A legal dispute has arisen between the Zambian government and the Lungu family over custody of former President Edgar Lungu's remains, with the government challenging a court order that would return the remains to a private mortuary, arguing that the family failed to take necessary legal steps regarding their lapsed appeal and that the order was granted ex parte in their absence.
深度探索
先修知识
- 暂无数据。
后续步骤
- 暂无数据。
深度探索
LUNGU FAMILY BLAMED IN REMAINS DISPUTE本站添加:
South Africa's Pretoria High Court is expected to hear a legal showdown tomorrow, Thursday, April 30th, 2026, between the Zambian government and the Lungu family over who should have custody of former President Edgar Lungu's remains.
The Zambian government has since moved to challenge a recent urgent ruling that compelled it to return the remains to private mortuary.
The ruling was issued shortly after authorities acted on the August 2024 High Court decision, which granted the government authority to repatriate the former president's body for state funeral and burial.
Several applications have since been made in relation to the matter.
In its latest application, Two Mountains Burial Services has accused the Lungu family of being the authors of their own misfortune, arguing that the family failed to take the necessary steps regarding their lapsed appeal pending before the Supreme Court of Appeal.
The burial service further submitted that the Lungu family had been called upon to file a condonation application together with an application to reinstate the lapsed appeal within 24 hours, failing which the government would proceed to execute the August 8th, 2025 court order.
Two Mountains contends that the Lungu family's ex parte urgent application constitutes an abuse of court process and has urged the court to order the applicants to pay costs on a punitive scale, including counsel fees.
On the other hand, the Zambian government argues that the order directing the return of the body to the Lungu family was granted ex parte in the absence of the government of Zambia on April 22nd, 2026, and should therefore be reconsidered and set aside. It further argues that the members of the Lungu family are not residents of South Africa and have both the capacity and motivation to move the late president's body outside the Republic of South Africa.
The government adds that if such action proceeds as it believes is already underway, it would cause irreparable harm.
Justin Tamanins.
相关推荐
BREAKING: Judge Kathleen Issues Emergency Arrest Warrant After Trump Defies Order
Frontora
2K views•2026-05-29
Trump Impeachment STORM IGNITES as 29 Judges Vote for Conviction!!
DanielBriefDaily
2K views•2026-06-02
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में 5 जजों का शपथग्रहण समारोह #supremecourt #judges #oathceremony #shorts #ytshorts
Bharat24Liv
4K views•2026-06-02
THE STREISAND EFFECT AT BARBARA STREISAND’S HOUSE! - First Amendment Audit
KULTNEWS
1K views•2026-05-30
EBK Jaaybo Won’t Be Going To Trial?! | Criminal Lawyer Reacts
floridadefenseteam
404 views•2026-05-29
OFFICE HOURS: The Theft of Black Brilliance... AI and Intellectual Property (w/ Lisa E. Davis)
marclamonthillnetwork
2K views•2026-05-29
Monkton family worries husband who murdered wife could inherit all of her assets
WMAR2news
152 views•2026-06-02
Jury seated in the Frisco Track Meet stabbing trial — opening statements set for tomorrow
Wfaa8
343 views•2026-06-03
热门趋势
Why Batman Lets The Joker Live 🤨
zackdfilms
9222K views•2026-05-30
They're Complete Trash
penguinz0
558K views•2026-06-04
The Murder of Deputy Caleb Conley
MidwestSafety
810K views•2026-06-04
I Bought FAKE HopeScope Merch (and paid a subscriber to give it a makeover) | Hopeful Hauls
HangWithHopescope
158K views•2026-06-04











