This video analyzes Canadian political discourse through two key examples: First, it examines how politicians can make contradictory statements about corporate nationality, as when Melanie Joly claimed Pratt & Whitney Canada is not American despite being owned by an American company, highlighting the complexity of defining national identity in globalized economies. Second, it demonstrates how political figures can mislead the public by confusing revenue with profit, as when Liberal officials claimed Canada gave away half the toll revenue on the Gordie Howe Bridge, when in fact the agreement splits profits (revenue minus expenses), not revenue itself. The video argues that political leaders often use vague language and misleading statistics to obscure policy failures, and that voters should critically examine the actual facts rather than accepting political rhetoric at face value.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Melanie Joly Makes A COMPLETE FOOL Of Herself During HILARIOUS NEW Interview
Added:Oh, poor Melanie Joly.
Embarrassing herself again in another interview.
And it's caught on camera, of course, like usual, like most of her blunders. I wonder what it's like in her personal life. How many embarrassing and disturbing and weird things she just says all the time to people in her personal life. I I I really do wonder.
We're going to have a look at this clip here posted by Ryan Garretson. He says, "David Reevely of The Logic just checkmated Joly. She unbelievably says she doesn't regard Pratt & Whitney as an American company because they have operated for such a long time in Canada."
>> [laughter] >> You can operate in Canada and still be American-owned, Melanie.
Put down the whiskey or the wine, whatever it is. You you you know you should not be inebriated when you're you know, having serious conversations. So, we're going to get into this. I have a couple more videos to show you, including one of Michelle Ferreri breaking down the Gordie Howe Bridge deal.
And a clip from Brian Lilley, who is starting to redeem himself a little bit.
And before we get into it, please don't forget to hit the like and subscribe button. Really helps grow the channel, and I appreciate you guys so much for that. Also, if you're on Facebook, come give me a follow over at The Dan Freeman Show on that platform. I know there's a lot of liberals, but power in numbers always helps.
So, let's get into this first clip, and then we'll talk about it.
>> And David Reevely, please go ahead.
>> Thanks very much for doing this, Minister. Um >> David, pleasure.
>> is uh about the the funding for um Pratt & Whitney in Longueuil.
This was the day after uh the president launched his latest attacks on uh Canadian industry and Canadian goods.
You went out and promised $34 million to an American uh defense contractor to keep jobs in Canada. Uh how is that elbows up? What are What are we thinking here by doing this?
>> Well, I don't think people in the aerospace sector would think that Pratt & Whitney in Canada is actually an American company. It's been in Quebec longer for 95 years.
And our goal is to anchor it for the next 95 years.
The Pratt & Whitney Canada facility is so key to the aerospace sector. This is where some of the F-35 engine uh engine >> Now she's starting to do the uh Carney thing. You notice that every time they start doing that they are about to basically just produce a bunch of word salad or blatantly lie.
Isn't that uh a bit interesting?
>> engines built. This is where many of the engines for Airbus are built. This is where many of the engines for Bell Textron's helicopters are built.
>> Geez, we need an uh counter when these guys start to talk.
Stop the count.
>> This is where the engines for Bombardi are built. And so it has 6,500 people working for it. It is not only important for Canada, but I must say in the entire company of RTX, which is which owns Pratt & Whitney, it is a key crown jewel of of the company. And that is why also the entire board of RTX was back in June at Longueuil and and at the facility to see the facility, but also to approve the investment. And to be frank, David, we're working on even more investments by Pratt & Whitney as they're looking at their next generation different types of engines and we think that we we can grow that number. So we will double down.
>> Okay, so let's apply that thinking maybe in a different scenarios. When MDA huge Canadian success story buys a company in Colorado, buys a company in France, buys a company in in the UK.
Are those do those become Canadian or are they American? Are they still French or are they still British? How does that work when it's a Canadian owner?
>> You see her face?
She realized she's oh, what did I just say?
Um well, here's what I think. Um well, I just made a fool of myself. Um >> expanding into other markets.
>> That's great.
When we see you know, CAE expanding or MDA space expanding and we can have even stronger also headquarter in Canada, that's what we want. We want to build our homegrown talent. We want to build back Bombardier, we want to even grow even more Havilland, we want to grow IMP.
We want to definitely grow CAE, MDA space, Telesat, all these national champions. How I see Canadian companies is both. It's first those who are, you know, Canadian not only because of course they're incorporated in Canada, but also have headquarters in Canada, very strong operations in Canada, but also those who have a real manufacturing footprint and that are key to our supply chain.
And so the definition of Canadian company is something that uh uh focused on in the defense industrial strategy uh and uh that we will continue to uh to double down on.
>> Yeah, you keep saying the same things over and over again. We're [clears throat] going to do this, we're going to do that, we're going to go double down, we're going to grow the industry.
Any of the [clears throat] industries, they're saying other things. They're saying that they're very worried about not having a trade deal, especially the manufacturing industry. They're thinking about leaving.
And once they start to get in the process of that and start signing deals like leases or contracts of any kind, it's done. And that could start happening very soon.
So, this doublespeak, this word salad, >> [clears throat] >> these you know, they're fumbling and stumbling through these interviews, it's just talk to fill in the time. They know it's it's over.
They know that they have not done what they needed to do to help Canadians.
They've done what they've needed to do to feed the bankers, globalist, elitist agenda though.
To destroy the middle class in real time, and it's happening. And I do apologize.
It was hard to even stay awake watching that. That that felt like it it was only 4 minutes. It felt like an hour.
Either way, we got through it.
>> [clears throat] >> Now, here's what a smart conservative, sober conservative woman sounds like.
So, this is a a video from Michelle Ferreri. It's posted by J GenXer.
This is regarding the Gordie Howe Bridge. They're the Liberals are accusing Pierre of lying with the criticism of Mark Carney.
Pierre lied or did he? No.
Factually, it's the Liberal whip, Mark Gerretsen, Mark Carney, and the whole Liberal spin machine who got caught.
Pierre called it exactly right on the Gordie Howe Bridge.
He goes on, but we're going to listen to what Michelle [snorts] Ferreri has to say here. She breaks it down very well.
>> Well, we've got a bit of a problem. If we're going to create unity in this country, we need some truth. So, the Liberal whip is Mark Gerretsen. He's a Member of Parliament for Kingston and the Islands. The Liberal Prime Minister is Mark Carney. Mark Carney came out and lied about the agreement with the Gordie Howe Bridge. [snorts] Pierre Poilievre called him out on it. Mark Gerretsen then went on to call out Pierre for misleading the public.
>> Poilievre says Canada gave away half the toll revenue [music] on the new Gordie Howe Bridge. But, that's flat-out wrong.
>> Um no, not flat-out wrong at all, Mark.
In fact, it's 100% true.
>> Here's the actual situation. Canada paid for the bridge up front. That part is true. And originally, Canada was going to collect tolls to recover that cost over time. But, the new agreement, it doesn't split revenue. It splits profits.
>> No. No, it doesn't. So, either Mark hasn't seen the agreement either, like the rest of Canadians, uh or he's lying.
But, we now know that government officials have actually confirmed that it is 100% splitting the revenue.
>> There's a massive difference there.
Revenue is every dollar that comes in.
Profit is what's left over after the expenses. Expenses like operations, maintenance, staffing, even paying down the bridge debt itself.
>> Mark, you're the whip. Like, you're supposed to be like in charge here of your Liberal caucus and like communications of what people say.
Um it actually literally the agreement says it's not going to pay down the debt servicing costs.
You're a liar, Mark, and you called Pierre a liar. So, you need to apologize. You need to delete. And you guys need to get your together and talk to your government officials and learn how to run a damn country.
>> So, before you decide if this is a terrible deal, ask yourself, are you reacting to the facts or how they were framed to mislead you.
>> think we could have struck a deal. But Mark Carney doesn't want a deal because fighting with Donald Trump is too politically valuable for him. It's too politically valuable for Doug Ford, for David Eby. They enjoy it. They know that there is a large section of the Canadian population and it's spread right across this country. It's all the people that voted for Mark Carney that are excited about him, that think he's great, his you know, approval rating hasn't been higher. They all love him fighting with Donald Trump. Most of them retired. And so, losing your job at the local plant because trade with the US is drying up doesn't affect them. They're living off their retirement savings, which is heavily invested in the S&P 500 in New York.
>> Where is it again? It's in New York.
It Look, man, again, not all boomers, but liberal boomers are the most insane, most insufferable, childlike adults you'll ever see.
I don't know how you grew up with the like if you're a conservative boomer, you you you're unless you're in like rural Alberta or Saskatchewan or Manitoba, but if you're in any major city or out here in the East, how did you grow up dealing with these morons?
I mean, what a bunch of selfish brats.
They behave like they're five, they vote like they're five, they think like they're five.
It's unbelievable.
They just want to see Carney and Trump go at it. And even when Carney gets the floor when Trump want mobs the floor with Carney, they still just want to see the fight.
Well, as long as someone's just go saying mean things to Donald Trump, that's all I care about. I don't care if my kids lose their jobs. I don't care if they can't buy their house. It's their fault. They spent too much money.
Back in my day, we only spent buh buh buh buh buh per month, and now they're spending a thousand dollars on this and that. Well, things are a lot more expensive thanks to your vote, by the way.
A dollar used to go a long way. Now it doesn't.
Yeah, are there people who overspend?
Sure, there are people who overspent when they were boomers, too, and still were able to have something left.
Now you can't spend anything without being broke.
Everything is way more expensive.
So, no, boomers, it's not that you worked so hard and that you just saved all your money perfectly and bought a house in a horrible housing market. No, you bought a house for like 50 grand in 1980, and now it's worth a million dollars.
That's what it is.
Now, it's not going to be for very much longer, and I wonder what the boomer voters going to do when a lot of them lose a big chunk of their net worth.
Be interesting to see what happens. I'm sure they'll blame Trump for that, too, but you these They don't care about the future generations. They just They don't care about crime. They don't They don't worry about anything like that.
And they selfishly vote for what they want to see and not about what's better for the future of the country, and it's really sad. It's really pathetic. And if you're a liberal boomer, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Related Videos

COP27- Jagan Chapagain, Secretary General of the IFRC
AfDBGroup
104 views•2022-11-10

The ABC spends a day on the campaign trail with WA Opposition leader Shane Love | ABC News
abcnewsaustralia
2K views•2025-02-24

S. Jaishankar Says India Facing Challenges of Terrorism Amid Rising Security Concerns
newsxlive
678 views•2025-05-09

Mayor addresses decrease in violent crime in 2024
WMAR2news
237 views•2025-01-07

Strengthening Human Rights Through Youth Engagement
NationalEndowmentforDemocracy
306 views•2019-12-10

Jeremy Corbyn speaking at event organised by the independent group of Bradford
Overseastimesnews
286 views•2026-04-22

LIVE: Trump to Non-Citizens, "Register in 30 Days or Get Deported" | Firstpost America | N18G
Firstpost
3K views•2025-04-14

Day 809 - Saudi prince tells ToI Israel needs to start being 'normal'
TimesofIsrael
4K views•2025-12-23
Trending

2.4 BILLION Records Got Leaked...
DeepHumor
15K views•2026-07-22

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Should I buy a Sawmill?
essentialcraftsman
29K views•2026-07-22

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23