanism. There are actually two different visas that that you people usually get a U visa and a S visa. Okay, there's some details here on the screen right now about S visa. So these are visas that are not even granted or applied for by the person but by a law enforcement agency usually trying to get it through the state department or USCIS or both to get the person to America and testify against a criminal or to get their or they're already in America in which case it would be USCIS. Uh and depending on the details of the case the immigration judges might also be uh involved but USCIS handles a lot of this stuff on their end. Uh but basically an S visa as you can see on the screen is for individuals who possess critical information regarding a criminal organization or enterprise and are willing to supply that information to law enforcement. Now I don't think that the that visa is insane. Um I think it's perfectly reasonable in the world we live in to have a mechanism to get people who might be stuck in other countries to cooperate in our criminal investigations to put a criminal away.

[00:03:52]That makes sense, especially with organizations like Interpol existent and we also have we also contribute and work with international law enforcement. So, I'm not a big fan of that. I don't like anything international, but that's just my nationalist opinion in the real world where we all live. Um, they do have criminals who are international criminals, so it makes sense to have something like this. But the insane part is where after completing the terms of your S visa satis classification, the same law enforcement agency can apply for a green card on your behalf. So that's the insane part. The fact that you can get a green card off of that is my only problem. Okay, it makes sense to get the person to cooperate to, you know, put the criminal away because that hopefully that's that you feel like that's your obligation. If you are some you if you have information about um some kind of crime, uh you should be expecting a green card out of it. But they do. Okay? And we have made it so that Congress has passed this law. Any kind of visa allowance is passed by Congress. That's how it works. Okay? If you hear that a visa exists, then Congress passed it at some point. Okay?

[00:04:58]So, Congress allows this insanity of this random foreigner getting a green card and eventually you can transform your green card either after 5 years, 2 years or 10 years into uh citizenship.

[00:05:10]Okay, you can get citizenship if under certain circumstances with a green card most of the time unless there's some moral turpitude or felonious activity in which case your citizenship will be denied. But other than that, most people most foreigners who get a green card can convert it into citizenship which is disgusting. This is how we have so many foreigners in America. So being legal doesn't really mean anything to me.

[00:05:32]Okay? You're still not supposed to be here. You should have never been given citizenship. Okay? So I'm against all of these visas. But nevertheless, to answer your question, yes. Um there is a process for somebody to there is a law that has been passed by Congress, two laws actually. These both these visas can be used. So the second way is a U non-immigrant visa which it doesn't really it's not really non-immigrant because again after uh holding this for three continuous years and being president in America you can apply for a green card and this one you can do yourself. You don't even need a law enforcement agency. Okay. So this one is for um victims of specific crimes like domestic violence, sexual assault and felonious assault who have suffered substantial physical or mental abuse.

[00:06:15]Okay. uh witnesses/bystanders eligibility. In some cases, a witness who is also a bystander victim, someone who suffered unusually high levels of trauma from witnessing the event may also qualify. So they're just again once again they offer green card a green card for this person too. Okay. So then now the first one made sense where it's somebody who has information on a criminal enterprise being able to come to America. That makes some kind of sense. The second one I this one doesn't make any sense to me at all. Okay. It's very sad that if this happened to somebody, but they're going to have to stay in their own country. Okay? But nevertheless, as the law stands, the U non-immigrant visa is another way that you can get a green card. So, it's not just Wawa. Okay? That's a completely separate thing from these. These are other kinds of visas that have been granted to people um that can be granted to people either through law enforcement agencies or through um themselves like the U visa which you can apply for yourself. The S visa is uh applied for by a law enforcer. Okay. Usually the police detective or the prosecutor is the one who would be uh applying for this S visa because they're the ones who need details on criminal enterprises because they're the ones who would go to court and be part of a legal criminal legal action against the defendants. So the comment goes to say that I agree that these people are defrauding the government to try to get some some sort of legal uh status. Um, this lawyer allegedly has zero moral compass if she is indeed guilty of the crimes that she is alleged to have committed. Okay, first of all, uh, this this comment was posted on my latest video where I talked about that uh, lawsuit against that lawyer in um, in uh, Washington Seattle.

[00:07:54]Uh, she has not committed crimes. Okay.

[00:07:57]Um, criminal charges are filed by you uh, either US attorneys in the federal case or by local prosecutors. Okay. This is a just a lawsuit filed is a civil lawsuit filed by a bunch of immigrants who who say that this lawyer defrauded them by filing fake documents about Wawas, okay, about abuse which was not real. So this is not a criminal prosecution. Do not confuse that lawsuit which is civil with a criminal action.

[00:08:24]She has not faced any criminal charges.

[00:08:26]I want to make that very clear because that's a very important distinction. Do not mix up civil lawsuits with criminal prosecution. Those are two different things legally and it's very important.

[00:08:35]Okay, you can literally be sued for for saying that somebody has criminal charges against them. Okay, because you're basically saying that the police think you they're a criminal. There's no criminal charges charges against that woman. My explanation was just saying that if she f if she did these things, then she must have committed certain crimes. I'm not saying that she did because I don't know. That's for the police to look into. Mine was speculation. And I made that very clear the way I said it in my video. Okay. The lawsuit is by individuals like regular people who just filed a civil lawsuit either to get money from her or some kind of other recompense uh for what they say was done to them. Okay? So she does not have have criminal charges against her. I want to make that very clear. Uh they go on to say of course US citizens should be protected from their abusers but having a law like this that allows someone to obtain law a lawful or often permanent immigration status in exchange for their testimony against their abuser who may or not have legal immigration status in the first place is inviting fraudulent claims. I agree especially within a population that is already fraught with legal challenges in the first place. Yes. Uh they go on to say send that back desper. Um agreed.

[00:09:47]Although some some most of these people have been deported that's why um they're claiming damages or somebody in their family has been deported. I think that's that's more likely scenario. Off topic here has anyone noticed that it must it must be really easy for someone to be accepted to law school nowadays. Um well it depends on the law school. Okay. Uh law schools like Cornell uh and uh other law schools that I'm familiar with it's actually difficult to get into. So, if it's like a highle law school that's very popular, it's not that easy to get into them. So, I don't I wouldn't necessarily agree with that. Um, but there are many unknown uh low-level law schools everywhere. So, yes, it's not that difficult to get a law degree um and to practice law. Any basically anybody who doesn't have serious crimes on their record can be a lawyer. So, uh okay, moving on to another uh familiar commenter. Love 1174 says, "So basically, as in a tennis game, the lawyers bat the ball back and forth and the judge is left to use his quote unquote discretion and nothing is done. Uh so the court system gets paid to do nothing. The laws are not followed at all." So I want to answer this because this is a very cynical comment and I'm familiar with this commenter. No offense uh to her. Um she's a very nice person, but nevertheless, this is a very cynical view of the legal system. That is not what happens. Okay. Yes, the lawyers argue back and forth, but that's their job. And the judge is left to use their discretion. Yes. But the discretion is not infinite. Okay.

[00:11:17]Congress writes laws. Either the the local state congress or the federal congress, they pass laws with certain intent. And the judge's job is to use his discretion, yes, but also be true to the laws that are passed. So, no. Uh the court system is not useless. Okay. Uh now I don't I'm not a fan of some of the decisions that the judges make but that does not mean you should give up on the legal system. A lot of people have made the mistake mostly because they don't understand the legal system and I wouldn't blame them because uh Americans are not trained on the legal system at all unless you specifically study the law which I did. Um you don't learn anything about the legal system going through high school, middle school, even college. You would not know anything about the legal system if you just go through our regular schooling. Okay? So I don't blame this person for being cynical, but that's not how it works.

[00:12:04]Okay, the judges can't do whatever they want. They have discretion within a certain amount of guidelines. So, let's talk about immigration to be specific.

[00:12:12]So, when it comes to asylum, which is one where the the court has uh some discretion, the immigrants have to prove that they they actually materially fear for their lives back in their countries. Meaning that if they were to be sent back that they would literally be physically harmed, they had to provide direct evidence uh that they would be harmed.

[00:12:32]Okay? That's why a lot of asylum 90 90% depends on the judge but most of the time most judges over 90% of the time the asylum cases are denied because these people are first of all lying their lives are not in danger they're economic migrants so they don't have any evidence and they can't prove anything to the judge in those cases the judge cannot just randomly grant asylum if they do then the BIA the board of immigration appeals which is above the immigration judges the immigration judges are over here they work for the justice department the BIA is the appeals court for the immigration judges. So if the immigration judges do the wrong thing and grant asylum in a case that they should not have been granted asylum, then the BIA will reverse that. Okay? Most of the time the immigration judges do what the law allows. Now there are certain cases, some immigration judges have a higher acceptance rates for uh immigrants, for asylum seekers because they use their discretion legally. It's legal. It's not illegal. There's some evidence that the liv lives might be at stake and they grant it anyways. What I'm saying is that we shouldn't have asylum at all.

[00:13:36]That's my argument. Okay. If your life is in danger, that might be true. I'm not saying it's never true. It's could be true that you're being chased down by some pe people back in your country.

[00:13:45]Maybe they have a good reason or maybe not. You know, it could be hate and persecution. I I don't dis I don't dispute that. What I'm saying is why are you coming to America? There's so many other countries you can go to. Okay? So that's not a good reason for me. And a lot of the conservativeleaning immigration judges will lose use that as the excuse to deny a valid excuse and valid reasoning to deny the asylum saying that you could have gone to so many of these other countries. You crossed over like 15 countries to come to America. If your life is in danger, why didn't you go to the next country over or two countries over or three countries over? Okay, you came to America for a very specific reason, which means you're most likely it's not that your life was in danger. you just wanted to come to America. So the discretion comes in in a a sliver of cases which do make a difference in the overall percentage of granting or not granting asylum. So that's what in that sliver of cases where it can go either way. There might be some evidence where you can use to say that this person's life is in danger. So I'm going to accept them in as an asylum seeker and they'll get a green card and become a citizen. Okay. So um so no the the legal system is not useless. Okay, it is not even I might s sound ci cynical in my videos sometimes but but the legal system is necessary. Okay, do not give up on it. It is not useless and it does work most of the time. Okay, usually when people who criticize the legal system are talking about it. They're talking about places where things have gone wrong either because the prosecutors or the defense or the judge did something wrong that was not according to the law. They used their discretion in a very bad way when it was clear that the situation was different.

[00:15:23]But you can't fire a judge or remove them just because you don't like their decisions. Okay? The judge usually has to have committed a crime or some significant ethical violation to be removed from their position. But you but it depends if they're elected judge or if they're appointed or whatever the rules might be. And if you're talking about federal judges, local judges, there's different rules. Okay? So this is a very oversimplification. in this comment is a very oversimplification of the legal system and that is not how it works. Okay? And it is not useless. The laws are followed most of the time. The last thing she says is the laws are not followed at all. That's not true. The laws are followed. The problem is the laws are too soft when it comes to immigration. That's Congress's fault.

[00:16:05]You can't blame the judges for that.

[00:16:06]Okay? I'm not saying there aren't bleeding hard judges. There certainly are. Okay? But you can't blame everything on the judges. There's a lot of blame to go around. the uh uh the president uh some of these presidents don't even veto these horrible laws that are passed by Congress. That's now it's a president's fault, too. So, there's a lot of blame to go around. You can't oversimplify the system. Okay? So, don't ever start with the word basically when it comes to a legal uh situation like this when you're talking about legal cases. So, this comment was posted on that Russian bride video I made. Okay.

[00:16:39]So, no, it is not basic at all. So you already are wrong when you say so basically this is there's nothing basic about it. It's very complex when it comes to legal questions and you have to know this is why going to law school and really understanding the law is important or at least you know everybody doesn't have to go to law school obviously cuz people can't do that but you have to really be familiar with the specifics of the legal system before uh commenting like this on its overall failure or success. There is no overall failure or success. There's so many different areas of law. Immigration is a very specific uh legal area with very specific and specialized um laws that apply that are different from uh the civil the regular civil and and criminal law. Okay. So, it's something it's a very specific area that you really have to know before you talk about it. Okay.

[00:17:29]I studied immigration law specifically for years before commenting on it. Okay.

[00:17:33]Okay. So, I understand all the different visas that that are available to people, how green cards work, uh what the asylum standards are. These are all things you need to understand before you comment on the legal system. If you want to sound smart, if you sound want to sound like an idiot, which a lot of people on YouTube do because they don't know the law, then you know, don't study anything and just randomly make comments. But if you want to sound smart and know something, you have to actually study the legal system. Claire Stew says, "Now, this is just a comment that that I wanted to comment on because this sounds insane. Uh, I heard they are keeping them detained possibly to be put to work like prisoners make license plates, but I could be wrong." Yes, you're definitely wrong. She's talking about immigrants who are kept in ICE detention, I think, or illegals, I should say, that are in ICE detention.

[00:18:21]That is insane. Where have you heard this? That's nuts. That is not what's happening. Put them work. Put them to work. How? They're illegals. Okay, what are you talking about? They're there because they're appealing their cases usually, otherwise they'll be deported right away. So, there's a lot of weird conspiracy theories floating around the internet. Do not buy into them. Okay, that's why I wanted to cover this comment. Next, this is a uh regular commenter who want to give some props to. They usually have they usually have good comments. Beautiful Seattle says, "I illegals are so entitled. Uh they think if they get across the border, they deserve to stay here forever." I that yes, literally. Okay, that that's our fault or people in America who have sent that message. That's why they think that uh real Americans are pissed. Yes, they are. Okay. Uh this was posted on my uh video about that mayor, the Chinese mayor who admitted to being a Chinese agent. Uh Melinda Ross says they need to check the legal status of Hispanics in office and their families all over California. Um yes, that would be great.

[00:19:27]They run for office in order to protect illegals. But even the even the white people who are in office who are clearly American citizens, they also protect the illegals, too. So, um you you're you might be right. I think you're definitely right in in a lot of the cases. Um but but but there are a lot of white people who born here who are doing the same thing. So, you know, it goes both ways. Um one of them is running it for mayor in Escandido, Elias Velasquez.

[00:19:53]Investigate, investigate, investigate.

[00:19:56]Yes. Um so the but the point is that most of them are legal. Okay. They either have green cards or they have citizenship. Most of them are are citizens. They are like people who were brought here as kids or they were uh naturalized citizens. Most of them. So they are legal. This is not going to um you know find you a lot of illegals in office. I don't think there are a lot of illegals in office. There doesn't have to be. There are plenty of American citizens, like people who are brainwashed with open borders ideology that are willing to work for the illegals, so it doesn't even matter.

[00:20:31]Like checking their legal status, sure, I'm definitely in favor of that, but uh I don't think there's going to be a lot of illegals in office. Maybe you might find one here and there. Um but most of them are either green card holder, most of them either naturalized citizens or they're just native born citizens who just support illegals coming here. So, um, agreed with the comment in general, but I don't think it's going to make that much of a difference just in reality.

[00:20:57]Um, next question. Waking 2020 says, "Where when is ICE coming to San Francisco?" Well, ICE has been in San Francisco for a long time. I picked out this comment because I want to generally comment on criticisms against ICE when it comes to their non-action cuz I've seen hundreds of comments literally of them saying, "You're not doing enough."

[00:21:17]So, let me let me outline the problems here. Okay. Regardless of the giant amount of funding that they have, uh the training new agents and putting them to onto the field takes a long time.

[00:21:30]They've actually um they've actually lengthened the training process because some of the ICE agents were not properly being trained and they're doing stupid things on the on, you know, out in the streets. So, the new regime at ICE, um the legal regime is to train them even longer. It's not the regular 6 months that was that was being done in the first year that Trump was in office. So there's a longer training period now. Uh it's a different training period, more complicated. I think that's good because there were some ICE agents doing stupid stuff. They have the ICE agents have to know the law. So the legal training has to be on point. That's one thing I'm concerned about because some of the ICE agents don't seem to be that caught up on the law. They can't answer questions.

[00:22:13]Even when talking to the media, their their legal answers are not correct.

[00:22:17]Okay? I pointed some of this stuff out in some of my videos, but they have to know the law because they're they're they're literally enforcing it. So, you have to know the law. That's just basic.

[00:22:25]Okay? Just like the police officers have to know the law that they're enforcing.

[00:22:29]You can't you can't have the citizens and the protesters know the law better than the police. Okay? So, their training is has been lengthened, which is good. The pro main problem with San Francisco or anywhere else is that there there aren't enough officers to enforce the law. Okay? America is way too big.

[00:22:47]That's the point. And California specifically and Texas and all these places, it's way too big and we don't have enough officers. That's the point.

[00:22:54]That's the main reason that they haven't come in big numbers. San Francisco. They have done operations San Francisco. I myself has ma have made videos where they did operations but we don't have enough officers and the training time is taking longer and longer which is good but it also means that well-trained officers take a longer time to put on the road that means that there aren't enough people doing the job. America's huge. Okay. Now, I have said and suggested to them, they haven't done this, but but I have said they should focus on the largest states because like states like California have the most amount of illegals because of the proximity to Mexico obviously. Okay? So, they should put if I were running ICE, I would put all the officer like 80% of them in California and Texas. Spread them out. Okay? Because those are the two states that have been completely invaded. Arizona is another one, but California is the biggest as far as the land mass goes and what we have to cover physically. So California will be, you know, priority number one because the most number of illegals live here. If you're allocating your resources based on the number of illegals that are present, then California will be the number one focus. But that's but it's not. They're in Massachusetts and and you know New England states which have the fewest number of illegals everywhere out of the whole country. So I their strategy is different from mine. Okay?

[00:24:10]I'm not saying those states aren't important. I certainly warn all the uh foreigners out of New England where the founding fathers walked the the earth.

[00:24:17]Uh I don't like these people being there. But nevertheless, if you want to focus on the sheer number of of people who are here illegally breaking the law, then you would focus on California. But they haven't done that. So I want to address this comment because people are saying all the time, "Oh, ICE isn't doing enough because they don't have enough people. They don't have enough pe trained people that are out there doing the job." That's the main reason that they're not wherever you're that they're not there wherever you're talking. Okay?

[00:24:42]People like, "Oh, they need to come to Kansas. They need to come to Washington.

[00:24:45]They need to come to New York." Blah, blah, blah. Yes, all of us want them to come everywhere, but there there just isn't enough people. So, keep that in mind when you have when you make these complaints. Okay? It's not it's not an invalid thing to point out, but there's a very good reason why I hasn't come to wherever you're talking about because they just don't have enough people. So, they do come. They've been to San Francisco multiple times, but they only done limited operations.

[00:25:09]Next, JJ Carroll says, "Deportations are not happening." I saw this stupid video.

[00:25:13]I sure hope he's not. JJ Carroll is a who doesn't know anything. Okay, this is a comment by a white girl.

[00:25:19]Awesome name. Uh, but nevertheless, this guy is a clown. Redacted itself is a clownish clownish channel. I don't know why you're watching it, but that's your choice. Um, he is absolutely wrong. You can argue about why if there are mass deportations or not. That's an argument.

[00:25:38]Okay. But when it comes I can I can say that on many things I am disappointed with what Trump has done. Specifically when it comes to foreign policy. You guys know I despise any kind of Middle East wars and I don't like the fact that Netanyahu was able to lie Trump into the Iran war. So I got lots of problems. But when it comes to immigration, they have done literally they have thrown the kitchen sink legally at this immigration issue. Okay, there's no other issue that I'm prouder of the administration on than this one. I did not think for a second that they would do half the things that they have done. Okay, within the current existing legal system, they have thrown everything at the wall in the court to try to deport as many people out of here as possible. Okay, there are many criticisms that you can have of the Trump administration. And I have a lot a lot. But immigration is not one of them. Okay. They have failed in some areas just because they did stupid things and and Trump put people who don't know uh the law into office. And Christine Nome is not a lawyer. That's that's her that's one of her technical problems. Although her policies were good, some of them were not legally sound and she was not able to give proper answers, legal answers in front of Congress when she was asked about them. basic constitutional stuff that she should have known. She needs to brush up on the Constitution as well.

[00:26:56]Um, but anyways, the Trump administration has thrown everything they can legally in the courts at this problem. They've they've pushed the envelope as far as they can go when it comes to uh ways to deport people. So, there are many things you can say about Trump's failures, but mass deportations, he's tried everything, okay? people that he's put into office who are not the smartest people, but uh they've tried everything they can under the current system. So, you can say that they're not massive enough, but I would blame the courts more than Trump on that one. And that's rare because usually I would blame Trump because he's, you know, his people are doing stupid things and he himself is doing stupid things. But on this, uh Trump's people have tried the their best. If there's one one area I would say that they're actually trying to do something, honestly, it's this area. Okay? Because I can you can you can disagree on many other things, but I know what's happening in the courts.

[00:27:51]Okay? I know the legal arguments they've made and they they tried everything.

[00:27:55]Okay? Especially in these lower cases to try to deport as many people uh denying all of the TPS, which has which was excellent. Those are things that other administrations would never do, even a Republican administration. Okay? Denying TPS to Haitians and Venezuelans and all these groups and trying to fight it in court. Okay? They they have fought hard on the immigration issue. That's one area where I give Trump credit. I take a lot of credit away on the economy, which inflation has hit even higher numbers now, way more than Biden. Okay? There's still sick fans on the internet defending this. Okay? And there are even more disgusting people defending the Iran war. Okay? Let's actually, by the way, get to that next. Uh my final thing, but yeah, on immigration, they tried everything. So I would give them a lot of credit uh on the legal front at least when it comes to immigration.

[00:28:47]Okay. I would take a lot away from them on the uh foreign policy front. So this is a comment post on my last uh the Russian bride video, the Russian green card video where this person says DC JK whatever. They say that Trump did stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

[00:29:05]How the hell do you know? Okay. First of all, they haven't presented any evidence to the public that Iran was even developing a nuclear weapon. Okay? And I posted a comment to this cuz I I really got mad because this is a dumb defense of Trump and really defense of Israel because back when I was a kid, back before the right before we launched the Iraq war under Bush, Netanyahu came and testified in front of Congress. I remember this. and he said that Iran was somehow involved in 9/11 and even back as back as the early '9s Netanyahu and Israel was saying that Iran was developing nuclear weapons. So this is a lie that that Netanyahu and the certain LUD party members in Israel have been pushing for literally almost four decades now since the '9s, three decades at least that I know of that we have video evidence of Netanyao saying that Iran is just weeks away, days away from developing a nuclear weapon.

[00:30:08]>> If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time. It could be a year. It could be within a few months.

[00:30:17]>> They have the wherewithal, the stored up preserved knowledge to make a bomb very quickly. Uh if they wanted to do it, >> Iran is so dangerous. Weeks away from having the file material for an entire arsenal of nuclear bombs.

[00:30:33]>> They're very close. They're 6 months away from being about 90% of having the rich uranium for an atom bomb. Iran is gearing up to have to produce 25 bombs, atomic bombs a year, 250 bombs in a decade.

[00:30:45]>> Ladies and gentlemen, time is running out.

[00:30:49]>> Iran will be capable of producing alone without importing anything nuclear bombs within 3 to 5 years.

[00:30:55]>> Okay, Bush was not dumb enough to fall for this lie, but apparently Trump was or Trump is looking for another excuse to distract from his failures at home on other issues like the economy. So, he's wanted to start a war. I don't know what his reasoning was is. All I know is that uh Trump and uh Pete Hagsath have failed miserably on this issue. Trump ran on being anti-war, being against regime change war, but he is he has literally started up a regime change war. And Pete Hexath has bragged about the fact that they did regime change in Iran. Okay? And losers and cowards like Tulsi Gabbard haven't said a word to speak up against Trump because Tulsi Gabbard is a coward and a Okay. She Oh, I'm so brave. Look at me standing up for the de against the Democratic party. Yeah. Where's you where are you standing? Why aren't you standing up against Trump when he's bombing a country that which you didn't want to bomb? She's been talking about ending Middle East wars for a decade now. Tulsi Gabbard. Yet, when the guy that she worked for bombs a Middle Eastern country, starts a new war for Israel, it's not for America. It's for Israel because Netanyahu wants to rule Iran. He wants to put a puppet in Iran and and uh have a pro-Israel person as the head of Iran. That's the ultimate goal for Israel and and that's all Trump is helping. Okay? Americans aren't being helped by the Iran war. We are suffering more than ever having to pay higher gra gas prices and many other economic repercussions which Trump just said that he doesn't care about the economic problems of Americans. He doesn't think about them when he talks about the Iran Iran war. America America literally strategically militarily we are getting nothing from participating in this.

[00:32:38]Nothing except our bombs our soldiers our marines are risking their lives for freaking Israel.

[00:32:45]uh being in the Middle East being ready to attack Iran as in a ground invasion and for the protection of our assets there which includes Israel. They're there in the Middle East for nothing.

[00:32:57]We're spending billions of dollars on on people on our soldiers and munitions for nothing but the gratification of Netanyahu. And Trump somehow changed his mind completely from when he was running. He went from being against regime change wars to bragging about regime change wars and being unapologetic about launching regime change wars. And all the hypocrites, all the YouTubers that you guys watch who are celebrating this are disgusting people with no principles. These are people who are claiming that they're anti-war just a year ago before Trump got elected a year and a half ago. Now they've all of a sudden they support the Iran war. These are Trump sick of fans.

[00:33:36]If you think that I'm going to fall into this category and just say whatever Trump does, I support. F that. My only allegiance is to one guy and everybody knows it. And that's George Washington.

[00:33:46]Okay? George Washington, the Constitution, and my ancestors. That's who I care about. I don't bow down to Trump or anybody else. I hate the political parties and I can barely tolerate Trump only because he's done so good on immigration. I tolerate Trump.

[00:33:59]He turned out to be just another lying politician who said he's not going to start wars in the Middle East and goes right in and starts war in the Middle East. Trump has no principles when it comes to this foreign policy issue. He's a liar. A 100% on the record liar who said he's against regime change wars, then goes and starts one after he gets elected. You can't deny that fundamental truth. Okay? And all the people who are denying this, pretending that Trump is so great after he lied to your face, you're pathetic. And if you think I'm going to not call you out on it, call him out on it and pretend that he's so awesome, you're wrong, cuz I am going to call him out on it. He keeps like justifying this Iran war. And it seems like he's, you know, dragging us toward a ground invasion more and more. And I'm not okay with that. That means Americans are going to die for Netanyahu and Israel because of what Trump is doing right now. And I'm never going to be okay with that. I was not okay. I left the Republican party originally because Bush bombed Iraq. And I was a I was like a teenager back then. That's what really propelled me towards the left because of how how much they failed how much Bush failed on the Iraq war and foreign policy. Disgusted me so much. It pushed me towards the left and then I became a progressive and then of course I became a conservative again later as I am now.

[00:35:17]But uh but yeah, this is the kind of stuff that pushes people away from the Republicans. And Trump is delusional. He just said today, "The Iran war is popular with Americans." He literally said that Trump is living in his own world. He's once again he's watching these idiots on YouTube who are supporting whatever he does. But the most of the American people, including real conservatives, are pissed off at Trump. Okay? So you guys have my my opinion. If you're some kind of Trump cultist, Trump sick of feel free to uns feel free to unsubscribe and run away from the truth. Okay? But I'm going to tell you the truth whether you like it or not. Trump is failing on foreign policy. Failing. F. F. That's what he gets from me on foreign policy. Okay. On immigration, I give him like a B+. But on on foreign policy, complete failure.

[00:36:00]He needs to get out of Iran completely and preferably stop doing whatever Netanyahu tells him because that's what he's been doing so far. And it's been it's done nothing but hurt America.

[00:36:10]Okay. So, there you go. There's there there's a doozy right there to to end off this um Q&A.

[00:36:18]But uh those are the comments I wanted to comment on and I'll be doing more of these Q&As's. Um hopefully one or two a week. Hopefully at least one a week going forward. But like I said, use proper grammar and complete sentences uh when you post your comments and questions and I'll pick them out hopefully in future videos. That's all I got to say for this video. Thanks so much for watching. See you guys in my next one.