50 Cent Said One Honest Thing And They Put HIM On Trial

[00:00:00]Why are you trying to take custody from this woman that you nutted in? Here's my question. Why are you doing that?

[00:00:05]>> That's the question, fellas. That is the entire room in one sentence. A man says one honest thing about his kid's mother, and somehow he's the one on trial. Not her, him. I watched this whole panel back, and by the end, I figure out something that nobody in that room wanted to admit. Not one of them could actually argue with what 50 said, so they argue with how he said it instead.

[00:00:27]Let me show you exactly what it happens.

[00:00:30]>> It feel like it's special because this is my son's mom in the actual thing, but we haven't had any intimacy for 12 years.

[00:00:39]>> She can be out back with the dog for all that >> to be honest with you. You know, and she's the only person that we didn't get into the documentary that I wish we did because it would be the person that's there that wasn't a victim.

[00:00:52]>> That wasn't a victim.

[00:00:53]>> No.

[00:00:55]See, there's when you think of women, we go women empowerment and for women, but let's not forget that there's some hoes, >> right?

[00:01:10]>> Just realiz there's people that are there and they're looking for these things like they look for that. So they she's just getting what she what she actually would. If you met at the present moment, check out the only fans, man.

[00:01:29]>> It's up 85%.

[00:01:33]>> Let's talk about work. So she's achievable when she's after. Trust me.

[00:01:38]>> I just want to say about Daphne that we we did reach out to Daphne. She was not in the film for that was her own choice to not be in this film. Quick context, fellas. 50 Cent and the Fain Joy share a son. They split more than a decade ago.

[00:01:51]A tape recently leaked involving the Fain and one of the names attached to the whole Diddy situation. And Fifty, who produced an entire documentary about Diddy, got asked about it in a premiere.

[00:02:01]He did not dodge it. He said she's not a victim. He said they had not been together in 12 years. And then he said this, >> "She can be all bad for the dog for life to be honest with Then he told the crowd to go check her Only Fans because it was up 85%. And this panel sits down to decide whether he crossed the line. And watch how quickly the question, did he lie? Turns into he was mean. It's true, but it's shrewd. Here is the first move they make.

[00:02:28]>> Was any of it the truth?

[00:02:30]>> It's not about whether this truth. I could say the truth about anybody. If I if I feel like I don't like her, I can say to the camera, "Yeah, that girl, I don't like her. It's the truth." Yes, but it's also rude. Rude as [ __ ] >> Two things can be true at the same time.

[00:02:48]Two things will be correct.

[00:02:49]>> Stop right there. Listen to what just happened. They're not saying that he lied. They're just saying that it's true, but it is rude. So, we have already skipped the only part that actually matters. Is it true? And everybody at that table just quietly agreed that it is.

[00:03:03]>> But we're looking for the truth here.

[00:03:05]>> It's not about whether this the truth. I could say the truth about anybody. It's not about whether it's true. Coming from the same people who 5 seconds earlier said that they were looking for the truth. You can't have it both ways.

[00:03:17]Either his statement is false in which case prove it or his statement ain't true. In which case you have nothing left but your feelings about the volume he said it at. And I always say this, the truth doesn't care about your feelings. It doesn't care about mine either. A fact is not less of a fact because it stings. That is the whole adult skill. sitting with something true that you wish was not true instead of getting mad at the person who said it out loud. But here's the part that actually gives the game away. Imagine it was a woman on that stage saying something blunt and ugly but accurate about her baby father. You think that same room would spend 20 minutes for her show? No. They lock onto the point and they argue the point. They would call it strength. They would call it speaking her truth. The torn police only shows up when the person catching the smoke is a man and the person being protected is a woman. That is not a coincidence. That is the entire pattern and we are going to see it three more times before this clip is over. And shout out to 50 for what might be the most savage product endorsement in human history. Most exes block your number. This man pulled up the analytics.

[00:04:24]Her only fans is high up 85%.

[00:04:29]Sir, that is not a dish. That is free marketing. He did her a numbers favor and insulted her in the same breath.

[00:04:36]Multitasking that [ __ ] Anyway, back to the trial of Curtis Jackson. This next part I had to rewind because the defense walks directly into a wall and does not feel it. One of them is defending 50 saying he did not really say anything bad about her. And then she adds five words.

[00:04:51]>> He didn't say anything bad about her.

[00:04:53]>> Yeah, he did. Even though she probably deserves it.

[00:04:57]>> Stop. Stop. Stop. So, you just >> you just you just said >> there's nothing wrong with it, even though she probably deserves it. That's what you just said. I just want to make sure I >> No, no, no. I was repeating you saying that there was nothing wrong with it.

[00:05:08]>> Okay, >> that's what you said. I didn't say anything wrong with the video.

[00:05:11]>> There it is. The defense agrees with 50 out loud while trying to sound like the reasonable one in the room, even though she probably deserves it. That is not me saying it. That is not 50 saying it.

[00:05:22]That is our own side letting the truth slip out while performing the high road.

[00:05:26]And that's exactly why I kept laughing throughout this part because even the people guarding her can't even keep the act up for a full sentence. The honest reaction keeps leaking through the polite one. So my question for the whole panel is simple. If even her defenders think she probably deserves it. Who exactly are we all pretending 50 lied to? And I want to add something the panel never even considered. Think about who's talking here. This is 50 Cent. A man with money, a media empire, a brand worth protecting. Men in his position do not torch the mother of their own child in public for a laugh. There is no upside. The headline alone is a liability. So when a man with everything to lose stands on stage and eats that reputation here anyway, that should tell you something. He is not doing it because it's fun. He's doing it because he believes that it's true and he has decided that the truth is worth the heat. People do not put their name on a lie that cost them. So now we've got two things pointing the exact same way. his own opposition admitting that she probably deserves it and 50 risking his own image to say it and the room is still asking if maybe he made it up.

[00:06:31]Okay, now they bring out their best shot and I want to be totally fair because this is the strongest thing the other side says all day.

[00:06:38]>> So, I just feel like I feel like it's just unfair for him to do that considering the fact that he also has a past. Was 50 Cent not a criminal at one point? Was he not does not have violent tendencies that he got in trouble for?

[00:06:52]Is he not on tape doing things that he's not proud of? But for him to then go on stage and judge someone else, someone that he had a baby with, is that not crazy?

[00:07:01]>> I give it to them. On the surface, that lands. The man has a past, a serious one. So, who is he to climb on a podium and grade anybody's character? And yeah, that is the moment they sound the most right all clip. But sit with it for one more second because the answer is right there. And he actually makes 50's case more stronger, not weaker. His past does not make her statement false. First of all, a man with a record pointing at a fact is still pointing at a fact. But forget even that. Here's the real difference, and it is the difference this entire video is about. 50 did his dirt and he owned it. He never once asked the world to call him a victim of his own choices. He took the weight. He served his time. He got shot. He built an empire on top of that wreckage. And he never asked for a victim card while doing it. That is what we call accountability. You do the thing. You carry the consequences and you do not ask to be excused. Now look at the other side of the table. The whole fight here is about her being handed victim status for choices she made, not coerced into made. So you cannot stand the two of them next to each other and yell hypocrisy because they did not do the same thing.

[00:08:12]One of them took accountability. The other one is being offered an exit from it. He owned his past. She's being rescued from hers. That is not the same situation. And he has a pass two is just a way to avoid noticing the differences.

[00:08:25]So the strongest punch they had does not actually hit 50. It swings right past him and lands on the exact double standard that he was pointing this whole time. Now this is where they go for the kill shot. And again, I'll set it up honestly because it sounds clever.

[00:08:39]>> When you choose to have sex with someone unprotected, you know the you know the implications of having unprotected sex with someone and then leaving it in at the end of sex, right? Okay. So, you chose to have a baby with someone when you did that, >> did you not?

[00:08:54]>> But what does H?

[00:08:56]>> So, now you have a baby with someone who you are calling a hoe on a public platform. Why would you do that?

[00:09:03]>> Why are you trying to get full custody of a child that you know someone that this hoe wants to also raise?

[00:09:09]>> You chose to have a baby with someone you thought did not have good character.

[00:09:12]That speaks to your character as well.

[00:09:15]>> But did not.

[00:09:16]>> What about Okay, I'm laughing. You're right. I can't even >> that's >> No, it doesn't. You can choose to and not to have babies with people who are not >> and that's fine. But you still have a brain and you still have your own thought process. You can choose not to have babies with people. That's a choice. You can choose not to have unprotected sex with people. That is a choice. You It's not like, "Oh, I I had to do this." You chose to do that.

[00:09:45]You're a grown man. You did that to yourself. You cannot believe nobody else. But >> what does that have to do? What What does it have to do with her choices, though?

[00:09:53]>> You chose to have a baby with her.

[00:09:55]>> Yeah, but the baby is older now. But what about her choices after the baby has arrived?

[00:10:00]>> She You thought she was going to change after the baby got here?

[00:10:02]>> Oh, wait, wait. What did she say? You thought she was going to change after the baby got here? Well, that was 12 years ago. People don't stay the same.

[00:10:11]People People grow. You're not the same person I knew from 12 years ago. The logic is if she's so terrible then what does it say about him that he picture had a child with her and now wants that child. They are trying to flip him into the unstable one the petty ex the villain. I have two problems with it.

[00:10:27]First the custody point does the opposite of what they think it does. A father who looks at the situation of his son and decide he wants that boy with him is not being vindictive. That is a man trying to get his kid out of an environment he thinks is bad for him.

[00:10:42]And let's be real about the environment because the panel keeps tiptoeing past it. We are talking about active adult content tied to the mother of a boy that's 13year-old that's about to walk into high school. A dad pushing to protect his son from the fallout of that is not the bad guy in this story. That is the bare minimum of what a responsible parent does. They framed his custody fight like it's proof he's bitter. To me, it is proof that he's the one that's actually thinking about the kid. Second, you choose her 12 years ago. is a garbage standard and everybody knows it because earlier in this clip when it was convenient for their sides they said it themselves.

[00:11:19]>> People don't stay the same. People People grow. You're not the same person I knew from 12 years ago. That was literally what you just said. So she's not >> exactly. So which is it? Either people change over 12 years in which case you can't judge his character today by a woman he picked a decade ago and says he has not been intimate with her since. or people do not change. In which case, her passion is fair to talk about. You do not get to run both arguments depending on which one protects her in the moment.

[00:11:47]The person you chose back then and the situation today are not the same thing.

[00:11:50]And pretending they are is just one more way to keep the conversation off of what's actually happening. And by the way, I love that the gotcha is you nodding her. That is the big philosophical checkmate, fellas. By that standard, half of the planet is disqualified from having an opinion about anybody. And she said, "You can't criticize her. You had a kid with her."

[00:12:09]That is not a moral principle. That is just biology with extra attitude. Be serious now. And then at the very end, when nothing else has worked, they reach for the last card.

[00:12:19]>> He wanted something that people were going to click on and he got it. But that was not necessary. That's still the mother of your child. Your child is probably going to see this video if he hasn't already. This is going to affect him.

[00:12:28]>> So you worry about this video and not the sex tape.

[00:12:30]>> Now they care about the kids at the very end. after defending his mother for 20 straight minutes. And I want you fellas to catch the timing because the timing is the whole tell. Sire being the one who actually gets hurt here. That was 50's point from day one. His exact words were, "She's not the victim. Sire is."

[00:12:50]The boy was the center of his argument before this panel ever sat down. So watch what just happened. The room ignored the kid the entire clip while they defended the mother and only picked him up at the buzzer once he became a useful thing to swing at 50 with. If that child was really the priority, he would have been the priority from the first sentence. But he was not. He was the closing argument. And that exposes what the outrage was actually about this whole time. It was never really about protecting the child. It was about protecting the mom. And S was just the most sympathetic weapon left in the drawer when the real arguments ran out.

[00:13:25]And here's the uncomfortable part.

[00:13:27]Nobody at that table wanted to say the thing that follows that kid into school.

[00:13:31]The thing his classmates can pull up on the phone. That did not come from 50 saying it out loud. It was already there. The choices came first. Being honest about how a child ended up in that position is not what damages him.

[00:13:43]The position damaged him. You can be mad at the man describing the fire if you want, but the fire was lit by somebody else. You want to know how I am so sure that this was never about decency? Run the tape backwards in your head. Put a woman on that stage saying something just as cold and just as accurate about the man who fathered her kids. That room does not spend one minute on her tone.

[00:14:04]They lock onto the point and they ride for her. The lecture about discernment and reading the room only ever comes out when the blunt one is a man and the protected one is a woman. That is not a principle. That is a reflex. And once you see the reflex, you cannot unse it.

[00:14:18]50 did not get dragged for lying. He got dragged for refusing to dress the truth up in something softer. That is the only thing he's actually guilty of. But yeah, I want to leave you with this question, fellas. Forget about 50. If a woman has stood on that exact stage and said the exact brutal thing about her baby father, word for word, tone for tone, does that room call it rude or do they call it her true? Let me know in the comments section, fellas, because I think we all know the answer.