Southwest Airlines has revised its plus-size passenger policy multiple times, initially requiring passengers who couldn't fit in one seat to purchase a second seat in advance without guaranteed refunds, then changing to allow airport agents to provide additional seats at no extra cost when adjacent seats are available, though passengers may be bumped to a later flight if the plane is full.
Deep Dive
Voraussetzung
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Nächste Schritte
- Keine Daten verfügbar.
Deep Dive
Southwest changes ‘plus-size’ policy againHinzugefügt:
Remember that new Southwest plus-size passenger policy that ticked off a lot of people?
>> It feels a little unfair. It seemed kind of fair that the financial responsibility would fall on me.
>> Well, the airline is already changing course.
Earlier this year, I told you about Southwest updating its long-running customer of size policy.
Before that happened, passengers who needed extra room could request an additional seat for free at the airport or buy one ahead of time and usually get that money back later.
But under the new rule, Southwest said that passengers who couldn't fit within the armrest of one seat should buy a second seat in advance, and refunds were no longer guaranteed. So, of course, that did not go over well. Critics said Southwest was walking away from one of the most inclusive airline policies in the country, and travelers raised concerns about gate agents being put in the uncomfortable position of deciding whether someone fit in a seat.
So now, Southwest is updating the policy again.
The airline says, quote, "On flights where adjacent seats were available, our agents at the airport are empowered to provide an additional seat at no extra cost to customers who require one."
But, there is a catch.
If the flight is full, you may not get on your original flight. Southwest says it will work to accommodate you on a later one.
So basically, Southwest is still encouraging passengers who know they need extra space to book that second seat ahead of time, but they are no longer requiring it. That feels like the airline is trying to walk back on this without fully going back.
So, what do you think? Does this fix the problem or did Southwest get it wrong from the start?
Ähnliche Videos
She Lost Her Car... But We Still Helped Her!
RecoveryBoyz
129 views•2026-05-30
Deadly Got Talent Auditions You Should NEVER Try at Home!
gottalentglobal
5K views•2026-05-29
Cozy Cottage Jazz | Warm Morning Cafe Ambience 🌸
villagejazzhouse
846 views•2026-05-29
DeBoer Wants Alabama Tougher, Texas Tech Calls out the Texas Longhorns | TNR 5/29/26
NextRoundLive
2K views•2026-05-29
Smart Working Techniques for Faster and Safer Jobs Part 54✅ #construction #adamrose #workers
worksmart-98
2K views•2026-05-29
LIVE: Move Into Friday with Special Guest Ed O'Brien | Morning Becomes Eclectic
kcrw
778 views•2026-05-29
On Bended Knees - Jekalyn Carr (Official Live Worship)
halalafrika
7K views•2026-05-29
Black Hills To Badlands In A Nova Bought SIGHT UNSEEN-Going To Towns Tour with HUNDREDS of CLASSICS!
ViceGripGarage
52K views•2026-05-29
Trends
Why Batman Lets The Joker Live 🤨
zackdfilms
9222K views•2026-05-30
They're Complete Trash
penguinz0
558K views•2026-06-04
The Murder of Deputy Caleb Conley
MidwestSafety
810K views•2026-06-04
I Bought FAKE HopeScope Merch (and paid a subscriber to give it a makeover) | Hopeful Hauls
HangWithHopescope
158K views•2026-06-04











