This video presents a debate between Tucker Carlson and Israeli host Yudi Seagull on Channel 13, where Carlson argues that Israel is the most violent state in the world, even more than Iran, due to its open boasting about assassinating political opponents. The debate explores the hypocrisy of using one's own country's actions as a moral justification for violence while condemning similar actions by others, highlighting the importance of applying universal principles consistently across all nations rather than creating double standards that favor one's own country.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Tucker Carlson RIPS Israeli Host: 'You're The MOST VIOLENT State!'Added:
So, Israel is the most violent state in the world, even more than Iran.
Are you serious?
>> No country, and I say this with sadness, but no country has boasted more about killing its political opponents than Israel. Of course, it is never allowable, period, for any person to kill an innocent. You can't kill a child. The child did nothing wrong. Welcome back, folks, and buckle up because we're diving head first into a verbal cage match that's going to make your jaw drop. Tucker Carlson, the man, the myth, the legend, recently stepped into the lion den, Israel's channel 13 to spar with host Yudi Seagull. And let me tell you, if it wasn't a friendly chat over hummus and pea, no, wasn't. This was a full-blown no holes barred intellectual brawl, pushing buttons and exposing truths that polite society usually sweeps under the rug. Tucker went there asking the uncomfortable questions and the reactions h they were uh let's just say chef's kiss. Let's roll the tape.
But it seems like when you speak about Israel as the most violent state in the world, you forget to mention that it is the most attacked h state in the world from so many enemies.
No, like any other country in the world.
So if you don't put this equation together, it seems like we are doing it for fun or that we lost our morality.
This is self-defense. Israel has definitely lost its morality. There's no question about that.
They sure have. And Tucker's right.
There is no question about that if you're an honest actor who uh is tied to the truth. Now, Tucker Carlson entered the belly of the beast to spar with an Israeli host. His name is Yudi Seagull.
He's on Israel's channel 13 and the debate was fiery from the jump. I'm going to save the best clips for last, but why don't we actually start off with uh the host asking Tucker a question that I'm sure he already knew the answer to.
>> Do you generally believe Israel would try to harm you because of your opinion?
>> Do I believe Israel would try to harm me? Yes.
>> I mean, of course, I don't know. I I I hope not. I don't want to be harmed.
>> Yeah.
>> But my my main interest is not Israel.
>> I'm just asking you. you were implied to that when you spoke about your coming to Israel. Let's see that for a second.
>> And I said to them, "Okay, I want to send you uh the flight information." Um, and I want you to pass that on to the Israeli military just so, you know, they don't mistake us for an Iranian drone or something. I mean, not to be paranoid, but again, this is probably the most violent country in the world, Israel.
>> So, Israel is the most violent state in the world, even more than Iran.
Are you serious?
>> No country, and I say this with sadness, but no country has boasted more about killing its political opponents than Israel, of course. So, yes, Israel brags about assassinating people, and of course, it does assassinate people.
Boom. Right out of the gate, Tucker drops a truth bomb that would make most mainstream media hosts simultaneously combust. Most violent state even more than Iran. The sheer audacity of the question. And then the followup, no country has boasted more about killing its political opponents than Israel.
Now, I know what some of you are thinking, but what about Iran? And sure, there are plenty of brutal regimes in the world, but Tucker's point isn't about who has the highest body count overall. It's about the boasting, the openness, the pride in these targeted assassinations. Think about it. When was the last time you heard a western nation openly brag about taking out its political adversaries with such casual confidence? It's a stark reminder that when you strip away the propaganda, the narrative of self-defense often mismasks a much more aggressive and frankly unhinged reality. It's like a school boy, a schoolyard bully who brags about beating up kids and then cries defense because you know what? It was my self-defense that did it. when someone pushed me back, that's why I did what I did. Complete BS.
>> I don't really know what more I can add to that. I think Tucker said it perfectly. I mean, I'll fine. I'll give you some other examples.
If a foreign country, and I really want you to be honest with yourselves about this. If a foreign country, an enemy of ours, decides, we don't like their scientists.
We don't like America's nuclear scientists. So, we're just going to we're going to assassinate America's nuclear scientists.
Would you be okay with that?
>> Folks, this is where Tucker truly shines. Cutting through the noise of with a simple yet devastating hypothetical. Would you be okay with a foreign country assassin named our nuclear scientists? The silence is deafening, isn't it? Because of course, the answer is a resounding no. But when Israel does into Iran, suddenly it's intellectual operations or preemptive strikes. It's a classic double standard, folks. When an act of war and terrorism when it's done to us is somehow justified and even celebrated when they do it to others. It's like saying, "My dog is a loyal protector, but your dog is a vicious beast. when both are just dogs doing dog things. The hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it with a knife.
And Tucker just jammed that knife right into the heart of it. This isn't just about national security, folks. It's about a fundamental disrespect for international law and the sovereignty of other nations all while demanding special treatment for themselves. Guess what? You can't have it both way, folks.
Would you be okay with Israel coming in and just assassinating our scientists?
They they've been doing that in Iran for a very long time. Just going in. I remember having a debate with Jillian Michaels and she brought that up like it was a good thing.
Hey Jillian, how would you feel if a foreign country decided that uh they don't like midriftbearing fitness gurus with a fake vocal fry and come into our country and assassinate women like that?
It would suck, right? I mean, certainly because you would be a target, but it would suck. It would suck that a civilian would be targeted for slaughter by a foreign country, but that's what Israel does. So, uh, I know how credulous this host is. I know how shocked he is that anyone would ever claim that Iran is less vicious.
They're less barbaric than the Israelis are. But the truth is the truth. And we've all been forced to see it for the last two and a half, nearly three years.
>> Let's go to the next video.
>> You can't kill people who did nothing wrong.
>> It's not just bad. You know, we I'm going back to October 7th.
>> This was a massacre that was attack on Israel, about innocent, about uh women, raping women, kidnapping uh infants, take them to the tunnels for long months inside Gaza. Do you imagine what the United States would have done to an enemy that would have attacked the United States and do the same in the same magnitude?
>> Ah, the classic October 7th card played like a trump card to justify anything and everything that follows. Now, let me be crystal clear here, folks. October 7 was absolutely horrific. No one disputes that barbarity of targeting civilians.
But here's the kicker. The host immediately pivots to what would the United States do? As if that's a moral compass we should all be following without question. News flash. America's response to 9/11 wasn't perfect. While understandable in its initial fury also led to two decades of disastrous wars, countless innocent lives lost, and to destabilize entire regions. Is this really the blueprint for morality we want to emulate? It's a false equivalency designed to shut down crucial thought. You can criticize us because look what happened to us. It's the argument of a child who says, "But he hit me first after burning down that house." We're talking about universal principle and protecting civilian lives, not a tit playground brawl. This isn't a license to commit your own atrocities in response. It's a call for restraint and adherence to international law, which apparently some folks find inconvenient.
Well, I don't I don't need to imagine because we had 9/11 where many innocents were killed and in response the United States killed some of the perpetrators and also many innocents. And so we we've done that. It is never allowable period for any person to kill an innocent. You can't kill a child. The child did nothing wrong. And civilized people understand that. That's what civilized people are.
>> But it seems like, >> right, >> but it seems like when you speak about Israel as the most violent state in the world, you forget to mention that it is the most attacked h state in the world from so many enemies.
you know, like any other country in the world. So, if you don't put this equation together, it seems like we are doing it for fun or that we lost our morality. This is self-defense.
>> Well, Israel has definitely lost its morality. There's no question about that.
>> Like, imagine being a vicious barbarian and not realizing you're the vicious barbarian.
Like, that's how that conversation, that whole exchange comes across to me. Okay, so let me just understand something.
Nothing that the Israelis have done to the Palestinians for freaking decades, the Nakba, the mowing the lawn ever so often in Gaza, you know, where you the Israelis just go in and just start start slaughtering people to teach the Isra the Palestinians a lesson. All that stuff according to the Israelis and by the way according to me according to Tucker Carlson was not justification for the targeting of civilians on October 7th. That wasn't justification for it.
Right?
Then the Israelis turn around and say October 7th is justification for everything we're doing right now.
No. The same standards need to apply fairly to everybody.
So, if that's the way the Israelis feel about their own behavior following October 7th, then if you rewind back to October 7th, based on their own logic, Hamas was free to do whatever they wanted. It would still be moral. They could have killed more people because of all of the atrocities committed against the Palestinian people prior to that day, right? Why wouldn't why wouldn't the atrocities of the Israelis against the Palestinian people prior to October 7th apply to Hamas and what they carried out on October 7th? Similar to how the genocide that Israel is uh carrying out and provides cover for. They think that it's totally justified to do it because of what happened to them on a single day October 7th.
See, the thing that they're having a hard time understanding is that they're not special. You're not special to the Israeli people. You are not special.
Your life isn't more important than a Palestinian's life.
Your war crimes are just as bad as war crimes perpetrated by other countries.
You're not special. I don't care what you guys tell yourselves. I don't care what kind of magical thinking you engage in. Your life is not more valuable than other people's lives. I know it's hard to accept that, but that's what Tucker Carlson is referring to when he talks about universal principles. Civilian lives should be protected under any and all circumstances. But the Israeli Israelis don't believe that unless they're talking about themselves when it comes to literally everyone else.
Slaughter away. Who cares? We're the Israelis. We're special. Next video.
The reason that I have caused to comment on this and to say that it's wrong is that I'm paying for it. There's no reason the United States should be sending any money at all to Israel and particularly not to its military. Israel has neighbors that >> even if the price will be the annihilation of Israel.
>> This is not your problem.
>> I don't want to be clear. This is the morality that you're preaching for.
>> Well, well, let me tell you what I do think, >> okay? which is I don't want Israel to be destroyed. I don't want any Israeli to be harmed. I personally have always liked Israel. Not that that's relevant, but I I have. So, it's not I don't want is anyone to be hurt in Israel. I just don't understand why the United States has an obligation to pay for any of this, to send the weapons for it, to lend its moral authority to Israel, to lend its diplomatic cover to Israel, to lend its air force and its navy and its military to Israel. They don't understand where does this obligation come from and no one will answer that question and instead they say, "Well, you're an anti-semite."
>> Yeah. Look, uh I mean, the way that this host is behaving tells you everything you need to know about their sense of entitlement to our money.
Our money.
So, it's not good enough to sit by and just stay quiet as they carry out their slaughter campaigns, their land theft, their border expansion project. That's not good enough. You also have to bankroll it, right? And then you have these charities, Cars for Kids in the United States. Never enough. It's never enough for the Israelis. It's never enough. They have to lie and cheat through these nonpro nonprofits to take money from Americans who think they're helping underprivileged children here in the United States. But it turns out the money actually goes to freaking adults who want to take a trip to Israel.
adult uh people who want to find a match, another Jewish person that they can match with and get married. That's that's what Cars for Kids is uh spending the money on.
It's never enough. It's never enough.
the lying, the cheating, the stealing, the slaughter, the border expansion.
Their sense of entitlement takes an already disastrous situation for them PR-wise and it just puts it on overdrive steroids. No, no, no. You are not entitled to our money. You're not even entitled to our support. I don't support it. I'm actually a little more extreme than Tucker Carlson. I don't like Israel. I would like nothing to do with Israel. It's not good enough to stop bankrolling their atrocities. I do not want to be allies with them. I would prefer to have a hostile relationship with Israel. That's what I would like.
And I don't know if he's doing it for strategic reasons or if he genuinely like, no, I like Israel. I I don't know how you can. I don't know how anyone can. But I'm not going to lie to anybody about how I feel toward Israel. Terrible country that has destroyed our country thanks to the wars that we've got gotten dragged into in the Middle East. Thanks to the trillions of dollars we spend fighting their wars. Thanks to the hostility that's been directed toward our country because we help them with their dirty work.
I'm not going to pretend like I like Israel.
Anyway, so while it's abundantly clear that Israel was the main motivator behind attacking Iran, going to war with a country of 92 million people, this host Seagull desperately wants us to believe otherwise. It's amazing. Take a look.
>> You accuse Nathaniel of dragging Trump into an unnecessary war with Iran. So, let's think about what it actually mean. Do you really think that a foreign leader can pull the president of the United States into a war he didn't want? And what does it tell us about Trump? Is he really that weak? This is where the mass slips, folks. The host with a smirk essentially asks, "Are you seriously asking or suggesting our guy BB could manipulate your mighty American president?" And Tucker's answer, a resounding yes. And let's be honest, anyone who's been paying attention knows it's true. The idea that the US foreign policy machine, especially in the Middle East, isn't heavily influenced by Israeli lobbying and interest is is frankly laughable.
We've seen it for decades with politicians bending over backwards to appease a foreign government, often against America's own strategic interests. To pretend otherwise is to insult the intelligence of every American who's watching us get dragged into endless conflicts. It's not about Trump being weak. It's about the pervasive insiduous in in crazy influence of foreign money and lobbying that prioritizes another nation's agenda over our own. It's like letting your neighbor dictate what color you to paint your house and then acting surprised when your property value goes down. We need to put America first, folks, not Israel first, not not any other country first. Period.
>> Well, I don't think that that could happen. I saw it happen. I was there and so that happened. I blame Donald Trump for folding under the pressure from Benjamin Netanyahu and his many allies in the United States. Donors to Donald Trump, people in the media class here were effectively working on behalf of the Israeli government. And Donald Trump, whose decision it was, caved under that pressure. But on February 28th, the United States followed Israel into this war. And the Secretary of State of the United States said, "We had no choice." They chose the time. The Israeli prime minister decided when this started. Well, that's the definition of control. He had control of this war.
>> It's over. It's over.
The American people have seen too much.
Democratic voters, for the most part, already knew. But now conservatives are waking up because it turns out we uh like living in a you know sovereign country, a country where our people with our government and our representatives who have been elected by the American people make decisions that benefit us.
That's what a sovereign country is, right? We haven't lived in a sovereign country for quite some time now. The fact that we are in a war against Iran is um a very big example of that.
But here here's this guy who's like, "Oh, are you saying that Trump is so weak that he got tricked into a war?"
Yes. The answer is yes. The answer is yes. Uh-huh. That's what happened. You know, the guy who said over and over and over again that these Middle East wars are stupid. He's not going to start any of these wars. you know, he literally won his election by repeating over and over again that he's not going to start any of these dumb wars. But he did just that. Why? Why would he do that as the global economy is crippled by it? Why would he do that when the majority of Americans are against it? Why would he do that when we have nothing to gain from this war? He would do it because Israel wants it.
So, I would really appreciate if people like this stop trying to insult our intelligence and pretend like again what we have been seeing for the last nearly 3 years didn't actually happen because it did happen. We all witnessed it. We all saw it. And I'm sick of the gas lightning.
The final moment worth bringing up is when Tucker basically um called Israelis terrorists. And uh I agree with it.
Let's take a look.
This is exactly what Donald Trump said.
He said that United States would have been in danger. So you don't believe Donald Trump?
>> I don't believe Donald Trump. But I also think as an Israeli, you should pause before using the phrase terror regime since you live in a country that just murdered thousands of children in Gaza.
We should all pull back a little bit on the rhetoric like that. I I'm not defending Iran, but I'm just I'm just saying >> even the fact that you want me It's a little It's a little hard to hear that from an Israeli right now.
>> Damn right. It's hard to hear that from an Israeli. I don't want to hear an Israeli talk about nuclear weapons of another country, considering the fact that they have clandestine. They have a clandestine nuclear program. I don't want to hear anything about terrorism or terror regimes from the Israelis when they themselves are the biggest terrorists on the globe right now. And I do mean that.
Uh, the Israelis do not have a moral high ground in anything right now.
Literally anything.
So, you want to talk about terror regimes, look in the mirror, Israel.
And it feels real good to see Tucker say it right to that guy's face on channel 14. It's wonderful. More of that, please.
>> And there you have it, folks. Tucker Carlson once again proving why he's one of the few voices left willing to speak inconvenient truths even when it means facing down a hostile foreign media.
He's peeling back the layers of propaganda, challenging the sacred crows, and forcing us to confront uncomfortable realities about international relations and our own country's role in them. This isn't about hating the country. It's about demanding accountability, consistency, and a foreign policy that actually serves American interests. So, tell me, what do you think? Did Tucker hit the nail on the head, or is he way off base? Let us know in the comments below. Hit that like button and subscribe for more unfiltered picks that the mainstream media won't touch. We'll see you next time.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











