A US Senator argues that the US-Iran war is unjustified because the administration has lied about Iran's nuclear program, which was actually stopped by a diplomatic deal that President Trump abandoned; the Senator emphasizes that understanding the full historical context—including the US's role in toppling Iran's democratic government in 1953—is essential for making sound foreign policy decisions, and that more war between the US and Iran has not produced peace or stability since 1953.
Deep Dive
Voraussetzung
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Nächste Schritte
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Deep Dive
US Senator DROPS BOMBSHELL on Trump’s Iran War Claims in Explosive SpeechHinzugefügt:
Mr. President, thank you. I appreciate my colleague and strongly support his resolution that will be voted on tomorrow. And I've taken the floor off and on this topic and don't need to repeat things I've said before, but today I guess what I want to say is basically this.
The American public does not like being lied to by its government. Of course we don't, but particularly on matters of war.
I'm old enough to remember two tragic circumstances where the American public was lied to by their civilian leadership about war. Many lies were told by successive administrations beginning with the Eisenhower administration through Kennedy and Johnson in particular about the Vietnam War. And how tragic it was when Americans realized that much of what they had been told that led first the US to take over the French colonial project in Southeast Asia and then to engage in war, much of what they had been told was false.
And when you're losing your sons and daughters, 56,000 US deaths in the Vietnam War, and then you find that the civilian leadership has been lying to you while troops have been serving honorably, it is incredibly embettering in a state like Virginia where there's so many military equities, but to to every state. We were lied to about the war in Iraq. We were told that Iraq had something to do with 9/11, that was not true. We were told that Iraq was pursuing nuclear weapons and had weapons of mass destruction they'd use against the United States, that was not true, but those were put on the table before a vote in Congress to engage in a war that most now agree 25 years later was a massive massive mistake. And so I come from a state that lost a lot of people in Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam, and I join my colleague today to support his resolution because I believe the United States is not being told the truth about the situation in Iran. First, the administration worked very, very hard up until essentially a week or so ago to avoid any public hearings about the war in either the house or the Senate in the committees that have jurisdiction over important matters. I mean, not to have a public hearing about a war?
So, right now and I'm going to go into this in an Armed Services Committee hearing later in the week, the administration is not even willing to share the legal rationale. The opinion developed by the Office of Legal Counsel at the State Department.
They're not even willing to share that rationale with members of the United States Senate.
They won't share it with members of the Intel Committee. They won't share it with members of the Armed Services Committee. They won't share it with members of the Foreign Relations Committee.
They won't even share the legal rationale. What are they afraid of? That raises some natural suspicion.
In at least two instances, I believe the administration is not being truthful with the American public about this war.
One was the assertion of a a whole different series of rationales, but one of the rationales that seems to now be the one that they rely on is, well, of course, the war is needed to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.
No, it isn't.
We had stopped Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by a diplomatic deal that Donald Trump chose to tear up as my colleague just mentioned. That had stopped Iran's nuclear program. That deal was a comprehensive deal that took months, even years, to negotiate. It contained some provisions that were time-limited, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, but it came it contained two provisions that were permanent. The first was on page one of the deal that Iran will not seek to purchase or acquire or develop nuclear weapons. That was a permanent pledge by Iran.
And the second part of the deal that was permanent was Iran agreed to permanent inspections by the IAEA including inspections according to an additional protocol that had been developed by the nations of the world after North Korea had cheated on a nuclear program earlier. Earlier, those were permanent pledges by Iran to not pursue nuclear weapons and to allow intrusive inspections.
And President Trump decided over the objection of his Secretary of State and Defense to tear up the deal.
So when President Trump says now, "Well, we have to wage war. We have to subject our troops to being killed and being injured and and billions of dollars of cost and Americans and people all over the world paying more for gas to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon." That is a lie.
Diplomacy had stopped them until President Trump tore it up. And to make matters worse, President Trump with the US following a 12-day war of Israel against Iran to destroy their nuclear capacity, took additional action that the White House said had destroyed Iran's nuclear program.
So if we had controlled it first by diplomacy and then a year ago added on to a war waged by Israel against Iran to obliterate the nuclear program, there was not a nuclear program that justified this war. There was no threat of any action anytime soon by Iran to develop nuclear weapons that justified this war. It I don't like to use this phrase. I don't use this phrase a lot. The White House has lied to the American public and every time they say this war is justified to stop Iran's nuclear program, they are telling the the public a lie.
The second lie they're telling, and I'll just say this and then hand it back to my colleague, is is a is a different kind of a lie.
Um if you state a set of facts that are true, but you don't state the full set of facts, you're telling a lie.
And I've heard President Trump, and I've heard Secretary Hagel say many times, "We need to stop Iran because they have been a thorn in our side since 1979. They've been a thorn in our side for the last 47 years."
Our our our decision-makers are acting as if the US-Iran history started in 1979. When Iran, the Iranian people toppled their government.
And then yes, in the aftermath of that toppling started to say death to America, death to Israel. And they act like that's the only history. And and my colleagues will recount Iranian misbehavior, taking over our embassy in violation of international law, funding proxies to attack the US embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut and other locations, funding proxies that attack US troops who were in the region in or near Iran. My colleagues will cite that information and they'll they'll cite it accurately. And Iran has done a series of horrible things to their own people, to American positions, to to other nations in the region. But my colleagues always ignore the president always ignores.
Secretary Hagel said always ignores that history didn't start in 1979.
If you want to understand the history of this relationship between United States and Iran, you got to go back to World War II when we were allies.
There was a pivotal conference in the middle of World War II in Tehran in 1943, where the allies, the US, the Soviet Union at the time, and Britain guaranteed to Iran its sovereignty and its independence and its borders, and the Iranian people loved the United States, and we were allies.
Then in 1953, during the Eisenhower administration, the United States made a catastrophic mistake. There's a recent book by Scott Anderson called King of Kings that lays this out in clear and unmistakable detail. The United States decided we would topple the democratic government of Iran.
1953, the US, through the CIA, engineered a coup. We toppled the democratic government. We installed the Shah, a dictator. We funded the secret police of the Shah who tortured, exiled, imprisoned, and killed thousands of Iranians.
And the US basically put this puppet government, a dictator, over the Iranian people from 1953 until they finally tired of it, and they cast that government off in 1979.
And guess what? 26 years of the US funding a dictatorship, killing and torturing Iranians, led the new government of Iran to be drum roll anti-United States.
We turned Iranians from friends into enemies.
We didn't have to do that, but we did it.
And Secretary Hagseth and the president never mentioned that.
They don't mention that after Iran overtook our embassy, we funded Iraq to wage war on Iran. We we gave Iraq funds. We gave Iraq intel. And in a seven- or eight-year war, Iraq We we funded Saddam Hussein to wage war against Iran. Hundreds of thousands of Iranians were killed, and they knew the US was partially responsible for it. In late 1980s, a US Navy vessel, the Vincennes, shot down an Iranian commercial aircraft killing 290 civilians. It took us years to admit that we did it, but we eventually admitted that.
The United States invaded Iran's next-door neighbors to the east and west to topple their governments, Afghanistan and Iraq, and Iran believed, "Well, you toppled our government 1953, you're probably preparing to do it again."
And this recent war on Iran, we've wiped out their leadership.
We've killed civilians. We bombed a school killing schoolgirls. Now, we all know that the United States does not intentionally decide to target schools.
That's not what we do intentionally, but to an Iranian who has watched the US intentionally topple their government 1953, intentionally participate in the assassination campaign against their leaders, shoot down a civilian aircraft in the late 1980s, intentionally fund Iraq to wage war against Iran, an Iranian will look at the US actions and say, "Wait a minute.
This is part of a pattern. We were friends until you decided to topple our government 1953."
The point that I'm making about this is if you're not willing to be honest about the history and acknowledge not only Iranian misbehavior, which continues to this day. They just executed somebody um in Iran, a student, in a gross violation of human rights. And so, you have to acknowledge the Iranian regime has conducted all kinds of bad activity, but if you're not willing to acknowledge the role that the United States has played in turning this nation that was a nation of allies into enemies, then you're going to get the policy wrong.
You will get the policy if you don't acknowledge the truth.
And what is that truth as I finish? The truth is, if more war between the US and Iran would bring a solution to any of these problems, then we would have found the answer at some point between 1953 and now. We have had a back-and-forth going between the United States and Iran since 1953, and it has not produced peace. It has not produced stability. It has not produced anything for the good of the Iranian people or the American people, frankly.
And for us to think now that But, you know what? More war Now, just a little more war would be the right thing to do to bring a better resolution to this painful 75-year chapter, it shows a profound ignorance of our history and a and a just shocking level of naivete.
And so, that's why I have joined with my colleagues every week to look this Senate in the eye and say, as a deliberative body with constitutional powers and an oath that we've taken to provide a check against an executive, particularly on matters of war, we can't let this go under the radar screen, classified hearings only.
We have to be as loud and consistent as can be to say that more war between the United States and Iran is not an answer to anything. It hasn't been an answer to anything since 1953, and it's not an answer to anything now. And that's why I support this resolution. We should not be at war without a vote of Congress.
Even if there were such a vote, I would vote against it.
But, if it were to pass this body and be signed by the president, I would then drop my complaint that the war is illegal. I would say it's unwise, but I would be outvoted as I am often on events, and thus it wouldn't be illegal.
It is an illegal war. It is an unwise war that demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the deep tragic history between the US and Iran. And for that to my colleague from Oregon, I strongly support your resolution. And Mr. President, I I now yield.
Ähnliche Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











