In modern warfare, targeting critical infrastructure such as energy facilities and logistics networks can systematically degrade an adversary's military capacity and economic stability, as demonstrated by Ukraine's coordinated drone strikes on Russian oil refineries, chemical plants, and transportation hubs that disrupted fuel supply chains, reduced refining capacity by 13%, and created cascading effects across the Russian economy and military operations.
Deep Dive
Prerequisite Knowledge
- No data available.
Where to go next
- No data available.
Deep Dive
DOUBLE STRIKE ON MOSCOW:Kremlin's key oil refinery burns logistics collapse & panic in Russia's rear
Added:This week Russia's so-called special military operation came home. Moscow is on fire. A refinery in the heart of the Russian capital was struck by Ukrainian drones.
Russian air defense failed its own citizens. Oil facilities are burning from Krasnodar to the Yaroslavl region.
And the Kremlin's promise that this war would bring stability to Russia is turning to ash along with its petroleum infrastructure.
We've got the footage, we've got the numbers, >> [music] >> and tonight we're going to break down exactly what this week's deep strike campaign means for the Russian war machine. Welcome to the war update.
Let's start where the smoke is thickest, Moscow. This week Ukrainian drones struck the Moscow oil refinery, and they did it twice. Not in some borderland city, not in a remote industrial region, inside the city limits of the Russian capital itself.
The Moscow refinery, one of the 10 largest petroleum processing facilities in the entire Russia.
This is the plant that according to analysts tracking Russian energy infrastructure supplies approximately 40% of all petroleum products consumed by the Moscow region.
The first strike came on the morning of June 16th, and open-source analysts were able to identify exactly what was burning.
The ELU-AVT-6, the plant's primary crude oil desalting, dehydration, and atmospheric distillation unit.
In plain terms, this is the first stage of the entire refining process.
Every barrel of crude that enters this facility passes through the ELU-AVT-6 before it goes anywhere else. And without it running, the plant's 30-plus downstream installations, the catalytic crackers, the reforming towers, the thermal cracking units, cannot operate at capacity. Ukraine did not hit a storage tank. Ukraine hit the unit that makes everything else at this refinery possible.
Then came June 18th, and the refinery burned again.
The second strike within 48 hours produced multiple simultaneous fire outbreaks across different parts of the plant. Not one point of impact this time, but a broader engagement igniting several positions within the perimeter at once with dense black smoke rising from more than one location and climbing high above Kapotnya.
The Ukrainian forces deployed a mix of systems for this operation.
Primarily, the FP-1 and Lyutyi. [music] The smoke from the fire was visible for kilometers across Moscow.
Local residents filmed it from their apartment windows, from the street, from moving cars. The footage spread across the internet within minutes.
Moscow's mayor confirmed both strikes publicly, which is itself a story.
Russian officials do not go on record acknowledging successful Ukrainian drone strikes in Moscow unless the footage is already everywhere and denial would be more damaging than confirmation.
When Russian forces crossed into Ukraine over 4 years ago, the official justification, repeated endlessly on state television, in Kremlin press briefings, and in speeches by Putin himself, was that this operation was being conducted to ensure the security and stability of Russia. The people of Russia were told that the army was going to denazify Ukraine, neutralize NATO threats on Russia's border, and come home to a safer, more secure country.
Four and a half years later, the Moscow air defense system is shooting interceptors over the capital, refineries are burning, and the mayor of Moscow is issuing statements about drone attacks to his own citizens.
The operation reached its destination, all right. It just wasn't the destination anyone advertised. And before you think this is a one-off event, a lucky strike that somehow pierced Russian defenses and will never be repeated, the Ukrainian drone campaign against Russian energy infrastructure has become one of the most consistent and consequential elements of this entire war.
These are not random acts. These are systematic, targeted, and increasingly sophisticated operations designed to degrade Russia's capacity to fund and fuel its military. Let's walk through what happened this week because it wasn't just Moscow.
The strikes this week covered an extraordinary geographic spread.
And when you look at them together, a very clear strategic logic emerges.
On June 15th, >> [music] >> Ukrainian drones struck the Azot chemical plant in Novomoskovsk in the Tula region.
Now, the Azot plant is not some small factory on the edge of town. It is one of the largest producers of mineral fertilizers in Russia.
That alone would make it an economically significant target. But the reason it sits high on any Ukrainian targeting list is the second part of its production profile.
Azot also supplies raw materials used in the manufacture of explosives.
When you are running an artillery-intensive war that has consumed ammunition at rates the entire Western world has struggled to match, the facilities that feed your explosives pipeline are critical infrastructure.
That plant took a hit on June 15th.
The same day, Ukrainian forces also struck an oil depot in Ryazan in the Yaroslavl region.
This facility was not some private fuel terminal. It belonged to Ross Reserve, Russia's state strategic reserve system.
These are the facilities that Russia maintains precisely for situations of national crisis, for moments when the normal supply chain breaks down, >> [music] >> and the state needs reserves to fall back on.
Hitting the strategic reserve is a statement of intent. Ukraine is not just targeting the day-to-day fuel supply. It is targeting the buffer that Russia would use to absorb disruption.
Then [music] came Krasnodar. And this is where the week strikes get particularly significant. On June 15th, Ukraine security service struck a major oil and gas hub in the Krasnodar region, described as the largest liquefied hydrocarbon distribution complex in Southern Russia.
This is not a small regional depot.
Southern Russia is one of the most energy-active parts of the country, and this complex sits at the center of that network.
The drones damaged five storage tanks, two loading facilities, and the warehouse and truck parking infrastructure that keeps the whole distribution chain moving.
And critically, the Russian air defense systems that were supposed to protect that facility were also disabled in the attack. That last detail matters enormously. It means the strike team didn't just get through, they also neutralized the defenses that were supposed to stop them, which has implications for every future operation in that region. And the Krasnodar story didn't end there. On June 16th, the so-called Poltavskaya oil depot in the Krasnodar region caught fire after drone debris fell on the facility.
The Poltavskaya depot serves as a critical logistics link in the supply chain between a Lukoil refinery and the network of petrol stations that fuel everyday life in southern Russia.
When that link burns, the disruption ripples outward into the civilian fuel supply, into trucking, into agriculture, into every economic activity that depends on liquid fuel, which in southern Russia is essentially everything.
Now, step back and look at those four strikes together: Tula, Yaroslavl, and two separate incidents in Krasnodar, all in a 48-hour window with Moscow as the centerpiece. And you are not looking at opportunistic attacks. You're looking at a coordinated campaign designed to hit Russia's energy and industrial infrastructure across multiple regions simultaneously.
Stretching air defense resources, >> [music] >> creating multiple simultaneous crises, and maximizing the economic and psychological impact on the Russian home front.
The psychological dimension here cannot be overstated. And this is something that mainstream Western coverage frequently underplays. When ordinary Russians watch state television telling them that the special military operation is proceeding according to plan, and then they look out the window or open Telegram and see that the Moscow refinery is on fire, that the strategic fuel reserves in Yaroslavl were just hit, that Krasnodar is burning, the cognitive [music] dissonance becomes increasingly difficult to manage. The Kremlin's information architecture depends on Russians being able to compartmentalize what they're told [music] from what they can see. Every drone strike that reaches a major city, every refinery fire that gets filmed from 30 different angles and posted online, makes that compartmentalization harder.
Let's talk about the numbers because the cumulative data here is what truly captures the scale of what Ukraine's drone campaign has achieved.
In May alone, eight of Russia's 10 largest oil refineries were hit by Ukrainian strikes. Let that number land.
Eight out of 10. Not one, not two. Eight of the 10 largest petroleum processing facilities in the entire Russian Federation took damage in a single calendar month.
And the consequence of that was measurable and dramatic. Russian oil refining output fell by 13% compared to previous levels. 13% is not a rounding error. 13% is a historic low, the worst output figure for Russian petroleum refining since the full-scale invasion began in February 2022. And the effects of that drop are cascading through the Russian economy in ways that are increasingly hard to hide.
Fuel prices are rising. Supply is tightening.
And as the briefing note for this episode puts it with some understatement, the deficits and price increases have become obvious enough that fewer and fewer people believe the television stories about how everything is going according to plan.
There is also a qualitative shift in the targeting strategy worth noting here.
And it reflects a significant evolution in Ukraine's approach over the course of this war.
Earlier in the conflict, Ukrainian strikes frequently hit infrastructure that Russia could repair relatively quickly. Storage tanks that could be replaced, pipeline sections that could be patched, buildings that could be rebuilt. Those strikes were effective in creating disruption, but Russia had demonstrated a capacity to absorb and recover from them faster than the strategic impact required. The targeting has shifted. The focus now is increasingly on the secondary processing equipment. The specialized refinement units, [music] the cracking towers, the complex machinery of petrochemical processing that is both harder to replace and crucially subject to Western sanctions.
Russia cannot simply order a replacement catalytic cracker from a Chinese supplier the way it might order spare parts for a truck. This equipment requires specialized Western technology that Russia's sanctions exposure makes extremely difficult to procure.
When a secondary processing unit at a Russian refinery is destroyed, the timeline for replacement is measured in years, not months.
Ukraine's planners understand this and the targeting reflects it.
Now let's move from the refineries to the logistics war because the drone campaign this week was not limited to energy infrastructure.
On June 17th, Ukraine's military intelligence directorate released footage of operations deep inside Russian-held territory targeting logistics infrastructure behind the front lines.
The destruction of supply routes, fuel depots, ammunition transfer points, and transportation nodes in Russian rear areas has been a consistent element of Ukrainian strategy. And the June 17th footage demonstrates that this campaign is ongoing and active.
When you degrade the logistics chain feeding the front, when trucks can't move, when fuel depots burn, when railway links get severed, the effect compounds over time appearing first as shortages, then as rationing, then as operational failures on the front lines themselves.
On June 18th, Ukrainian drones struck a railway bridge in temporarily occupied Crimea.
Crimea has been a recurring target throughout the conflict for obvious reasons. The peninsula is not only symbolically important, but serves as a major logistics hub for Russian forces operating in southern Ukraine.
The Kerch Bridge, the main land connection to Crimea, has already been struck multiple times.
And the campaign to isolate and complicate logistics on the peninsula continues.
A railway bridge is particularly significant because it targets exactly the kind of heavy tonnage military supply that trucks cannot easily substitute. Ammunition, armor, fuel in bulk. When you cut rail, you don't just slow the supply chain, you often eliminate it entirely for certain categories of cargo.
And in the Donetsk region, >> [music] >> strikes continued along the Donetsk to Mariupol corridor, one of the key supply arteries feeding Russian positions in the east.
The destruction of logistics on this axis has been a persistent Ukrainian objective, and the footage of those strikes this week shows it remains an active, productive line of effort.
What all of this adds up to, the refinery campaign, the logistics strikes, the Crimean rail interdiction, is a comprehensive effort to degrade Russia's ability to sustain the war it is fighting.
Ukraine cannot at this moment match Russia's firepower on a one-for-one basis along the front lines.
But it can, and demonstrably is, attacking the foundation that makes Russian firepower possible.
The fuel that powers the vehicles, the ammunition that feeds the artillery, the logistics chain that connects the rear to the front. It is a war of attrition fought at the systematic level, and the data suggests it is working.
Now, let's talk about where this goes.
Because this week also brought significant announcements about the expansion of Ukraine's strike capabilities.
And the contrast between what Ukraine is developing and what Russia's showcase weapon actually does is a story in itself.
Ukraine's Minister of Defense, Mykhailo Fedorov, announced this week that Ukraine is preparing to strike Russian territory with ballistic missiles. And importantly, he framed this as something in a fundamentally different category than what has come before.
This is not just an incremental capability improvement. It is a qualitative shift in the threat profile that Russian strategic targets will face.
And the announcement came with real technical substance behind it. Ukrainian company Firepoint has completed development and testing of its anti-ballistic missile designated the FP7X.
The FP7 and FP9 families of ballistic missiles are designed to function as analogs to the American ATACMS system.
But according to the company's founder, at approximately half the cost. When you factor in Ukraine's industrial scale and its increasingly mature domestic defense production, the implication is that these weapons can be produced in meaningful numbers, not just as proof-of-concept demonstrations.
At the same time, Ukraine is deploying new capabilities at the other end of the cost curve.
The Dart missile is a newly developed weapon designed for launch from aerostats, essentially tethered balloons that can maintain persistent surveillance and now, with Dart, can also engage targets directly.
This is a different kind of capability, persistent, low-cost, and capable of holding territory under surveillance and fire without the sortie limitations of conventional aircraft.
And on the interception and air defense side, Ukrainian company Skyfall has unveiled the P-1 Sun Long, an AI-powered interceptor designed for maximum precision and engagement speed against incoming threats.
The AI component allows the system to detect and classify targets at up to 1 km and engage them with a speed and accuracy that traditional rule-based interception systems cannot match.
Now, set all of that against what Russia has been presenting as its premier strategic weapon, the Oreshnik hypersonic missile.
The Oreshnik has featured prominently in Russian state media and in Kremlin rhetoric as a weapon system so advanced [music] that NATO cannot defend against it.
But reporting this week revealed a rather significant problem with that narrative.
The Oreshnik has guidance issues stemming from its use of gyroscope components that date back to the 1970s.
We are talking about navigation hardware that was designed and manufactured before the personal computer existed.
The consequence is that the missile's actual accuracy on target is considerably worse than advertised, deviating by potentially tens of kilometers from intended aim points. A weapon that costs enormous resources to produce, that Russia deploys as a centerpiece of its deterrence messaging, that the Kremlin points to as evidence of Russian technological supremacy, is in significant part guided by Soviet-era gyroscopes that would be recognizable to engineers who worked on the space programs of 50 years ago.
That contrast, Ukraine fielding AI-guided interceptors, Aerostat-launched precision missiles, and domestically produced ballistic missile analogs, while Russia's showcase hypersonic weapon relies on 1970s gyroscope technology, tells you something important about the trajectory of this conflict.
Defense innovation does not always favor the larger army or the wealthier state.
It favors the party with the greater urgency to solve problems, the greater flexibility to adopt new approaches, and the greater willingness to integrate cutting-edge technology into operational systems at speed. On all three of those dimensions, Ukraine has demonstrated a consistent advantage throughout this war.
Let's close with the strategic picture and the question that this week's events make very difficult to avoid.
Russia launched what it called a special military operation in February 2022 with a stated set of objectives.
Neutralize the threat, it claimed Ukraine represented, ensure Russian security, and stabilize [music] Russia's strategic environment.
Nearly 4 and 1/2 years later, the results are visible.
Russian oil refineries are burning at a historic rate. Russian strategic fuel reserves are being struck. The Moscow refinery, in the capital city of the operation's architects, has been hit by Ukrainian drones.
Russian logistics infrastructure, from Crimea to Krasnodar, is under sustained [music] attack. Russian air defense systems are being fired over Russian cities on a regular basis. And the Russian economy is absorbing a 13% contraction in petroleum refining capacity with sanctions protected equipment that cannot be replaced on any timeline that serves Russia's wartime needs.
At the same time, Ukraine is completing development of its own ballistic missile systems, deploying AI-guided interception platforms, and sustaining a deep strike drone campaign that has proven capable of reaching any point in the Russian Federation.
The war that was supposed to last days, that was supposed to produce a stable, secure Russia, has instead produced an adversary that is systematically dismantling Russia's energy infrastructure. And a domestic situation in Russia where fewer and fewer people believe what the television tells them.
The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense and the intelligence services have stated clearly that the strikes will continue and intensify for as long as Russia continues the war it started. That is not a threat. That is a description of operational reality. Every week that passes without a Russian decision to stop the killing is another week of the kind of targeting we saw this week.
Another week of refineries burning, logistics routes cut, and the Kremlin's promises of stability becoming harder to square with the footage on Telegram. In February 2022, the Kremlin tried to show the world it could impose its will by force.
But today, as the costs of this war increasingly arrive inside Russia itself, we want to turn the question over to you.
After nearly 4 and 1/2 years, which of its stated goals has this so-called special military operation actually achieved? And what has this bloody war truly brought to Russia?
Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
And that is the state of play as of this week.
Thank you for watching the war update.
If you enjoyed this analysis, then make sure to like this video and subscribe to our channel. We will track every development as it happens. So, stay with us.
Related Videos
126 .bikey6
mikey.bikey6
572 views•2026-06-16
Tamil Nadu Assembly | "இருமொழி கொள்கை பின்பற்றப்படும்" | Governor Arlekar | 2 Language Policy
News18Tamilnadu
558 views•2026-06-18
Rep
RobSmithOnline
3K views•2026-06-15
Cross-Voting Hits INDIA Bloc As NDA-Backed Nathwani Wins Jharkhand Seat, ZPM Makes Rajya Sabha Debut
cnnnews18
283 views•2026-06-19
WHILE TRUMP BEGGED CHINA FOR HELP — CHINA WAS SECRETLY ARMING IRAN BEHIND HIS BACK
Frumreporttwo
219 views•2026-06-18
The U.S. Iran 14 Point Memo of Agreement... What's REALLY Happening...
J.S.Candid
4K views•2026-06-17
Israel Says 'NO' to Trump's Iran Deal | Peace Deal or Middle East Powder Keg?
NEWS9LIVE
365 views•2026-06-15
Iran emerges stronger, Israel more isolated after war, analysts warn
aljazeeraenglish
65K views•2026-06-14











