England Has The Most Joyless King

Añadido: 2026-05-15

[00:00:01]My ministers al will also proceed with the introduction of digital ID that will modernize how citizens interact with public services.

[00:00:13]>> My goodness. My goodness. See, I thought that Europe is the cradle of civilization.

[00:00:19]I thought that white people are hot [ __ ] But it seems that the Asia No. No.

[00:00:25]The Asian China was miles ahead of us.

[00:00:29]When you look at digital ID and how to genuinely control a population, the Chinese have already solved this out. I mean, look, you can scroll down and you can see images from China and people are pointing out digital ID will control every aspect of your life. Without it, life is impossible in China. You can't even enter food market to buy food if you don't have a valid digital ID passport.

[00:00:55]Because of digital ID, Chinese people are formally lined up like sheeps in the snowstorm to take the PCR test because if you refuse, authorities would remotely invalid your digital ID passport to stop you from using public transport. Uh, again, you know, I I I'm sad to say this, like I I used to be a right-wing nationalist and I was thinking that the white man, but no, no, like unfortunately the Chinese the Chinese like they their methods of governing are so advanced that our leaders are constantly trying to copy them. Uh, all jokes aside though, right?

[00:01:30]Like let's stop kidding for a second. Is this uh Britain's the no fun allowed king? Cuz that's how it feels to be.

[00:01:37]Like first he bans cigarettes, now he's uh banning internet anonymity and uh is also in favor of people not having cars so that they have to show digital IDs when they use public transport. Uh he is the no fun allowed king. LIKE SERIOUSLY, HAS HE ACTUALLY passed a single legislation that's genuinely fun? That's like increasing the happiness for people. Just one. Just one since he took the crown. No. Why not? Well, I mean people will say, "Well, hold on V. He is the king. He's not supposed to pass legislation. Well, that's true, but like he did take away cigarettes from people, right? Did he give anything in return? Huh? Did he give something in return? No. Uh now, the thing that uh makes me uh make fun of all of this, right? Like the reason that um I'm a little bit uh upset about what's happening is that uh during the pandemic, all of us, every single one of us were on the same page. Every single one of us were like, "Yeah, the great reset is bad. Digital ID horrible. Uh, I will not sit in the pod. I will not eat the bugs. I will not comply." Do you guys remember those? Oh my goodness. I REMEMBER THOSE, RIGHT? WHAT HAPPENED?

[00:02:50]What happened? Like apparently now people uh are like, "Oh, you know what?

[00:02:53]Maybe I will sit in the pot. Maybe I will use digital ID." Uh, I mean, look at this. You can't you can't basically say that uh democracy isn't working, right?

[00:03:04]People are saying lovely democracy we're having. And when you look at the number of voters that do not support digital ID, uh they're less than 50%.

[00:03:15]Less than 50%. And and when you look at the ages, it gets even more interesting, right? And by the way, all of this is happening because up until now, there was no push for an actual digital rights bill. There were some people on the internet that were considering it important, but uh the reality is like no one genuinely truly spent money on the issue. You know, no one campaigned. No one actually tried to get people uh to raise awareness. And so uh of course this is going to pass. What I find it really fascinating is is how they have managed to push it, right? So in the beginning almost everybody on planet earth was against digital ID and I remember like even the news was mocking China for having digital ID. They were considering this to be the hallmark of an authoritarian state because now the government with a click of a button can debank you. They can ban you from social media. They can prevent you from finding work. They can ban you from public transport. How do I know? Because China has it and China does it. And uh why would I think Britain wouldn't do it when there is no legislation preventing them from doing it? Like if they legitimately want to uh flag someone's digital ID in order to make them non-compliant and then that person just bans from every single website that requires a digital ID, what is the legislation that would stop them from doing this? There isn't any. Right? And so how did we get to this point? Well, the interesting thing is that all they had to do is go with the classic uh protect our children.

[00:04:43]Like that was it. They didn't have to invent anything new, right? Uh the other alternative would have been to stop terrorism, but apparently they went with protect the children this time. And all of a sudden, the left and the right agreed. Yes, children require protection. No one is asking, but at what cost? And what happens when the child becomes an adult and has to live in the [ __ ] hole? Apparently, like that's not part of the conversation. The ban pornography, very interesting. Like in 2020, literally very few people gave a [ __ ] about porn. was more like a personal issue, right? Like you as a person shouldn't go on pornography websites. That was the the vibe. But if you have children, you should install parental controls. Like that was what people consider normal during the pandemic. After the pandemic, all of a sudden, pornography becomes this huge epidemic. This like like out of the blue, right? Very astrourfed. Now, what's interesting about it is that um people like me that were saying this is going to expand beyond pornography. Like it's going to go to online banking. It's going to go to hate speech laws. It's going to go to other places. Uh we were ah no, you're a degenerate.

[00:05:47]Okay. Interesting. Uh but the way that this was pushed is uh fascinating. So you have all these nations talking behind closed doors, right? You have Canada, Australia, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and some retards from the United States. And they all talk together, and then they release it at the same time. They offer no alternative solution. They make it seem like either you're with them or you're a degenerate. Uh and now they're trying to rush it through because they people are starting to realize what they're doing.

[00:06:18]Number one, it's not about the children.

[00:06:20]Uh number two, it's uh a huge security risk with many people having uh just last week in France like hundreds of millions of accounts uh social security numbers, private invest information being released to the public, right, through the dark web because hackers managed to hack uh the system.

[00:06:38]companies that no one heard about, companies from Israel, which are now making billions of dollars. I mean, they're they're charging uh from my understanding around $2 per identification. Like that's insane, right? Uh and so these companies are also collecting other data that nobody knows. Like for example, Persona is one of these companies. It was uh exposed uh in its front end that it wasn't just scanning to see if people are over 18.

[00:07:04]it was scanning to see if their for 200 other things including if the person has paid their taxes, if the person uh uh has a face that looks like a terrorist, like all all these other nonsenses, right? And so we can see where it's going. Like the trend is u more and more towards state control. And the problem is like this is what I don't get. Like I would expect people to become more libertarian. In other words, defund the state. Like that should be the normal mentality, not abolish the state, right?

[00:07:33]defund the state. Like the state should still have an army, should still have police and everything, but it shouldn't have the money to afford all of this tax surveillance, to afford uh paying for offcom and committees and commissions, right? Like this is the normal healthy mentality of someone that's against it.

[00:07:49]It's defund the state. But instead, when I look at the dissident on the online right, you know, I look at the lotus eaters and other people, uh they actually are happy with this. In fact, they think the state should be even more powerful. It's just that they should be in charge.

[00:08:03]It's like okay I mean I guess that's one way to view it. Sure why not? Uh the reality is that if the state was uh popular, if the politicians were popular, I would understand why people wanted these politicians to have power.

[00:08:18]But currently we have some of the most unpopular politicians in our history.

[00:08:23]And the reason for this is because they're cowards. Uh the current political climate is risk adverse. And so if politicians are fake and gay, uh if you have u automized individuals, right, autotomized individuals can be held responsible. You know what they did, you know who did it, you can hold them responsible. The opposite of the automized individual is the committee, is the council, is the experts and then you can't hold them responsible because the politician says, well, I mean, that's what the expert said.

[00:08:53]Uh but more interestingly is that when you have politicians that are risk adverse uh they have a team of experts which tell them exactly the body language they should do. Uh what to read from the prompter. Uh the speeches are managed. You you do not have talk shows anymore. You do not have debates anymore. Uh this isn't how the '9s used to be. Like it's interesting how all these trapcons, you know, they don't mention about the time when politicians would actually be forced to debate and they were forced to engage with their opposition. Not just when the new elections is coming, but consistently like throughout the year. Like I remember in my country for example, there were talk shows that uh held all the way up until 1:00 a.m. in the night.

[00:09:33]And the idea was that the politician became so tired that he started doing gaffs. And you realize that all politicians are doing gaffs. All politicians are imperfect. And so you have to choose the one that's still the most uh I I I guess like fit for service, right? Like if if everyone makes gaffs, at least you get to choose the one that makes the least amount of gaffs or the ones that can articulate himself under stress. And that was really good. You know, we had some of the best politicians when uh that thing happened. But now you don't even have a debate. Like when's the last time you had someone from Labor and Reform be invited at the talk show uh where the host is genuinely neutral and they just want the audience to see which one of them can handle pressure, right? But no, I mean uh I guess you know the video game uh Hell Divers, which uh the developers claim that it's a mockery for the United States, is actually a mockery for the European Union and the United Kingdom in the future. And uh what do I think about this? You know, I'm kind of sad. I'm not going to lie. This is not the type of world I want to live for my kids. Uh but it's a survivable world at the end of the day. You know, like my parents lived through communism. I guess my children can live through this [ __ ] Uh people live in China just fine. You know, it's a functioning state. The trains arrive on time. Uh food is being delivered at people. So, it's like, okay, I mean, sure, why not? We could have had better, you know, we could have had gay space communism, but I guess we're going to have the Chinese authoritarianism. I joke.