President Donald Trump announced that the United States will bomb and destroy Iranian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants in Tehran, every time Iran targets ships in the Strait of Hormuz using missiles, rockets, drones, or other weapons. This threat was issued in response to Iran's violation of a 60-day memorandum of understanding that was supposed to open the straits for free navigation. While US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Washington remains open to diplomatic settlement, the US will continue military strikes as long as Iran remains a threat to global shipping. Under international law, targeting civilian infrastructure such as bridges and power plants constitutes a war crime, though the US has only conducted strikes against Iranian military targets so far. Despite polls showing 60-70% American opposition to the war, there have been no significant street protests similar to those during the Iraq War.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Trump warns Iran: US will bomb infrastructure for every ship attack in Strait of Hormuz
Added:President Donald Trump has warned that the US will attack Iranian infrastructure every time Tehran targets ships in the Strait of Hormuz. So, in a post on social media, Trump said this, "From this point forward, anytime the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by missile, rocket, drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy one bridge or power plant, including those located next to or in the capital city of Tehran."
Now, earlier, the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was open to a diplomatic settlement with Iran, but warned it will continue its military strikes as long as Iran remains, quote, "a threat to global shipping."
Now, Rubio made the comments at a meeting of foreign ministers in Manila.
>> If you make a deal, if you sign on to an agreement, and then you violate the agreement, the agreement's no longer valid. That doesn't mean you can't have a future agreement, but ultimately that future agreement will have to be judged on whether or not you're complying with the conditions. And that deal called for the opening of the straits, free and fair navigation. In fact, they were supposed to put out a statement to that regard a week a week and a half ago. And instead, on the day they were supposed to put out that statement, instead of doing that, they targeted and blew up or hit a ship. So, we remain open to diplomacy. We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way, but right now they don't seem to be serious about that, and so we're going to continue to protect shipping. We think other countries should join us in that endeavor. We don't need them to, but they should because they're more impacted by it than we are. And at the same time, we are going to, when the opportunity presents itself, degrade their ability to target global shipping.
>> All right, Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan joins us now live from the White House.
So, Rosiland, the president, as I mentioned, posted on his Truth Social account. He also spoke to reporters just a moment ago. What's he saying?
>> The US President Donald Trump is arguing that he does have the right to uh carry out such strikes uh given that Iran has been violating the memorandum of understanding. That's the 60-day long agreement between the US and Iran in which they were trying to find a permanent end to the war which the US and Israel began back on February 28th.
The US president said that Iran is uh posing an existential security threat, my phrasing not his, to vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz and to countries in the region and that he has ordered the US military to hold the Iranian military to account. However, under the international law of war, it is a war crime to target a civilian infrastructure, bridges, power plants, water treatment facilities, anything that goes toward protecting and extending the life and welfare of a community. A military is not supposed to target those facilities on the face of facing international law punishment in an international law court. So, the US president has made this threat several times during the course of this war, at least three times in the past a couple of weeks by my count, but the president has not actually responded in kind. What we have seen over the past 11 days, however, have been US military strikes against Iranian military targets, which is considered acceptable in the course of armed conflict.
>> So, Rosalind, the president is going to Dover Air Force Base to witness the caskets carrying the bodies of four American soldiers who were killed in this conflict returned to American soil.
And I just wonder, I mean, are these deaths forcing the president to justify the war to the public? And I mean, is he attempting to justify the war to the public, especially now?
>> We heard the US president say in response to a reporter's question that Americans are upset about the economic cost but that they support the war. I'm not quite sure which poll the president was quoting that he says has just been released but in a number of polls that have been conducted since the war began on February 28th, the percentage of Americans opposed to the war with Iran has risen and is somewhere between the 60s and 70% range. So I'm not quite sure whether this is a new poll that the president is quoting but that said what you have not seen in tandem with the overall opposition to the US led war against Iran is a wave of street protests or demonstrations similar to what we might have seen during the course of the war against Iraq over that 20-year period. We saw notable tens of thousands of people filling the streets in the United States over various points as well as that million-person march in London at the beginning of the war in 2003. You haven't seen that kind of outpouring or demonstration of opposition to the war in the US in this conflict. It's simply turning up in opinion polls.
>> All right, that was just here is Rosalind Jordan for us there on the North Lawn of the White House.
Rosalind, thank you.
Related Videos

COP27- Jagan Chapagain, Secretary General of the IFRC
AfDBGroup
104 views•2022-11-10

The ABC spends a day on the campaign trail with WA Opposition leader Shane Love | ABC News
abcnewsaustralia
2K views•2025-02-24

S. Jaishankar Says India Facing Challenges of Terrorism Amid Rising Security Concerns
newsxlive
678 views•2025-05-09

Mayor addresses decrease in violent crime in 2024
WMAR2news
237 views•2025-01-07

Strengthening Human Rights Through Youth Engagement
NationalEndowmentforDemocracy
306 views•2019-12-10

Jeremy Corbyn speaking at event organised by the independent group of Bradford
Overseastimesnews
286 views•2026-04-22

LIVE: Trump to Non-Citizens, "Register in 30 Days or Get Deported" | Firstpost America | N18G
Firstpost
3K views•2025-04-14

Day 809 - Saudi prince tells ToI Israel needs to start being 'normal'
TimesofIsrael
4K views•2025-12-23
Trending

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Steam and Xbox Just Dropped The Hammer On PlayStation
OhNoItsAlexx
9K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23

SuperBike Factory Has Gone... What's Next for the Motorcycle Industry?
thatbikersimon
11K views•2026-07-22