This video presents a critical analysis of Tucker Carlson's New York Times interview, arguing that TYT (The Young Turks) defended Carlson against legitimate journalistic scrutiny regarding his rhetoric about Israel, Jews, and political influence. The speaker contends that Carlson uses coded language, 'just asking questions' rhetoric, and insinuations about Jewish influence to avoid direct accountability, while TYT's selective editing and misrepresentation of the interviewer's questions helps normalize or rehabilitate Carlson for populist audiences. The commentary distinguishes between legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies and antisemitic conspiracy theories, arguing that questioning Israel's actions is not inherently hateful and that media figures should be held accountable for their rhetoric.
Approfondir
Prérequis
- Pas de données disponibles.
Prochaines étapes
- Pas de données disponibles.
Approfondir
ANGRY TROLLS! | TYT's Ana Kasparian & Cenk Uygur are ENRAGED!Ajouté :
You know, there's been a lot of people that are uh that responded to the um interview that Tucker Carlson gave.
Um and you know, and went you know, I think pointed out the fact that he lied very directly and obviously.
And it was pretty pathetic overall. Like almost I mean, I haven't watched the whole thing cuz it's like 2 hours long cuz who the [ __ ] cares? He says the same [ __ ] on his show. He just does it directly without anybody questioning him, right? Um but uh thank god somebody is is coming in there and defending Tucker Carlson against these horrid attacks by the New York Times. Is it Candace Owens? His his uh buddy from another mother that uh you know, that apparently you know, thinks that he's being attacked because of Israel and Jews and whatever.
Um no. You know who came to his rescue more than anybody that I've been able to find?
[ __ ] TYT.
Garbage journalism.
New York Times gotcha of Tucker Carlson backfires. The Young Turks.
>> [snorts] >> Now, I could be you know, crass and jaded. Assume that uh this is just them trying to carve off a slice of uh that Jimmy Dore money.
Uh but honest to god, I think this is just cuz uh they're looking at the money that he's making online along with Candace Owens and their numbers are down, their money's down, and this this is a fresh teat.
Right?
So, I want to see a little bit of this how they attack the New York Times and how dare they question the honesty and integrity of Tucker Carlson.
I'm a former um Israel-Palestine uh correspondent. You were pressing him on if the modern state of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people >> [gasps] >> today has legal or biblical legitimacy.
You were sort of questioning him on this idea. Why though were you so interested in those questions? There is an enorm- Wow, they're slicing the [ __ ] out of her question.
You You're not going to You're not going to do the Hold on.
TYT, you're not going to like let her have a whole question.
has legal or biblical legitimacy. You were sort of questioning him on this idea. Why though were you so interested in those questions? There is an enormous sensitivity around Israel being the homeland of the Jewish people and the attempt to delegitimize that.
>> I have enormous sensitivity about the United States being the homeland of my people and the burial place of my ancestors. Asking questions is not hate.
Also, by the way, um this isn't the burial place of Tucker Carlson's ancestors.
It Like stop talking about the last couple of generations of your people as your [ __ ] ancestors. In this country, even if if your people came over on the [ __ ] Mayflower, your ancestors are buried on this ground, but on the ground the Brits or the French or the Spanish fought to control, not America itself.
It's just [ __ ] goofy.
Anyways, this is uh She's a She's from um uh this what Watch Tucker Carlson spars with New York Times host over Israel.
Not hate. Telling the truth is not hate.
And they don't want to answer the questions and they don't want to tell the truth. Can asking questions though stir up hate?
I mean language [clears throat] is powerful.
Just to give you a sense of how deep the hellscape we live in truly is. [ __ ] you, Anna. Holy [ __ ] First of all, give the woman a complete sentence before you start criticizing how she's talking about this and it's directly related to what Tucker said. She's obviously talking about the Ted Cruz interview at one point where Ted Cruz and him getting into this argument about the biblical nature of of why the country exists versus the material creation of it as a nation-state or the old British protectorate nonsense.
She didn't just like and and believe me the him dismissing his criticism period like it's there's no anti-Semitism there like of course I'm not of course I'm not which is exactly what a public anti-Semite would say it pardon me but I'm not taking him at his [ __ ] word.
Once a person shows you who they they are believe them.
And that's exactly what he's been doing.
[ __ ] is it how is this different from anything he said on Fox?
Uh that was a New York Times uh hatchet job of a woman's interview with Tucker Carlson and an incendiary [ __ ] who lied to her [ __ ] face and said he didn't say things he said.
reporter Lulu Garcia-Navarro who was New York Times' Israel-Palestine correspondent making Jesus Christ. Hold on. TYT TYT is still making edits of this woman's stuff when Anna's talking. Watch they play the video.
>> in truly is. Uh that was a New York Times >> They're just looping it.
>> reporter Lulu Garcia-Navarro Yes.
>> Jewish to me.
Who was New York Times' Israel-Palestine correspondent making the case that asking questions about Israel's intent is wrong because it might insp- Well, see, here's the problem, uh ditch wish, um we don't know that she was asking if a question about asking questions about Israel's intentions at all because the way you guys cut that [ __ ] up we don't know the basis of her question in that moment at all. And and the other thing is Tucker Carlson, because he's a coward and a scumbag and a liar always does this, you know, casual inference through questions. I'm just asking questions, you know. Why why do we have to put up with this? Why can't you kill the Jews? Why why why should we put up with this from the Jews? Like that kind of [ __ ] It like those aren't just questions. Those I'm not quoting him. I'm exaggerating hyperbolically as an example. But the point is the he he does this allowing for the inference thereof, push-pull questioning all the [ __ ] time. So stop acting like he's I'm just, you know, I can't I'm just I'm just wondering. The [ __ ] out of here.
Inspire hate, you're a journalist?
You're a journalist. Cenk, she's a journalist? Yeah, I know, I don't think so, especially after watching that.
>> [laughter] >> Especially after watching our edit of half of each of her questions.
>> I also had the misfortune of watching the whole two-hour thing. We're going to give you important clips from it. And what Yes, I anything like what you cut before? Is important as what she >> You'll notice, by the way, that I don't do that on this show. I might bug out of a clip early or [ __ ] off with it.
But this is just dumb.
Is he all in for Israel? No, I I don't, actually. He asked and what she didn't ask.
>> But I'm also not going to be suckered into pretending that Tucker Carlson is a legit conver- you know, a a a morally grounded person that can be trusted about this or anything. Nobody gets to [ __ ] backdoor in because of a broken clock moment.
But that's what Cenk wants. Cenk wants to backdoor in Tucker Carlson and give him legitimacy because they share this thing about Israel in particular.
Which means all the other stuff that Tucker Carlson gets is just kind of like a friendly disagreement now.
All of his anti-immigrant [ __ ] all of his racism, all of his anti-woman [ __ ] So, after you see the clips, what I want to talk to you about is what was her mission in that interview? Cuz that's really the most important thing and it tells you >> Yes, she was probably she was clearly with a with a Hispanic last name sent by the Jews to trick him into making a fool of himself. do more about mainstream media and the New York Times than it does about Tucker Carlson.
So, for me All right, you're you're not going to play the part where he literally lies about calling Donald Trump the Antichrist that she plays the clip for him and he's like, "I never said those words in my life." When she really reads the words that he actually said.
at least, it really did seem like Lulu Garcia Navarro's um point or objective throughout this conversation with Tucker Carlson was to excoriate him for daring to ask a line of questioning in regard to Israel that Israel doesn't like. And what Israel likes to do and what defenders of Israel like to do is they like to weaponize identity in order to shut people up as Israel is carrying out war crimes, atrocities So, sorry, real quick. You can be against what Israel's government is doing and call them war crimes and atrocities and the like, but that doesn't mean you have to pretend that it that an adversarial journalist talking to somebody like Tucker Carlson is going to press him on a bunch of different issues.
Like what the [ __ ] Cuz honestly, this has this looks way less than like why can't we have an honest conversation about the [ __ ] Israel's pulling and more like how can we polish Tucker Carlson's ass for our viewers at TYT? What are you going to do? Hire him? Put him on a show?
Link up with him? Is TYT going to fold into the Tucker Carlson network?
atrocities, genocide, you get the picture.
And so, um those days are over.
People want to actually ask appropriate questions.
Well, again, nobody gives a [ __ ] if you ask appropriate questions or cite appropriate details.
That's not what Tucker Carlson does, [ __ ] uh that will inform the American people about what Israel's really up to. So, uh who can Hold on.
No, no, no, no, no. No, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope. You could say that the Israeli government is attacking people in Gaza and killing people indiscriminately, which they clearly are doing. You could say that they have been engaged in ethnic cleansing of the area, if not full-on attempted genocide. All those things, valid, you could bring them up. But what Tucker Carlson says is that Donald Trump's helping them and Donald Trump's joining them in the Iran war is because he was [ __ ] hypnotized. That that Israel is making him do it. He's an innocent victim in this. Poor, pathetic, sad, soft-brained Donald Trump got Netanyahu whispering in his [ __ ] ear and then he magically did this because Israel wants him to, instead of he's a bloodthirsty prick just like Netanyahu and they're peas in a [ __ ] pod.
Tucker is I mean, even his dipshittery around is this the Antichrist that they draw attention to, the rest of the time he talks about Trump, he talks about how Netanyahu cast a spell on him, how the his donors whisper in his ear and he they magically make him do something he doesn't want to do. [ __ ] you. Donald Trump wanted to do this in his first term and he didn't get around to it till now.
I don't give a [ __ ] nobody does, that people are questioning what the Israelis are up to. That ship is [ __ ] sailed.
You're allowed to. Nobody ever said you weren't. The problem was that anti-Semites glommed onto it and tried to go, "Yeah, let's get them." And everybody was like, "Fuck you, I'm trying to really criticize what the government is doing, not the existence of the Jews." And it's really hard to separate these two [ __ ] from that crowd as well. But in the meantime, because we've all we can all recognize difference between Jews and the Israeli government and how the Israeli government is asking what Tucker Carlson's primary directive is on his show is finding some way to forgive or protect Donald Trump from his own [ __ ] decisions because of Jewish witchcraft making him do this.
[ __ ] you, lady.
Who cares about your sensitivities, Anna? What matters here is whether or not you're asking questions that actually enlighten the general public through the work you're doing. Now, Well, if you're Okay, here's a good reason why she might be asking those.
There is a an assumption among amongst a bunch of people that anybody who's questioning Israel, there's a chunk of them, it's not indicative of the viewers here or the viewers of my show, or certainly not the viewers of Tucker's show, but there's a big chunk of people that when they hear people jumping on Israel right this way have like a knee-jerk reaction that it's an attack on the Jews and the like. And and asking a bunch of questions to separate the Jew haters from the people who are legitimately criticizing what Israel is doing right now and justifiably so is necessary.
Why does that bother you? Why do you keep bringing it up? Not why is it brought up in general. Other people talk about it, too. But why you? Why do you seem to dig in this whole thing about whether or not they biblically have the right to exist when you previously used to believe this? And why do you own land in Cutter now? Like that is a legit question of Tucker Carlson. This is And the weird part is is that I think Anna and Cenk are both reacting to her questions of Tucker Carlson because they feel attacked.
They think that's her question for everybody who criticizes Israel.
And at the same time, Anna and Cenk are trying to help Tucker Carlson rehabilitate himself.
[ __ ] I'm I half expect Rusty Trombone to get a show on there in the like I Maybe they'll set him up like a court his own little court TV thing while he's going through his rape trials. Now she has no You know what they could do? Cenk I got a great idea. They could revive the name the camel toe bit you used to do with Anna where you'd show a close-up of a woman's crotch and people would have to guess who it was.
Remember that? Wasn't that hilarious?
Do that. No interest in I'm sorry, Lulu whatever her name is.
>> Garcia Navarro. Um she she might not she might be more considerate of the sensitivities but if you're a journalist I think getting to the bottom of the truth is more important. And Right. And if you're interviewing a specific person, getting to the bottom of why they care about what they say they care about and why they use the language they do, especially around a sensitive topic, and they're and and Tucker also does one other thing and and we'll move on cuz [ __ ] these idiots. But Tucker also does a regular thing that I want people to watch out for whenever you see it. Clip besides laughing uncontrollably at really weird points and saying obviously and everyone knows this as a way of certain and then saying that other people are casting spells with words where he's using propagandistic language on purpose in these instances is that um he he does this thing where if he can be as bigoted about something as he wants to be and then when when called on you know, onto the carpet over it, he either deflects to someone else and going up I'm not the only person asking these questions. You know, like yeah, anybody who's read the Turner Diaries or the or you know, the uh protocols of the elders of Zion are asking the same thing. It's not the [ __ ] point. I'm asking you why you're saying what you say.
That's that's what he dodges.
So and and again, they're just polishing Tucker's ass.
And that's partly the case that uh Tucker Carlson tried to make in response. So before It did he?
That's partly the case he was trying to make in response?
What was the other part?
The You mean the part where um uh immigrants modern immigrants are going to change the nature of the country that his ancestors died I I suppose protecting slavery from the north?
Before we get to any of what Tucker had to say, I do think it's important for you guys to really fully understand how she operates when it comes to the topic of Israel specifically and only Israel.
Let's watch. These [ __ ] >> Watch. The reason I want to press on this a little bit more is that you know that there is an entire >> [gasps] >> um anti-Semitic worldview that has been based on the protocols of the elders of Zion, you know, that there is like this co- And by the way, look at Tucker right now looking at her like I don't understand what you're talking about. I don't know that that's true." When he [ __ ] well does.
Ignorance is not innocence, Tucker. Stop it. a ball of powerful Jews that controls the world You know, the the one that Anna got called out for going, "Yes. Yes." and doing the, you know, whatever the uh the the Jewish cartoon meme of the merchant. And you know, that book was written in the early 20th century, but it you know, helped the Nazis and it really has informed a lot of the views of many people today that there is, you know, this very powerful sect of Jewish people who want global war and global conflict.
And I think that there is a concern that I have and a real concern. I don't I don't mean this is as something that people say to slander anyone, but just a real concern that the rhetoric where everything is blamed on Israel, where Israel has these supernatural powers almost. By the way, yes, he literally has said they're casting spells, that their words are their spells and stuff. This goes beyond AIPAC and donors and [ __ ] like that.
He's literally talking in mythical and magical terms.
>> to influence the president, to influence the previous president George W. Bush to enter into the Iraq war. Uh All things, by the way, that Tucker has said or insinuated or said and then insinuated and then insinuated and said multiple times. to, you know, be involved in assassinations, etc. That it has echoes of that.
Lulu, you're not a journalist. [ __ ] you, Anna. The Do you have any Like, all right. I know she watches this show. I know they play clips and I know she Anna She's been on this [ __ ] show.
Anna was on Tucker Carlson show as a non-adversarial guest. And let me tell you something, like she's not just defensive about like how that question that let me just say for the record that was not a loaded question when it was aimed at Tucker Carlson because she's addressing [ __ ] he's actually said. And and a lot of it is it's not just like I'm just asking questions about whether they have too much control or whether AIPAC and donors he's literally said that these are demons and that they whisper spells into the president's ear and I know he wouldn't do this. I know he doesn't want to do this so they have some sort of supernatural control over him which is absolutely reflected in like anti-Semitic, you know, mystic Kabbalah fears that people have had. So shut the [ __ ] up.
You're not a journalist because the fact of the matter is Yes, she is cuz she quoted him directly. She's referencing [ __ ] directly. You're not a journalist, Anna, because you don't know that or you're pretending not to.
>> Regardless of whatever book you're referencing right now, there's a small group of um Zionist billionaires, okay?
We're talking about Larry Ellison and his his son, David Ellison. Uh the Murdochs. Uh what else? Um Miriam Adelson. Miriam Adelson and before her husband passed away, her husband was a giant donor to Donald Trump specifically. Right, we're not talking about donors, [ __ ] There are a lot of AIPAC style donors and and that's very obvious. That's not what he's talking about.
Donald Trump other donors and [ __ ] them over.
You think he really cares?
Specifically for what?
To carry out the best interest of Israel even Right, but that's standard donor class [ __ ] He's doing more for the pharmaceutical companies than he is for Israel if you really look at the money outlay of US taxpayer dollars. He actually believes the Iran [ __ ] I know you think that that Netanyahu tricked him into it, but he's been wanting He's He's a typical Republican.
He wanted to follow the PNAC plan, and that's what he's doing. Even at the detriment of the American people. In fact, he gave a speech once standing right beside his wife arguing about how it brought him shame that he wore a US military uniform as opposed to an IDF uniform. Okay, that's who they are. And do they have control over our political system? Of course, they do. They're billionaires, and bribery is baked into our political system for a reason. I'm begin Right, but even then bribery wouldn't do all of it.
There's got to be an ROI on it.
Trump's got more business interests right now with Saudi Arabia and the UAE than he does with Israel.
I'm starting to think Hal doesn't like Ana. Um no, I can't stand her. I think she and Cenk are frauds, and I think their entire purpose as a network is to diminish the Democratic vote. They are the that that is the the the the raison d'être of TYT. I'm beginning to really learn. And so, like, oh, you can't ask these questions because Nope, she didn't say that.
He's directly talking about magical cabalistic powers that these people have, not donor class money [ __ ] Reality is a big conspiracy theory because reality Israel has determined is a trope? Yeah. So, look, there's two things about that that are so important.
Number one Yeah, tell us what's important, Cenk.
None of our questions were about why are you so opposed to the war? What do you think's going to go wrong with the war?
Why Okay.
Which war? I guess let's start there.
But also the interview itself wasn't about I get Well, okay. I don't I don't know why that's a drag for him.
He She talked about a lot of reasons why you would support this or you wouldn't support this in that interview, at least in the pieces that I've seen. Why were you so animated by the genocide, etc. Got nothing 2 hours and nothing about policy or substance. Almost every question was framed as, "Why did you talk to Nick Fuentes? Why aren't you concerned about the feelings of Israelis? Why are did you do this? Why did you do It was Cuz it was a personal interview.
>> all He's not a politician. He's not running for office.
His policy descriptives are [ __ ] He's a media figure. He He runs his podcast out of a fake shed, you dumbass.
one giant gotcha, right? And it was all structured not around policy, but around He doesn't have He doesn't have policies. He's not a politician.
fended the sensitivities of some of the most powerful people in this country.
Why is the New York Times >> Whoa, sorry. So, the average person wouldn't be offended by his attitude towards immigrants.
Guess not. in the business of protecting the sensitivities of the most powerful people in this country and doesn't care about policy or substance at all. And so, look at the framing.
No Well, he's a media figure and she's asking him media questions.
Tell you what, if he gets elected to office and he and he's offering bills up or co-authoring them, then we'll talk about policy. He doesn't have any [ __ ] policies. He doesn't have any morals.
at all.
He's a fraud.
He said a demon raped him. GET THE [ __ ] OUT OF HERE.
No questions passionate or otherwise about 22,800 kids dead in Gaza, the current invasion of Lebanon by Israel, etc. But, over and over she comes back Again, he's not a politician.
She's asking him specifically about his messaging on his show.
But, at least we know in 2028 who Cenk's going to vote for.
the enormous sensitivity. That's a direct quote, you saw with your own eyes. The enormous sensitivity of Israel supporters here.
So, wait, Lulu, what's more important?
23,000 dead kids or the people who are offended that you pointed out 23,000 dead kids? And for Lulu and Yeah, that's not what they're pointing out.
Those are all material realities. What she's asking about is, how is it that you think they whisper magic words into Trump's ear and this this like ghostly cabal controls everything?
As And again, Tucker's whole point is Trump is an innocent. Trump is not responsible for his own choices. You even the bribery [ __ ] what the [ __ ] How much money does this [ __ ] need?
Why does the bribery have to be, you know, result in damage? You don't think he could like if he's [ __ ] art of the deal, dude, that you couldn't bribe him just to for oil revenue and [ __ ] minerals rights in other countries and shipping lanes and [ __ ] tariff, you know, cutouts and [ __ ] like that?
There's billions to be made in all of that.
Trump is doing this cuz he wants to.
And you guys made that the last election a [ __ ] coin flip between him and Harris like there's no [ __ ] difference. And as a matter of fact, Trump might even be better for Gaza.
Even though Trump you know, Plaza Gaza and maybe the the Palestinians shouldn't really live there because you can't really live there anymore, which is him arguing for ethnic cleansing, him starting the Iran war, bombing a kid's school. And And all this time, Tucker Carlson helped get him elected, just like you did.
She doesn't have a responsibility to check like what his voting record in [ __ ] Congress is. She get She has to ask him why he says what he says and what the root of it is because there are a bunch of people that Well, [ __ ] here I'll show you.
Nick Fuentes is making videos about how he's pissed that that Tucker Carlson um uh distanced himself or said he regretted interviewing him.
Yeah, here it is.
Here it is.
Um I'm going to get over here so I can stretch this image out. [ __ ] lazy bastards. All right, where are we?
Uh Here we go with this this business.
Yeah, here we go.
Um This guy.
Tucker Carlson attacks me in New York Times interview. This is the This is the clip from his show.
Because he he said he regrets interviewing him. And she's like, "But you had him on.
What do you agree with him on?
What Why? Because his name is bad? What What about the things you guys agree on?
What's What is so Why do you regret it if you still agree with almost everything he says?
That's essentially the question.
By the way, I I fully expect and and I'll be very disappointed of Cenk and Ana if they don't do a Nick Fuentes rehab video very, very soon.
We're going to get into the news here.
We're going to talk all about this Tucker Carlson interview with the New York Times.
And I just want to say at the very beginning, this is a really important interview to talk about.
I just want to impress upon you the significance of this. Obviously, Tucker has emerged as one of the most important influential voices.
But it's not just his influence, it is So So it's not It must be great to be Tucker Carlson right now cuz everybody from Nick Fuentes to TYT, if there's a difference, is polishing your ass right now. is the network that he is involved in.
We've talked about this at length.
Tucker Carlson is obviously involved in a clique.
He is involved in a clique, which is vying for power. He is not a journalist.
He is not a commentator. That's not what he is.
Do you know what Tucker Carlson was doing throughout 2024?
He was in the Arabian Peninsula meeting with the heads of state and heads of government of all the Gulf Cooperation Council nations.
Saudi You say that like it's a bad thing. Arabia, the Emirates, Qatar.
That's not >> You know, all the states that exist by and largely because of slavery currently.
>> what a journalist does.
You know a lot of journalists from the Huffington Post, independent journalists on YouTube and Spotify that are meeting with the Crown Prince of the United Arab Emirates, that are meeting with the Crown Prince of Qatar, of Saudi Arabia.
I don't Well, and also don't forget has Donald Trump's, you know, cell phone on speed dial and can show up at the White House anytime he wants, or at least could at that point.
>> think so.
I don't know what he is.
Nobody knows what he is.
He is clearly some kind of intelligence-aligned operative. He is clearly involved deeply with his best friend Peter Thiel, with J.D. Vance, another good friend of his, with Joe Kent a CIA Ouch. a officer.
Yeah, uh you're welcome. Uh I sold as in um He is in bed with people in the intelligence community and people in this government and exerts influence on it.
And that is why there is so much consternation among the pro-Israel crowd about his rise and about his apparent shift and what he talks about and how he talks about it specifically as it pertains to Israel.
And so what he says in this interview it's of importance. It really matters because this is the discourse. This is the conversation inside the American right wing and this is going to determine the future of where the party goes after Trump leaves office. Yeah, that he was just on um I want to say on Was it Hannity's show or somebody else? Anyway, somebody was running through the numbers and saying that Tucker Carlson's got 7% of uh you know, the in the 2028 primary for Republicans maybe sort of ish, which is like within biting distance within the uh you know, statistical uh you know, window of J.D. Vance and the other leaders.
J.D. Vance is a vice president heir apparent. There's going to be an attempt to consolidate support around him and that's going to be an awful lot of power to dictate the future of the GOP in the wake uh Yeah, but I mean nobody's going to be able to tell him what to do with that rizz. of the sunset >> Hannity you know? Yeah, that's what I thought too.
>> political career. It's a big deal.
And Tucker is a spokesman for this.
He's a prophet for this.
And so it matters what he's thinking and saying. Um so anyway, that's just a little bit on the significance of it.
I want to get into the interview. Sorry, it his little snippet about the uh the significance of a New York Times interview with Tucker Carlson is that Tucker Carlson is an intelligence asset of the Gulf states and is a puppet of Peter Thiel hell-bent on elevating J.D. Vance. I would just like to point out that that was the throwaway in the beginning of this. Where is Jillian Michaels black pill when we need it?
And in the first place, I want to talk a little bit about what he said about me because he did address me directly.
And it's sort of funny. There were a few major topics in the interview. They talk about the war in Iraq Did it hurt? Ron, the Trump administration, J.D. Vance.
They talk about what's happening in the country. But a significant chunk of the interview was really all about me and my interview with Tucker back in October of 2025. What's interesting is that Tucker did not want to talk about that at all.
Didn't want to talk about me. He almost seemed insulted that he had to.
Interviewer kept bringing me up at Well, yeah, because he loses audience if he insults you because you guys are like you're co-conspirators. You're fellow travelers. asking me him about me and he seemed uh not happy about that.
So, we're going to work through this.
We'll start with what was said about me and my interview. And like I said, this is not completely self-indulgent. We're going to tie it all I I I think it kind it probably is.
>> together at the end.
This is very significant. This is a dialectical situation. Okay, this this is the dialectic in the populist nationalist post-Trump GOP. It really matters a lot.
Uh Yeah, look at his face on the freeze frame. I don't know that he believes this. So, we'll start with some of his comments about me. I did clip them, so they're just a little bit shorter here.
And we're just going to read through it Mercifully. Uh just like did you cut out all context like TYT did and just attack the reporter? And then I'll discuss it. So, the interview By the way, hit the like, share the show.
Don't forget to give a thumbs up or a thumbs down. That doesn't quite matter either if you if you really feel that way. It helps me in the algorithm anyways.
>> says, "How do you see Fuentes in terms of the future of the right?"
Now, pay close attention. This is Tucker's answer. What does he think about the groper movement, me, the future of the right-wing?
This is a quote. He says, "Most of the debate about race, ethnicity, religion, and to some extent immigration are less resonant long-term than debates about economics.
I think the main frustration among young people is not just that the composition of the country is changing too fast, but the main concerns are about the lack of economic opportunity for young people."
Older people Yeah, that sounds like a dodge. Like, I wish it sounds like Tucker Carlson wishes the country was more racist than it was.
But, he's very frustrated that when he tries to warn people about the awful march of the brown people, they don't seem to give a [ __ ] and they're more concerned about their pocketbooks and their friends' pocketbooks. Some of their friends might also be a shade of brown.
Possibly. And therefore, he's really frustrated that that's somehow works better as an argument, you know, politically than talking about race or immigration.
Womp [ __ ] womp. other people do not acknowledge that. And so, I think most future conversations politically will be about economics.
It's a really interesting statement, isn't it?
Because obviously, my show, if I were to say what the big issues of my show are, I would lay them out very clearly. I would say one, it is the transition of America from a white nation to a non-white nation.
This is called the By the way, that's also what Tucker like launched his show on. fourth demographic transition.
>> tell you darkly yours, believe me. That like don't don't think for a second he's going to hold back with this dipshittery. And fourth or fifth demographic transition, it's global.
And that is that because of communication transportation technology, because of collapse of birth rates in the first world, rise of birth rates in the third world, you have a massive migration of non-white people, poor, peasant, illiterate, non-white people from the By the way, same [ __ ] Tucker says.
Just you know, occasionally not as you know, I would argue that Tucker isn't as direct in his language, but they absolutely agree. This is exactly my point.
Tucker didn't want to talk about Nick Fuentes not because oh god, that was such an embarrassment. I shouldn't have done that, but because he want he doesn't want to be called out for the fact that they are exactly aligned in this [ __ ] They are exactly aligned. This is they absolutely share this belief system.
And Tucker doesn't want to be called out about it. He's more than happy for Nick Fuentes to be the [ __ ] red flamer on it and just and catch all the heat, whereas he does the kind of like you know, I don't gentrified version of of this bigoted message. Same [ __ ] Same [ __ ] They absolutely are in agreement.
in the global Oh, and also the fact that the New York Times reporter asked him about this, TYT would suggest that this is just her trying to vilify Tucker.
south to the global north. And we're talking about Hispanics and Asians moving north into the United States.
We're talking about Africans and Middle Easterners moving north across the Mediterranean into Europe.
So, I would say that's one of my big issues and it is You don't say.
>> is an issue of race, ethnicity, and religion. It's changing, like he said, using his terminology, it is the composition of the country that is changing and changing too quickly. It is the absolute total change, but it's also the rate of change. This is the central issue of our time. That America and Europe was Europe was for thousands of years European, white, whether it's the Germanic tribes, whether it's the Romans, the Right. You get it. Good lord.
So, he's still pissed because Tucker disavowed him in the New York Times interview, right?
Um and and it would be one thing if like he he was all nice to me when I was on his show and then he, you know, behind my back he distanced himself. That's not even the problem. The problem is is that Tucker Carlson says the exact same [ __ ] thing this [ __ ] says. He just dresses it up in in in questions and harmless language and, you know, like, "Oh, I've just, you know, these are concerns other people have." But of course it's true. Of course it's true.
The all that [ __ ] that Tucker Carlson says is exactly a parrot of what Nick Fuentes is is just saying directly.
And what TYT is protecting Tucker from.
Good lord.
So, anyways, you you get the point. Um so, uh you you cannot defend Tucker Carlson in his current form on his current show without defending Nick Fuentes and all of his groper pals.
It's the same [ __ ] It's the same it it's they all believe the same thing.
It's just that there you know, there are the people who you know, kind of you know, grand wizard their way through these conversational points. And then there's the David Dukes of the world who managed to try and perform well, I'm just you know, all I'm doing is trying to support my own people and talking those kind of languages and that's what Tucker Carlson does.
So, anyways, like I'm I'm just glad that TYT just fell over their [ __ ] shoes protecting Tucker Carlson from the big mean New York Times lady who had the nerve to ask him like a journalist about [ __ ] he has actually said. And the difference between how he says it and how an anti-Semite would say it. And if you can clarify that and you can speak, you know, openly about these kind of things or ask these kind of questions and not come across as an anti-Semite, why aren't you doing it?
[ __ ] TYT. And again, their entire job is to demoralize the Democratic voter.
Just keep them get them to stay home.
You know, they played as big a part as they possibly could in the 6 million people that sat home during the last election cycle.
>> [music]
Vidéos Similaires
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











