LANDSLIDE! Trump Republicans LOSE SENATE ELECTION in OHIO as Trump SCREAMS at Staff?!

[00:00:00]Can't continue to make deals like that horrible Iran deal where we give them 150 billion dollars back.

[00:00:07]>> In today's breaking story, one of these things, as you are about to see, is not like the other. The artist of the deal, well, he made a statement earlier today so far beneath dignity and undoubtedly so far from the truth that it belies his obsession with this guy. Welcome to Occupy Democrats and please hit that subscribe button if you believe in the end Trump is a man of his word.

[00:00:31]>> [music] >> In our breaking story, Trump goes low again in a delusional rant at the G7, this time regarding his Swiss cheese Iran deal memo to take a meeting to discuss and plan to enact at some point the insurance of the long and short-term goals that we've been committed to from the outset of this war, not a war. Hey, step up to my word salad bar, Donald.

[00:00:58]That one's on the house. But truly, it's about as clear as the mud that Trump has been slinging not only regarding the deets of the deal, but the pie of mud he hurled earlier today at the man who lives rent-free inside his twisted mind.

[00:01:13]Wait till you see this, but first, let's set the stage by getting some recent reaction regarding Trump's brilliant deal making.

[00:01:21]>> And while no one has seen this agreement and there is still some doubt that it will even actually materialize, it appears at the foundation to be a payment to Iran to open the strait. The numbers are fuzzy, but it looks as if there will be significant sanctions relief given to Iran so that they open the strait. Now, that is an abomination in and of itself, but it basically renders the future nuclear negotiations a failure in advance because if you have given up all your leverage just to open the strait, you have nothing left to try to get them to come to the table on their nuclear program.

[00:02:05]This has been an epic disaster for the American people. This war has been an epic disaster for American national security. America is weaker today because of this war. Iran is stronger.

[00:02:19]And well, we wanted to end.

[00:02:23]This agreement will be proof positive to the American people of what an absolute dumpster fire this war has been from start to finish.

[00:02:32]>> We're apparently not allowed to see the supposed deal that Trump just signed with Iran. We'll get some expert help with that in just a moment, but bottom line, it does just seem to be Donald Trump surrendering on behalf of the American government, agreeing to cease all of our military operations there, potentially agreeing to pay Iran in the form of lifting previous sanctions or unfreezing previously frozen Iranian assets.

[00:02:58]And in exchange for us paying them, we get a return to most of the conditions that existed before the war, except things are now worse for us and better for them.

[00:03:10]>> Looks now like Mr. Trump has lost his war of choice. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Major General Paul America is now weaker than it was before Trump started this war. Iran is definitely stronger.

[00:03:23]13 KIA so far to show for it, 200 wounded plus.

[00:03:28]Our economy's under attack. War stocks are down. The Chinese are happy.

[00:03:33]And the Strait of Hormuz can be shut down at will by Iran. What's this MOU that we've got? We don't know. We haven't seen the details. We don't know how much treasure Mr. Trump is going to give the Iranians. We know what President Obama did, 1.7 billion, and the Republicans have never stopped talking about that. We want to see just exactly how much of the farm got sold to Iran.

[00:03:57]>> Okay, in our featured clip today, Trump, ever the elegant statesman, blustered and bullied another incendiary bleat as the eyes of the world winced.

[00:04:07]>> Is the fact that the agreement now final or are you still >> No, it's not final. It's a memorandum of understanding and if I don't like it, we'll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their head.

[00:04:20]>> When do you expect them to worry?

[00:04:21]>> If I don't like it, if they don't behave, we'll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head.

[00:04:29]Okay? Cuz they've misbehaved for 47 years.

[00:04:33]All right?

[00:04:34]>> Does it include them?

[00:04:35]>> But nobody could have made this deal.

[00:04:37]I mean, the JCPOA done by Obama, he handed them a billion seven in cash, gave them a hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of gave them billions and billions of dollars, but he gave them 1.7 billion dollars in cash, green cash from banks into a Boeing 757 and flew it into Iran.

[00:05:00]And they stood at the plane. I have pictures of it like, "Oh my Look at this money he's giving us." He tried to bribe his way out. I didn't do that.

[00:05:08]Nobody mentions that. 1.7 billion and hundreds of millions of dollars. They tried to bribe their way out of it.

[00:05:16]And you know what the Iranians did? They laughed at Obama and they said he's a stupid son of a Okay, thank you very much.

[00:05:24]>> Thank you very much.

[00:05:25]>> Okay, uh as we show you some of the great memes Jagger and I circulating around the festering carcass of the great white deal maker, uh we ask that you like, share, and please take care out there, especially if this earworm puts a smile on your face.

[00:05:41]>> [music] >> That's the sound of the men working on the chain gang.

[00:05:47]>> Donald Trump's efforts to rewrite history and desperately protect his legacy is about to blow up in his face.

[00:05:52]That's because an Oscar-winning actor is coming in hot with a plan to expose some of his lies about a very specific event, and I've all the details for you next.

[00:06:01]The Hollywood legend I speak of is human rights activist Sean Penn. Let's begin with some comments he's made about Trump that range from the hilarious to the scary. In this first clip, he's talking about his novel and alludes to the inspiration for a character described as orange and bloated.

[00:06:14]>> There's a character in here, the landlord, who uh uh I mean, I'll just say it. You read it and you go like, I'm pretty sure that's Donald Trump, or you're you're you jazz riffing on Donald Trump. Is that fair to say? Does that seem like it's a uh a fair characterization?

[00:06:34]>> Well, I mean, as it is a book of fiction, I think, you know, you as you write, you have certain models. You asked me in in in the break about who I what face I had in mind when I was thinking about my lead character, Bob Honey. And what all I can say is I I had for the for the character you're talking about, the landlord, I had sort of a bloated orange walrus image.

[00:06:58]Um and and and and if that therefore reflects anybody familiar, you know, I I think it's a fair interpretation.

[00:07:07]Now, >> [applause] >> in these more serious clips, Penn has a theory about the rise of Trump as a politician and the potentially scary conclusion to his reign. Have a listen, and then I'll share his latest big move.

[00:07:18]>> When we started to see the kind of reality television takeover of the culture, the I am something because I have nothing to offer you.

[00:07:30]And so, you need to pay attention to me more than to things of value.

[00:07:37]Uh I am That became hip.

[00:07:41]The less you had to share with people, the more excited people became about you, or arrogance became the principal charisma in the country.

[00:07:52]And we should have probably seen coming whatever it is that Mr. Trump represents, whatever it it is that led to an electorate in the electoral college system uh allowing him to be in office.

[00:08:10]>> Leader, we should consider worst-case scenarios, and I do think it's a reasonable theory that Donald Trump is not unlike the spouse of someone who leaves him perhaps for another who then murders their former partner because if they can't have her, nobody can. And I think Donald Trump in his solipsism may have that relationship with the world.

[00:08:31]And that this destruction is in part uh a power play and also a literal intention of of his final out.

[00:08:40]>> Do you think he'll try to stay on?

[00:08:42]>> I think he might try to destroy the world by the before it before he before he ages out of life.

[00:08:48]>> That's Penn on Trump through the years, and there's no love lost. But Penn will be using his love for filmmaking and storytelling to turn back one of Trump's biggest lies. Deadline reports Sean Penn to direct timely movie next re-teaming with Warner Brothers on story of January 6th. Cop with Bradley Cooper in talks to star. Sean Penn coming off his third Oscar win for one battle after another has been quietly setting up a passion project, and it's a doozy. The currently untitled film will follow the early life of a cop who goes on to be caught up in the January 6th Capitol riots. Penn has scripted and will direct the movie, which has five-time Oscar nominated actor Bradley Cooper in talks to star in the lead role. There's no deal yet.

[00:09:26]Penn, known for his strong political convictions, previously attended a public hearing of the House Select Committee investigating the deadly 2021 insurrection. At the time, Penn said he was there to observe as just another citizen to see if justice would be served. He sat alongside several law enforcement officers who defended the capital. Among those he was seen speaking to were Michael Fanone, the former Washington D.C. police officer who was severely injured and beaten on the day. You don't have to squint hard to see a strong resemblance between Cooper and Fanone, but sources wouldn't be drawn on whether the latter is the subject of the film. It may not turn out to be him, but Fanone's story is a compelling one. He served as a cop from 2001 until his retirement in 2021 and like Cooper has Italian heritage. A one-time Trump supporter, he joined the Capitol Police in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, but later fell out of love with the president. The divorced father of four daughters who has faced relentless threats from political extremists wrote a book called Hold the Line. Those are the highlights.

[00:10:23]For the full story, visit deadline.com.

[00:10:25]It is worth noting that Michael Fanone has his own Occupy Democrats channel and I'll put the link in the description so you can get to know him and his point of view as more details about the film emerge. Trump has spent years pretending his violent rioters are heroes and patriots, but Penn has the power to smash his lies to pieces in front of millions of viewers. If it happens, it'll be a massive win for accountability and free speech and total humiliation for Trump. It would be the perfect swan song for the lame duck president.

[00:10:51]>> The conversation began with a simple observation. The visuals.

[00:10:56]During the G7 appearance, critics argued that Donald Trump appeared detached, isolated, and disconnected from the energy and authority traditionally expected of an American president in a room full of global leaders. And in politics, optics matter.

[00:11:13]For years, Trump's supporters argued that his style was his strength. Even when policies became controversial or outcomes uncertain, the confidence, the messaging, and the appearance of control often carried political momentum. But critics now argue something has changed.

[00:11:31]They believe the images shown today reflected uncertainty rather than confidence. One commentator went even further, describing the moment not merely as politically damaging, but strategically dangerous. The argument is straightforward. When America appears uncertain, the world notices. According to this perspective, rivals and competitors do not simply react to policy documents. They react to signals.

[00:11:57]They watch body language. They watch alliances. They watch whether America projects strength or confusion. That criticism led into broader concerns about global consequences. If allies begin questioning American consistency and adversaries begin testing limits, critics argue that moments that appear symbolic today can evolve into real geopolitical pressure tomorrow. Another major criticism centered on what opponents describe as an increasingly familiar pattern. Major announcements followed by pushback, adjustment, clarification, and sometimes reversal.

[00:12:32]According to the discussion, this cycle creates uncertainty not only internationally, but domestically. The concern raised wasn't simply whether individual decisions were right or wrong. It was whether the governing style itself creates instability. One of the strongest themes throughout the discussion focused on the political cost inside Trump's own coalition.

[00:12:53]Commentators argued that political figures associated with defending difficult or controversial decisions may eventually carry those consequences into future elections. The suggestion was that political loyalty can become expensive when policies become unpopular. At the same time, critics connected foreign policy choices directly to everyday economic concerns.

[00:13:16]They argued that massive defense spending raises difficult questions for ordinary Americans. People struggling with housing costs, inflation, health care expenses, and economic pressure often ask whether enormous international commitments translate into better lives at home. That frustration, according to this perspective, fuels voter fatigue.

[00:13:38]And voter fatigue can become disengagement.

[00:13:42]One commentator expressed concern that disappointment may eventually produce something even more dangerous than political anger, political withdrawal.

[00:13:51]If citizens stop believing their vote changes outcomes, democratic participation weakens. But perhaps the most emotional section of the discussion focused not on America, but on Iran. A speaker raised a question that often gets overshadowed in geopolitical analysis. What about ordinary Iranian people? The argument presented was deeply emotional. For years, many dissidents and reform advocates inside and outside Iran hoped that international pressure could weaken the regime and create opportunities for change. From that perspective, any agreement that reduces pressure without structural political change feels like abandonment. The criticism became sharper. According to this viewpoint, easing sanctions too quickly, releasing assets, or postponing hard security questions may unintentionally strengthen the very institutions critics hope to weaken. The claim made by commentators was not that prosperity automatically changes ideological governments.

[00:14:53]Instead, they argued ideological systems often prioritize survival and influence over economic modernization.

[00:15:01]That distinction matters because if leadership priorities remain ideological, critics argue that financial relief may not produce moderation. It may instead increase resources available for rebuilding military capabilities and regional influence. Others challenged what they described as optimism surrounding assumptions that economic opportunity alone can transform political systems.

[00:15:25]Their concern was simple: economic incentives do not always overcome political identity, and geopolitical conflicts rarely end because leaders suddenly decide prosperity matters more than power. By the end of the discussion, one message became clear.

[00:15:42]Many of these commentators do not believe this story is finished. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the criticism, the concern being expressed is that agreements announced today do not erase underlying tensions tomorrow.

[00:15:55]Regional allies remain concerned.

[00:15:57]Strategic competitors continue calculating. Domestic political consequences continue building, and voters continue asking difficult questions. Supporters of Trump would likely argue this criticism is exaggerated and that negotiation, flexibility, and avoiding prolonged conflict represent strength, not weakness.