International humanitarian law establishes minimum standards that must be applied in all armed conflicts, including the distinction between combatants and civilians, prohibition of indiscriminate attacks, and protection of civilian objects, with states like India bound by the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their implementing legislation (Geneva Conventions Act 1960) to ensure humane treatment of all parties involved in armed conflicts.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
"BLOOD, BORDERS AND HUMANITARIAN LAW" on "THE MANIPUR FILES" [06/06/26] [LIVE]
Added:Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, Hey, hey, hey, hey.
News, both state and central government.
foreignch.
Indianitution Right.
International humanitarian foreignis Dr. University Normal new normal.
arm conflict and order.
International humanitarian law.
International humanitarian law.
Human Mhm.
former protected armed violence between government authority and organized armed group May 3rd 2023 organiz. as group organiz Arm group unlawful implementation of international Article 3 CD International America Humistan, 2004, 2006.
Supreme Court at least.
Common article is minimum standard to be applied in all conflict situation.
Foref.
1 2 3 4 1949.
1960.
There's no law in love and war.
There's no law in the war.
use of force is legally valid or not I'm defending my use of force in different last Protocol 197 customer There should be always distinction between combatant and combatant.
distinction always 260,000 4786 house burning religious places.
Always no distinction.
No quarter order. No quarter order. No survival be left in that particular village.
There should be always between civilian object and military objective. Military objective Boom.
Low indiscrimin 1249 article is taking is prohibited in war time as well as peace time prohibited treatment.
liberation protocol 1977 applicable Okay.
Article one domination right That that was argued by the They never heard very for example 1997 selfclaration we will fight the war for the national liberation in compliance with the article 34vent okay international armed conflict nonational armed conflict International Security International humanit Sovereign statements Suspension of operation agreement.
Conventions 1960 Conventions 1949 domestic legislation Conventions Act 1960.
Indian armed forces armed.
Okay.
Suspension of operation agreement.
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Ministry of Homes, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, State, Legal Obligations, Geneva Conventions. 1960 they are bound by international humanitarian law of nonational or international armed conflict international armed conflict International749 characteriz.
Even prisoners of war, liberty, right?
humanitarian 1949 article article convention any situation of war or armed Martin's customary character civilian object Principles of necessity and proportion.
adversary.
Last minute before firing the final Four Geneva Conventions of 1949.
Okay.
Geneva Conventions Act. Parliament of India.
Ministry of Home Affairs.
Suspension of operation agreements basis armed groups are bound by common article very minimum Bangladesh Bangladesh 1971 Bangladesh Okay.
Democration Anytime.
International humanitarian India even matters.
International law.
Mhm. Mhm.
Red first world war second world countries.
complete.
internal problem.
Government information.
I wonder investig investiguring.
factor.
State level human is the basic problem.
International temporary loan.
foreign.
Okay.
Local problem.
Political Government of India. Yeah.
What are the Okay.
Government of India.
Okay.
United Nations Armed Forces Power 1950s Foreign speech. Foreign speech.
power committee of Mhm.
Tribal unity el commencement of genocide campaign by the cookie with intent to destroy in whole in part.
This is genocide.
Widespread and attack directed against M civilian population with knowledge of attack by armed group with his foreign merin bricks of convention.
Crime.
Commencement of genocide campaign.
Commencement of genocide campaign by milit We intend to destroy and hold in particular.
Prevention and punishment of genocide under international law.
Genocide intention to destroy in whole in partn group.
Never implement.
There's no single case.
armed conflict.
There's no different nothing to do with human And those are not involved in the war.
Rwanda criminal tribunal for Rwanda.
Yugoslavia criminal tribunal for Yugoslavia forbun.
War crime war crime violation of laws of wars. War crime war crimes crimes and humility trial aggression criminal court.
for Red Cross.
Wherever criminals found the country has the jurisdiction try offense.
Low is Univers not capable to fight.
law is benefit for the border party.
There are a lot of yers.
Okay, we need to Okay.
International.
human anotherche.
Criminal Court operates within the political environments.
International law cannot operate beyond geopolitical environment including institutions like UN security.
It depends upon the cooperation.
Global values terrorism.
Complicity complicity wrong forces has a History of ethnic to 1997 unability or unwillingness of the state kind of sort of warict Unability. unable or unwillingness.
ICC jurisdiction Security Council acting under chapter 7 of UN charter security number one. Number two, the state party referral is state party to state office of the prosecutor. ICC public importance evidence office of the prosecutor of the ICC of unable unwillingness mechanisms.
International Military Tribunal ational solidarity.
Not only with respect to 2023 specialty violation of not only international humanitarian law but also international human rights law even constitution basic norm article 21 of India's constitution right to life personal liberties civil society the state has failed to do its duty civil society and human rights forum civil society coalition on human rights and UNCCP report civil society reports alternate reports but we need to reach out to the political forum forum body diplomatic political situation because state has closed the doors.
But best example military tribunals world at the end of the war victors responsibility armed forces any security and all actors involved irrespective of community.
Okay.
Okay.
Even participation India population attention.
future of UN intervention basic Mhm.
Mhm.
Every force complain special Human Human Rights Committee.
Okay.
for legal aspect perspective.
Okay.
Figures. Exacttovel.
successful.
Okay.
Last option, human rights violation.
United Nation Evidence.
Foreign speech. Foreign speech. Foreign speech.
Heat up here.
Related Videos
HOA Cut MY Grandmother's Trees While I Was Gone — A 1944 Iron Pin Made It a $225K Mistake
HOAJustice-u1l
2K views•2026-06-06
Commissioner Baloyi exposed how corrupt police use IPID to fight their battles, Madlanga is angry
Evidence-d3q
9K views•2026-06-08
The $200,000 LEGO Scandal Got Way Worse
InternetAnarchist
72K views•2026-06-12
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RobertElderSoftware
2K views•2026-06-07
PRRA Refused, But The Federal Court Found The Officer Ignored Key Issues
behnoush.shafiei
185 views•2026-06-09
KARMELO ANTHONY DURING TRIAL AUSTIN METCALF DAD JEFF CAUGHT GIVIN SUBPOENA WITNESS ANSWERS🔥#MISTRIAL
AunTeaFeeabouttheFACTZ4Real
191 views•2026-06-07
Forty-Seven Percent Vanished
LavishWellbeing2026
281 views•2026-06-07
Could Criminals Exploit This Loophole? Bessent Faces Intense Hearing Scrutiny.
CONGRESSWATCH-e7x
3K views•2026-06-08











