The Supreme Court's refusal to intervene in redistricting cases due to proximity to filing deadlines, even when a Trump-appointed justice acknowledged the maps were racist, demonstrates how procedural rules can prevent judicial review of discriminatory voting practices.
Install our extension to search inside any video instantly.
Jasmine Crockett EXPOSES "Racist" Voter Maps! 😳Added:
They were going after the new maps that we ran on in March. Guess what? I had already been in litigation over the previous maps because they were problematic and it was a Trump appointed justice who agreed that even what they were doing in this moment was racist.
But four days before our filing deadline, that was when the Supreme Court decided to say, "Nope, we're not going to deal with this. It's too close to the filing deadline and therefore we won't touch it." But we know that they've changed their tune as it relates to say votes that have already been cast.
Related Videos
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29
