This video analyzes how military operations are often framed through strategic narratives, using the May 7, 2024 incident where US Central Command claimed unprovoked Iranian attacks on US Navy destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz as an example. The content examines how conflicting narratives between the US and Iran regarding damage assessments and attack origins reveal the complex nature of international military conflicts, where both sides may present different perspectives to justify their actions and maintain strategic positioning.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
šØCENTCOM Justifies WAR: āIRAN Made An UNPROVOKED ATTACK Against Us!āAdded:
US Central Command says US forces intercepted unprovoked, listen to this, unprovoked Iranian attacks and responded with self-defense strikes as US Navy guided missile destroyers transited the strait of Hormuz to the Gulf of Oman on May 7. Iranian forces launched multiple missiles, drones, and small boats as USS Truckton, USS Rafael Peralta, and USS Mason transited the international sea passage. No US assets were struck.
Sentcom eliminated inbound threats and targeted Iranian military facilities responsible for attacking US forces, including missile and drone launch sites, command and control locations, and intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance nodes. If we listen to the central command, we will think, "Oh, poor old American army being attacked 6,000 miles away from the United States after killing people in that country.
Why would they do that? How dare they, the Iranians?
Why did they plant their country next to our bases in the region?
Of course, that's the propaganda arm of the American army of terror that is conducting these illegal operations following the orders of the Epstein regime. President Trump who gets his orders from Benjamin Netanyahu.
Unprovoked Iranian attack. Unprovoked.
The audacity. My goodness, the audacity and the gaslighting and the deflection and the lies.
But at least they're confirming that there was an attack. And hey, nothing was touched. But maybe tomorrow or in two days time the ships or the destroyers or whatever it is they will just go back to repair in uh the United States.
Not because of the Iranian attack, because they hit a sea turtle in the street of a dolphin accidentally jumped on the deck and the captain had a bit of an altercation with him.
not because of an Iranian attack.
Lightning struck and they need to kind of repair the command and control unit.
Although from Iran, by the way, they said that the their monitoring showed significant damage to the American uh enemy.
RGC Navy's combined operations following enemy aggression.
The RGC opened fire with anti- ship, ballistic, and cruise missiles and suicide drones towards enemy destroyers.
And they said that the intelligence observations indicate significant damage to the American enemy and three enemy warships fled the straight of area. So according to Iran, they're saying that there is significant damage. But according to the United States, there was no damage. I'm telling you what both of them say.
It's your choice who you want to believe.
the United States or Iran.
Okay, all of this operation is likely the beginning of the war, but they will wouldn't come and outright say that this is the beginning of the war.
So, they can keep Iran in this mode, right? not necessarily going all out, not launching immediate attacks, keeping Iran's response limited because this is how usually Iran responds in a limited manner.
They're clearly trying to test the waters of the current red lines and keep that equation there so they can continue to attack Iran here and there and bother them and have this aggression against them without attracting an allout war potentially using it as leverage for concessions in their heads or to keep Iran in this mood up until they want to launch a larger scale attack. M and why could this be the beginning of the war? Because this event can have a chain of events coming against it or following it.
For example, now there was another attack coming from Iran against several movements in the Kuristan area in northern part of Iraq. Have a look at this video.
So according to a post here and this is not the first attack. This is coming as a round of attacks. In recent weeks, Iran targeted a hub that operates on behalf of Israel and the United States in the Kurdistan area with a drone, which again shows that there is movement happening there. Iran wouldn't attack it for no reason.
They've had several attacks in recent weeks.
and the level of preparation that's coming from the Kuristan area and the UAE with tens of thousands of American troops is uh an indication that they potentially plan to have a ground operation on one of the Iranian islands too with the support of the United States.
Now, the most serious threat that we had so far from Iran came from Amir Kusrai, the head of the the commander of the Iranian army who said the following following four words.
They will regret it.
They will regret these attacks happening against Iran.
We already saw the response. But again, are they going to have something more intense against the United States or are they going to just that's it, call it a day?
Uh, is the United States going to accept the fact that three of its destroyers were attacked?
And will they add this to the list of excuses that Iran is the aggressor? Because the whole point in all of this is to portray Iran as an aggressor. Donald Trump knows that no one supports him in this war in the United States.
In Israel, everyone is criticizing Benjamin Netanyahu for failing everywhere in Gaza, in Lebanon, and Iran.
What does Donald Trump have to do to try and get some public support for this operation?
He needs to come up with fake assassination attempts to generate sympathy.
Israel would have to have these false flag attacks against uh Jews in certain parts of the world.
And then they would need to have an operation happening from Iran and they would call it unprovoked so they can have an attack against Iran and play victim.
I mean is anyone falling for it? Perhaps we we don't know how many people are falling for it. But for anyone seeing this whole thing, it's ridiculous. It's a pathetic attempt from Donald Trump.
But what's more important than that attempt is the reason. And that reason is a larger aggression against Iran.
There is no other interpretation of all of this movement coming from the United States in the region apart from the fact that they want something from Iran. They want Yeah. They want to have a bigger attack.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K viewsā¢2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K viewsā¢2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 viewsā¢2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K viewsā¢2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K viewsā¢2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K viewsā¢2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 viewsā¢2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K viewsā¢2026-05-29











