Mali's military government under Assimi Goïta has firmly rejected negotiations with armed insurgent groups, maintaining that military force alone is necessary to restore peace and sovereignty, despite warnings from former officials that this approach has reached its limits and that dialogue may be essential for lasting stability.
深掘り
前提条件
- データがありません。
次のステップ
- データがありません。
深掘り
BREAKING: No Negotiations — Only Surrender | Goïta Draws a Hard Line追加:
What happens when a former senior minister openly says the military government can no longer lead Mali toward peace and the government responds with a direct refusal to negotiate with armed groups.
That is the political storm now building inside Mali and the implications could reshape not only Mali but the entire balance of power across the AES alliance. Welcome back to the Africa News channel. If you're new here, make sure you like this video, subscribe, and turn on notifications because the political temperature inside the Sahel is rising fast.
In a recent interview with France 24, former Malian Justice Minister Madu Ismaela Konate delivered a serious warning about the direction of the country. According to him, the current military-led authorities under Asimig Goita are no longer capable of leading Mali toward lasting peace using military force alone. He argued that the all military strategy has reached its limits and suggested that negotiations with insurgent groups may now be the only realistic path forward.
>> The option taken by the military ha to terminate the Algeria's agreements on one hand to want to bring this debate on the agreements back to Bamako and ultimately to do nothing about all the all this has put us in a rather difficult context from a military point of view from a strategic point of view.
We exposed ourselves regarding the recapture of Kdal which was praised at one point. But this recapture of Kal was after a rather tough battle with support from the Russian militias at that level.
But it was not at all about regaining control of Kedal if we had not truly undertaken political actions in Kedal, notably reconnecting with the communities of Kedal. For 6 years that this military hunter had been leading Mali, there has been no option other than military. And this military option that allowed us to take control of Kdal which we lost under difficult and unacceptable conditions is a sign today that this all military approach does not work. The diplomatic options that involved cutting off from the entire world first with on the domestic level with the posit the the political actors on the external level with everything surrounding us and at the level of the international community. This rupture today is an absolute nonsense. Mali and Malians are being exposed to conditions where an all military approach is not effective. The old military approach has shown its limits and Malians need to realize today that there is another option which is the option of dialogue, the option of peace and the option of dynamics that allow us to fight against terrorism today. This dialogue is necessary. It is crucial and it applies to all parties. No one will prevail through force.
>> Do you realistically think that Aimigi Goita will agree to step down?
>> So two things that he does not agree to step down is one thing and that he wants to lead Mali to the brink is a second thing that must be unbearable for the Malians.
>> Mali is in mortal danger.
>> Of course, Mali is in mortal danger.
That's not all. The worst part is that we Malians are being exposed to mortal danger as soon as an inexplicable end was put to the dialogue between the Malians from the north and the south. As soon as people are prevented from expressing their opinions, as soon as rights are violated, it becomes unbearable today to see a regime that has no other proposal, no other offer for Mali, for the Malians than the abyss. That statement alone is explosive in today's Mali because for years the current authorities have built their legitimacy around one central promise.
Restoring sovereignty, crushing terrorism, and rejecting foreign controlled political solutions.
The military government positioned itself as the force that would finally do what previous civilian administrations failed to achieve. And across much of the country, many Malians supported that message, especially after years of insecurity, foreign military presence, and political instability.
But now, a former insider is openly questioning whether the strategy is working, and the response from the government was swift and firm. The Malian authorities made it absolutely clear that no dialogue is being considered with what they describe as terrorist groups responsible for years of bloodshed and national suffering.
>> The armed groups have received support from both internal and external sponsors who provide intelligence, logistical means and recruit terrorists or in any case mercenaries who call themselves terrorists.
Some of these sponsors even act openly like Ukraine which has publicly claimed its logistical support for terrorists operating in the Sahel. Before we continue with full speech, this is Mali Foreign Minister Abdullah briefing on what happened on April 25th. As you have already learned through the government's official statements, Mali was the victim on Saturday, April 25th, 2026 of complex coordinated and planned terrorist attacks with both internal and external sponsors against several cities in our country.
These attacks caused casualties both civilian and military among whom was the late army general Sadadio Kamar, Minister of State, Minister of Defense and Veterans Affairs whose passing was detailed in the transitional government statement dated April 26th, 2026.
In his memory and in memory of all the victims of these barbaric and terrorist attacks, I would like to invite you to observe a minute of silence.
Thank you.
Mallay.
The people of Mali, Malian men and women and friends of Mali continued to mourn the illustrious departed Army General Sadadio Kamar whose character was beyond reproach.
His exemplary career.
His patriotic commitment and ultimate sacrifice have now made him a national hero.
I reiterate the transitional government's sincere gratitude for the many messages, calls, statements, testimonies, and other expressions of sympathy, compassion, condolences, and support received from the international community during this tragic time.
However, I cannot help but point out that certain international organizations mandated to defend human rights as well as supposed international NOS's which claim to defend human rights were strangely silent when Mali was attacked on April 25th.
Yet, on the other hand, they suddenly regained their voice to issue selective condemnations following the opening of an investigation and the subsequent arrests.
It is always regrettable to see the continued politicization of this issue of human rights accompanied by selective condemnations that are often motivated by underlying geopolitical intentions.
To return specifically to the attacks, I would now like to provide the following detailed observations.
First, the alliance between terrorist groups and certain armed groups operating in the northern regions of Mali is no longer in any doubt.
The parties involved themselves claim responsibility for this evil coalition.
This confirms what the transitional authorities have been repeating since the attack on the boat, the Tombuk 2 September 7th, 2023.
Next, it should be noted that the complexity of the attacks, their coordination, and the number of terrorists involved confirm the change in the modus operandi of the terrorist groups initiated a few months ago. First, you witnessed it as an attempt to suffocate the national economy.
This cynical plan failed thanks to the responsiveness of the armed and security forces and their partners.
A contingency and response plan by the national authorities was implemented effectively.
These attacks are not isolated incidents. As you know, they are part of a vast plan to destabilize Mali and also an attempt to replace the executive branch.
The Malian executive by the terrorist horde, hence this unnatural alliance through this coalition of armed terrorist groups.
What happened on April 25th was aimed at nothing less than decapitating the country's leadership.
There were two major targets that were aimed at.
The first was the residence of the head of state in Kati.
Two car bombs targeted this residence.
One exploded, one was shot at and then exploded. The second due to its response was unable to detonate.
So the target was wellnown.
The second unfortunately was the car bomb that exploded at the residence of the Minister of State, Minister of Defense and Veterans Affairs. You know the rest. I believe the primary objective and ultimate goal was unmistakably clear to everyone involved.
to replace the leadership in order to bring in individuals who are certainly directly under the financial influence of foreign powers that only seek to destroy. The drive to rebuild our country, our country's choice to take its destiny into its own hands, to assume its sovereignty, to ensure its security, to develop independently in Mali, in the region, and on the international stage. And this determination cannot be broken. Our country will continue to stand tall to face challenges and to take responsibility for its decisions.
As the writer Joseph Kizerbo would say, I repeat it every time in the Ara, if we lie down, we are dead.
Mali will not lie down.
We will not accept subjugation, nor will we submit to the dictates of regional states or more distant countries who believe it is their right to decide for us who should lead our country, what decisions we should make. That decision belongs to the people of Mali. We will be able to take responsibility for them with full dignity and responsibility despite these cowardly and deceitful attacks.
In their nefarious undertakings, the armed groups have received support from both internal and external sponsors who provide intelligence, logistical means, and recruit terrorists, or in any case, mercenaries who call themselves terrorists.
Some of these sponsors even act openly, like Ukraine, which has publicly claimed its logistical support for terrorists operating in the Sahel. Others still continue to bury their heads in the sand.
For us, it is very clear today. We must understand what we are talking about when we speak of the fight against terrorism. For us, the interpretation is absolutely clear. For us, this is a hybrid war, a war waged by proxy by certain states against Mali and against the other countries of the confederation of Sahil states by attacking a mosque on April 25th.
This once again confirms that terrorism in the Sahel is political.
It has nothing ideological or religious about it.
It is also an information war in which disinformation, manipulation, the glorification of terrorism and even we go further, the laundering of terrorism are all intertwined to such an extent that those who today label the transitional authorities as tyrants are now allies. the spokespersons and the media relays of terrorist groups. And you follow on a daily basis certain media outlets that have now become the clear spokespersons providing the necessary platforms for these terrorist groups without a single voice being raised to call them to morality to reason or even to respect the law.
Regarding the responsiveness of our defense and security forces, I would like to remind you that we have found ourselves against our will engaged in an asymmetric war.
This means that unlike conventional conflicts, the Malian armed forces are not facing clearly identified enemies, but rather terrorists operating in a devious way. I would even say in a treacherous manner because some were practically wearing our army's uniforms, acting in a devious and treacherous way, hiding among the population and carrying out spectacular attacks on both military and civilian targets. This makes the fight extremely difficult.
This requires a response adapted to the threat which our armed and security forces strive to provide on a daily basis.
In this fight against terrorism, I reaffirm the highest appreciation of the top authorities of the transition, the government and the Malian people for all the various forms of support and assistance from Burkina Faso and Nijair within the framework of the confederation of Sahel states.
Thanks to the operationalization of the unified AS force, our joint fight against terrorism is bearing fruit.
Without being fatalistic, attacks like those of April 25th, 2026 unfortunately form part of the various scenarios of asymmetric warfare.
Despite the actions taken and the victims caused, Mali will not back down.
It will not back down in its determination to eradicate terrorism from our territory from the AS area with the support of Burkina Faso from Nijer and other partners notably the Russian Federation whose actions alongside us I would like to acknowledge this struggle in which the AES confederation is engaged is being waged for collective security. I would even say for our collective security far beyond the Sahel region if we have not yet realized it.
In this dynamic, the AES confederation is playing its full part and serves as a bull work against hydro terrorism. Of course, our response is not solely a securitybased one.
It is comprehensive and holistic in its approach and carefully incorporates political, geopolitical, social as well as economic and development dimensions.
However, I must clarify that the government does not consider engaging in dialogue with the terrorist armed groups lawless and faithless who bear responsibility for the tragic events our people have endured for years.
The Malian government's openness to dialogue has been demonstrated on several occasions, notably within the framework of the National Refoundation meetings and through the intermediary dialogue forums.
By further incriminating itself with JNIM affiliated with al-Qaeda, the FLA has freely chosen to take sides and to support the cause of an extremist group recognized as a terrorist by the United Nations, which added it on October 4th, 2018 to the sanctions list against ISIS and al-Qaeda.
In accordance with resolution 2368-207, we continue to welcome former terrorists who have joined the Republican framework.
I would also like to share a few words of assurance and reassurance with you.
On behalf of the government of Mali, I once again pay strong tribute to the resilience of the Malayan people, but also to the resilience of Mali's guests who live among us and whom many of you here in this room represent.
Do not give in to panic and murder. This is our response to these cowardly and barbaric attacks.
Despite the attempted overthrow of the authorities, the institutions of the republic remain strong and institutional and security continuity is maintained even reinforced with the assignment of the duties of the minister of defense to the head of state who according to the constitution is the supreme commander of the armed forces.
The appointment of General Umar Diara, former chief of the general staff of the armed forces alongside the head of state as deputy minister also ensures institutional continuity.
Operationally, the new chief of the general staff of the armed forces who has just been appointed by the council of ministers is also an act confirming this institutional continuity as well as the continuity in our political choices and the responses to be provided to preserve Mali's sovereignty and defend its territorial integrity.
Whatever the circumstances, no Malian, no head of state, no government will ever give up an inch of our territory.
We will defend our country. We will defend our sovereignty.
An investigation was also opened by the public prosecutor at the military court of Bamako on May 1st, 2026.
And the investigations carried out rigorously have made it possible to identify and apprehend both civilians and military personnel involved in the planning in the coordination and execution of these attacks.
This is to assure you that the law will prevail so that justice can do its work.
Measures are being taken to strengthen and adapt our security system throughout the entire national territory.
These simultaneous and heinous attacks have only strengthened the fighting spirit, determination, and unity of Malians around the preservation of our republic's institutions as well as the trust of Malians in their armed and security forces.
This is an opportunity for me to denounce those countries whose media serve as platforms to spread terrorist messages.
With regard to diplomatic and consular missions and the offices of international organizations, additional police personnel have been deployed.
Police stations have been instructed to increase patrols around embassies.
I will share everything with you in a moment. the contact details of the focal point at the Ministry of Security and Civil Protection responsible for coordination with diplomatic and consular missions.
The government of Mali remains attentive to the needs of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives of international organizations in Mali and we are open to hearing any specific requests from you.
We understand the obligation to protect and assist nationals.
The government has exactly the same obligations towards the Malian population as it does towards guests of Mali whom you represent.
I simply invite everyone to consider in doing so the negative impact of interpretations regarding the content or form of some of these messages on the national security situation and on the morale of our fellow citizens regarding our service by airlines. I can confirm to you that enhanced security measures at President Modivoca International Airport have been implemented and are ongoing.
There are no operational logistical constraints for airlines serving Bamakco and kerosene deliveries are continuing regularly.
I will conclude for everyone's attention with a clear message.
The armed and security forces are continuing their mission with courage, professionalism and determination.
The state of Mali stands tall.
The state of Mali is taking action.
The state of Mali is vigilant.
Mali has indeed been struck.
As the saying goes, Mali may waver, but Mali will not capsize.
Thank you for your attention.
>> The government insisted that these are lawless armed movements attacking both the state and civilians and therefore cannot be treated as legitimate political actors.
At the same time, the authorities argued that they are not against dialogue itself. They pointed to previous national consultation efforts, including the national assises for reoundation and the intermalian dialogue as proof that the government remains open to internal political discussions aimed at national stability and long-term peace. But there is one line the government appears unwilling to cross. Negotiating directly with armed insurgent factions.
And this is where the tension becomes extremely important because this is no longer just a security debate. It is becoming a battle over the future identity of Mali itself.
One side argues that after years of war, negotiations may be necessary to stop the violence and prevent endless instability. The other side believes negotiations with armed groups would reward violence, weaken the state, and destroy the image of strength the government has projected both domestically and internationally.
And perhaps most importantly, the government may fear that opening negotiations now could be seen as a sign of weakness at a time when Mali is trying to project power not only inside the country but across the wider Sahel region. Remember, Mali today is no longer operating in isolation.
Together with Bkina Faso and Niger, the country has become part of a new regional block determined to challenge traditional Western influence in West Africa. That means every major decision taken in Bamako is now watched far beyond Mali's borders. If the government suddenly shifts toward negotiations with insurgents after years of military rhetoric, critics could interpret that as an admission that the military approach has failed. But if the government refuses negotiations entirely and insecurity continues, pressure could also grow internally and internationally. So the stakes are becoming extremely high. And now the biggest questions begin. If negotiations are rejected completely, can the military strategy alone truly stabilize Mali in the long term? If talks with insurgents are eventually considered, would supporters of the government see that as betrayal or realism?
Could continued pressure inside Mali strengthen the government's nationalist image even more among its supporters? Or could this become the beginning of deeper political divisions within the country? And perhaps the biggest question of all, is Mali entering the most decisive phase yet of its postcue transition? Possible future outcomes are now emerging very clearly. The first possibility is that the government doubles down even harder on its current strategy, intensifying military operations while strengthening nationalist support and regional AES cooperation. This would likely reinforce the image of strength projected by the authorities and could rally more supporters around the government in the name of sovereignty and national resistance.
The second possibility is that behind-the-scenes channels quietly open in the future without publicly calling them negotiations, allowing the government to maintain its strong public position while testing alternative routes to reduce violence.
And the third possibility is rising political polarization inside Mali itself, where voices calling for political compromise become increasingly louder while the government continues defending its hardline position as necessary for national survival. What makes this situation so sensitive is that whichever direction Mali takes next could influence the entire Sahel region.
Disclaimer. This video is a geopolitical news analysis based on public statements, political developments, and ongoing events. It does not support terrorism, violence, or the overthrow of any government. The purpose is to examine emerging political tensions and possible future outcomes in the region for educational andformational purposes only. And before you go, tell us what you think in the comments. Should Mali ever negotiate with armed insurgent groups if it could reduce violence? Or would that only encourage more instability in the future? And do you believe the government's refusal to negotiate shows strength? Or could it make the conflict even harder to end? If you support the work we do here at the African News Channel and want us to continue bringing you deep analysis and major African geopolitical updates, consider joining the channel membership or sending a super thanks. Your support helps us continue producing these reports and growing independent African focused journalism.
In moments of national crisis, governments are judged not only by the enemies they confront, but by the choices they refuse to make.
関連おすすめ
US-Iran War LIVE: US Launches New Strikes On Iranian Military Site Near Bandar Abbas | WION Live
WION
6K views•2026-05-28
Guess Which Country Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Next! w/ Chris Hedges
thejimmydoreshow
5K views•2026-05-30
TRUMP LIVE | POTUS makes massive announcement on Iran nuke deal in high-stakes cabinet meeting
TheEconomicTimes
536 views•2026-05-28
The Silence Around Alex Coughlan | #80
RealEddieHobbs
2K views•2026-05-28
Did China Get to Marco Rubio?
ChinaUnscripted
1K views•2026-05-28
Sonko Is Now Speaker. But Who Are the Two Men Who Made His Return Possible?
djbwakali
11K views•2026-05-28
Why Was There No Mention of Israel or Gaza in The DNC's Autopsy Report
wearefindout
227 views•2026-05-29
Trump Just Got HUMILIATED... And It's Going VIRAL
harryjsisson
46K views•2026-05-29











