This video examines how diplomatic credibility and leadership perception influence international negotiations, using the example of Iran's preference to negotiate with Barack Obama over Donald Trump. The content suggests that diplomatic success depends on perceived trustworthiness, consistency, and the ability to achieve agreements through dialogue rather than military force. The video argues that leaders who prioritize diplomatic engagement and consensus-building tend to maintain stronger international relationships, while those who rely on confrontational approaches may face reduced cooperation from other nations.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Trump’s Left STUNNED After IRAN Chose Obama Over HIM 😳🔥Added:
Iran today has a magical opportunity to say that they will negotiate a ceasefire but only >> [music] >> if it's with Obama.
>> This is the latest. So, Iran made a special announcement on Iran news media and they said they don't want to talk to this guy. No way, no how. [music] They said, "Nope." And they want to talk The only one they'll talk to is [music] Barack Obama. This is Iran's trolling of Trump is so [ __ ] funny. They're so goddamn good at it. With their AI, their Lego videos, and now they've said [music] they'll only negotiate with Obama because he's the goat.
>> [laughter] >> What? Look at this. He is still calling out Oba- He still has Obama on his mind. "Greatest sucker of them all," Trump called. This is all about the fact that he cannot get the Obama deal with Iran. That's what this is all about. This is why he's complaining.
This is why he's It's all because he can't get the Obama deal.
So, yeah.
He hasn't been president in years and years and years and years and still calling him out. But, that's what this is all about. I want you to understand this whole war thing. He Trump cannot stop the war unless he gets a better deal than Obama had. And Iran is not offering that. So, this right here is why he's going absolutely nuts. This is why he's going crazy. This is keeping him up at night.
He can't get the deal Obama got years ago.
Let me know what you think in the comments and like and follow for more.
>> We pulled it off without firing a missile. We got 97% of their enriched uranium out.
Uh they were able to maintain a modest civilian nuclear program for energy.
>> And so you think it was working?
>> Well, it's Not only did I think it was working, uh even Israeli intelligence thought it was working. Uh even our intelligence services thought it was working.
So, there's no dispute that it worked.
>> Well, there you have it. We wouldn't be in this mess if Trump wouldn't have ripped up the deal that Obama made with Iran. Whether you like it or not, it was working.
For what it [music] needed to do, it was working.
But it just wasn't a good thing according to Trump.
Let me tell you something. And and I know MAGA is going to come into the comment section and they're going to be like, "Oh, what do you want to do? Just send pallets of money over to Iran?" It was Iran's money, with interest. Okay?
Or what do you Iran can't have nukes.
We have nukes. A lot of other countries have nukes. You mean to tell me you're going to trust Trump with a nuke? Are you [ __ ] kidding me right now? Are you? Hm?
And then here's the thing. It doesn't matter if he goes over there and destroys that entire country [music] or wherever, so we don't have to send money here, here, and there.
Okay? You'll never see the money that Trump saves.
Okay? You'll The higher elites will see it, but the middle class will never see it. Where's that doge money at? Where's that $5,000, MAGA? Where's that at? Huh?
All that fraud that Elon Musk found. Hm?
Did you get that? You didn't get that, did you? Huh? What about the $2,000?
Huh? What about the peace president? Oh, I can negotiate anything. You can't be a good president unless you can't can negotiate. Where's that at? You all voted You voted for no wars. You voted for cheap gas. You voted for eggs. You voted for groceries. [music] And guess what you got? You got a [ __ ] egg.
Yeah, that's what you got was an [music] egg.
You [ __ ] So, get this. Donald Trump attacked Iran on the premise that they were developing nuclear weapons and that he needed to strike their nuclear sites in order to contain them. Yet, back in 2018, Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, which blocked Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Now, do you know why Donald Trump withdrew from this deal?
Because guess who signed it.
Barack Obama. That's right. Back in 2015, [music] Barack Obama struck the Iran nuclear deal that imposed strict limits and inspections on Iran's nuclear programs in exchange for lifting economic sanctions against Iran. And it was working as is proven by this chart. But because Donald Trump could not stand the idea of Barack Obama striking a successful deal, Trump withdrew from the agreement despite facing global opposition and despite there being no evidence of Iran violating this deal.
And now, in 2025, Donald Trump is taking us into war to contain their nuclear program, which Barack Obama had already done 10 years ago without having to take us into war. So, there you have it. All of this to spite Obama, a man who was superior to Donald Trump in every sense [music] of >> So, Iran just tweeted out that they will only negotiate with Obama.
Yeah.
They said, uh, "Sorry, we're holding out for the goat."
Yeah, we're not talking to you. We were going to wait for President Obama, the greatest president of all time.
We ain't [ __ ] with you, but we're chilling here by the sea straight of Hormuz until you send in the varsity team. We will only negotiate with Obama.
Oh my, Trump's head is going to explode.
[music] He's >> [laughter] >> I'm sorry.
Oh my god.
Trump, there will be ketchup, french fries, and cheese burgers hitting every wall of the White House.
>> Apparently, we're now offering Iran what is the equivalent to Obama's original nuclear deal. Yeah, that's that's where we're at.
Back to square one.
You know the deal that Donald Trump tore up because it had Obama's name on it and that hurts his feelings and he came out and said it was a very stupid deal, a terrible deal, the worst deal ever. You know, that deal?
Well, apparently, it's not stupid anymore.
Maybe somebody read it.
But hey, this is what happens when you elect people that are more concerned with one-upping the opposition than actually governing.
Like Donald Trump.
I would be interested to know how many people have died because he tore up >> [music] >> that nuclear deal just because it had Obama's name on it and that's a scary Muslim sounding name. Ooh, it might have even had Hussein on it. Ooh, and for the MAGA morons that haven't figured it out yet, this is the United States of America, not the Alabama football team. You know what I'm saying?
Yeah, get that through your head. Yeah, because when you elect really stupid people, people die.
That's what happens. And I know you don't care about that because the people that die aren't the same color as you and, you know, that's a huge disqualifier for you to care.
And keep in mind that basically every single one of our allies told Donald Trump to not tear up the Iran nuclear deal.
They told him that this, what's happening right now, is exactly what would happen. Now, we did have one ally who did not agree with that. Do you have any idea who that was?
Yeah, Israel. Of course.
Israel, the country that got us into the Iraq war.
Here's a crazy idea. How about we not listen to war criminals when we start trying to make decisions about we're going to do with foreign policy and war and all these things. How about we not listen to war criminals like Benjamin Netanyahu, cuz that's exactly what he is. But here we sit today listening to a man who committed genocide against the Palestinians >> [music] >> and potentially going into war to keep him happy.
A man that committed genocide against Palestinians. [music] Yeah.
You know, they say you can tell a lot about a person by the type of people they hang out with.
Yeah.
Yeah.
We hang out with Benjamin Netanyahu.
What does that tell you about us?
Now, I know a lot of you guys mouths are watering at the idea of of of live-streaming, you know, the US bombing Iran on the big screen while you play beer pong and probably got baseball and football on the other screen.
And look, I get it. Death and destruction is entertaining to a lot of you people.
I It's not a sport. Okay? These are people's lives we're talking about.
People just like you and me that don't give two shits what their government thinks.
Yeah. The ones that should perish shall not be the ones that do.
It will be the innocents.
It's always the innocents.
Yeah.
>> In the international arena today, [music] many people observe that Barack Obama is still often regarded [music] as one of the most suitable figures to represent the United States in important discussions and negotiations.
This has led many to ask, "Why is Donald Trump not the person chosen for such roles?
Why do parties not seek to persuade him to participate in those negotiations?
And why do many countries appear more inclined to work with Obama? Looking back to 2015, Obama succeeded in reaching [music] an agreement with Iran through diplomacy without resorting to military action."
By contrast, during Trump's [music] presidency, tensions between the United States and Iran escalated at times [music] and resulted in the use of military force.
According to those who support Obama, reaching consensus with Trump is difficult because they believe he places too much emphasis on power and his own interests. Many people wonder why, if parties [music] wish to build an agreement with the United States, they cannot simply invite Trump to participate and work toward [music] common ground. From this perspective, some argue that Obama continues to enjoy broad trust and credibility.
Some even believe that his public image [music] has become increasingly positive, particularly because he was the first black president of the United States. Although Obama no longer holds office, many people still regard him as one of the most notable leaders the United States has ever had.
Those who follow public discussions often observe that Obama receives more praise and public affection than negative criticism.
Not only in the United States, but also in many parts of the world, Obama is still viewed as a leader capable of engaging in dialogue and seeking [music] solutions through negotiation.
Those who hold favorable views of him argue that when Obama participates in negotiations, he generally aims to resolve issues through consensus rather than creating unnecessary confrontations. [music] Meanwhile, Trump has criticized the Iran nuclear agreement reached under Obama's administration, [music] arguing that it allowed Tehran to move closer to developing nuclear weapons capabilities.
Based on this assessment, some people believe that Trump is implicitly suggesting that Obama made excessive concessions to Iran.
However, Obama's supporters question how a diplomatic agreement could be viewed as something that harms the United States.
In their view, [music] the purpose of the agreement was to control Iran's nuclear program, not to encourage [music] the development of weapons.
At the same time, some argue [music] that Trump opposes Iran possessing weapons that could be used in conflict.
However, his critics [music] contend that his administration also relied on military force in confrontations [music] with the very actors it sought to contain.
From this perspective, Trump is seen as someone who always wants to maintain maximum control over international affairs.
Another topic that is frequently raised concerns [music] Trump's relationship with Canada.
Some people argue that he made statements that many Canadians [music] found uncomfortable, including suggestions related to Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States.
Although this was not a practical [music] proposal, such remarks prompted opposition from many Canadians who viewed them as inconsistent [music] with their country's sovereignty.
According to this viewpoint, if a leader cannot effectively manage domestic [music] economic issues, the economy will face significant challenges.
>> [music] >> Trump's critics argue that extending influence into Canada would not solve the United States internal difficulties [music] and could instead create additional pressure for both countries.
They contend that if such ideas were ever implemented, both the United States and Canada could face complex financial, administrative, and social challenges.
This is also one of the reasons why many Canadians do not feel aligned with Trump's views. In their opinion, his policies [music] and statements often make matters more difficult for partners rather than helping them achieve their objectives.
A segment of the American public has also expressed disappointment, feeling that their lives have become increasingly [music] difficult.
They ask why, if a leader truly wishes to serve the people, so many families continue to face significant economic pressures. [music] These individuals argue that their lives have become more challenging >> [music] >> and hope that the government will focus more attention on domestic needs.
From this perspective, some believe that Iran does not view Trump as someone capable of meeting its expectations in negotiations.
>> [music] >> As a result, they place greater trust in Obama because he is perceived as calm, cautious, and more moderate in his leadership style.
According to this view, [music] working with Obama is considered easier than negotiating with Trump.
Some people also speculate that Iran [music] may see an opportunity to build a better relationship with the United States if a figure such as Obama were to continue playing an important role [music] in political life. They argue that if presidential term limit rules were changed [music] and Obama were able to run again, he could still receive substantial support from voters.
According to those who hold this perspective, an Obama victory could create opportunities >> [music] >> for more positive cooperation between the United States and other countries.
Conversely, they worry that if Trump continues to play a leadership role, international relations could [music] face additional tensions.
For this reason, they believe that Obama [music] is better suited to participate in discussions concerning US-Iran relations.
They argue that he has the ability to listen [music] and resolve disagreements through dialogue, while expressing concern that Trump may make unpredictable decisions.
Trump's critics also maintain that a leader should place the interests [music] and well-being of citizens above all else. In their view, the people are the ones who grant authority to government through their votes, and therefore, the president's foremost responsibility is to serve the public interest.
Based on all of these arguments, those who hold this perspective conclude that Donald Trump [music] is exercising presidential power in a manner that they believe does not fully align with the expectations of many Americans.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











