Gene-edited organisms in agriculture pose significant risks because genetic modifications can spread uncontrollably through natural processes like cross-pollination, bypassing natural selection filters that would normally filter out harmful mutations; this is particularly concerning when regulatory frameworks are weak or non-existent, as demonstrated by the case of CRISPR-edited cocoa trees in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, where gene edits can enter the regional gene pool through insect pollinators and spread to small farmers' crops, potentially causing irreversible environmental damage.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
How is this ALLOWED?
Added:Who gave the Mars Candy Company the right to edit the genetics of every cocoa tree on Earth?
>> Probably a corrupt politician.
>> In the last reel, I told you that Mars is using CRISPR to gene edit cocoa trees. Gene >> I thought that was just for humans.
>> Editing of cocoa trees is in a different risk category altogether from growing cocoa cells in a tank. Cells >> Even that is risky. Why don't we just let nature do what she does?
>> in a tank stay in the tank. If something goes wrong, you just shut it down. The problem doesn't escape into nature. A gene edited tree is the opposite. Cocoa is a cross-pollinating perennial that releases pollen year-round for 25 to 40 years. Once a CRISPR edited cocoa tree flowers near other trees, edited pollen enters the regional gene pool through insect pollinators. Yes, >> How much money does Bill Gates have invested into this?
>> Industrial plantations control their own propagation through grafting and clones, but they don't control where pollen is carried or drifts on the wind. And in Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire, where roughly two-thirds of the world's cocoa is grown, small farmers routinely plant seedlings from seed pods from their own trees. Carrying >> It just feels like corporations are trying to destroy this planet in the name of profit. But what is profit worth if there's no planet to enjoy it?
>> Carrying edits delivered by insects from neighboring trees. It's pretty concerning that you can't unwind it this on either pathway once it happens.
Genetic change is slow on purpose.
Natural selection filters harmful mutations because not many of those offspring live long enough to reproduce.
An engineered edit skips that filter entirely. The moment a small farmer germinates seeds from a nearby tree, the edit goes straight into the next generation. Cocoa takes 5 to 10 years to mature and lives for decades. If the edit causes a subtle problem, it gets multiplied across farms for years before anyone notices.
>> And this is part of what has put a lot of farms out of business because you'll have modified seeds, genetically modified seeds, and they blow into someone else's farm, and then they can have lawsuits to go after them for having their seeds on their land when nature just distributes it as it will.
>> And by then, the genetics are already embedded across the region. The question is, does anybody have the right to edit genes on all cocoa trees, including trees they don't own?
>> I mean, how close is this to a crime against humanity, especially whenever it's unelected officials making these types of decisions?
>> That's what's going to happen. How do the affected countries respond? Well, Ghana exempts most CRISPR edits from regulation entirely. As long as the company just clips out sections of genetic material and doesn't add foreign DNA, there's no application, no risk assessment, no field trial requirement.
Ghana's own guidance says gene edits present no unique environmental concerns.
>> What are we doing?
>> Côte d'Ivoire grows 42% of the world's cocoa. They passed a biosafety law in 2016 with no functioning regulator to enforce it. So >> I swear we're on the the path towards hell, aren't we?
>> When the two countries that produce most of the world's cocoa, the regulatory answer is either this is exempt or nobody's home. The scariest part of the chocolate story isn't happening in a tank, it's happening in a field. By the time >> And this, ladies and gentlemen, is one of the biggest reasons that I am running for Congress in South Carolina. You see, we no longer care about nature, and instead we have placed profit and making money over nature. And don't get me wrong, making money's fun, it's enjoyable, we all need to do it to survive, but at what cost? If we're completely destroying nature, if we're completely genetically modifying cocoa, which I love dark chocolate, out of existence, then what's it worth? What's it worth to have the entire world, but to lose your soul along the way? On November 3rd, write in Clayton Couturier.
Related Videos

EAStalk “Electrochemical sensors as a platform for improving Animal Welfare” with Dr Sofia Teixeira
euraquaculture
176 views•2025-06-20

Cesare, son of San Mauro (eng)
AkuOutdoorFootwear
608 views•2016-02-03

Why Gen Z is Taking Creatine (It's NOT for Muscle Growth)
Michealhealth
830 views•2026-04-22

Guillaume Durin - Catch and Release - Extraction and Purification of NGS Grade DNA and RNA from FFPE
Labroots
851 views•2015-01-27

Webinar: Unlocking Competitive and Sustainable Agriculture Through Plant Breeding Innovation
americanseedtradeassociati3281
319 views•2024-06-28

AI in neurology: predicting protein structure
VJNeurology
622 views•2023-07-06

Stevia Innovative technologies for cost effective and sustainable production of Reb M
ingredionemea201
207 views•2023-03-14

Biological Effects of Radiation
CDC
551K views•2015-08-27
Trending

Playstation NO DISC/NO BUY Fight Is Over...
DavidJaffeGames
4K views•2026-07-23

Steam and Xbox Just Dropped The Hammer On PlayStation
OhNoItsAlexx
9K views•2026-07-23

Americans Confused in Australia for 17 Minutes Straight
IWrocker
17K views•2026-07-23

LIVE NOW! Cellular Structure and Functions | Complete Cell Biology Lecture | Anatomy & Physiology
MukhtarAliyu-t7m
387 views•2026-07-23