The Supreme Court ruled that raisin farmers were required to surrender 47% of their crop under a federal marketing program, establishing that agricultural products constitute property rights, meaning government regulations can mandate property surrender as a condition for market participation.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Install our extension to search inside any video instantly.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Forty-Seven Percent Vanished
Added:47% of your raisins could be taken by the government. You think private property is simple. You grow it, you own it.
Wait, not exactly. Exhibit A, raisin farmers were ordered to hand over part of their crop under a federal marketing program.
Exhibit B, they were not choosing charity. It was the price of selling raisins at all.
Then the Supreme Court snapped to the verdict. Raisins count as property, too.
The defense rests. And that is why
Related Videos
HOA Cut MY Grandmother's Trees While I Was Gone — A 1944 Iron Pin Made It a $225K Mistake
HOAJustice-u1l
2K views•2026-06-06
Commissioner Baloyi exposed how corrupt police use IPID to fight their battles, Madlanga is angry
Evidence-d3q
9K views•2026-06-08
The $200,000 LEGO Scandal Got Way Worse
InternetAnarchist
72K views•2026-06-12
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RobertElderSoftware
2K views•2026-06-07
PRRA Refused, But The Federal Court Found The Officer Ignored Key Issues
behnoush.shafiei
185 views•2026-06-09
"BLOOD, BORDERS AND HUMANITARIAN LAW" on "THE MANIPUR FILES" [06/06/26] [LIVE]
sktvmanipur
15K views•2026-06-06
KARMELO ANTHONY DURING TRIAL AUSTIN METCALF DAD JEFF CAUGHT GIVIN SUBPOENA WITNESS ANSWERS🔥#MISTRIAL
AunTeaFeeabouttheFACTZ4Real
191 views•2026-06-07
Could Criminals Exploit This Loophole? Bessent Faces Intense Hearing Scrutiny.
CONGRESSWATCH-e7x
3K views•2026-06-08











