civil war continues between Reform and Restore

[00:00:08]Breaking news with base and bougie. So guys, there's been a huge online civil war in the rally and it's so disappointing because we have a country to save and rather than us focusing on fixing our country, we are fighting like it's it's a a scene from Game of Thrones. We're just battling it out every day on X. So basically you have the two right-wing parties right now.

[00:00:31]The biggest one being reform and then following that is Restore Britain. Now Reform Britain Reform prison what am I saying? Restore UK have decided well has decided to do a grooming gang inquiry.

[00:00:46]Whereas reform initially said they was going to do an inquiry. Nigel said he doesn't want to do it anymore. So now there's this back and forth online. So you have people saying that Restore and Reaper are only our only hope.

[00:01:00]Personally, I don't think Restore is our only hope. And I don't think I have any intention of voting for Restore ever. If I ever end up voting for Restore, I'll be absolutely shocked. If you guys want me to do a video on why I wouldn't really support Restore as of now. The reason why I say as of now is because you never know in the future. My mind might change. Right now, I just don't have time to go into that rabbit um hole. But yeah, I'm just saying that because I feel like every time I post videos, I'm always seeing comments like, "Vote restore, vote restore." And I'm just like, I don't see myself voting for that party at all for many reasons. But that would have to be a separate video. Um, but yeah, so many people are saying that, you know, Robert is our only hope because Robert is the only person that's doing an inquiry and God bless Robert and D. And then the people that are saying that Reform and Nigel are snakes.

[00:01:45]Nigel is a snake. He's always backtracking. He said he's going to do an inquiry, but he hasn't done an inquiry. It's now 2026. I'm going to show you some tweets. So, there's one tweet from someone called Skint Eastwood who said, "No help from you. You promised to fund your own grooming gang inquiry only to go back on your words.

[00:02:03]Luckily, after being stabbed in the back by you, lot as a reform. Reaper low did his own inquiry showing he's much more trustworthy than you." And then on the flip side, you have people who are saying, you know, um that reform are doing the right thing by deciding to focus on winning an election so that they can actually do an investigation that actually holds statuto powers. And people are saying that Restore Britain are only doing this for money. I'm going to pull up some tweets. Um so one tweet says, "Spare us the emotional manipulation. He never said that. The victims deserve justice, accountability, and real structural change so young girls and boys aren't failed by the same system systematic failures, cover-ups, and institutional ne negligence ever again. Giving victims a place to tell their stories is important. Nobody's arguing otherwise, but listening alone isn't justice. The victims deserves far more than just being heard. They deserve change. And this is coming. This is a tweet following somebody said, "You called for a gang inquiry, a waste of space." After Niger said an inquiry is a waste of space. Another tweet, Maggie Oliver has spent years fighting for grooming gang survivors. She knows exactly how these inquiries work. At her joint press conference with Nigel Farage, she made it clear only a governmentbacked inquiry has the legal power to compel witnesses, access sealed files, and force institutions to hand over evidence. Farage listened. Robert Lo didn't. He pushed ahead with his own inquiry anyway, not because it could deliver justice because he wanted the political spotlight. Survivors deserve real investigation with real powers, not a vanity project. So, this is the type of war that we're seeing right now online, particularly on X, where you have people just going back and forth.

[00:03:40]People are saying that Rupert Lo is doing the right thing. Restore is our only hope because um why should we wait three years because obviously the next general election is in three years to finally do something. We should be on our feet talking about it every single day. And then you have other people saying that you know what reform are actually doing the right thing because at least at the end of those three years they can actually do something that would lead to these people being arrested. Another thing I wanted to point out was actually a back and forth between Matt Goodwin and Connor Thomas was it Connor Tomlinson that got very very heated and this is just a reflection on the um fracture on the right. So Basil the Great which is like this big platform on X. He's always pro restore. He never has anything nice to say. I don't know. allegedly he's being paid. Um, so he said, "Raheem Hassan, a man who does work for Nigel and the Reform UK, has just accused Rubert Low of grifting off the victims." Just going to insert the tweet there. Someone called Raheem said, "Restore Britain's botnet is terrified of the people who tell the truth about Grifter report low and his BMP light army." Matt Goodwin responded and said, "What is the point of a rword inquiry unless it is statutory?" And I agree. There's nothing wrong with that. This is what nobody has realized. re e low either because they are too dumb.

[00:04:52]That is so read.

[00:04:55]They are too dumb or they don't care don't really care about doing the hard yards to get the actual change those girls in their families deserve. So then Connor Thomasson responded, "Were the victims who participate participated too dumb to realize that Robert's inquiry didn't have statuto powers, Matt? Should they not have bothered to show up and share their stories? Will the reform government not use the inquiry findings to identify culprits? Are private persecutions pointless? If so, why did reform successfully threaten one in Manchester airport assault case and promise a private inquiry and has driven you to say something has driven you to say, sorry, I can't pronounce that word.

[00:05:30]I'm not even going to try. Partisanship, I got it. So easy. Has driven you to say something truly ugly here. You might think it might it makes everyone who supported and participated in inquiry look foolish but far from people will but far more people will see you as a cla was see as kas and vindictive. Why can't I read today guys? I can read.

[00:05:52]Trust me I can read. It's just been a very long day. The Matt Goodwin says your party is all over the place on everything from this to the ILR to deportations to extories and you know it. You are wasting your time. Bookmark this tweet. I want you to come back and look at this in 10 years when you realize the only thing he was doing was helping the left. And this is something I've been screaming for my lungs. This whole thing of restores our only hope.

[00:06:15]How can somebody who's literally for instance what's going on in Makerfield?

[00:06:19]Um obviously there was a poll that came out. This is like a poll of like 300 people. So it's not actually a reflection of real life. But the reality is is that Restore is taking away votes from reform. Now if Restore was taking away votes from reform and was actually in the lead, I will be celebrating. I'll be saying yes at least we have a right-wing party because believe it or not guys and you should be able to believe it if you just read if you actually look at restores policies and reforms policies there's no difference there's not a single difference on energy bills on the NHS on mass deportations they're so parallel to one another there's no difference so what's happening is Restore if Restore was in the lead and you know going headto-head with Labor I would be there celebrating Because Restore Britain is a party that is planning to implement the changes that I want and many other patriots want. But what's happening instead is that Restore are only knocking off points from reform who is this close to Labor. I'm going to put show the poll and only giving Labor a win. And this was something that I tweeted about when Restore Britain first launched and I said good on them and I hope they do win. But if this is only going to lead to Labour getting in power, we have a serious problem here. And that exact thing that I predicted is happening in the maker field where restore are not in the lead, restore are not going to win.

[00:07:39]I'm not saying this to be nasty. I'm saying this according to the polls and according to how early the party is and according to how much the woman who is um campaigning is nowhere to be seen.

[00:07:49]Rer is also never nowhere to be seen. I don't know why you guys are saying this is your only hope when the guys literally never nowhere to be seen. But anyways, that's a different story for a different day. I'm not going to bash anyone. But they're not going to win. If they were winning, I would be clapping because again, restore and reform, they're very parallel. There is no difference. This idea that oh my gosh, Rupert Low is going to be more harsh on migration. Have you heard Rert Low? Have you heard Rert Low? He sounds like an absolute Tory. He does not plan to be harsh on migration at all. I'm going to insert some clips here.

[00:08:18]>> I have never said we we should deport people who are here legally. That's not something I think we should be talking about. And by the way, I don't agree uh with Nigel Farage in saying that, you know, all these people should be repatriated. You can't once you've legally accepted people if they're making a contribution, if they're paying tax, and if they've become a properly integrated part of our community, you have to treat them with respect. Now, I Nigel always accuses me of saying I would deport whole communities of British passport holders. I've never said that, Basil. So restore only the best the only thing restore are literally doing is just taking away votes from reform and handing it over to Labor. And I have a serious serious problem with that. It's not I'm not saying this because I hate reform or I I want the English to be replaced or whatever because I see this a lot every time I criticize Restore.

[00:09:07]And this is another reason why I'm so put off restore. It's like you can't even ask questions. But I have a serious problem with that because I don't want another couple years of socialism, Marxism, Islamism. And we will get that with Labor and said, "You didn't address anything in my post. People will notice this. Like I said, your party and ship is making you swing widely. Grab for any insult you think might stake in the hopes of killing off a threat to an easy uncontested path to power, insinuating that the victims are dumb for participating in Reuben's choir should be beneath you." But he didn't say that though. Matt didn't say that. He didn't say the victims are dumb. I didn't read it like that. What he's saying is that an inquiry is dumb, which I don't think you should have said. I think inquiries are very important. You know, I don't care if someone is standing on the street with a sign saying hundreds of thousands of girls are being assaulted.

[00:09:56]Anyone who's informing the public, whether it's through documentaries, whether it's through social media post, whether it's through inquiry, it's not dumb. It's important work because people need to know just how gruesome this is.

[00:10:05]And in turn, they'll realize just how much multicultural multiculturalism, sorry, isn't working. So, I don't think he should have said dumb, but at the same time, he wasn't saying the victims are dumb. I think that's just like I don't know why Connor did that. Then, um, Matt just went ham and said, "How dare you suggest I've insulted victims of the rape gang? I've talked about the Pakistani Muslim gang every week on GB News. I've given hundreds of speeches across the country about it, including universities when it made your persona non- Greta.

[00:10:33]And I was one of the first people in Britain to demand the deportations of Jew national groomers. Let me be clear, Connor. I was calling you another senior restore activist dumb people who are grandstanding thinking they were sold the scandal by holding a non-statary inquiry that is simply too weak. You really are a horrible person. If you want the truth and justice for victims, then vote reform. Get a full statuto national inquiry and hold hold sorry all those official including officials restore is now helping escape justice by helping Andy Burnham to account.

[00:11:13]Um, so the reason why I wanted to show you guys that back and forth is because I wanted to show you just first and foremost just how much the right is fractured and also just to give you guys an idea of just how people are in two minds when it comes to how do we solve the grooming gang inquiry. You have one side that's saying let's just do the inquiry. There's no point waiting three years. There's no guarantee any right-wing party is going to get into power. So let's at least do something.

[00:11:37]And there's others that are saying it's not going to do anything. You're making these girls go through their traumas that really and truly they probably want to move on from, but they can't move on from because the people that caused them this type of trauma are still walking free and they could harm them or harm their children or harm any other women.

[00:11:55]So, I can see both sides of the argument.

[00:12:01]So, I'm just going to quickly go through a timeline of all of this. So, from my understanding, and feel free to correct me, guys, cuz I was probably like 9, 10, 11 when the whole grooming gang stuff happened. I only found out about the grooming gang stuff 2 years ago. That's how much the mainstream media did an excellent job at covering it up. Um, so yeah, but from my understanding, it was Tommy and the EDL. They were the first people to speak up about this. They were the first people to bring this to the police, to the establishment, and they did jackal. They were the first people to hold events about it, documentaries, hold protests and things like that. And for the most part, they were demonized for it, which is absolutely disgusting.

[00:12:34]That's how I came to know Tommy Robinson much more. That's how I came to actually admire Tommy Robinson. Not that I ever hated him. I just never really paid attention to him. But when I read watched his documentary, not sorry, when I watched his interview with Jordan Peterson and I realized just how much he fought for these girls, that's when my heart for him just grew. Um, Nigel Farage was also vocal about this since 2012. I'm going to insert a clip. What we have seen in Rotherham in particular is child abuse that has taken place on a scale that I think is actually difficult for decent people to even comprehend.

[00:13:11]Fear of being thought to be racist came above the interests of those young girls and I think the case is not only utterly disgusting but if this isn't political then goodness me what is. Had these offenders been from a different race, I suspect more would have been done earlier. Even when these awful practices were being unveiled, a collective blind eye was turned to the practices for fear of causing offense. And it's been hidden for far too long in too many northern cities. All those local council people, all those police officers around the country that chose to ignore grooming for fear of being called racist. What we >> But no started to be vocal about this once he joined reform. though I personally couldn't find any evidence videos. Feel free to send me the link guys of Rupert Lo talking about this prior to him being in reform. So he was in reform from July 4th, 2024 to March 7th, 2025.

[00:14:05]>> The mass of young white workingclass girls by gangs of Pakistani rapists is a rotting stain on our nation. This is not about Elon Musk. This is not a bandwagon of the far right. This is about the victims and ensuring swift and brutal justice is delivered to those demons responsible. It is about distinguishing between right and wrong.

[00:14:28]>> So it was during that period of 2024 to 2025 that Rapo started to talk about the grooming gangs. Now during this period Nigel stated that he was going to do an inquiry.

[00:14:37]>> What we need and what we're calling for is a rifle shot inquiry. one that looks specifically were gangs of Pakistani men young white >> said this on the 7th of January 2025 and he also said it on the 27th of October 2025 so he was all sitting here hoping and waiting for an inquiry time went on there was no inquiry he then said he's not going to do the inquiry even went on Gus a couple months to say um inquiries are a waste of time which triggered the internet I'm going to insert the clip here >> gang's inquiry we've had the terms of reference published this morning and I just wanted to ask you both what faith you have in the inquiry that it will deliver for victims. Uh >> absolutely none. Absolutely none. I mean I've wanted a national grooming gangs inquiry. I've done everything I can to try and push the government into it. The problem is you know any third party inquiry is a waste of space unless you can subpoena police officers, social services, civil servants who were all part you know of turning the collective blind eye. And I think everything this government has done on this issue is an attempt to literally kick the can down the road to not fully open this up. And and you know I am in touch I'm in touch with quite a few of the victims of this.

[00:15:55]Um one or two of whom want to be candidates of ours as we go.

[00:15:58]>> Now when I saw this I just thought to myself Nigel that's very very like disgusting. How can you just sit here and say inquiry is a waste of time? But it just took a little bit of research and just asking a couple of questions to understand that Nigel had a point. He has a point. They Okay, I don't like his use of the term waste of time because I stand by the fact that I think inquiries and just anyone who brings attention to the grooming gangs is doing important work. I don't care if you're even standing on the streets of a sign is still important work. So the term waste of time isn't that great. However, I do understand where he's coming from when he says you're going to get these women to relive their traumas and tell their stories over and over again. And at the end of it, there's not going to be any arrest. Why? Because inquiries do not hold statutory powers. Meaning, you cannot arrest anyone through an inquiry.

[00:16:49]You can't. An inquiry is just an information sheet telling us what happened, where it happened, why it happened, and so many other things. But in terms of actually getting people locked up, you can't do it through an inquiry. So as much as I see people so passionate about Nigel doing inquiry and I admire that we all want some kind of justice for these young girls, I don't see anything wrong with Nigel Farra saying actually I would prefer to take the route of arresting people rather than sitting down and essentially talking about something that we already know of. And I'm not saying this to sound insensitive. I hope that doesn't come across insensitive, but what I'm trying to say is we know it was bad. We know it was horrible. We know it was gruesome. We've seen the documentaries.

[00:17:32]We've heard Maggie Oliver's inquiries.

[00:17:35]We've heard Robert Low. He done a speech. I'm going to insert it after this. But we know how bad it is. Now that we know this, can we get down to arresting these? It's when I hear these stories, I want someone to be arrested.

[00:17:49]I don't want no long talking. I don't want no long talking. It makes me so angry and all I want is for these be arrested. That's how I feel. So I don't blame Nigel Farage for wanting to take that same approach. Now the reason why Nigel Farage decided she doesn't want to do an inquiry is because he spoke to somebody called Maggie Oliver. So Maggie Oliver tried to do an inquiry and guess how much it lasted her guys? Eight years. And it costed her millions of pounds. I don't know the exact figure, but it's definitely not in the thousands. It's millions. Eight years.

[00:18:19]Millions of pounds. And guess what?

[00:18:21]Nobody's been arrested. It's only now that she's been able to get a judicial, what's it called? I don't know the exact word, but I'm just going to say it here.

[00:18:28]And the reason we brought it um is because after a 7-year statutory national inquiry that cost over200 million pounds where 7,000 was well 7,500 vulnerable survivors and victims of all kinds of child sexual abuse and put their faith in a in a inx the independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation. Um that was started in 2015 and now in 2026 we are still um you know scrambling around in the in the rushers with nothing really having changed and all those people who put their faith in who were retraumatized in the hope that real change would come have been basically misled lied to and the whole country is outraged.

[00:19:13]You know what, Ian? I saw that in Ixa.

[00:19:15]Um, what the problem is, I mean, we've we've engaged a full legal team to support the victims and survivors who want to be heard. I don't need another national inquiry to know what's wrong.

[00:19:24]What I need is somebody to grab it, who wants to act. We don't need more um more more pointless talk. Um but the problem is you know we're trying to give ensure that victims and survivors have real status in this inquiry because we've already you know I know that the government are gathering legal teams and barristers and lawyers to represent all those public servants who in in my opinion have been are guilty of institutional coverups and corruption on a scale I've never seen in any other subject whilst at the same time we are not able to get them to give an answer about whether survivors are going to get that status. So we're going to have imbalance in the power of those who contribute to inquiry and they're the kind of things that at this point in a statutory inquiry they're the things that need to be looked at so that victims and survivors can be properly represented. It's no point building another catalog of 7 and a half thousand uh survivor stories which happened in on the truth project but those have no legal standing. They don't go into the evidence chain. They're just an aside.

[00:20:24]Whilst at the same time we have all those who are responsible for this neglect um and destruction of lives, having full legal teams on a you know >> on a scale that doesn't have to add up the pennies when victims are still scrambling in the background. It you know is it going to be another paper exercise is the question. And right at this moment um I haven't seen anything that makes me think otherwise.

[00:20:45]>> To court today, you've won your case.

[00:20:48]There's going to be a full judicial review into why these reforms have not been carried out. Is that the essence of this?

[00:20:53]>> It is really, Nigel. And I think it's it's important to say that the judge was very thorough, but he said that there was a legitimate expectation that uh a 7-year national statutory inquiry that cost seven uh 200 million pounds, 7,000 victims put their trust in it, that the public expects those recommendations to be implemented. And this goes way beyond grooming gangs, which is what I'm known for. This is about protecting and safeguarding every child in the country and you know we've sort of the my charity the Michael foundation we've taken this forward um on behalf of all those who are silenced who don't have a voice because and also the public in this country because most people believe that if you have a statutory inquiry those recommendations will be implemented. the government have fought for 15 months tooth and nail against the charity to say um we didn't have a case we were out of time that actually there is no obligation for them to do anything in relation to any statutory requirement recommendations so I think what we wanted to do was show transparently and honestly that promises mean nothing and as we go into now the new statutory national inquiry looking at ethnicity and grooming gangs the question has to be asked If 7,000 victims who retraumatized themselves for seven years did it for nothing, why are we going to have another national?

[00:22:14]>> That's the worry, isn't it? We get another inquiry, we go down the same process. But you've won a great victory today.

[00:22:19]>> Apparently, it's historic.

[00:22:20]>> No, you really have won a great victory today because this now under judicial review will be examined forensically in court.

[00:22:28]>> So, it was Maggie Oliver who spoke to Nigel and said, "I don't think this is a good idea. It's going to take a lot of time. It's going to take a lot of money.

[00:22:34]At the end of it, the girls are not going to get the justice they deserve, which is seeing these people arrested.

[00:22:38]These people need to be arrested. So, she explained this to Robert. She explained this to Nigel. Robert didn't listen. Nigel listened. And what I'm seeing on the internet is Nigel's being demonized more than Robert.

[00:22:54]And I don't get it. And you guys know me. I've been a hard critic of Nigel Farage. So, for me to sit here and be somewhat backing him, it's not even like I'm backing him. I'm just saying I I get it. Both are important. Inquiries or investigations are important. But if he was to ask me, I would go for an investigation if I could see these arrested. Just think about it, right?

[00:23:13]You've gone through the most traumatic, inhumane experience of your life. You're reliving it for eight years by having to retell your story. You know, I've had friends who were sexually assaulted and just for them to say they were sexually assaulted, they're shaking.

[00:23:32]They're shaking. They're they're they're crying. It It takes such a toll on you.

[00:23:37]Do you understand? They They're talking as if it happened yesterday and it happened 10 years ago. That's how much of a toll it has on a woman or a man. So imagine having to relive that again and again and again at the end of it. No one's arrested, you know. And not only that, if you think about it, a lot of the grooming gangs took place a decade ago. So think about it. A lot of these women might be married. They might have kids now. They might have jobs. They probably just want to move on from this nightmare. But the thing is, they can't move on from this nightmare because it's still a nightmare. And the nightmare is these men are still walking free. The policemen are still walking free. The the NHS staff that just told them, gave them pills and told them to f off, they're still walking free. Um the lawyers who ignored this and covered up, they're still walking free. That in itself is a nightmare. So what I would want for those women is for them to just have peace that there's some kind of justice in the world and that these can get arrested.

[00:24:33]That's what I want for these women. But again, this is not me saying that inquiries are not important. I think inquiries are great in informing the public of just how dark this is. Cuz like you saw my Piers Morgan show, you have people like that Eva and Ava girl that are going to try and downplay it and act like, "Oh, it wasn't that deep."

[00:24:49]No, it was disgusting. You were forcing these girls to have sex with animals.

[00:24:53]They were staping these girls tongues to tables and them. They were using, you know, those things that used to burn someone where it leaves a mark. Yeah.

[00:25:03]They were burning them with the the sign M as a sign of Muhammad. They were torturing these women. It's not a little little, oh, I just spiked her drink and I did something with her and I sent her home. No, they were they were putting them in dog cages. When I hear things like this, my blood boils. All I want is for these men to be arrested. I don't think about my first thought in mind isn't oh documentary inquiry interview. My first thought is who who who arrest arrest arrest and I think that's where reform are at.

[00:25:34]They've seen the information. They're probably traumatized by this information and they're just like arrest. But getting to that place of arresting them require them winning a general election.

[00:25:43]So that way they have some kind of power so that they can actually hold a national investigation which actually has statutory commission and the legal power to see these people who covered it up, participated, arrested. I don't see anything wrong with that. I just feel like sometimes people just do too much when it comes to attacking reform. And guys, you guys have watched my videos for a long time. I've been a hard critic of reform and Nigel Farage, but as of lately, I just feel like it's just been a bit too forced. And I'm too real to just jump on the bandwagon and just start attacking people because everyone no like he has a point. Let's see these people arrested.

[00:26:20]Robert Lo after leaving um Reform UK, he decided to take the inquiry route which I applaud. I absolutely applaud it you know um to take time out of your day to gather all these women and collect all the evidence. Even me just reading this evidence makes my blood boil and makes me so sad and mellow. So imagine, you know, people like Rupert Lo and Sammy Woodhouse having to do it over and over again every day for almost like a couple months now. I applaud them for it.

[00:26:46]Absolutely applaud them for it. Not only that, their argument is why are we waiting 3 years to do this? You know, there's no guarantee we're going to win a general election. Let's talk about this every day until the world knows what happened to these young girls in Britain. And I don't say this to be mean. I don't say this to attack anyone.

[00:27:02]There was some backlash about this inquiry. Um, I'm on X a lot and there were a number of people who came out on X, a number of victims who came out on X who said that they didn't feel supported in this inquiry. Now, I'm not reporting on this to bash reform. I don't care to not sorry restore. They all have the same name. Reform, restore, revenge, revive. I'm not saying this to bash restore. I'm just saying this to do my job as a independent journalist, which is tell the truth. And the reality is, I'm going to insert some tweets here. So many people have come out and said that they weren't treated nicely by some of the people who are in charge of this inquiry. Some of the people came out and said that they felt like they were just being used for press and dashed away.

[00:27:42]Some people even came out and said that they were groomed by white men and they were dismissed from the inquiry because it didn't match the picture they was trying to put out. I'll let you guys, you know, figure that out yourself. Um, I'm not sure if you guys were aware, but even a Talk TV interview came out, I think in February, where a young man said that he felt that Robert Low was just using him and his mother for the inquiry and they didn't really actually receive support. Now, this is alleged allegedly.

[00:28:10]Let me emphasize allegedly because I know Rupert Low is quick to sue people and I don't want to be sued, but I'm going to insert it here.

[00:28:18]>> I respect the rape gang inquiry. I do respect it because at the same time it might not be me. You're helping other people. But to me, it's like you're doing it for votes and I aren't interested in that. I don't I don't associate with any of that. If you're using my mom's story and me for votes, I won't be involved in it at all.

[00:28:37]>> What a brave young man. The the clamor for a national rape inquiry continues.

[00:28:42]Um, can I >> He's also referencing Rbert Low there who who uh actually pissed him off >> independently done um this he what >> he Rupert Low actually didn't uh Rupert Lo ghosted him which is very interesting information.

[00:28:55]>> Sorry I thought Rbert Low was setting up his own independent.

[00:28:58]>> Uh well apparently he brushed him off.

[00:29:00]Rupert Low made them come down there take photos with him and then Rupert Low never contacted them again. Now this is all alleged. We're going to obviously >> we'll put that to Rupert Low. He can come and come and have that discuss. uh shows you a little bit of uh behind the scenes maybe of just uh how optically illusionary some of these.

[00:29:17]>> Now, we don't know if this guy is telling the truth. He could be lying. He could be being truthful. We don't know.

[00:29:23]But at the end of the day, it's my job as a journalist to report every single side of everything. Cuz when I saw this, I was extremely concerned. And when I posted it, I got attacked, you know, even by Sammy Woodhouse herself. She commented something along the lines of, "You're just chatting [ __ ] for clicks."

[00:29:38]And I really didn't understand that because if it was reform, if someone came out and said reform didn't give us enough attention, you wouldn't say that.

[00:29:46]If someone came out and said labor didn't give us enough attention or help for the grooming gang, you wouldn't say that. If someone came out and said the grooms didn't give us enough attention for the grooming, you wouldn't say that.

[00:29:55]And this is why I'm so put off restore because anytime I even ask a question, it's like you're just attacked like crazy. And everyone's experiencing this.

[00:30:06]Even Alex Phillips, she had a whole outburst. It's just weird, you know, like let's have conversations. But yeah, when she said that, it was just like, yeah, that wasn't really nice because I'm just doing my job as a journalist and if it's not true, just just say it's not true. Just provide the evidence and that's it. Why do you have to sit here and say I'm chatting [ __ ] for clicks?

[00:30:26]It's so weird. And that's another thing is that it's kind of like damned if you do, damned if you don't. Because if you talk about grooming gang inquiry or anything related to grooming gangs, you're chatting [ __ ] for clicks. But if you don't, then that means you don't care about English victims. And I'm kind of seeing that same parallel with Niger Farage in the sense that if they don't talk about the Greening Gang inquiry because I don't know, they focus on winning a general election, which requires a lot of work, they're accused of not caring, but when they do talk about it, it's oh, we're only doing this for clicks. And Niger Far has been talking about this since 2012.

[00:30:57]So, I just thought that was a bit unfair, but I don't hold her to it. I didn't I think she's still done amazing amazing work with just the grooming gangs um and exposing it. I won't take that away from her, but it's just like, yeah, but I also want to point out that I think the reason why you're seeing a couple of victims coming out and saying that they are unsatisfied or they don't feel like they receive support or they feel like they're being used is because essentially at the end of the day, no one's been arrested. Like, put yourself in these girls' shoes. You've gone through the worst of the worst situation a woman can ever go through and no one's arrested at the end of it. inside of you, you're going to be somewhat I don't want to use the word unsatisfied because it sounds a bit insensitive, but it's the only word I can think of right now, but you don't you won't feel like you fully received justice, if that makes sense. And >> but my ears really did pick up with the words low. I've had my misgivings about his inquiry from day one. His inquiry has no statutory status whatsoever. So, he cannot compel anybody to listen or to take action. So these girls, these women who have been through the most horrendous abuse are having to relive that abuse and have their words and their torment blasted all over social media. But when will they see justice?

[00:32:14]>> And this is the flaw of inquiries is that inquiries are only there to inform.

[00:32:19]Meaning you gather people, you get them to tell their testimonies. They go through that trauma of having to relive that disgusting terror. It is terrorism um in detail and at the end of it like no one's arrested of course you're going to feel like you know even if Sammy Woodhouse and Rupert Low tried their absolute best gave them the support gave them the therapy gave them money whatever they could have given them gave them comfort whatever it could be gone to parliament to tell their stories for them whatever it could be at the end of the day if the person that harmed you isn't arrested I couldn't even imagine how internally you would feel like we haven't received any justice essentially and that's the flaw of I would say inquiries is that they don't hold statuto powers and I don't see anything wrong with Nigel Farage and reform pointing that out Nigel Farage and reform saying do you know what we're going to focus on the GE general election and once we have that power to get these people arrested we're going to do it with immediate effect and I hope reform deliver on that promise if they don't I'm done with reform I will be on the streets protesting for for reform to get out get out. I'll be on the streets protesting for reform to get the out of parliament cuz don't lie this is serious. So I do hope they deliver on that. But on the at the same time I do respect load's work when it comes to inquiry. I don't care if you're putting a social media post. I don't care if you're standing on the street with a sign. Anyone who's informing the public of what happened to these young English girls is doing important work.

[00:33:54]Is it a bit annoying that no one will be arrested at the end of it? Yes. And I don't think people should be demonized for pointing that out. But Rutert Low, Nigel Farage, they're all doing important work. And I just think that the right just needs to stop fighting all the time. At this point, I think that a grooming gang inquiry or investigation will be much better in the hands of the left at this point cuz at least the left are organized. At least the left are tunnel vision. The left, they see a problem, they march about it, they fight about it, they go to court about it, and they fix it in like seven working days. But the right is like there's always this infighting, which is so sad because I feel like the right really is on the right side of history.

[00:34:30]But the reason why we never really get anywhere because we're just too busy fighting. Kind of like what we saw with Matt and Connor just fighting about, oh man, you said that how dare you. It's just really silly. But anyways guys, if you guys want more videos like this, I'm trying to return back to my talking videos. Please like, comment. Not for my own engagement in vanity. I really don't care for engagement, but just like and comment. That way I know you guys like this type of stuff and I will continue to do my sit down videos cuz for a moment I felt like you guys wasn't really liking my sit sit down videos.

[00:34:56]But anyways, thank you for watching. See you guys soon.