International military alliances require continuous strategic reassessment, where decisions about troop deployments reflect broader geopolitical considerations and alliance obligations, as demonstrated by the US pledge of additional troops to Poland despite previous policy reversals.
深度探索
先修知识
- 暂无数据。
后续步骤
- 暂无数据。
深度探索
Trump pledges extra troops for Poland as Rubio cautions allies本站添加:
This is not a decision that was made on the back of a napkin. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned NATO allies that the number of US troops in Europe will change hours after President Donald Trump surprised them by pledging thousands of troops would be sent to Poland. But Rubio said such decisions were technical, not political. First of all, the United States has global commitments for our military. So, we are constantly reevaluating where we're positioning forces. I think, you know, what's happening now is that any decision that's announced or made is viewed through the broader context of some of the, you know, the frictions that we've had in recent months. Trump announcing a plan to send an extra 5,000 troops to Poland appeared to be an about-face. It came a week after the Pentagon said it was canceling the deployment of thousands of troops there.
On Friday, NATO allies and Secretary General Mark Rutte applauded the shift.
Our military commanders are working through all the details, but of course I welcome it.
Um but let's be clear. Uh the the trajectory we we are on, which is a stronger Europe and a stronger NATO, making sure we will over time, step by step, be less reliant on one ally only as we have been for so long, which is the United States. It was Rubio's first meeting with NATO allies since the war on Iran sparked deep divisions inside the block with Trump saying he was considering withdrawing from the alliance. In a in a moment of conflict >> Rubio cautioned NATO ministers that Washington's frustration with some of them would still need to be discussed.
>> If you go back 30 years, there's never been a time in which there hasn't been a debate in American politics about what our presence and our contribution to NATO should be. And that is always driven by what is the value of NATO to the United States. I understand NATO's valuable to Europe, and it should be. It also has to be valuable to the United States. Trump has fiercely criticized NATO members for not doing more to help the US-Israeli military campaign on Iran. On Friday, Rubio said the US had not asked NATO for help on the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's oil and natural gas moves. But, he said there needed to be a plan B if Iran refuses to reopen the waterway. He said the US has seen some progress towards a deal with Iran, but more work is required.
相关推荐
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











