Live 6-12-26 : [95] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic ... mv = Energy

[00:00:01]All right, should be streaming again.

[00:00:04]Some error with my OBS and uh so there should be audio this time hopefully or good enough audio. And um so now the drawing is already drawn. So I guess that's the good news uh because I'm really not going to go, you know, off this subject. So, I'm just going to keep bringing this subject up until there's a response to it where they actually draw it or explain how they think the experiment would work. So, you have two masses. So, you're on the space station and you have two [clears throat] masses that are going to be a thousand times heavier than a ball bearing you're going to use to bounce off of them. And they have hard surfaces, hard glass-like surfaces. So they don't dent, they don't fracture, they don't break, they don't displace, they don't do anything, okay, to um dissipate the energy in any way to absorb it. And in every way um it's elastic. And as demonstrated by anvil experiments and then Steve Mold did the experiment even more precisely with u silicut surfaces, you can get 250 bounces without trying too hard. If you tried real hard, you might be able to get more because he sort of screwed it up because he didn't realize the surface he was bouncing it on was just a surface and what you have underneath that needs to be solid like cement. It needs to be something immovable like an anvil. Um anyway, and he didn't do that, especially when he took the vacuum, you know, and sucked the air out.

[00:01:38]You know, the point was is that he could actually hear the ball bearing bouncing because he could hear it through the the floor moving that he had it on. So, these are all things you got to understand. But anyway, we're talking about hundreds of bounces. And so the point is is that yes, many times the initial momentum will be put into the object because by their theory, every time the little ball bearing, so you take two ball bearings with a spring between them or explosive and you just shoot them with, you know, 100 MV going this way and 100 MV going that way. So they're both going that way. And so you have your two heavy things. You're on the space station, so they just stay there. You shoot your little ball bearings going back and forth now. And their kinetic energy theory says, okay, it is going to bounce hundreds of times, maybe a thousand. Um, and every time the ball bearing hits the surface, they claim twice the momentum when into the surface. So they claim every time your car moves, it pushes the earth. The earth actually spins. Yeah, they think so. Okay. No. So just like uh you know, I'm use the example of my skin. I don't move. Something could hit me and it bounces off my skin because my skin's elastic. It's like a trampoline. It absorbs and then rejects. It doesn't absorb and reject. It can't do that.

[00:02:57]Okay. Um, so it can't create more motion. It can't go both ways. You can't use the motion twice. You can't absorb the motion and throw it back. You can't do both activities. You can't create free motion in the universe. You can't use the momentum twice. It's not possible. So if the two things move, you're not getting the reflection, 100% reflection. And if they don't move, then you are. So that's the real rule. So if they move, you're only getting a 50% uh reflection. And very quickly, you're going to run out of energy. And that's the real rule. You're not going to get hundreds of bounces.

[00:03:41]You only can get hundreds of bounces if they don't move and they reflect the energy.

[00:03:47]So the fact is that's what's going to happen. The object's way too heavy to absorb the energy from the small object.

[00:03:53]It's not in the right portions and it's happening too fast. So it just reflects it and that's all that's going to happen is the big things aren't going to move and the ball is just going to bounce back and forth like it would on Earth on an anvil. The anvil doesn't absorb hundreds of times more energy than you put in. You put in a certain MV, that's the only MV you can have after the experiment. The in MV, no matter what direction it is, has to equal the out MV. You can't have more mass moving after the experiment than before. That's the simple thing this experiment proves.

[00:04:32]So, one of you, these people, these opposers of what I'm saying, need to explain what they say happens in this experiment. So, if we do it in space, what do they claim happens? Do they claim the objects move and I still get 100% reflection, or are they going to concede that no, if the object moves, I'm going to get a much smaller reflection?

[00:04:59]concede the reality that if I throw a tennis ball at a brick wall, I get back most of the energy. I throw it at a brick wall on wheels that can move, I don't get back, okay, the same energy. I don't get the same aggressive reflection. I get half of that reflection, more than less than half maybe. If it absorbs the energy, I'm not going to get the energy back. And you can just understand this by the pendulum argument, right? I mean, I've done this so many times, but I I mean, you really think every time the pendulum swings back and forth, it's putting MV in, MV in, MV in, MV in, MV in, MV? It just keeps hitting and keeps putting MV into the brick wall. You really think that's possible? 100 times, 256 times. Come on.

[00:05:50]You can't be that silly.

[00:05:53]All right, so that's where I'm going to focus. So, I'll make another video just doing this again, just to be obnoxious about it, because until they have a response to this, until they concede that their physics doesn't work in this case, and that it needs to be fixed, it's incomplete, it's [ __ ] it's nonsense, it's silly, uh, it won't work, it won't do what they claim if they actually did the experiment, then there's nothing to talk about. All right? Because it's a very simple mechanical experiment. It either does or doesn't. So you can either claim that these two objects gain hundreds of times more momentum or you can see that no they can't really do that. I can't put 100 momentum of explosion in and make more than that out.

[00:06:41]Okay, that's as clear as I can make it.

[00:06:44]All right, so we'll go to their [ __ ] comments, but they're all [ __ ] So it's fundamentally a waste of time.

[00:06:51]These are all just lying scum, frankly.

[00:06:56]uh and such. Uh what do I got to hit here?

[00:07:03]It's one of these things.

[00:07:06]Uh yeah, there it is. I think this this will work. It should work. All right. So there's there's [ __ ] Um so let's see what this one is. So So this they're just digging up these old experiments.

[00:07:18]Look, this is this spar [ __ ] with this wooden stuff. Okay. I mean wood against a spring is stupid. So there's absolutely no reason to do wooden experiments.

[00:07:28]Just no reason at all. And I've already stated clearly um chart it. I I I don't want to see any of your side by I don't want to see any of these comparisons. You know what I want you to see? I want to see you do a chart of exactly how much the one mass okay at one distance and then four distances and then 16 distances and just give me your numbers. So, I've already requested. That's all I want to see. So, why can't you do that? So, let me just pop that up here. Since we're here, I should be able to find that. Yeah, this image here, I believe. So, here, here's the chart. So, do a one mass dropped 1 cm and tell me how much did it weigh?

[00:08:11]Because that's what the spring is doing, right? It's a scale, isn't it, [ __ ] I mean, it's a scale without any numbers on it, but isn't that what a spring is?

[00:08:21]Same thing as a scale. You're saying a certain amount of pressure is equal to a certain amount of weight. A certain amount of distance is a certain amount of weight. So, you just tell me how much weight is on that spring. Don't give me this [ __ ] about how many millimeters. Show me. Okay. Based on some kind of real scale of what you're claiming [snorts] the truth to be. Okay.

[00:08:41]So, the whole point is is this wood [ __ ] is [ __ ] This giant steel thing that they're dropping this wooden thing on is [ __ ] So the SP experiment is [ __ ] But there's the chart. Okay, this is what I claim. It works out perfect in sense that it makes perfect sense. I mean 2 4 6 8 3 6 9 12 5 10 15 20 9 18 27 36. It just makes so much goddamn sense.

[00:09:08]So let me see your predictions for what the spring. Okay, the amount of compression in the spring. How many units of compression? That's what these are. are units of compression. Might as well be weight. Might as well be anything. But they're just units. Two units of compression. Three units of compression. Five units of nine. Do me that favor. Let me see what your chart looks like. [ __ ] All right. [ __ ] for brain. Ass wipe.

[00:09:34]Lying scum.

[00:09:36]God. These people are just deplorable.

[00:09:40]All right. So, back to this crap.

[00:09:45]All right. So, we'll just read it. We won't bother playing this horseshit. Uh here's the five mass dropped one height.

[00:09:50]So I don't see a five mass anywhere.

[00:09:52]According to Gary, this should be the same as a one mass five velocity or 25 times the height. Yes. And what they're claiming is a one mass going 1.2 velocity or one mass going 1.2 velocity is the same as a five mass going one velocity.

[00:10:11]That's their claim.

[00:10:13][laughter] Yeah. Right. Okay. Sure. I mean 2.2. Okay, sorry. Twice the velocity. They're claiming all I have to do is make a one mass go a little more than twice the velocity and it will create as much weight or pressure on a surface as a five mass going one.

[00:10:32]That's how [ __ ] they are. All right, this clearly isn't the case. Now you're nuts. You people are just absolutely I mean to defend this 25 times the fuel to go five times as fast thing is just so goddamn stupid. It doesn't happen retards. You cannot possibly believe this in your hearts.

[00:10:53]Conventional science predicts it should be the same as a one mass five height.

[00:10:58]So what let's understand five height is just a little over twice the velocity.

[00:11:08]That's the way it works. It's only a little over twice the velocity. Four times the height is only doubles your velocity. That's all it does. So five times the height is just a little bit more than double your velocity.

[00:11:22]And so they're saying a one mass going a little more than twice the velocity equals a five mass going one velocity.

[00:11:30]You believe that [ __ ] And yes, that's what is being proven.

[00:11:36]It's not being proven. You [ __ ] pieces of garbage. In the following exper experiment, is that what it says?

[00:11:43]Experiment. Uh a mass is launched. So now they're launching them. Oh, isn't this a joke? with one spring and then two springs at the same time. So what when did any of this theory be um argued as rational? So we already know that the I've made the argument so many [ __ ] times that springs suck at launching objects. So the lighter the mass, the less energy gets into it. The heavier the mass, the more of the springs energy gets into it. So it's a huge disproportion.

[00:12:16]So it's just a waste of time. I mean, just ignore an argument I've made over and over and over again as an absolute [ __ ] proven fact. That's how springs work. You can't use twice the compression of a spring or twice the idea of twice the velocity, two springs compressed the same amount and have any assumption, okay, that the springs will put the same amount of energy in when you change the mass. Because the lighter the mass, the higher the velocity, the more energy that's left in the spring. I mean, we've been over it so many times.

[00:12:52]Such a pile of [ __ ] Okay. When launched with two springs, the mass only traveled 1.48 times faster. Yeah. I And I've already made it absolutely clear that we know why that is now. Because the springs don't produce all of their energy into the object when launching.

[00:13:12]When the object leaves, the spring is still moving. The spring oscillates after the object leaves. The oscillation is an indication that all the energy didn't get into the object. You [ __ ] [ __ ] liars. I mean, I've made this argument hundreds of times now, maybe a thousand times now.

[00:13:31]According to Gary, it should be close to twice as fast. No, according to Gary, you can't do this. You can't use springs for this purpose because they're terriblely unreliable.

[00:13:42]Uh, once again, Gary was proven wrong.

[00:13:44]So, once again, you just lied about something, an argument I've made over and over and over again, and you just lied like I never made the argument, you [ __ ] pieces of [ __ ] All right. In the following experiment, mass is suspended uh with one spring, then two springs. So the same mass is expended with two springs and how much does it weigh? Are they going to prove that it doesn't weigh half as much? You know that the spring compresses twi half as much by Cook's law. Then three springs then four springs. Each time they're being released and the mass starts to oscillate. The maximum velocity is analyzed each time. Result, it requires four springs to go twice as fast. So [ __ ] it does. So big [ __ ] lie.

[00:14:30]Anyway, according to Gary, it only requires two springs. No, according to Gary, it requires more than two, but a lot less than four. Once again, Gary is proven wrong. So, [ __ ] you. No way.

[00:14:40]Okay, go ahead and deny it all. Once again, coward. No, you're the cowards because I've made this spring argument over and over and over again. And it's an obvious one. Go ahead and film the goddamn thing. And you can see the spring. The faster the ball's moving, the more the spring is going to be oscillating, liars. So, you can videotape that actual event, you [ __ ] liars.

[00:15:04]Jesus, what pieces of human garbage. All right, let's see what the commenter says. I can tell Gary is again in big trouble. So, [ __ ] you. All right, you're in big trouble. You haven't dealt with my arguments at all. So, I'm just going to keep making them over and over again.

[00:15:18]Keep saying, "Okay, where in here has these people shown any integrity? I made this argument over and over and over again. And will they please explain what happens on the space station when I put an object between two heavy objects and make it bounce back and forth? What the [ __ ] happens? Lying scum. All right. He has again nowhere to run. No st. Oh, [ __ ] you. [ __ ] you. [ __ ] you. Gary's um bombarded with real experiment. Oh, [ __ ] It's like hitting the bull.

[00:15:48]Oh, [ __ ] you again. You know this [ __ ] You know, like somehow they on a pool table they can make free momentum. They can take the momentum of the Q ball. Piro actually believes this.

[00:15:58]He can shoot the pool ball into the 15 balls and break them and they'll actually have more momentum than they had than the Q ball had going in. That he can make free [ __ ] momentum.

[00:16:10]That's how [ __ ] dumb these lying pieces of scum are.

[00:16:15]All right. They think bowling balls can knock down pins for free.

[00:16:21]You can make heat for free. You don't need a source of energy, right? Yeah.

[00:16:27]You can you can have a five mass movement 10 velocity. You can add five mass to it and conserve all of the momentum. And yet you did a whole bunch of stuff. You caught fire. You did shot pieces off, pieces bounced off. All kinds of [ __ ] happened. Well, what did you use for that energy that you didn't use any of the momentum? So somehow you did it for free. Somehow you made that fire happen or you made all that heat or you created all that noise or you created all that whatever without using any of the bowling ball's energy so to speak. So the bowling ball made noise.

[00:17:03]The bowling ball caught fire. Bowling ball did all kinds of stuff but it didn't slow down. Yeah. [ __ ] you.

[00:17:11]Too stupid. I can't believe I have to do this for years over and over again because you're all scummy liars defending a [ __ ] silly religion.

[00:17:20]God damn, this is so bad.

[00:17:23]I just didn't think humans were this deplorably dishonest.

[00:17:28]All right. When he runs out of excuses, you know, where's your you're the one with excuses.

[00:17:33]Uh well uh you see uh the reason why the Mythbusters couldn't get anything like the kinetic energy result is because uh tin cans don't crush evenly. Yeah, [laughter] that's the excuse.

[00:17:49]He just moved the goalpost. Oh, [ __ ] you. There. You're the one moving it.

[00:17:53]Okay. Backing it up, moving it over there. You keep changing the [ __ ] subject. I make a video, I make a specific point, and you ignore it entirely. So [ __ ] you. There was no response to the Mythbuster video.

[00:18:06]There's no response to this last argument. So [ __ ] you.

[00:18:11]After seeing uh consistent repetitive results, he keeps resetting it now.

[00:18:15]Okay, just lie some more. Uh it's been going on for years. Yes, it has. Your evasions have been going on for years.

[00:18:22]Your lies, you lying scum. Uh he'll no doubt go on stupid analogies when he reads this. So, so what stupid analogy that there's the simple argument that I've already pointed out that Brozo discovered this fact actually, okay, when he had his stupid solder sucker launcher thing, he found out that guess what? Twice the spring compression didn't make something to go twice as fast. And the same spring compression didn't make a half mass go twice as fast.

[00:18:56]Yeah. Then that happened 10 almost 10 years ago. All right. It shows a lack of self-awareness. It's I'll [ __ ] you in the ass. They'll get what you deserve.

[00:19:06]You scummy little piece of crap. All right. I genuinely think it would be good sake of I think it'd be good for your health if you just, you know, frankly uh because you're a ball of puss. Uh you should probably take some antibiotics and get what you deserve. Uh because you're nothing but um scum. Yeah, you need a good antiseptic.

[00:19:31]Oh god, what deplorable pieces of crap.

[00:19:37]All right, so let's see if there's any scummy comments by any of the scummy listeners.

[00:19:43]Three of them. All three. [laughter] Geez, it's just so pathetic. Oh, there's just no point doing this internet thing.

[00:19:51]It's just so broken.

[00:19:54]Uh, but whatever. That's all we got, I guess. But yeah, it's just no point. All right. So, Gary, really stupid claim.

[00:20:03]Cartwheels store 50% of the energy of 200. So, I didn't say it's 50%. So, that's just a lie. But what is your claim? So, again, they're pretending there's no subject here, right? So, I point out that it's um completely unintuitive when you want to make a cart where you're going to measure the linear motion that the fact is is the more wheels you have and the smaller their radius, the more hidden energy. They'll act like little flywheels. And the lighter and bigger radius your wheels are, the less energy they store as rotation because they're moving much slower. Okay? They're rotating. the mass is rotating less quickly. Okay? Like especially the axle. So if it had an axle, a big wheel, the axle turns really slowly for a very high velocity. And for a small wheel, a very small velocity is the axle spins very fast. So you can understand that if I just measured the the momentum stored in the axle, I could show that big wheels make less energy stored in the axle. Small wheel, lots of energy stored in the axle. So it's a perfectly rational argument to make about why they have made these low friction carts with little tiny [ __ ] wheels. because your intuitive sense is that's not very efficient. Now, the fact that I pointed out that they've never responded to is when they make match uh you know, mousetrap cars, you know, where they have a tiny bit of energy they have to use to make the car go as far as possible. So, it's a contest and they're trying to get the car to go as far as possible. What do they use? The biggest wheels possible.

[00:21:55]So, when they're trying to get the car to go as far as possible to waste as little energy as possible, they use big giant wheels.

[00:22:06]Can you understand why it's reasonable to question why they're calling the low friction cart? Okay, they're implying it's the most efficient cart when clearly it's not.

[00:22:19]All right, you scummy liars again. So again, they're just ignoring actual physics. I mean, this is actual physics that if you're going to measure something's linear motion, you're going to get completely different numbers for the amount of energy you put in and how much velocity you get if you have little tiny wheels on the cart. You have to put more energy in to get a linear motion because it's all like little flywheels. The wheels end up just being little flywheels and they're stealing the energy. the linear motion. They're stealing it, you [ __ ] [ __ ] And then when you hit a brick wall, well then you can get the linear motion back because the wheels are all turning in the same direction as hitting the wall.

[00:23:07]So you can convert their the stored energy in the flywheels, you can convert it into an impact.

[00:23:14]So, the truth is is that you're hiding energy when you use carts with little tiny wheels. You're hiding it. It won't be seen in the actual linear velocity.

[00:23:26]Absolute fact. Absolute good physics.

[00:23:29]And here these lying scum are pretending that I've never made this argument when I've made it hundreds of times.

[00:23:37]They're just such lying scum. Okay. So he says the Pasco carts like here here the weights of the cart are about 250 gram and 500 gram. Because the collision tests disagree with draft science. He says there's extra hidden momentum hidden in the wheels of the carts. Well, it's just an absolute fact.

[00:23:55]Twice the velocity means twice the amount of whatever is stored as a flywheel. You double the linear velocity. You've doubled how much energy you've stored in the wheels.

[00:24:09]And it's just the right amount to make things come out the way conventional science predicts. It's twice as much, three times as much, four times as much depending on how much you've increased the velocity you've doubled it, quadrupled it, or you know, on and on.

[00:24:26]So yes, it's significant. All right. As pointed out before many times, he never thinks this is a problem when you have large I've this is just a big fat lie.

[00:24:35]I've never defended any other uh circumstance where we don't recognize this fact. That's just a lie. So, this is a lie. He never thinks this is a problem when you have larger carts going into smaller carts, whatever that means.

[00:24:50]I I've never said it's not a a fact.

[00:24:53]It's not a real thing. I've never paid any attention to those experiments.

[00:24:57]Frankly, I couldn't give a [ __ ] about those experiments because those aren't ones making free momentum. I only care about the ones where you're making free momentum. Those are the only experiments mean anything to me. All right? Or [clears throat] anytime uh predictions align. So we'll go to the thing. But just these are just all lies.

[00:25:16]Just amazing. They just keep lying.

[00:25:20]Uh experiments don't come out his way.

[00:25:22]The problem just happens to appear then.

[00:25:24]So just it's a [ __ ] lie. The the problem is free momentum and your claim that you can make it.

[00:25:32]Yeah, that's the problem. Your idiotic claim is is that all I have to do is change the size of the bullets I put in a zip gun. So, I could have an explosion and shoot bullets at both directions in a gun. And all I have to do is change the weight of the bullets and I can change how much energy is in the explosive.

[00:25:52]So, if I want, you know, 10 jewels, I use um very small bullets. I mean, very big bullets. I want a million jewels. I use very small bullets. So, just change the size of the bullet and I can change how much energy the explosive had.

[00:26:09]That's your crappy gutter theory. Your gutter religion.

[00:26:16]All right.

[00:26:18]Even ignoring that the setting that aside, so why would I set it aside? He says the wheels of the smaller cart in the experiment store up to I so I don't know why he's claiming I said this. they store up to 50% of extra momentum. I don't think that's what I've ever said.

[00:26:34]So, that's just I don't know what percentage it is.

[00:26:38]I had the conversation with physicist Michael about this very subject. I didn't say 50%. And physicist Michael said, "Oh, yeah. I didn't think of that.

[00:26:46]That's a real subject. I ought to look it up." He never looked it up, by the way.

[00:26:51]All right. This can't happen. Okay. So, there's his claim. So, I've already made the statement. Of course, it can happen.

[00:26:57]Of course, it's a real physical phenomenon. The size, the rotational size of the wheel matters. Okay, this can't happen because the wheels would have to turn faster than the motion of the entire cart. Well, it's just idiotic. Obviously, big wheels only get one rotation, okay? Uh, you know, over a very long distance and then small wheels get many rotations going across that same distance. You're an idiot. So this is these are the idiots making these arguments. They're this [ __ ] stupid.

[00:27:30]So this [ __ ] idiot doesn't realize that the number of rotations will decide the velocity.

[00:27:37]And obviously, you know, if you have 17 rotations versus one rotation, then you're going 17 times faster. That means the little atoms on the wheel are moving 17 times faster.

[00:27:53]Uh, but it gets even more ludicrous because the wheels would have to go up to 15 times faster than roll without slipping. What does that even doesn't even mean anything. So there's I don't even know what that means. Where do you get this 15 times faster number from?

[00:28:10]Where do you get any of that from? We're talking about the mass in the wheelbase.

[00:28:16]So the wheels, the axles, um, whatever is rotating. Okay, that um that's mass rotating rather than just moving.

[00:28:28]All right, [clears throat] if each wheel is 2 grams and 3 cm in radius, well, they're obviously not three centimeters, so that's saying they're like a centimeter.

[00:28:39]And if we assume that the maximum Well, some of them I guess it depends on the Pascal ones are a little bigger. They're they're Yeah, they might be 3 cm. Okay, for a maximum uh clarity that all masses concentrated on the outer edge where the velocity is the greatest. There's no velocity is the greatest. This is idiotic. You're an idiot. There's no greatest velocity. Then the 250 g cart going 5 m/s has an additional 50% of its momentum stored in those two gram wheels. So I never said any of that. And where's your evidence it's a 2 g wheel?

[00:29:18]That's the whole argument is that they're not that light.

[00:29:22]If they're that light and there's no axle, then there's no argument. But that's not what their carts are made out of. So that's there. That's why there's an argument, you jackass.

[00:29:32]All right. It must have wheels spin at 200 whatever this is. No. No, it doesn't. Okay. It's just a fact that the smaller the radius of the wheel over the same exact inches of distance traveled, the wheel moves much faster.

[00:29:49]Idiot. It rotates many more times.

[00:29:54]Idiot.

[00:29:55]Okay. All right. The mass of the wheel edges would have to be moving 15 times faster than the motion of the cart.

[00:30:02]That's what Gary's nonsense implies.

[00:30:04]When those teachers roll the carts, the wheels are are secretly they're not secretly uh spinning 15. No, they're not sp 15 times faster. So, you're just a liar. I never said any such thing. So, just keep lying. What I said was when the cart's going twice as fast, however much energy is in the wheels, there's now twice as much energy in the wheels. So now you've taken a bigger piece of the energy out of the experiment for the car going faster. There's less energy available to create linear motion. Do you understand?

[00:30:44]There's essentially less waste in in there's [clears throat] more waste. So you're doubling the amount of friction losses or whatever you would call them.

[00:30:54]So they're not under the same conditions. You dumb [ __ ] lying sack of [ __ ] And again, I've made this argument over and over. All right, at this point, [clears throat] I've virtually given up on getting through to G. Yeah, [ __ ] you getting through. You should go. You should get what you deserve. Okay, if I if I had the authority, you're a lying scum, and you should pay for that, you piece of garbage. You piece of ridiculous [ __ ] I mean, to pretend you're made anything but lying [ __ ] arguments, you [ __ ] AI faker. You [ __ ] piece of [ __ ] Like you ever had any sincerity here? You really believe it takes 25 [ __ ] goddamn times the velocity to to um I mean 25 times the fuel to go five times as fast? You really believe that if I spin a generator five times as fast, it's going to make 25 times the electricity. Do you really believe that every time a a ceiling fan spins twice as fast, it's using four times the electricity? are five times as fast as using 25 times the electricity. You lying sucking piece of [ __ ] Of course you don't believe any of that crap. You liar to type this crap like you're a sincere player here. You [ __ ] piece of crap.

[00:32:09]Godamn. I hate these humans. I would point out that I and I presume others aren't trolling him. Oh, you're just such a [ __ ] liar. Every bit of your commentary that you have produced by this AI thing, every sentence is a lie.

[00:32:26]Overt lies.

[00:32:29]Okay, we actually [ __ ] you on a human.

[00:32:33][ __ ] you. Um, like I said, this guy can't get it any worse than he deserves.

[00:32:38]These lying pieces of [ __ ] pretending they give a [ __ ] about science.

[00:32:43]You'll get outed soon enough. Okay. I mean, the fact is is that if I am right, okay, there's going to be enough curiosity to find out who the [ __ ] you were, you piece of [ __ ] [clears throat] Maybe I don't care about him whatsoever and really think there's no need for pity. Yes, please. It's irrelevance. It's a science argument, you pieces of garbage. You are defending a religion, okay? A silly [ __ ] religion, and I am defending evolution.

[00:33:12]That's all that's happening here. It's Darwin against scummy religious [ __ ] Okay. Arrogant Inquisitioners.

[00:33:20]All right. He loves wasting. I'll [ __ ] you in the ass till dead. Just get what you scummy pieces of lying garbage deserve. I'm here because I hate [ __ ] I hate being told that [ __ ] is true. Okay?

[00:33:34]I'm not a believer in absolute garbage religious [ __ ] Shove your dogmatic [ __ ] up your ass.

[00:33:44]Okay. If we were um put low friction carts against glider on air track using the same smaller masses, wouldn't we see virtually different results given the air track gliders have no wheels? So you said the whole problem with the air track I've already explained too. But why? What are you even talking about? Of course they've done the experiment with the [ __ ] air track and they've gotten the same silly results. And I've explained why is because every time they have a collision on the air track, it's above the center of mass. If you hit two things above their center of mass, if two things collide and the collision point is above their center of mass, what do you think's going to happen, [ __ ] Oh, this is going to happen. Not this. Their tails aren't going to lift up. Their [ __ ] heads are going to lift up. All right. Push.

[00:34:36]And that's just air being uh creates thrust. So I've already made these arguments. They don't give a [ __ ] As you might know, he has a pathetic excuse for a glider. So it's pathetic. It's not real physics that all I have to do is change the pitch of those gliders and I change what direction they go in. So even though the British have been doing this a long time with these little swamp boats and you can see that as soon as they tilt a little bit, air flies out and there's a thrust. So, we already know it's a real thing. You [ __ ] lying sack of [ __ ] Oh god. Every single one every single thing these people do is a lie. They can't do a single honest [ __ ] thing.

[00:35:19]God damn. I hate this planet.

[00:35:23]All right. So, Gary, impossible to ever be convinced by explanation. So, there has been no explanation. So, I've already responded to this, right? So, there's no point. Yeah. So, we're done.

[00:35:34]I already did this [ __ ] right?

[00:35:37]Uh he's unwilling to do his own. Okay.

[00:35:39]So, yeah, we already did this [ __ ] Yeah, I already did my own experiments.

[00:35:43]That's and that's another absolute fact here is they keep trying to claim I haven't done any of these experiments.

[00:35:48]And the original one I did, the first one I did still stands as one they haven't any response to. Just make yourself a balance. and then put a four mass at the one velocity position and then put a one mass at the four velocity position on the other side. And you'll find that it oscillates perfectly indicating that a one mass moving 4V is the same energy as a four mass moving 1V. And that's an absolute fact. That's an experiment you people won't debunk.

[00:36:21]You won't explain to me how that happens, why that happens. What's your explanation? Oh, that's right. You don't have one. You What's your excuse?

[00:36:32]Do the experiment. Show the experiment and then explain how it makes sense to you that somehow there's twice as much energy on one side than there is on the other. Four times as much energy on one side than the other side. How is that possible? [ __ ] [ __ ] All right. So, I believe we've done enough.

[00:36:54]Oh, just hate hate this scummy planet. Oh, [sighs] it's just they are there just I there's so rare there's so few honest humans on this planet. It's just so [ __ ] rare uh to find an honest human. And that's that's pitiful.

[00:37:15]All right, look at that. 10 viewers and not a single comment. Well, not a single comment, you know, since it was 10 viewers. [laughter] Yeah. Uh, but whatever. Who cares?

[00:37:27]I'll give you I I'll I'll hang around another minute or two just to see. I mean, there's 10 of you. You think one of you could say something uh intriguing, interesting, something for me to respond to.

[00:37:41]Well, somebody in my, you know, somebody says, "I've been watching your your videos for years." And then they ask me the question, "What do you think of quantum entanglement?"

[00:37:49]And just like so, so it's like even my own listeners are liars [laughter] because obviously the guy hasn't listened to any of my videos.

[00:37:58]I mean, it's just such a basic question to be asking me. Of course, I think it's absolute [ __ ] you jackass.

[00:38:04]I mean, [laughter] just Yeah. So, it's like it's just you can't win. It's just this is you know it's just deplorably depressing how broken um humanity is you know there just will not progress you know in this um you know with this mechanism the the Google sphere okay and it really is about Google you know this whole popularity [ __ ] [ __ ] you know that we should, again, it's almost like the hyperdemocracy where, oh, well, you know what that just means? That just means you pollute the right decision with a bunch of dumb people's opinion, right? I mean, there's a bell curve, right? Uh, you're going to make a decision. Is there much sense in having half of that bell curve as part of the decision? [laughter] No. No.

[00:39:03]There's no sense to it at all, really.

[00:39:05]And, you know, and I'm not talking as a big defender of elitism. Uh I've always been a big defender of democracy, but it's an absolute fact that once it becomes idiocracy, that is once the bell curve is slanted and there's more idiots than uh Einstein's uh then you're [ __ ] Okay? Because democracy just means get the wrong answer every [ __ ] time, sadly.

[00:39:32]All right, so I'll get the [ __ ] out of Oh, there's a comment. Oh, it's force reality, so it's already here. I can't make sense of Piro's response to the argument. There was a bit of an exchange [clears throat] on the Reddit post. Oh, well, the only response I saw was him saying babble about how [clears throat] well it's we it's not MV equals uh 12 MV 2. Uh it's the derivatives equals the derivatives, which is the same thing. So again, he's just lying that um you know, replacing the velocity with um dt over I mean d distance over d time is the is is the same thing as just saying okay I'm going to try to make those two things equal and they're not equal. One of them is how you measure a velocity. The other one is the velocity. So you have to understand the measurement of a velocity isn't the velocity. So when you do this in an equation, yes, this isn't this isn't good theory.

[00:40:39]All right. So let's see if I can find that.

[00:40:42]All right. So this should be it.

[00:40:46]Um yeah, so I should have to just Puro was in here somewhere, right? I don't see Piro in here somewhere. Let me refresh this. Maybe it was the one before this. Oh, yeah. This is the Yeah.

[00:40:59]So, it's the one before this.

[00:41:02]All right.

[00:41:05]Uh, let's see. Evading arguments. That's not the difference between energy, reflecting, and absorption. Okay. 29 comments. Yeah, that's the one. Wow. I didn't think that, but yes, I don't know what he was saying.

[00:41:19]>> Video presentation.

[00:41:20]>> Clearly not responding.

[00:41:21]>> Reddit post for a in Come on. Quit playing that tripe. All right. So, here it goes. All right. So, you gave him piros. Okay. So, using two equations to solve for two variables doesn't involve setting MV to equal to K. Yes, it does. That's exactly what they do. They just rewrite the MV.

[00:41:41]So, it's M and then the V is replaced by DT over DT. Distance D over DT. And then they do it in the same thing in the kinetic energy formula. So they just keep making the formulas different, but it's the same difference. Okay, so 18 replies. All right, so you posted my time code. Good.

[00:42:03]Uh, cool. DS has just asserted point blank false statements. I guess that means he loses the argument. So that didn't happen. Oh, this isn't Piro. Uh, what I don't understand is why you don't give a crap about the fact that DS blatantly does this. You really don't give a [ __ ] about the truth, do you? So, I didn't say anything wrong or incorrect. So, it's just a that idiot.

[00:42:25]It's just that an idiot. Uh, he's responding to Piro's comments. I'm not going to summarize the response for you.

[00:42:31]You can just watch or listen to it yourself. I still haven't given me this so-called point blank false statement.

[00:42:38]You claim draft science stated. Yes, there is no point blank. Uh, let's see.

[00:42:42]I don't want to hit that. Let's just see what Piro says first. Uh, the false statements him claiming using two equations. So, he's saying the same thing over again.

[00:42:51]Uh that's false. Uh that's not how it works. So he's saying exactly the same thing. It can't be just an opinion. Uh we use a particular method of solving multiple equations with multiple var. So we already we saw all this. All right. I saw it when they went to measure the mass of an electron and she basically just said MV equals 12 MV² and then did the crossing out. So don't tell me it's not how they get the equation, that's how they get it.

[00:43:19]All right.

[00:43:20]>> [clears throat] >> You don't set the momentum. So it does whatever this this this doesn't matter.

[00:43:24]The the real point isn't this stupid equation. The point is that the consequence of it is free momentum. So will you please respond to the actual video? And of course he's not right. So I've made this argument over and over and over. He's not responding to it.

[00:43:40]They have two different equations. In math they are equal. They have the same equivalent. So So he just says in math they were equal. If they were equal, they'd have the same or equivalent equations. What's the same in the two equations are the initial and final velocity. So here he says it again and you're just saying that's what's being disputed. So how the [ __ ] can you say that that's what's uh the same when you're saying that somehow uh this extra the the velocity is a squared component.

[00:44:13]Given the initial, you can discover the final and vice versa. The two can be unknown. So again, this is just [ __ ] It's not why there's this silly equation. So he's just bullshitting.

[00:44:25]All right. So let's see what this your snake makes no sense. The ar mass bouncing between two larger masses in space there. So he's trying to get him back onto the subject. Okay. Uh of how many bounces it bounces and how do you put twice the momentum into the object every time it bounces. So, how do you put twice the momentum every [ __ ] time it bounces? And it bounces 250 [ __ ] goddamn times. How is that not free energy or free momentum? Anyway, according to physics, when you put energy into the heavy mass, giving it motion while you get the reflection with minimal losses. It does happen on Earth.

[00:45:01]You can bounce a ball bearing on a heat treated anvil and it will bounce many times. We shouldn't say many, you should say a hundred uh before it loses its motion to gravity. each. No, it doesn't lose it to gravity. It actually does heat the surface or does something to lose it. Gravity doesn't steal energy.

[00:45:20]Each time the ball bearing bounces, it supposedly gives energy to the heavy mass while giving you a reflection.

[00:45:25]Well, the point is is you can't make more mv. And each time it hits the surface, there's more mv in the universe than there was the moment before it hit.

[00:45:34]That's the fact.

[00:45:36]Okay, so this is the wrong guy answers.

[00:45:38]Okay, it turned out to be an error.

[00:45:40]false. That doesn't change the important argument being made. I don't know what that is. So, the liar is conceding I didn't lie. What do you mean if [clears throat] it can't be an error?

[00:45:52]Because he doubled down on it, which is what I called out. Are you just making more evasion? So, what where is this guy talking about? So, he's he's not explicitly explaining what he's claiming I errored. Your response makes no sense.

[00:46:05]The argument is about a light mass bouncing between two larger masses in space. the reflection in your scenario wouldn't be a perfect reflection even in the elastic collision case. So, we know it's good enough for 256 [ __ ] bounces. So, quit telling me it doesn't happen because it's happening right now on Earth. So, I can show you that you lying piece of [ __ ] So, the fact that you're clueless about what actually happens, like I said, you could just say anvil and bounce and put that into YouTube as a search result and you'll get plenty of anvils with ball bearings bouncing on them 100 times.

[00:46:45]Unless the larger mass is infinite, which doesn't exist in real life. So, again, it doesn't have to be infinite.

[00:46:52]Doesn't have to be anything but a few thousand times maybe or hundred times heavier than the object it's hitting.

[00:47:00]Uh, why does everyone else have to do the basic work for So, you're not doing any work, you lying sack of [ __ ] If you throw a tennis ball at the space shuttle while it's in space, you're not going to knock it out of its orbit. It's a fact.

[00:47:13]It's not going to absorb the tennis ball's energy. It's just going to bounce. The tennis ball is going to bounce off the space shuttle, and that's all that's going to happen. There's not going to be any space shuttle being pushed by the [ __ ] tennis ball.

[00:47:27][ __ ] idiots. All right, Piro. What does it have to do with MV equals K?

[00:47:33]This is just what an idiot this is. It has to do with your silly formula that says twice the momentum goes into the object, you [ __ ] Your silly notion that somehow direction matters, that somehow this way cancels that way, you [ __ ] idiot. All right. There's no paradox in what you're saying. What you are not understanding is that metal is elastic uh uh by the meaning of elastic. So again this is the joke. It's elastic except for the fact that it completely absorbs all the energy and reflects it.

[00:48:08]It does both too stupid. All right.

[00:48:12]Anyway, it bends just like rubber and then springs back. So that's not really what happens. So the truth is um you know what really happens is a few electrons move and then they say the whole object isn't going to move and so the electrons go back to where they were. So the surface uh does the reflecting.

[00:48:32]The metal molecules are so strongly connected to their neighbors it's hardly um bends but that's how it's working.

[00:48:40]You're claiming it's moving you idiot.

[00:48:43]It absorbed twice the momentum. absorbed metan reflect absorbed that's professor Leuen's statement you liar so the energy goes into the metal layers uh and then they push back so again so he's he's he's basically denying the very argument being made that somehow he's never seen the professor Leuen clip and he's never seen any other physicist point out that this happens that it's non-negotiable as professor Leuen said you throw the tennis ball and the Earth moves that way twice as much as the ball is going to come back this way. That's their argument, you [ __ ] All right. Anyway, fitting the smaller massive back. Okay.

[00:49:28]The momentum works out. So, he says it again. H how's it work out? You have now 300. You put 100 in and now you have 300. That's not working out. That's working stupid. Okay. And the energy works out. So, lie lie lie. Okay, since it's nearly elastic, so more nonsense.

[00:49:48]Okay, nearly all the So, we're Anyway, nearly all the energy is reflected. So, he just said nearly all the energy is reflected except twice the energy is absorbed. Twice the momentum is absorbed.

[00:50:01]Okay? And some of the energy goes into deformation. So again, none of it can go into deformationations. That's the whole point of the hardened steel anvil. And that's the whole point of using the silicut glass surfaces is because they are undeformable and the cause heat and wear. So again, you blew it. That's what you you just said. There's no problem. Oh, you're such a [ __ ] idiot. All right. So maybe you could post the time code to this me reading this pile of [ __ ] Uh because I won't do it in my, you know, I'm not going to waste I'm just going to remake the argument. Okay. the argument they've over and over again evaded. So I'm just going to remake this argument over and over and over. So he has in no way responded to this actual fact as an experiment. The simple question is what do you claim happens? I hit this surface with 100 MV. I hit this surface with 100 MV in a little tiny object. What does it do? They're perfect elastic surfaces. If I was on Earth, I could get it to bounce 256 times. So, it's very elastic. What happens? Do these objects move or don't they?

[00:51:20][ __ ] Yeah. God, you lying piece of [ __ ] All right. Good. Thank you. So, that was worth waiting for. Uh, so I didn't realize there was a whole bunch more [ __ ] written here. Oh, we can go back to the other [ __ ] Right. There was like eight comments somewhere else here.

[00:51:43]This comment section is Yeah, wasn't there? Yeah, I got to figure out how to get back to single thread comments. Oh, see full. Yeah, I have to go see full discussion.

[00:52:00]This is Reddit sucks.

[00:52:04]I hate the way they thread these comments.

[00:52:07]So, 18. This is where we go. And then this guy's got 16 more here.

[00:52:16]And then there are seven more here. So, this is the one we didn't read.

[00:52:23]So, something was deleted. [sighs] I won't bother with that. Um, all right. Since you're being obtuse on purpose, uh, I'll just move on and ask proh.

[00:52:39]Okay, this is DS's ser. Yes, it does. It involves the very exact thing without relying on DS. What kind of mental gymnastics are you going to come up with to defend this? Um and it's absolutely clear of what means this his statement that the timestamp in the link you posted you know committed never said he was wrong about anything no matter I don't know what this guy is claiming again he's claiming I'm wrong about something and there's just nothing there's no evidence of a statement about what I'm wrong about.

[00:53:15]So yeah there's no point. All right.

[00:53:19]Uh, no one except you will know the point blank false statement because it's the very thing the first post was relied to which was time. No. So, this is just this is just a waste of time. [laughter] I couldn't say, you know, this one has the U-turn. So, I mean the image here, you know, so so I I guess I could put that back up, right? Um, which is kind of funny, right? So, it has this is like a Uturn and that's the point. you don't get 200% going into the object. You just get the 100% back. So, it's just like a lever, right? I mean, a lever is basically except for the fact that it's not ideal in the sense the lever's movement will consume some of the energy. The fact is you could drop a two mass here and you could lift a two mass here. And that's all you're going to do is change the direction. Right? So ideally, if you didn't have to move the weight of the lever, so if we could make it out of carbon or some kind of thing, it was very light, 100 times lighter than the object, then we'd only lose 1%.

[00:54:18]And what you're basically saying is is you could drop the two mass a mass here and you'd place another mass over here and you could just change the direction for free. It wouldn't cost anything except the motion of the lever.

[00:54:32]Are you going to really argue that there's it did cost something? that somehow the whole earth is now moving.

[00:54:39]Is that really? So again, we've made 300 momentum. We only had 100 masses moving in the universe and now we have 300 masses moving in the universe. And if I put that whole thing on another lever, then I can make 600 times the momentum in the universe. And I can make 1,200 times the Yeah, there's just no stopping it, right? I mean, if if we use these two objects, these two heavy objects moving, you get it. If they actually do absorb all of that MV, I could put two even heavier objects outside of them, and they could end up bouncing back and forth, making any even more MV.

[00:55:18]Yeah, it's all too ridiculous. This free momentum is not a thing. You can't make free momentum. Mass moving in the universe is a thing and it doesn't matter which way it's going. Nuclear bombs make all kinds of mass move in opposite directions. It doesn't cancel.

[00:55:41]It's all real energy.

[00:55:45]Real, not fake.

[00:55:48]Real. Okay. And it doesn't because one's going this way and the other's going that way doesn't mean it cancels.

[00:55:56]doesn't mean it's for free.

[00:56:02]Stupid [ __ ] I can't believe you have to have this conversation. I can't believe we can't find any honest people interested in physics to show up to any of these rooms ever.

[00:56:15]It's just disgusting.

[00:56:18]Oh, [ __ ] you and Tesla. Really? [ __ ] you in the ass till dead. Tesla was an idiot.

[00:56:25]just shooting [ __ ] hundreds of watts of power into the goddamn earth and thought he was going to shoot it to France and be able to pull it out of France. I mean, it was idiotic.

[00:56:38]Uh Jesus, he mentions he could hear up to 800 kilome. [ __ ] you in the ass till dead. I mean, really, I'm not even going to bother reading the second comment, you stupid idiot. Tesla was not all that. He did three or four smart, clever things and then he did about seven or 800 really dumb things. He had 675 patents. How many of them are for a real device? He was paid a million dollars to make a telegraph. And what did he do? He made a big lightning tower and wasted the guy's money. I mean, JP Morgan basically gave him the opportunity to invent radio and he just threw away the opportunity because he wanted to move electricity instead of just make Morris code electrically. I mean, he already knew he could do it and he just he was just too much of an [ __ ] to do what he was simply asked to do, which was make a radio.

[00:57:38][sighs] God. I mean, he was such a jerk.

[00:57:42]All right. Anyway, but he was so right about, like I said, the little things like like like the resonant frequency thing is just so obvious because this is another energy thing, you know, like you could thump on a bridge and you could just keep thumping and and if you thump at the right frequency and you're always hitting it when the bridge is moving in that direction. So that is you change its pitch based on the motion of the bridge. So you're always in sync with the motion. So every time it thumps, every time it hits, it always hits in the direction that the bridge is moving.

[00:58:18]The fact is is yeah, you could take something with a 9volt battery and just have it hit over and over and over a million times and you could actually make the whole bridge eventually move because it would all be adding velocity, adding energy rather than ever subtracting it. So if you can always keep the motion going in the same direction as the object you're trying to add it to, then you can add a a tremendous amount of energy.

[00:58:47]So yeah, I mean that's so obvious too, but obviously that goes completely against the kinetic energy theory because the kinetic energy theory is making you think you're putting twice the energy in and you can't put twice the energy in.

[00:59:01]You can only put in the all the energy and absorb it. You can't reflect it. You have to absorb it.

[00:59:08]Anyway, all right. Anyway, sure thing. I'll make a response with the time code later.

[00:59:15]Yes. All right. Thank you. That'll save me a little trouble. Uh because it really has to just deal with the subject.

[00:59:24]I mean just I like I said in all of this discussion what is so difficult about just drawing what I drew right because so none of these people you just say okay just just draw what he drew and just explain what you say will happen I have these two hardened objects I create motion between them with a little object it starts bouncing what actually happens do I h get hundreds of times times more momentum put into the two objects or no if they move the thing doesn't bounce as much.

[01:00:02]Which one happens?

[01:00:05]Gary's theory or the one professor Leuen said, "I'm going to give you a sleepless night because what I'm going to say is so [ __ ] stupid. You're not going to believe you're going to MIT to learn it because it's so goddamn stupid."

[01:00:21]And let's understand in the lecture he never answers the point. All right? He never explains the paradox. He just says, "Here's a sleepless night." I'm not going to tell you why this is idiotic. I'm not going to explain why it's not idiotic. Right? So, he just explains how it doesn't make any [ __ ] sense at all. And then he ends the lecture without even explaining why it doesn't make any sense.

[01:00:46]Uh, thank you for clarifying about the K equals MV statement. I think somewhere I was thinking about it as though they make sure MV and K are conserved like in Newton's cradle. Well, like I said, you can't conserve them. As soon as you change the mass, you can't ever conserve both. It's impossible. That's why this thing is so obviously stupid. Why should there even be an argument when all of us should be able to agree that mathematically you cannot possibly conserve both you know without this direction trick you know as an absolute motion in the universe you can't conserve both okay um and you know if you change the mass if you move energy from one mass into any other ma you know up or down, you either have to increase the velocity or decrease the velocity. And any increase or decrease in the velocity obviously means the momentum and kinetic energy numbers are going to go sideways.

[01:01:54]That's why you can change how much energy gasoline has by just changing what you're pushing with it. So you push light things, right? Yeah. Uh the gas has a lot of octane, but you push heavy things. Oh, not so much because yes, the only way you get high kinetic energy is to push light things.

[01:02:17]All right. Anyway, till next time and such and so forth and whatnot.