The Kenyan High Court upheld the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua while awarding him KSh50 million in constitutional damages from the Senate for infringing his fair trial rights by denying an adjournment during his absence, establishing that impeachment proceedings must afford due process protections and that constitutional damages can vindicate rights and deter future violations.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
Breaking News: High Court Upholds Gachagua's Impeachment
Added:Arising from all that we have said, these are the orders that we make. One, the prayer seeking to quash the resolution of the Senate to impeach His Excellency Gachagua is hereby declined.
Two, a declaratory order is hereby issued that His Excellency Gachagua's fair trial rights were infringed when the Senate declined to allow an adjournment in the impeachment proceedings despite his absence. Three, a declaratory order is hereby issued affirming the constitutional necessity for Parliament to enact a dedicated statutory framework governing the impeachment of the of Deputy President under Article 150 of the Constitution.
Four, the court makes no findings on pension and emoluments.
The first petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before an appropriate forum.
Five, the court awards constitutional damages of Kenya shillings 50 million to His Excellency Gachagua payable by the Senate to vindicate the Constitution, restore the dignity of the affected party, and deter future violations.
Five Six, parties shall bear their own costs given the public nature of these proceedings.
And lastly, for the avoidance of doubt, any prayer not expressly allowed herein is accordingly disallowed.
Before we take leave of this matter, we wish to record our appreciation to all counsel who appeared in these proceedings and all parties for their industry, diligence, and the quality of their submissions.
Your collective effort has contributed to the development of constitutional jurisprudence on this subject. We also extend our gratitude to the judiciary staff who worked tirelessly to support the bench in ensuring that this decision the first of its kind under the constitution 2010 was rendered in time. Thank you very much.
Related Videos
HOA Cut MY Grandmother's Trees While I Was Gone — A 1944 Iron Pin Made It a $225K Mistake
HOAJustice-u1l
2K views•2026-06-06
Commissioner Baloyi exposed how corrupt police use IPID to fight their battles, Madlanga is angry
Evidence-d3q
9K views•2026-06-08
The $200,000 LEGO Scandal Got Way Worse
InternetAnarchist
72K views•2026-06-12
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RobertElderSoftware
2K views•2026-06-07
PRRA Refused, But The Federal Court Found The Officer Ignored Key Issues
behnoush.shafiei
185 views•2026-06-09
"BLOOD, BORDERS AND HUMANITARIAN LAW" on "THE MANIPUR FILES" [06/06/26] [LIVE]
sktvmanipur
15K views•2026-06-06
KARMELO ANTHONY DURING TRIAL AUSTIN METCALF DAD JEFF CAUGHT GIVIN SUBPOENA WITNESS ANSWERS🔥#MISTRIAL
AunTeaFeeabouttheFACTZ4Real
191 views•2026-06-07
Forty-Seven Percent Vanished
LavishWellbeing2026
281 views•2026-06-07











