Iran employs a coordinated multi-domain strategy to maintain pressure on the international community, combining diplomatic negotiations with simultaneous military threats, including naval mine-laying operations, missile and drone capabilities, and proxy networks across the region, while demanding significant economic concessions before addressing core security concerns.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Iran CEASEFIRE Or Collapse; Hormuz Oil Threat Rises; Israel Strikes 150 TargetsAdded:
The Strait of Hormuz is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point. And right now, it is the most dangerous 21 miles on the planet. 1/5 of the world's oil flows through it. 1/5 of the world's gas.
Every tanker that moves through that passage is a rolling target. And this week, Iran made it very clear. If they cannot export their oil, no one else will either.
That is not a negotiation. That is a loaded gun pointed at the global economy.
I'm here on the ground in Israel, and what we are watching right now is not a simple back and forth between Washington and Tehran.
What we are watching is a regime that is negotiating with one hand and loading weapons with the other.
And the world needs to understand exactly what that means.
Let us start with the agreement that everyone is talking about.
President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio both spoke this week about progress. They talked about a memorandum of understanding, about the gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and about a possible 60-day extension of the ceasefire. That sounds like movement.
That sounds like diplomacy working.
But then you look at what Iran is actually demanding on the other side of the table.
Tehran wants access to tens of billions of dollars in frozen funds. Reportedly around 24 billion dollars in the first stage alone.
And under the broader framework being discussed, possibly access to 100 billion dollars in total frozen assets.
100 billion dollars. Going into the hands of a regime that funds Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and militias across Iraq. And all of this before there is any clear agreement about the nuclear program.
This is the trap. This is the pattern that Iran always uses. First open the Strait. First lift the pressure. First release the money. And only then, maybe, we will talk about uranium. In the Middle East, only then is where hard questions go to die. The United States knows what it needs. Washington wants a clear answer about the enriched uranium.
Will it leave Iran? Will it be destroyed? Will there be real international supervision? Not the kind that Iran can manipulate and delay, but real verifiable permanent supervision.
That is the red line, and Iran is trying to bury it under layers of economic demands.
While the talks were happening, something else was happening in the water.
The United States Navy this week assisted vessels that had been struck and stranded in the Gulf, including a massive Greek tanker carrying about 2 million barrels of oil that had been sitting stuck since March.
American officials spoke about helping 10 to 12 additional vessels in similar situations.
But at the same time, US Central Command was reporting something that should alarm every person watching this.
Iran's Revolutionary Guards were seen operating fast boats. Drones were spotted. There were movements that looked exactly like attempts to lay naval mines near the strait. Missile launch sites near the water were being prepared.
Since the start of the naval blockade, 27 ships have already been turned back.
Oil prices jumped 5% before optimism around the agreement brought them slightly down. And the Americans did not just issue warnings. There were reports this week of American strikes in southern Iran, near Bandar Abbas, Sir, and Qeshm Island, targeting Revolutionary Guard boats attempting to lay mines, and targeting launch sites and surface-to-air missile systems that were threatening American aircraft.
Washington called itself defense. Iran called it a violation of the ceasefire.
Iran also fired at American aircraft and warned that if it is blocked from exporting oil, it will block everyone else from exporting oil, too.
That warning was not aimed only at Washington. It was aimed at every Gulf state, every global energy market, and every regular person who fills up their car at a gas station.
And to make sure that message was understood, the United States has positioned around 20 naval vessels in the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea right now, including two aircraft carriers.
On top of that, there are reports of F-22 fighter jets and dozens of aerial refueling aircraft deployed at military facilities across the region, including in Israel.
Refueling aircraft are not a small technical detail.
They extend the operational range of fighter jets dramatically.
They enable long-distance strikes. They tell Iran very clearly that the military option has not been removed from the table.
Trump's diplomacy is not replacing the military threat. It is sitting on top of it.
Now, let us go inside Iran, because what is happening inside that country right now is just as important as what is happening at the negotiating table. The man now presented in reports as Iran's new supreme leader is reportedly operating from a bunker beneath a bunker. His communication with the outside world is severely limited. He is using a system of messengers to make decisions, which means every decision is slow, filtered, and possibly distorted.
And yet this week he released statements calling for war, warning that American bases in the region would not be immune, and claiming that Israel is approaching the end of its existence.
That is not what a regime coming to the table in good faith sounds like. That is what a regime that is playing for time sounds like. And internally, Iran is paying a heavy price.
The country endured 88 days of internet shutdown, one of the longest nationwide blackouts ever recorded.
The digital economy collapsed during that period. Businesses were destroyed.
Income disappeared. When the regime finally started reconnecting the population to the internet this week, it was because the internal pressure had become impossible to ignore.
There are also signs of a struggle within the regime itself.
Iran's president is reportedly trying to restore some level of civilian normalcy.
The Revolutionary Guards want to maintain control through censorship and fear.
Outwardly, the regime is claiming victory. Internally, the country is barely holding together. But here is what we must never mistake for weakness.
The Revolutionary Guards are already working to restore their missile and drone capabilities.
Early assessments after the strikes on Iran spoke about very severe damage to their defense industry.
The fuller picture this week is more complicated. Some production sites were damaged less than expected. Some production lines were moved and are being restored. Some launchers are still usable and according to updated assessments, possibly around 2/3 of Iran's missile launchers are still operational with some having been pulled out of tunnels that were blocked during the strikes. This is exactly why Israel cannot simply look at the headline of an agreement and feel safe.
We have to look at what remains in the enemy's hands the morning after.
In Lebanon this week, the story moved from the negotiating table directly to the ground. The IDF struck dozens of Hezbollah targets. On one of the most intensive days, around 150 targets were hit within 24 hours.
Strikes in southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, the Tigra area, locations where Hezbollah is actively trying to rebuild weapons depots, headquarters, observation posts, and firing infrastructure. On a single night, more than 100 Hezbollah targets were reportedly struck. More than 90 of them in the south in the Mascara area. On the ground, Israeli forces from Brigade 810 under Division 210, operating together with the Yahalom Engineering Unit, located and destroyed an underground Hezbollah tunnel route approximately 100 m long in the mount area.
That is not one tunnel. That is part of a system that Hezbollah spent years building inside villages, inside civilian spaces, directly on Israel's border, turning southern Lebanon into a prepared attack platform.
And while the diplomatic conversation continues, the IDF keeps finding on the ground exactly why Israel cannot stop too soon.
The newest and most serious threat in the north is the fiber optic FPV drone.
This is not a minor technical development. A drone guided by fiber optic cable does not depend on radio signals. That means it cannot be jammed by electronic warfare the way conventional drones can. It flies low.
It transmits high-quality video in real time with almost no delay. It can target forces, vehicles, commanders, or infrastructure with very high precision.
This week, 136 claims of responsibility were recorded. 48 of those involved explosive drones. Since May 19th alone, more than 20 suicide drone attacks were documented. This is no longer a scattered tactic. This is a method being used to systematically change how the IDF operates in the field. The price this week was real and heavy.
Colonel Meir Burdman, the commander of Brigade 401, was seriously wounded in an explosive drone strike in southern Lebanon.
Sergeant Gnome Eleazar, 19 years old, from a city in Israel's south, a soldier in the 601st Combat Engineering Battalion, was killed by a Hezbollah drone.
Another soldier was seriously wounded in a separate attack.
Earlier, there were also reports of a female soldier seriously wounded and six others wounded with various levels of severity.
These are not numbers. These are people, and they are being hunted while everyone at the diplomatic level is talking about agreements.
Naim Qassem, the leader of Hezbollah, this week tried to turn the situation into a political weapon inside Lebanon.
He spoke against disarmament. He threatened the Lebanese government. He hinted that his people could take to the streets and bring down the government from within.
In plain terms, Hezbollah is telling Lebanon, "Accept us armed or we will tear you apart."
Secretary of State Rubio responded with a sentence worth noting.
He said the era in which a terrorist organization holds an entire nation hostage is coming to an end.
The question now is whether that becomes real policy or stays as a headline.
In Gaza, the campaign against Hamas's command structure continued without pause.
Mohammed Oda, recently appointed as replacement for the head of Hamas's military wing in Gaza, was eliminated in a strike in the Alamal neighborhood of Gaza City.
Oda was not a public figure, but inside Hamas, he was central. According to reports, he headed Hamas's intelligence headquarters on October 7th and was directly involved in gathering intelligence, planning targets, coordinating operations, and building the picture of the Gaza division's vulnerabilities before the massacre.
This matters. Mohammed Deif was eliminated. Mohammed Sinwar was eliminated. Yahya Sinwar was eliminated.
Now Mohammed Oda was eliminated.
According to one report, of all the senior commanders of Hamas's military wing who were operational on October 7th, only one central figure has not yet been eliminated, Imad Akel, the head of Hamas's home front operations inside Gaza.
Hamas is not only losing people, it is losing operational memory, chain of command, knowledge of tunnels, warehouses, weapons locations, how to coordinate fighters, and when every person who takes a senior role immediately becomes the next target on Israel's list, it becomes almost impossible to rebuild a stable military structure.
The Houthis in Yemen and the Iranian backed militias in Iraq were not the center of this week's headlines, but they are inseparable from the question on the table.
If Iran receives money, sanctions relief, and a reduction in pressure without the agreement specifically addressing how Iran funds and arms its proxies, that money will not stay in Tehran. It will flow to Hezbollah, to Hamas, to the Houthis, to the militias in Iraq, through shell companies, through through ports, through smuggling routes that Iran has spent years building.
This is why an agreement with Iran cannot be measured by a single clause.
It has to be measured by the entire system.
This week also revealed details about how Iran operates beneath the surface right now.
A Chinese equipment procurement network running through the United Arab Emirates, shipping routes designed to obscure the origin and destination of cargo, and an Iranian cyber espionage campaign targeting defense, aviation, and communications companies in Israel, the United States, and the UAE using fake job postings, files that looked like legitimate employment documents, and video call links that appeared to be Zoom or Teams meetings, all designed to install espionage tools on company computers. Same method, every arena.
Hide, infiltrate, wait, activate at the right moment.
Trump is also pushing a broader diplomatic vision.
He spoke this week with leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Bahrain, and Pakistan, pushing for Arab and Muslim countries to join a regional framework alongside Israel, an expansion of the Abraham Accords path as part of a new regional stability agreement. It is a large vision. Ports open, Iran restrained, Arab nations moving closer to Israel, the region stabilizing.
But the walls are thick.
Saudi Arabia is cautious. Qatar is not moving quickly. Turkey is playing both sides. The Gulf states want stability, but they fear both a stronger Iran and a completely collapsed Iran equally. And so, after all of it, the mines, the tankers, the drones, the tunnels, the uranium, the proxies, the diplomacy, the money, the question of this week is the same question it always is.
Is Iran actually retreating, or is it only changing shape? If a real agreement removes enriched uranium from Iran, establishes genuine international supervision, opens the Strait of Hormuz without Iranian control mechanisms, stops the weapons transfers to Hezbollah, and preserves Israel's freedom of action against real threats, that could be a significant moment in history.
But if the agreement only extends the ceasefire by 60 days, releases money, opens the sea, and leaves the nuclear question, the missiles, and the proxies for some undefined next stage, then this is not the end of the war.
It is a reset timer. And Iran will use every second of it. Iran does not see separate arenas. For Tehran, the nuclear program is a strategic card. Hormuz is an economic card. Hezbollah is a military card. Hamas is a Palestinian card. The Houthis are a maritime card.
The Iraqi militias are a pressure card against America.
Anyone who looks only at the memorandum of understanding is missing the system entirely.
Israel cannot afford to miss it.
Because if the regime in Tehran survives this moment with uranium intact, launchers still operational, new money flowing in, and an armed Hezbollah sitting on the northern border, the question will not be who won this week.
The question will be how much time is left before the next round begins.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











